are voting against their own economic interests
Daily reminder that 'trickle down' economics is a liberal straw-man, and was never proffered by any conservative economist ever in the history of time.
Greed is a mortal sin. I weep for your soul.
>>76477254
Doesn't that describe their policies well though?
rednecks dont vote republican for economic reasons
but if they decided to vote for this year's republicans, they might be able to get a job with meaningful pay and finally be able to move out of moms trailer
>>76477179
The shills are sure awake tonight.
>>76477179
If everyone vote for their interests the economy would fall apart. You're welcome.
>>76477179
No, I'm voting against your economic interests. Because I fucking hate you.
>>76477179
makes yo
reagans "trickle down: policies are what created the 90s boom, clintons liberal policies are what created the 2000s busts.
>>76477254
They never used the term "Trickle down", and it was a derogatory term by Liberals, but the idea of what it is, is something that Republicans have campaigned for.
Just because they didn't use the exact verbiage doesn't mean that republicans didn't run on the idea itself.
Stop this argument. Its as bad as the one that "democrats were the ones against the civil rights bill". While technically correct, its a half truth and no modern democrat would be associated with the dixiecrats who eventually switched to the republican party.
>>76477179
i vote republican because we're fucked either way and this way i get to keep my guns and dirtbike trails. if you vote dem you are literally a fag.
>>76477345
No, leaf man. Supply-side economics has nothing to do with 'trickling'.
Cultural marxists invented the term.
>>76477179
These are great. Simply great. The right is for big goobermint in name and in policy and they constantly go ON and ON about big manly tough sounding shit but they're halves of fags
>>76477179
we don't care. I make more than enough money to be happy. liberals are the greedy ones, thats why they are crying about the trickle down economics and minimum wage. the rest of us are just fine. we choose to work a trained skill rather than a job anyone can do. (starbucks, mcdonalds, or any job that doesn't require much movement or skill)
>>76477179
another white genocide, kike liar thread
>im white
>white people should be ashamed
>goldberg
>>76477179
>voting against their own economic interests
that man looks like he's just fine economically
>>76477654
"Surpluses are bad"
>Alan Greenspan
"Basic Guaranteed Incomes are Good"
>Milton Friedman
>>76477179
Explain again how the party that demonizes my race and gender will do anything in my interest?
>>76477506
All booms are caused by technology.
Economics is a failed meme science that has never done anything positive in the hands of mankind.
>>76477535
>Its as bad as the one that "democrats were the ones against the civil rights bill".
The civil rights act was passed after the 'southern strategy' was supposed to have occurred. Moreover, the 'southern strategy' never happened. It was a conspiracy theory offered by liberals as a justification for their support of slavery and Jim Crow laws. Don't ever forget Rob Byrd.
>>76477179
The "economic interest" of the average millennial shitter consists of buying the newest iPhone every 6 months.
I see no reason to rob people with more money just to make that a reality.
>>76477179
Friendly reminder it really makes you think
>im white
>white people should stop being islamophobic and racist
>i'm not being racist painitng ALL of a group as this or that myself
>muh kike math
>stein
>>76477179
OP, it's mainly because they think they are going to win the lottery, or somehow otherwise "beat the odds" and become rich. They know the system is corrupt, but since they refuse to accept that they have no real chance of ever becoming wealth, they have deluded themselves into thinking they will be, so they want the corrupt system in place so that they can use it later.
>>76477746
:3
>>76477767
Stop using so much welfare. White people don't kill eachother? People are people most races are wivestales
>>76477179
Hmm really makes you think
>>76477869
He also didn't like black people. FDR was the same. What do we remember about these people? Commie cripples. Just like Sanders narrative today
>>76477179
I thought white people didn't know what it was like to be poor?
>>76477991
Maybe not about blacks but about certain religions
>>76477788
Witnessed
So then you would agree the best course of action is to completely free the market since we don't know how it works?
>>76478021
Shoot em on 5th avenue and see if they still love you?
