Why don't you support common sense gun reform?
>>77197115
Does that stop accidents
>>77197115
You don't have a right to own and operate a car.
>>77197115
SHALL
>nigger still just steal cars and guns and dont care about the rules
>>77197115
>2016
>not having firearm insurance
Its only like $5 a month.
>>77197645
This. Driving is a privilege, not a right
You want to deregulate guns so they're treated more like cars?
>>77197819
unless you are merely travelling and are an article 4 free inhabitant AM I BEING DETAINED
>>77197115
>Why don't you support common sense gun reform?
HURRRRRRRRR DURRRRR
SOMETHING SOMETHING MAGIC PIECE OF PAPER
>>77197115
Because the only thing "common sense" about it is in the title.
>>77197645
>You don't have a right to own and operate a car.
And you have a right to own semi-autos? Are you faggots for real?
>>77197115
>1 POST BY THIS ID
STOP REPLYING
THIS POST WAS PAID FOR
sage
>>77197115
If he doesn't represent radical islam, then why in the fuck does he get to represent us gun owners?
>>77197645
This post is the best post. Literally no other argument needed.
The founders of our country guaranteed through our Constitution the right of all adults to keep and bear firearms.
YOU DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO PISS AWAY WHAT OUR FATHERS AND MOTHERS DIED TO CREATE
>>77197983
Yes??
>>77197983
why yes, yes we do.
>>77197115
>your state has inspections
Might as well kill yourself now anon.
>>77197983
Which ammendment says you have the right to bare pedals you fucking mong
>>77197645
WHAT?????????????????????
>>77197983
What is the Second Amendment again?
Oh thats right, its the fucking right that says I get to own a gun.
>>77197115
funny but i don't remember the amendment guaranteeing the right to own a car
>>77198034
Happy? Now there's two posts by ID
>>77197115
Because I want this country to drown in the blood of the innocent.
>>77197983
Yes, as you can see, it's right there.
<---
>>77198071
How much do you get paid to act like a fucking idiot on a Lebanese socket licking forum?
>>77197115
>1 post by ID
O N E P O S T
N
E
P
O
S
T
>>77198052
It clearly says "the right of the people to keep and bear muskets" right there. If they wanted all weapons like semi-autos to be protected then they would have put "arms" instead of "muskets".
>>77198142
Shut up and just take the bait with us.
>>77198049
*cough* standing militia actually *cough*
>>77197115
Where does it say "the right of the people to keep and bear cars, shall not be infringed"?
>>77198101
>This message brought to you by Correct The Record PAC and Everytown For Gun Safety ®
>>77198052
>>77198105
should niggers with violent crime records be allowed to own guns?
should mentally unstable schizos be allowed to own guns?
after all, it's their 2nd amendment right, yes? i don't see anything there that would prohibit it
>>77197115
Because capitalism is like real life while socialism will always fail because it ignores nature and exists only in fantasy.
>>77197115
Because we dont drive guns everywhere
>>77198324
thats correct. its inconvenient, but correct.
dont like it? carry a gun and even the odds
>>77198324
Yes to all of those, it s their right
>>77198324
Congrats, you can read, want a cookie?
>>77197115
#HowManyMuslims have to attack us before you support common sense immigration reform?
pic related every time
>>77197689
NOT
>>77197645
SHALL. NOT. BE. INFRINGED.
GODSPEED, AMERICA!
Driving is not a natural right. Self-defense is.
>>77198172
DELETE THIS
Tag and title exist primarily as a method for revenue collection and for use on public roads. Neither are necessary for operation on private property.
Tests and training are only needed for public use. Public carrying of guns requires tests and training.
The health requirements are pretty lax for driving are only there to ensure that the driver is physically capable of operating the vehicle and doing so within the most minimal safety parameters. There is no level of mental health screening for vehicles. An equivilent level of testing for firearms would be to see if the person is capable of picking it up, aiming and pulling the trigger.
Insurance requirements only exist because of the rates of accidents and cost per incident is high enough that its better for the public good to require insurance. The rates of gun accidents/defense is so low its not necessary to require this insurance.
Renewals are for revenue/requlation of public use. Most concealed carry states have an annual renewal fee which is about as much as registration.
Inspections for safety are unnecessary because catasprophic failure resulting in injury is incredibly unlikely. Most states inspect mainly for emissions anyways and that is not needed for guns.
>>77197115
You know what's not protected by the Constitution? Cars. Owning a car is not a right as a citizen it's a privilege. Owning a gun is a fucking RIGHT
>>77198502
Good point,
>>77198101
thanks for posting the FIRST reply in YOUR thread.
Now please keep a civil conversation and be kind enough to answer what other posters have said to you.
