I'm sure some of you may have seen this image from time to time. It shows by nation who they believe to be the biggest threat to world peace. What is /pol/'s opinion?
http://www.strawpoll.me/10481000
I've tried to include everyone but if you think of someone else let us know in the comments.
who gives a fuck, as long as they kill me.
Trust me there's a map under this image
>>77204822
i think biigest threat is india cuz they are tech support and bad at it so if the nukes decided to malfuction they will have to call tech support and it will be india and it would go boom boom we die
>>77204970
damn.... this... actually seems plausible
>>77204822
Australia's got some explaining to do.
>>77204822
Afganistan chooses pakistan. haha
>>77205012
Looks right.
>third world countries hate us cause they aint us
What else is new.
No Saudi Arabia?
>mfw idiots in my country actually think Iran is a serious threat
>mfw no one remembers how they were BTFO by Saddam's army in the 90's
How is America a threat to Argentina? We have chinese soldiers in our country.
I would say China is the biggest threat.
>>77204822
With allies like these, who needs enemies?
>>77205289
It's not what nation do you think will attack us. But what nations most likely to start a global conflict.
There is no country powerful enough to start WW3 with against America. Except maybe Russia or China.
WW3 will be started by American civil war
>>77205341
Oh sorry, that make more sense.
I guess America is the right answer then, I mean to create a global conflict you have to be relevant first.
>>77205515
>WORLD WAR
>America Civil War
Seriously nigga?
>>77205334
>""""""allies""""""
a police way of saying bunch of colonies, satellites and vassal states. Vassals tend to dislike their masters
lol pakis
>>77205520
True but a small war started by a small nation can attract the likes of America. Technically then it would not be the US who started it. Think WWI.
>>77205564
It's a valid point. Everyone is in our business. A civil war would easily draw influence from outside sources and divulge into a full conflict around the world.
>>77205634
>police
te*, fuck my life
>>77204822
Iran is the only place that has it right
>>77205660
Yeah but imagine this, an American civil war start, why the hell Germany, UK or Russia would send troops inside America? To fight for what? First-World country aren't that influenced by America (at the point of actually sending troops for a political intern), only third-worlds.
>>77205656
That's true too but America have a history of going full rambo very easily so is either America or Iran. But I don't think that countries like Hungary can start a world conflict on these years.
>somalia
>>77204946
kek
>>77205957
They're only there because some African country on the map chose them.
>>77205660
An internal conflict in a country like the US is the last thing the other first world nations would enter. If we support one side and the other wins, then its not exactly good for us.
>>77205564
We influence the entire world. What America does, Europe follows.
Our economy and consumption is enormous. It would affect everyone. A civil war in America would be the size of WW2 but perhaps with less aircraft, artillery and tanks. Our land mass is enormous and we have millions of gun owners here.
Hell, even just the NYPD alone, if it were a standing army it would be one of the biggest in the world.
>>77205867
Germany and UK would probably send troops into America for "peace keeping" purposes under NATO or the UN. New political agendas would ensue as Europe would see its opportunity to overthrow us for the power grab. Russia would probably try to set up its own territory and arm US rebels.
>>77206097
You think Russia would try to take land? I could see them picking a side and supporting them but I don't know about seizing land.
>>77206097
Well but if they go under 'peace keeping' then is just keep being an American civil war, not a WWIII. Not get me wrong, an American Civil War would be amazing as well but I don't see how that would involve more than three or four countries.
>>77206334
Depends how bad it got
>>77205957
You wouldn't be laughing if you shared a border with them like Kenya does
America's the biggest threat to world peace simply by virtue of how incredibly powerful they are, no-one can really rival them in terms of ability to completely fuck everything up wordwide. How in the fuck is Iran supposed to threaten world peace? Maybe peace in the middle east but they can't really project their power beyond that region, meanwhile America can fuck up any region, any time, anywhere on the planet at a whim.
Interesting, I heard pol was a good place for educated discourse, but it seems like it's full of complete and utter retards.
>USA
>Israel
>Germany
The greatest irony of the three is Israel, considering they're the only nation that has acted defensively in all of their wars against nations that were publicly proclaiming the destruction of their state and slaughter of their people. Not to mention the amount of land they acquired as a result of these wars was returned for peace with neighboring nations. The best example being the entire Sinai returned to Egypt as a result of Egypt's recognition of Israel's existence. Sad part is the President was later assassinated by Islamic terrorists for doing such a thing.