>>76478021
>>76477905
I'm a white male. I was asking op how the democratic party would do anything in my interest when they demonize me.
>>76477991
Keynesians in general are a bunch of kike guiding good goy retards into enslaving their nations into endless kike debt by wasting as much money as possible for the kikes.
And it's been both parties sadly.
>>76478173
check ur privelg shitlord
>>76477179
I live in California
I'm looking to buy a house
Please tell me more about how millions of beaners going back negatively effect my economic interest,
>>76477179
Friendly reminder that rural working class republicans do not aspire to be millionaires.
Friendly reminder that rural working class people vote Republican because the republican party shares their cultural values.
The man in the OP appears to own a truck, land/farm, at least one firearm, and a happy family playing in the background. Friendly reminder that he probably has everything he wants/needs.
>>76478324
I read that quote and thought only no wonder why you all learned to hate and despise him so much
>>76478324
>Keynesianism
Reading the summary one paragraph description.. the premise sounds correct.
But there's gotta be infinite ways to actually implement it and room for incompetence and corruption, etc...
But the idea seems very, very general.
I guess western nations have their specific brand of it though?
>>76477798
It wasn't the southern strategy that caused the shift. The southern strategy further solidified the shift, particularly the south voting republican for the foreseeable future.
It was johnson's push of the civil rights bill that led to a lot of democrats and dixiecrats switching parties. Before Johnson, Georgia for example was always democrat. When Johnson ran for election, that was the first time they ever voted republican and voted that way ever since.
Many pissed off conservative democrats found solace in the new republican party of Barry Goldwater variety. Reagan and Nixon are the ones who further implemented the southern strategy to set the schism in stone.
>>76477701
holy f my great grandpa is from there, what is happening
>>76478758
Some have broken free and we hear ramblings as to shitty roads, theft, crime, corruption, and coalburning
>>76477179
Tax cuts across the board DO trickle down by their very definition.
>>76477179
he is the first step to natsoc anon
we vote to feel alive again
>>76477179
Ever stopped to wonder why conservitives are mostly older and more experienced of the world than libcucks?
Or why many libcucks grow out of their faggotry once they mature and become more and more consertive as they gain understanding and wisdom?
Probably not. Im sure you're just some loser pot-smoking know-it-all mangina.
Maybe those "redneck" voters understand that a quick pay-day at the cost of your nation's future is a bad decision.
You'll understand deferred gratification once you're older.
>>76479001
Cite one example. If you mean by definition then you want people to take the cut and become poor. In all other times you pretend that reality in fact doesn't say that anybody CAN become broke. Your ideology is shit
>>76477179
>voting against their own economic interests
lel, when you make $100k plus a year come back and tell me that.
Faggot.
>>76477179
you never explain how though
>>76479237
Even rich people and businesses love democrats because they do shit. You're not supposed to hear these things though. Which wing is more antizionist? Go with that one.
/thread
>>76479159
>take the cut and become poor.
How does keeping more of my money make me worse off?
>>76479387
>muh agross le berd
>trickle up?
No. It's trickle down. So muh shmorgasberd doesn't matter. It never goes down. Nothing ever goes down
>trickle down economics don't work
Lol this is the most retarded thing i've ever heard. Its like you think the only way an economy can ever work or has ever worked is if a bunch of poor faggots steal money from the rich. This is not the case.
>>76477179
Not an argument.
>>76479331
I'd rather have a zionist in office than people who want to fuck over their own country.
>>76479582
Fiat money. Derivatives. 500 to the poor on 50K tax. 5000 to corporations. The IMF disagrees with you. I think they might be more credible than you
>>76479046
GOP will become Workers' Party under Trump; his words
Hail Final Victory!
It's true for democrats too
>>76477179
>be military
>be engineer
>trump wants military expansion
>only candidate not punishing R&D of aerospace systems
I guess I'm not the "most"?
>>76477179
What tax cuts? It's 2016. Are we still pushing that myth?
