HILLARY'S BOT AUDIT COUNT SUDDENLY DROPS
https://www.twitteraudit.com/hillaryclinton
ARCHIVE FROM 3 DAYS AGO
https://archive.is/SpRmR
TWITTER AUDIT COMPROMISED
bamp
BUmp this is some real shit.
>>76656091
>being surprised by hillary's internet army
we are many and well payed
trumpfags on suicide watch
>>76656786
>>76657998
bumparoo
>>76656091
Not surprised
>>76656091
Post this to the god emperor!!
>>76656091
It was always compromised. It shot up to like 70% a a few weeks ago. Too bad Breitbart has the stats from a year ago :^)
Can't erase the past Hillary. Look, the media can shill all they want and cite twitteraudit to say its a legit, but anyone who has ever used Twitter knows the truth. 300k+ retweets AND almost the exact same amount of likes in the span of 3 hours? More retweets per minute than any tweet ever in the history of twitter yet she's like #167 in number of followers? Come on.
Did you notice her recent post about Trump has 250k likes? It seems disproportionate.
Each audit takes a random sample of 5000 Twitter followers for a user and calculates a score for each follower. This score is based on number of tweets, date of the last tweet, and ratio of followers to friends. We use these scores to determine whether any given user is real or fake. Of course, this scoring method is not perfect but it is a good way to tell if someone with lots of followers is likely to have increased their follower count by inorganic, fraudulent, or dishonest means.
>NOT UNDERSTANDING HOW IT WORKS
>FUCKING LEAF
every time
>>76656091
Is there a way to see how many real vs fake followers liked her hip and epic tweet?
No shit. Even her followers are fake.
>>76661175
>>76661175
NO! You're stupid, STUPID!
>>76656091
>6 000 000
We need another shoa.
Can this be brought to media's attention? And if so, can we do this?
