I'm in a gun control debate
- Home
- Board: /pol/ - Politically Incorrect
- Reading: I'm in a gun control debate
Can someone please dump all the 2nd amendment images here? Especially the one explaining the way militias can prevent tyranny?
>>76597842
The consititution does not give the right to bear arms, only for militias at a time of war.
>>76597842
Self bumping
>>76597908
kill yourself kike
>>76597943
Not this one...The one with a screen cap explaining how it will be easy for a well armed militia to resist attempts of resisting government takeover.
I think it has an image of a fighter jet.
>>76598181
Dumping
>>76598181
that one was mostly satire
>>76597908
Best ally, shouldn't you be removing kebabs?
>>76597842
>>76597842
The only real power is violence. So unless you want to get fucked by tyrants, you have to be on the same level as them in regards to fighting power, therefore guns.
>>76597842
>>76597908
Of course the Jew spreads his lies everywhere.
>>76598928
None-the-less America is a free country and the government cannot take away the rights of the people to own firearms. Including blacks.
>>76597842
Battle of Athens. Group of U S citizens overthrew a corrupt and tyrannical local government.
>>76599313
I think the fact that Moore, Zuckerberg and the assortment of other (((celebrities and millionaires))) all believe they should be allowed to have armed bodyguards makes it pretty clear that they believe the right to self-defense is something only the elites have, and ordinary people should not be privileged to.
>>76599562
This. Gun control never affects the elite or criminal classes.
Section 5 licenses in the UK allow people to own machine guns with the Home Secretary's approval. That's pretty well connected.
Afghanistan.
>>76597842
SHE IS AGAINST US
SHE IS AGAINST US
SHE IS AGAINST US
SHE IS AGAINST US
One for the femsbians...
If you really worry about muh rapeculture, what are you doing to really empower wom*n?
>>76597842
Let me help an anon out
>>76597908
US Supreme Court says different. It's called DC v. Heller; look it up.
>>76602787
Neat. How does it work?
>>76597842
Arguing that armed militias will prevent tyranny in the modern military age is fucking retarded. The government can kill you by sitting behind a desk at a computer. Kill yourself.
>>76597908
Not according to the supreme court, fag.
>>76601681
>mfw I wrote an almost 1500wd speech from that image
>>76598735
/pol/ is satire
>>76598735
>>76598181
was it something about vietnam/ISIS?
>>76597908
When are we not at war?
>>76602844
>notes vague move to shall issue cc when that was also the time of the Clinton gungrabs.
I hate this meme graph, it makes me think the person is a retard whenever I see it posted.
Three strikes laws went into effect in the early 90s so we started keeping criminals in prison instead of letting them go commit more crime, that's what that drop was. This of course lead to muh school to prison pipeline ""institutionalized racism"", but that's a whole other kettle of shit.
>>76597842
>If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers, may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual state. In a single state, if the persons intrusted with supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair. The usurpers, clothed with the forms of legal authority, can too often crush the opposition in embryo. The smaller the extent of the territory, the more difficult will it be for the people to form a regular or systematic plan of opposition, and the more easy will it be to defeat their early efforts. Intelligence can be more speedily obtained of their preparations and movements, and the military force in the possession of the usurpers can be more rapidly directed against the part where the opposition has begun. In this situation there must be a peculiar coincidence of circumstances to insure success to the popular resistance.
>Alexander Hamilton
>Federalist Papers #28
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed28.asp
>>76604795
>person is a retard
i am a retarded, though
>>76597842
>Especially the one explaining the way militias can prevent tyranny?
I'm pro-gun, but damn that sure didn't work.
>>76604990
pic related, California prison population spiking up thanks to 3 strike laws. Crime rates fell off a cliff in the early 90s because of this, one of the things Clinton actually got right.
>>76598797
>Is innocent life valuable?
>No
>Then why can guns?
So innocent people can't defend themselves.
>>76605126
Yes it would. Guerrilla warfare has hardly ever been beaten, anytime in modern history.
It has worked against British Empire during American revolution.
Guerrilla warfare has worked against Napoleon in Spain
It has worked against Ottomans in Balkans.
It has worked against US in Vietnam
It has worked against Soviets in Afghanistan
It has worked against NATO in Afghanistan
It has worked against NATO in Iraq
Indeed the only effective way to stop this kind of warfare destroy local support by killing people off (see Jewish-Roman war), exiling them (see USSR after WW2). And in civil war conditions, these are not options. Asking military personnel to take part in military crimes against their own would lead to shattered loyalty.
Even strongest nations fear fighting decentralized enemy. And as technology moves forward, guerrilla tactics are more effective, not less. Those who say they are not don't know how modern warfare is conducted.
Technology means there are far more breaking points, far more complicated chain of logistics. Those things only play to strengths of guerrilla fighters.
Decentralized but coordinated organization almost always prevails against centralized and "indoctrinated" one. It's same in economy and it's same in warfare.
>>76607319
>And as technology moves forward, guerrilla tactics are more effective, not less.
That's the only way I see it going. I mean, it's currently possible to 3D-print a drone save for a control board, battery, and a few servos. I doubt it's difficult to make a few, strap them all with home-made napalm or Hermite or something, and give them a concordant to hit. Hell, I bet you could make them follow a laser pointer without too much trouble.
