Does /pol/ seriously believe keynesian economics works? You guys can't be this stupid, right?
I like libertarian economics
>>76496686
Jokes on you, economics is too hard for me to understand beyond the concept that, 'profit=good'. As you can see, I am a good goy.
i like mercantalism.
>>76496782
Why?
>>76496866
But how do you even define profit if you don't understand any economics?
I think somebody jumped the gun on the file deletion
>>76496971
That wasn't me, I can tell you that. What the fuck is wrong with /pol/ mods?
>>76496918
Because it works better than the alternatives
>>76497002
there's been some right faggoty moderation going on lately.
>>76497087
Examples? I can only come to /pol/ once a day.
>>76496954
Profit is when you have more wealth than before you attempted to alter your wealth.
Wealth is analogous to power, as it's ones ability to alter the world according to muh dude Emerson.
>>76496686
Which do you like more OP Austrian or Chicagoan
>>76497471
>wealth is analogous to power
Only in certain conditions.
>>76497135
more pic deleted threads like 2 over in the catalog, for instance
>>76497060
What evidence do you have to support that claim?
>>76496891
Mercantilism's "Fixed pie" theory is wildly wrong, so you shouldn't like it.
>>76496686
>talk with some typical punk riffraff in what is a lefty punk meetup bar because some friends are very lefty
>him: "anon capitalism is soooo bad" "it just doesnt werk"
>me: "uhmm okay i am willing to listen, could you explain the economical mechanisms and why they inevitably fail in the end?
>him "IT JUST DOESNT WERK OK?! THAT ONE SMART GUY SAID SO"
![1465371169031[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/ncKWeEp.png "1465371169031[1]")
![1367986572692[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/q4HPBJt.png "1367986572692[1]")
