So how many shooters do you think were really there?
>>77070685
At least 2.
>>77070685
2...the same number of genders there are
>>77070685
It's possible there was only one, but I'm going to bank on two because muzzies like to work in pairs.
he had help from fbi or cia
>>77070789
Fucking bigot. Get on AfD's level:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SAHvLAJ-5aQ
>>77071008
Was getting shot part of his plan?
at least one
>>77071273
it was very painful
>>77070685
All these no-funz faggots thinking you couldn't shoot 50 faggots dead in a enclosed space.
Is it even possible to hit 100 people with a G17 and an AR 15? I'm not a gun expert, but those guns are cheap and shouldn't have that much stopping power to fully go through 2-3 people per round.
Unless that guy was absolutely loaded with mags, which is unlikely in suicide missions like this, the numbers don't add up to me.
>>77070685
My guess is that "shooter number two" was friendly fire.
>>77071273
probably not
gov has to clean up after themself, don't they?
>>77071949
He was shooting fish in a barrel.
A monkey could excicute 50 people in a nightclub filled with over 300
>>77070685
I think it's not impossible that it was one guy, but I don't think it's likely that it was just one.
1. Media and cops don't really have a good reason to lie and have a huge reason not to lie if there really is a dangerous gunman still on the loose.
For some reason people have a huge problem believing one armed guy can kill a bunch of people. It's really easy given the right location and has happened many times before, often with only handguns.
At least 2 probably 3 or 4
>>77072528
I'm talking about rounds available vs casualties suffered, not accuracy.
>>77073301
Mags can hold different amounts, let's say he has some shitty 25rd mags.
One in the rifle, one taped to it ready to go.
My cheap plate carrier can hold 6 mags.
Plus a few in pocket.
Ammo is not an issue.
>>77073486
Every time someone gives an opinion like this, it is immediately discarded.
