> lelbertarian roads
we don't need roads, we'll have a jetpack.
We have survived thousands of years with roads, what's the point of even having paved roads? Some sidewalks around me aren't paved, they're just gravel and they're perfectly fine even in rain they don't get all slushy like dirt and they don't crack and break after winter like pavement so they never need repairs.
Gravel roads also prevent the need for speed bumps or slow down signs because people normally drive slower on them, for main roads they would still be paved but for side roads why bother?
>>76522000
We are going to be flying around in drones prefer soon m8. It's already happening and you can go like 30 miles before needing to gass up. You can thank libertarians for that
>>76522357
I get rocks in my shoes while walking, and that's worse than woman rape.
>>76522000
nothing wrong twith those roads you faggot
>>76522000
Where were going, we wont need roads. Jetpacks will deliver us to our destinations.
>>76522000
This road is objectively better, you can't speed and therefore car deaths will drop significantly
free market wins again, checkmate atheist
>>76522000
Is that car being detained?
>>76522000
he got to other side just fine
>>76523744
Then wear proper shoes because that never happens to me
>>76522000
I like a challenge when driving.
>>76524297
8/10 post.
Not an argument
No es un argumento
Kein Argument
לא ויכוח
不爭論
>>76522000
No privately owned roads would be perfectly maintained but have ridiculous tolls every twenty feet.
>>76524428
If you don't care about my anecdotal story, why should I care about yours?
>>76522000
>posts picture of a statist road
>"lol libertarian roads"
statists are this retarded
>>76522000
If you cannot afford to build your own road you shouldn't drive. If you have incentives to drive you will eventually build your own road if you work hard and destroy the competition.
>>76524428
>Proper shoes
Wearing heels doesn't count.
>>76524532
>build roads with tax money
>sell to private companies
>they enact tolls
this is what they do in Texas
>>76524583
Because you should buy new shoes if you have a hole in yours instead of blaming the gravel.
>>76524650
Some people don't wear running shows everyday like they're in grade 1
why are roads a problem?
as it is, drivers pay fees for their license and registration.
roads will be a subscription service. you pay to be allowed to drive on them.
and let's say that the private sector tries to maintain the same level of roads, and can't raise enough through fees to pay for it. that's just a signal from the market that we should have fewer roads, and more people should shift to a more densely populated, urban mode of living.
if it turns out that private road companies make so much money that they can add tons of additional lanes and build new highways where there weren't before, that's also good.
the thing is, we want the market to serve as an INDICATOR of how we use our resources.
maybe complete privatization of travel will reveal that trains should overtake automobiles as the dominant mode of travel on land.
I don't know what'll happen, but I want us to switch to a system that figures out the best way.
>>76522357
Gravel roads put excessive wear on cars, leading to higher overall repair costs.
>>76525100
well, if you cannot afford to repair you should not have bought it
market consists of rational individuals
and if you are not rational, then, I am sorry to say that but....
>>76525100
That's why it should be for low traffic side streets. If you read what I wrote you'd see that I said for main roads they should still be paved.
>>76522000
Why do we even need roads?
A politician should take a stand and provide ever family with a flying car.
Call it "the people's shuttle"
lolbertarian borders
>>76522000
If we had libertarianism, we wouldn't even need roads.
>>76525687
Ugliest car I ever saw I hope I never have to see something as disgusting as this. Modernism really is a plague
Fuelled by greed.
It's super-fast.
