What do you guys have against better background checks? A more stringent background check coupled with better cooperation between federal agencies could have prevented today's attack. Omar Mateen was investigated by the FBI twice.
Gov't bureaucracies are a hindrance to our safety. We need all lists to be complied into one and then when someone buys a gun they can be given a background test that is all encompassing
>>77027771
SHALL
>>77028051
NOT
>>77028181
INFRINGED
>>77028190
...this is why we can't have nice things
>>77028190
Based anon doing god's work
>>77027771
>>77028190
NO POO FOR YOU
>>77027771
I agree OP we should openly discriminate Islamist radicals.
>>77028447
I'd be down with that too. A part of the background check could be "Are you a practicing muslim". If they answer yes, then no gun
>>77027771
He passed every background check you faggots have put on the books.
More than the average gun owner even given his job at the security company and gun license.
This endless background shilling is fucking pathetic.
>>77027771
But anon I don't have anything against background checks
>>77027771
Omar was an armed security guard with a license and clearance given by the company
Only gun control that would strip Hillary Clinton's bodyguards of their guns would stop Omar
That's clearly the fault of the FBI for not taking action. Just like with the San bernadino shooter, profiling them would have been "racist". But hey, at least the gays died without being racist, right?
>>77028653
>a guy about to shoot 100 people won't lie on his background check form
Gun grabbers are literally the dumbest motherfuckers on the planet.
It's never just background checks. Whenever they want to impose background checks they also want to stop certain guns from ever being sold to citizens.
>>77027771
Guy was a security guard anon. He had received all the background checks one could receive.
>>77027771
>Omar Mateen was investigated by the FBI twice.
Well maybe Obama should have deported or arrested him instead of letting him work around our families and children?
Really makes you think, doesn't it (((OP?)))
>>77027771
And what do these background checks look for?
>>77027771
He had a federal background check. Guess what, moron, the background check that you get when purchasing a firearm is a federal, not a state, background check.
>>77027771
>could have prevented today's attacks
he also had an explosive vest, friend. I'm fairly sure those aren't approved for use by the general public.
People who make themselves easily exploitable will be exploited. Do you notice how many of the seemingly marginalized people we're supposed to empathize with don't have the ability to defend themselves?
We wouldn't have a refugee problem if they were able to fight for themselves in their own country. The Jews or Armenian people wouln't have been genocided because they wouldn't have been helpless.
We have locks on car doors because we know criminals will break into them. We secure the entrances of our homes to discourage would-be robbers. Despite every observable instance available to people like you, the thought of having any responsibility for your own safety shocks you. Despite the parallels available to examine in every other sort of crime, like the war on drugs, prohibition, or illegal immigration, you lack the capacity to understand criminals have no intention of following the law.
