Is Breitbart a worthy source of information?
>>78231087
no they're just pandering to you fags to make money
Almost as bad as Drudge and Huffpost
>>78231241
what about gawker
>>78231087
It's not bad for a mainstream site, but there is a reason why we call it Kikebart.
>>78231384
Which is?
>>78231241
This.
Way too biased. The true answers are somewhere between all of the news sources combined, which is why I check all somewhat credible news sources multiple times a day.
>>78231241
>drudge
>news site
>>78231334
Way too biased.
It is biased so no.
>>78231334
Gawker is ded
>>78231087
It's a good source for citations. Just check their citations. And use that. Same for anything else.
>>78231087
>kikebart
>>78231741
Breitbart is pretty biased but they have their stories.
>>78231791
>>78231087
I don't think so but I like Milo. Its more entertainment than information
>>78231833
>>78231087
Good for laughs that's about it
>>78231439
Yuge kosher bias
>>78231901
>>78231901
>>78231833
>>78231791
>>78231741
all before shapiro left
>>78231938
>>78231087
Seems like the conservative version of Buzzfeed.
Their stories seem legit, but there is NO objectivity.
>>78231957
and my favorite
Salon.com is the only worthy source of information for me
>>78231241
how can you possibly put drudge and Huffington in the same sentence? drudge is a million times better than Huffington
>>78232190
Yes, we're all glad shapiro left. But let's talk about the site of today.
salon.com is the only news source i find worthy
>>78232313
>today
it's Milo...and if you think Breibart is not Pro Jew you should kill yourself
>>78231494
Somewhat credible?
Like MSN/CBS/CNN?
What the fuck news source isn't biased these days?
I'd really like you cum gargling faggots to say what you read.
Know why you won't? You're too afraid that everyone will gang up on you and tell you what a little brainwashed homo you are.
Media is balkanized. Trying to find a truly honest publication is like trying to find a hooker that will actually love you.
>>78232190
>Says a dude who is circimsized.
It's called pulling back the foreskin. Fuck Milo. Chances are, you can lose your dick in a circumcision.
>>78231087
Its not bad. Just beware of clickbait.
>>78232670
>What the fuck news source isn't biased these days?
/pol/
:^)
>>78231087
Areitbart Creitdart Ereitfart Greithart Ireitjart Kreitlart Mreitnart Oreitpart Qreitrart Sreittart Ureitvart Wreitxart Yreitzart
>>78231087
everything but milo is pretty golden. some of the background noise articles are good. milo is an overbearing faggot and breitbart needs to tell him to be more businesslike if he wants to keep flying around the country giving speeches
>>78232191
>>78232362
Nobody is taking the bait
>>78231087
>((Breitbart))
What do you think?
>>78232868
fuck you andrew breitbart was based
>>78233063
*coughcough*
>FRAUD
>>78231087
Yes like 7-6/10
As a conservative/libertarian I have no much to complain about.
>>78231241
Drudge links news articles you stupid spook
>>78231241
Huff is literally cancer. I would give that shit like 3/10 and I am being merciful.
>>78232190
>tfw you have no feeling in literally half your dick from your circumcision
I dont think hair ought to be growing on my shaft either
>>78231087
>any form of news
>worthy source of information
These things are mutually exclusive.
>>78234195
>druggy man
>worthy source of information
Drudge has been my main news source since Bill "Fat Chick Magnet" Clinton was busted for Lewinsky.
Since Trump I have used Breitbart daily.
Andrew Breitbart actually helped set up Huffpost which was created to be a progressive Drudge.
I like to think "progressives" now see the HPo/TMP/Salon/MotherJones/Crooks&Liars for what they are now.
>>78233660
Yeah, throw in AJ+, Mic, Mother Jones, NowThis, Buzzfeed, and Gawker (Probably the worst of all, now gone thank god) with that.
>>78236212
I forgot Salon, good god, next to Gawker that was literally the worst sack of excrement for "news".