Robot OPs usually deliver short OP with bait images and some of the following recurring themes:
is/are X white?;
is X Red/Blue Pill;
sexual & racist bait;
fap/no fap/ porn abstinence;
What did X mean by...;
Where were you when you realized ...;
[image] + well, pol?;
[image] + POL BTFO;
[image] + Hmmm, really made me think;
[image] + Hmmm, really makes you think;
[image] + Hmmm, I never thought of this;
[image] + I think X has a point;
Settle for [asian/arab/latino] women;
Genuinely curious as to why...;
>>77197115
>liability insurance of each gun
Why are leftists so obsessed with stealing peoples' money? Why would people support more money being taken out of our wallets? Why do you think we'd be in favor of this? Get a life losers.
>>77197949
>Constitution is magic piece of paper
Oh okay I guess I'll be taking all your legal documents then.
Oh I almost forgot your bank records.
What's the matter? It's just papers.
AS ALWAYS:
1 POST BY THIS ID/OP.
>1 POST BY THIS ID/OP.
1 POST BY THIS ID/OP.
>1 POST BY THIS ID/OP.
1 POST BY THIS ID/OP.
>1 POST BY THIS ID/OP.
1 POST BY THIS ID/OP.
>1 POST BY THIS ID/OP.
1 POST BY THIS ID/OP.
>1 POST BY THIS ID/OP.
1 POST BY THIS ID/OP.
>1 POST BY THIS ID/OP.
POL POSTERS ARE BEING ANAL PROBED AND TESTED BY OP ROBOTS AND DO NOT EVEN REALIZE IT.
"Never trust an OP who doesn't respond to his thread"
>>77198436
>>77198458
>>77198460
>3 gunfags just literally said "yea we should let criminals and mentally insane retards get guns too"
kek
guns for everyone.it'll be like the wild west again.
>>77198324
Want to deny them their right to own a gun? Fine. Do it by due process of law. Like the Constitution says.
>>77198801
do you own a gun?
>>77198801
>implying the wild west had many shootings
>>77197115
Because nothing that has been suggested counts as a common sense reform.
But you agree with me and admit your post was just shitposting practice for you upcoming trip to Australia, as evidence from your not replying to this post.
>>77198141
It's Brazil - do you really think they need to pay them?
HUEHUEHUEHUE
>>77198184
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4zE0K22zH8
>>77198905
no unfortunately
>>77199104
why not?
Stupid question: Since when did "well regulated militia" translate into "any nigger that can scrape together $500" ?
I mean, I see SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED bandied about constantly, but no one ever seems to mention that WELL REGULATED MILITIA bit. Is it unclear or something? Or is it inconvenient? Maybe I just don't speak burger well enough.
>>77197115
Continued:
>no magazine limits
>no limits on automatics
>no limits on bore size
>can carry and operate openly in public
So now you're advocating that I shoot my automatic guns in the middle of the street?
>>77197884
I DO NOT CONSENT
>>77197115
>that image
*only applies if you take it out in public. also no background checks, regulation against felon ownership, waiting periods, or regulation of various types and styles
Actually maybe it's not such a bad idea.
>>77199145
too expensive.
>>77197115
Cars are involved in many more deaths than guns, ergo gun laws should be more lenient than car control legislation.
>>77199187
>>77199094
Hey, a convenient explanation. Thanks!
fucking shill thread
>>77199244
Depending on you state's laws, you can buy certain weapons (a mosin nagant, for instance) for less than $200. ammo for the mosin in particular is also very cheap
>>77197115
>loaded guns left laying around by the side of the street for anyone to pick up
>ammunition dispensed from automated outdoor machines that don't even demand payment up front
>hired gunmen available in minutes from smartphone apps
>everyone knows to stay off the roads on weekend nights because of all the drunk people shooting in the streets and mostly getting away with it
>Oprah gives everyone a gun and laughs and laughs
>>77198324
If nigger cities didn't have shit gun control, there'd be a lot less crime. Fucking simple.
>>77198798
Learn to count Mexican jumping bean. There's two. Now three
>>77199187
Well who is the militia is where we can start. According to 10 U.S. Code § 311, it is all able bodied males 17 to 45. Per the 14th Amendment, this would apply to everyone, not just males.
What does Well-regulated mean? I like to pick out a contemporary piece that contemplated the term and character of such a militia. Alexander Hamilton in Federalist paper 29
> A tolerable expertness in military movements is a business that requires time and practice. It is not a day, or even a week, that will suffice for the attainment of it. To oblige the great body of the yeomanry, and of the other classes of the citizens, to be under arms for the purpose of going through military exercises and evolutions, as often as might be necessary to acquire the degree of perfection which would entitle them to the character of a well-regulated militia, would be a real grievance to the people, and a serious public inconvenience and loss. It would form an annual deduction from the productive labor of the country, to an amount which, calculating upon the present numbers of the people, would not fall far short of the whole expense of the civil establishments of all the States. To attempt a thing which would abridge the mass of labor and industry to so considerable an extent, would be unwise: and the experiment, if made, could not succeed, because it would not long be endured. Little more can reasonably be aimed at, with respect to the people at large, than to have them properly armed and equipped; and in order to see that this be not neglected, it will be necessary to assemble them once or twice in the course of a year.
