Ok, you want guns?
Fine, as our laws state, you can have a Musket.
What? What's wrong? A Musket is a gun. What's the problem?
When that law was created, only the Musket existed.
Therefore, that's the gun the law was referring to.
Problems?
Fuck off kike.
>>78281303
Where does it say musket
>>78281303
>.025 has been deposited into your account
real talk though, what organization is paying you?
>>78281303
>1 post by this ID
>>78281303
now i sit back and watch as the ancient, anti-progression, obstructionist republicans roll in to defend the exact thing they will probably get killed by one day
>>78281390
life?
illuminati?
idk pick one, whichever one makes you feel better
>When that law was created, only the Musket existed.
>>78281303
>they foresaw changes in media, culture, societal norms, technology, but never assumed weapons would change
You shitpost like a maplenigger
>>78281303
>Semi Automatic rifle that existed back then.
>>78281610
ok so how long have you been here?
if you've been here, you might know that this exact question/subject has been discussed literally hundreds of times
>>78281486
Instead of making an argument? Yeah, we all figured that
>>78281303
The Giradoni Air Rifle could fire 22 rounds in rapid succession before being reloaded and was available in 1750.
Fuck off.
>>78281303
were da free musket at
>b-b-b-bb-b-but, Scalia! Muh originalism!
get over it, you chamber-fucking yesgunz
Rifles were used on both sides of the revolutionary war
>>78281303
>inplying they were aware of concept of technological progress
fuck you op
>>78281303
And you have to remove this post because free speech only refers to the printing press and quill/ink writings on parchment.
>>78281303
SHAAAAAAAALL
>>78281303
Yes and you free speech only applies to old english because thats the language that was being used at the time
>>78281303
Hey you want freedom of speech ok you can have it in the newspaper, because radio, television and Internet were not invented. Therefore newspapers are the only thing the Amendment refers to. :'^)
Retard
>>78281303
>Ok, you want guns?
>Fine, as our laws state, you can have a Musket.
No
>What? What's wrong? A Musket
is a gun. What's the problem?
The right to bear arms, not muskets, jackass
>When that law was created, only the Musket existed.
lol, no
I hope you don't have any children. Don't want you spreading your stupid around and ruining evolution for everyone else.
They had gatling guns back then too so can I have those jew overlord?
>>78281303
Before you try to talk about the 2nd Ammendment lets start with the first. Get your Quill fucking pen write me a letter and give to some poor slob on a hoarse to get it to me. Because that was the top tech when the constitution was written you FUCKING ASSHOLE
what about alien technology
>>78281303
where ever you came from
this is some fucking OLD pasta holy shit
>When that law was created, only the Musket existed.
Not true so the whole point is moot.
>>78281303
>musket
The citizens were armed with the exact same weapons the miltary was using at the time. In fact, you are arguing that full auto Army rifles should be more available along with other military gear a soldier uses.
Giradoni air rifle was much more accurate, hit harder, had high rate of fire, held 20 rounds, was quieter, didn't produce smoke or a muzzle flash and was perfectly legal to own when the US constitution was written. Not to mention at the time regular rifles already existed and were issued to armies.
>>78283215
Not only that, but many militias used rifles in the Revolution. They were common with backwoodsmen for their accuracy at range, so they also became common militia weapons of the time.
>>78281303
>When that law was created, only the Musket existed.
Gee, you ever wonder if they make other types of bait?
>>78281303
Doesn't make much sense when you apply the same logic to our other rights.
>A helpful reminder that since the Port Arthur shooting happened, Australia's government changed the definition of a ass shooter from 3 victims to 5 victims.
>This is the only reason they can say that we have had "no mass shootings" since the law changed.
>>78281303
>Musket
Here is a 30-shot repeating musket from 1646.
Your argument is invalid.
Until recently a gun meant artillery and cannon
Arms or firelock or rifle meant rifle
>>78281303
>What is elasticity clause
>>78288623
Incorrect. Arms have always meant ANY kind of weapon. From a knife or sword, to artillery and missiles.
>>78287695
They shoot asses specifically over there?
>>78281486
> the exact thing they will probably get killed by one day
A nigger ?
>>78289662
Lol, sorry.
*mass
Stuck "M" key. oops.
>>78281303
Muskets were not the only extant guns then, faggot.
>>78281303
Arms. What is arms? Arms are weapons. A weapon is the symbol of office for any free man.
>>78290629
Correct my good sir.
>>78281303
People had cannons, later auto rifles- crank guns, that where around but not built due to parts cost at the time. People owned Private Warships, with guns that could level a costal city. Pretty much the WMD of their day.
We should all own tanks and choppaz
>>78281303
Excuse me sir but you can't exercise your freedom of speech over this electronic media that did not exist at the time of the writing of the First Amendment. Please acquire parchment, quill, ink and a courier and then we can discuss properly.
>>78291222
Nice trips.
Also have an image macro that says what you said.
