What Vikings really looked like
- Home
- Board: /pol/ - Politically Incorrect
- Reading: What Vikings really looked like
>Viking women had masculine faces
>The skeletons reveal another difference between us and the Vikings: men’s and women’s faces were more similar in appearance in the Viking Age than they are today.
>“It’s actually more difficult to determine the gender of a skeleton from the Viking era,” says Harvig. “The men’s skulls were a little more feminine and the women’s skulls a little more masculine than what we’re seeing today. Of course, this doesn’t apply to all skeletons from the Viking period, but generally it’s quite difficult to determine the gender of a Viking Age skeleton.”
>She explains that Viking women often had pronounced jawbones and eyebrows, whereas in the men, these features were more feminine than what archaeologists are accustomed to when trying to determine the gender of ancient skeletons.
>MFW SWEDES HAVE BEEN BETAS FOR A THOUSAND YEARS
>>78259055
source
http://sciencenordic.com/what-vikings-really-looked
Probably why the viking men went on raids to find some qt holes to plunder
>>78259055
still pretty impressive that a bunch of scandinavian twinks raided all of europe
did my post just get deleted
I would fuck a viking trap.
Now it finally makes sense why they didn't use Norse women to settle Iceland
>>78259055
>>78259385
kek kek kek
postin in ekek thread
>>78259055
>SWEDES
>Vikings
Pick one
>>78260004
degenerate trash
>>78260242
WE WUZ VIKANGZ N SHIT STOP OPRESSING ME AND DENYING ME MY CULTURAL HERITAGE
So if the women had masculine faces and the men had similar faces to the women, THEN they were not betas.