Oh well, guess i'll head back to r/the_donald where it seems people seem to be a big more logical.
>>77206522
Correct but Iran starts war. America joins. Allies join. Rivals join. WW3.
Probably because America is so goddamn free compared to the rest of the world. I'm sure if America was letting in ahmed's by the millions like the other countries and strictly forbade saying anything bad about them we would be considered a bunch of progressive good little goys :>)
It's going to be the Best Koreans. They don't actually want war but one of these days someone will fuck up and put a shell into Seoul and the south will lose its shit dragging in all the surrounding counties and the U.S Into ww3
>>77204822
>iran
>threat
>>77205012
Most Australians agree with the Americans ideologically. They tend to think your leaders are war mongers though..
>>77206851
Jew propaganda..
>>77204822
no saudi arabia, fucking sand nigger
>>77206969
My bad so that's 2 votes for Saudi. Cunt.
>>77207030
i was just wondering why it wasn't there, then i saw your flag. i voted israel.
>>77207118
Tried to include everyone obviously missed one. 96% white lad.
russia
then israel
>>77206944
DUBS SPEAK THE TRUTH
>>77204822
Only Jordan and Morocco got it right
Canada doesnt think Iran is biggest threat puhlease
>>77204822
India knows what's up. Islam and nukes means we'll see the bombs drop within our lifetime.
USA wouldn't be if it weren't for kike lobbyists dragging us into petrodollar wars.
US the real empire of evil
>people unironically not choosing China
>>77205656
Are you seriously trying to say we started world War I? We were literally the last to join and if the Lusitania had never sank we wouldn't have even joined the war
>>77206623
>iran starts war
Yeah iran sure is notorious for starting wars.
>>77204822
>Germany same amount as Russia
Kek, we don't even have a proper army and you still think we are a threat to world peace. Are we really that good? Yes, we probably are.
>>77207767
No. Not sure how you came to that conclusion. Serbia started it and I'm sure in 1914 people wouldn't have thought they were the greatest threat to world peace.
>>77207771
I don't believe that it's just an example.
>>77205012
You're cunts.
>picking anyone other than the country that always ruins everything
Does this mean which countries are most likely to cause global conflict? Then the most direct answer would be America since we have military forces on almost every continent. But in a way that also means Israel.
>>77208031
Yes most likely to start a global conflict. But say (complete bullshit here) Somalia (kek) started a war that involved most of Africa eventually America Europe and everyone else. Then Somalia would get credit for starting it.
>>77205334
You don't have any allies, you idiot. Countries don't have allies. They have friends for the moment that can help the achieve whatever.
Well USA and Israel seem to be the runaway winners. Question is which?
The British refused peace midway through WWI and lured the US into the war, drew the new fucked up borders for the Middle East, were instrumental to reforging mainland Europe into a powder keg, baited Germany into invading Poland, started WWII, lured the US into that, refused peace again, ruined mainland Europe again, created Israel... and then thank fuck spent the next few decades dicking over their own people and slashing their own wrists.
They'll get tired of that shit soon enough, then finally you'll have your new world war.
>>77209025
>US joint ww1 because of the U-boat attacks on shipping
>France really wanted to punish Germany at Versailles Britain warned against this.
>Poland baited Hitler into attacking Poland. Also Danzig corridor meant Hitler wanted Polish land.
>think FDR lured america into ww2 also what's Pearl Harbour
>Created Israel yea we did. Your greatest ally.
But cockroaches don't deal in facts.
>>77204822
>Iran is a bigger threat than Russia.
Now thats offending
>>77204822
Where is EU?
>>77209784
Not a state. (((Yet)))
Suppose you could vote Germany
>>77207865
You know what I re-read what you wrote and I don't really know why I thought that. it's four AM where I am I'm going to blame it on that
>>77210210
It's cool. No problem. Goodnight/morning.
>>77204970
I understand your frustration, Mister. Did you try power cycling again? How well did I serve you today?
>>77205867
If there were a full civil war in the US, NATO/UN would move in and secure the nuclear weapons at least.