Little else can be reasonably aimed at with respect to the people at large, than to have them properly armed and equipped
I hope you can at least see where this is going
>>77199356
Have you always been this sad or just since your neg hole got all pozzed up?
>>77199337
>>77199683
neat thanks,
lets see how this goes over for me in commiefornia
>>77198801
>guns for everyone.it'll be like the wild west again.
I don't see a problem here.
>>77199337
A friend told me you could crates of low grade ammo for nuggets but you have to mega clean the fuck out of it asap when you get home from the range. Is that right?
>>77198801
Also, a better question to be asking yourself: why in the world are these criminals and mentally insane retards out in public? If we know they're dangerous, why haven't they been imprisoned? Why is the government releasing people who shouldn't have guns into the public?
Ask yourself these questions instead of just accepting that mentally insane psychopaths are being loosed by the government into the general public where they can obtain chemical weapons and explosives easily and without background checks.
>>77200007
This applies to cheap AKs as well. I clean and lube mine right at the range and on the next day after the shooting.
>>77197983
>And you have a right to own semi-autos?
>Burger and doesn't know what the second amendment is
Please kill yourself. SHAME
>>77198801
>wild west
You mean there will be giant spider mechas walking around operated by guys in steam powered wheelchairs?
>>77198068
I like you
>>77197115
Why do you trust the government to have common sense?
>>77197983
>semi-autos
When will this meme die? Why do people that want to ban guns no absolutely nothing about them? Or did I answer my own question?
>>77198436
>>77198324
>thats correct. its inconvenient, but correct.
The 2nd amendment clearly *references* a right. It doesn't *define* one in full detail.
The founding fathers considered there to be a natural right to keep and bear arms, which was so commonly understood as to not need explication (and in fact was a thoroughly established feature of the English common law on which American law was based) and should not be infringed by the US federal government.
This was not an absolute and unlimited right for all persons to own whatever arms they wanted and bear them at any time and place of their choosing. In their time, there were laws against things like "affrighting" -- causing a disruption of the peace by carrying an unusual and alarming weapon, according to the standards of the community.
The right to keep and bear arms was a complex notion. It didn't mean convicted felons or officially recognized madmen could have guns, or that you must be permitted to carry a loaded pistol in town. It did mean a common citizen with no criminal record must be permitted to store firearms and ammunition in his farmhouse, and to carry them for defense when travelling.
>>77197115
Because the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
>>77197645
Most would consider it a right under the ninth amendment.
>>77199337
>>77200007
>falling for the nugget meme
>>77198801
>wild west
I get to hang niggers for even looking at white women? AND get take MORE land from natives? AND be the sheriff?
SIGN ME THE FUCK UP!
>>77198625
INFRINGED
>>77198052
>alabama
fucking racists rednecks i'll tell ya
>>77198052
Doesn't specify what type of arms retard, hence why you can't buy full autos or ICBMs.
>American education
isn't even a meme, it's just reality.
>>77203744
>you can't buy full autos
but you can, it's just expensive as fuck for the most part
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2014/05/21/machine-guns-legal-practical-guide-full-auto/
>>77198068
for every ten mongo leafs, there is a true genius leaf. a diamond in the rough
>>77203894
Exactly, so your """"right"""" is being infringed by these obstacles. Even barring felons is infringing on the 2nd amendment, get protesting now burgers!!! Your FREEDOM is already abrogated.
If guns were as regulated as cars, I could buy any gun from any era that fires any kind of bullet and use it to my heart's content on my own property without any kind of insurance, registration, record and without worry of ever facing criminal charges.
If cars were as regulated as guns, I could not drive across certain state lines without facing criminal charges.
Also the seating capacity, engine displacement, transmission gearing, and various cosmetic item restrictions that vary from state to state for no fucking reason.
Because you chip away at our right a bit at a time. We aren't dumb enough to believe that this is the last time the subject will come up.
Also, we might actually get behind this. Legal high performance high capacity guns, which can be bought in mass without government approval? Yes please. I want my 18 wheeler (rpg, mortar, etc), my formula one (full auto assault rifle, lgm, etc), my funnycar (automatic shotgun), and my stripped down dune buggy (sawed off shotgun).
Make that shit happen, /k will thank you. /pol wont, because /pol doesn't invest in much more than a KIA (glock) or their garage kept mustang (AR15), gunwise.
>>77197214
Fpbp
>>77198141
>Lebanese socket licking forum
kek, thx leafbro
>>77198064
>Owning cars less than 25 years old
>Driving the ODB-II Jew
>>77197115
the last thing you need is criminals with gun training
