You're given the choice to live in a totalitarian society governed and shaped by one of these men. Which do you choose?
>>76711459
I'd choose not to
>>76711459
Christopher
>>76711459
I'll choose the one who doesn't like dicks.
>>76711550
Interesting. I feel like Peter's society would be the less forgiving as far as law and order is concerned. I could see drug addicts and the like facing the gallows in his society. I'm not arguing either way though. Care to explain your choice?
Christopher
>>76711459
christopher
>>76711459
Peter obviously
>Brings back handguns
>Lets people actually defend their homes with lethal force instead of letting them rape your wife while you silently dial 999
>Degenerate scum REMOVED
>Dole scum REMOVED
>Drug addict scum REMOVED
>Fag marriage REMOVED
>Pushes church and the state closer together
>>76711459
Peter.
>>76711459
Hitchslap was far superior
Christopher.
>>76711702
Degeneracy and decadence are consequences of atheism.
Everyone can see civilization going to shit, Peter calls out the problem correctly.
A libertarian society would be perfect but it's unrealistic, and you did ask which totalitarian society I would want to live in.
Peter.
Even though Christopher is infinitely more likeable as a person and I'd probably agree with him on more issues than Peter.
>degenerate drug materialistic addict vs lolbertarian christcuck
I REMOVE BOTH HERETICS AND CHOOSE THE EMPEROR OF MAN
By the way, when did Christopher evolve from a communist cuck to a neocon cuck?
Peter is very open about his commie past, but I was watching some clips of Christopher in the 80s and he was extreme-left.
Peter.
I miss Christopher tho.
>>76712263
Around the time he met Margaret Thatcher when she was in power.
In his book he said he believed in Marxism at university because everyone around him in his class were dirty commies. Then he attended a dinner with Margaret Thatcher and said he found himself agreeing with most of the things she was saying.
>>76711843
This sounds amazing...
>>76711459
Probablly the one who's alive.
>>76712468
Nice, the Hitchens brothers are(were) refreshingly intelligent and well spoken.
Peter is a lonely voice of reason while everything falls apart and the plebs take over.
>>76713473
Christopher was definitely better at speaking in public and giving speeches, I'm glad he started to calm down a bit before his death.
Peter's views are much better but he hasn't got the likability that Christopher had.
Are any of the Peter votes coming from atheists and are any of the Christopher votes coming from a Christian?
>>76711459
I pick the less pozzed one, whoever it is.
>>76712569
I would so blue pill right about now.
This question gets to the heart of why religion, or more basically the belief in God(s), is an important part of a stable society. You'd always prefer to be ruled by someone who believes themselves to be accountable to a higher authority.
>>76711995
>not knowing Morality man
You have to go back
>>76715549
In all cases? What if the authority is Allah or the Aztec gods?
>>76711647
>>76711693
>>76711718
>>76711770
>>76711883
>>76712001
>Fedora lords supporting a Trotskyist
