Ban this but not that?

>>77040017

I'm still waiting for people to want to ban all Muslims. If they're willing to encroach on my 2nd amendment right then I'm willing to encroach on their 1st.

Sorry pal but a ballistic knife is an arm and the right to keep and bear it should not be infringed.

>>77040017
Come to think of it, no one NEEDS a terabyte of ram in their home system.
Don't even get me started on encryption.
That's military grade hardware, which should be restricted to government and law enforcement.
For the children.

>>77040997
You can't shoot someone with a terabyte of ram.

>>77041382

>you can't hug your wife's son with nuclear arms

>>77040017
>Most people I would assume ban on ballistic knife is good
I highly doubt that. I'm cool with ballistic knives.

File: 1464126813144.png (152KB, 358x432px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

152KB, 358x432px

>>77041524

>>77040017
Why would I want to ban ballistic knives? That's fucking stupid.

Stop trying to erode our Constitution. Just fuck off already.

>>77040017
ballistic knives are ineffectual man-toys. i don't even know how they got banned in the first place.

>>77040017
>I'm not implying I want guns to be banned but I don't see point for having high powered assault rifle is necessary.

First, assault rifles aren't high powered. Second. The way the rule works in America is that the people should be armed as the government. That if you have police officers running around with semiauto handguns, and AR 15's in their trunk on every street corner, that the people should have access to those as well.

Compare this to weird shit like a bag of anthrax or a 20 megaton bomb.

And balistic knives are call of duty shit. Nobody outside of some ninjas actually uses that. But even if they did, so what?