>>76479691
Lmfao the lengths this agenda will go to blindly ignore logic and just parrot shekels. Nigger what you just said is like an image I can't find of a circle of stickmen stabbing eachother in the back
honestly, I really don't give a fuck. I'm a NEET and i'm voting for trump for two reasons. one, because democrats were too fucking stupid to make sure Bernie got the nomination so therefore they deserve to be miserable. two, because it will piss off all the types of people I hate beyond belief. feminists, sjws, regressives. the tears these faggots will shed if trump wins will be enough to keep me from killing myself for atleast a year.
MAGA!
>>76477654
>-economist
>not talking about economics
this appeal to authority is so shit it's appealing to an authority that doesn't even apply.
>>76477654
Paul Krugman, former Enron advisor
>>76477179
>voting entirely on economic means
What about ideology and philosophical concepts?
If I could feed, house, and employ every American at the cost of all civil liberties you would still vote for me?
>>76477179
That pic is so stereotyping. I know plent that look like him that are #withher
Of course they have guns. They're farmers baka
>>76477543
The republicans want to sell the land you dirt bike on to private interests who will have you arrested for trespassing when you ride there. I'm dealing with this in Utah with snowmobiling
>>76480015
But then republigoys regulate yer benis
>>76477179
Friendly reminder that Reagen actualy cut taxes across all levels and "Trickle Down Economics Theory" is nothing but a strawman that is used by people who are not educated in both Supply Side Economics and Neo-Classical Economics.
Please do your Due Dilligence and denizens of the Red Pill by Educating yourself on the Kemp-Roth Economic Recovery Act on 1981 [1]
Liberal's then threw at Reagan the Economic Recovery Act of 1986. Which lowered individual top tax rates from 50% to 28% and raised bottom tax rates from 11% to 15%. [2]
>Occupy Democrats
NOT
O
T
EVEN
V
E
N
ONCE
N
C
E
[1] http://www.legisworks.org/GPO/STATUTE-95-Pg172.pdf
[2] http://legisworks.org/congress/99/toc-pl-99-514.html
>this is the part where OP is placed on suicide watch
>>76479865
Kek that picture can't be real.
>>76477179
less than 25% tax sounds dope as hell
>>76480102
Oh well Bush Jrs broke the world and they were exclusively for muh richy stimulation. On da bawls
>>76477535
No, Reagan's policies are what caused the early 80's economic growth and following late 80's recession.
A combination of Clinton and Bush's deregulations and a second dose of Reaganomics caused the late 00's recession.
The boom was caused by proliferation of the internet. No politician can validly claim responsibility.
I vote against my economic interests because I value my personal freedoms more.
Basically, I vote Republican because I like my freedom of speech, my right to bear arms, and my right to defend my home and property.
Any party that openly condemns white males (my demographic), will never get my vote, even if their economic platform is more in line with my interests.
>>76480226
So poor and pissed off. Sounds great life
>>76477743
>birth control, abortion and gays
isn't it liberals that only care about those things? that's just where their views happen to cross christians' and they aren't willing to budge on it. not even a christian but that's a glaringly shitty strawman, even in that pile.
>>76480102
He also raised taxes and debts. Like 15 times
>>76480220
>Reagan's policies are what caused the early 80's economic growth and following late 80's recession.
The bust always follows the boom. No one can change that.
>>76477825
you forgot
>ISIS are the only radical muslims ever
>>76477869
Trump's policies, if implemented, would dismantle trickle down economics, mass immigration and outsourcing are the cornerstones of neoliberalism and without them America shall veer economically to the left as American workers will have more power and can form strong trade unions.
>>76477743
>ultra rich capitalist wants deregulation
What? Big business loves regulation, it kills all the small competition. Fuck this moronic picture.
>>76477179
Now that Sander is out expect more lib trolls....
>>76479046
i-is that a female Schrödinger without ears?
Don't fucking vote out of self interest. Try thinking about what's best for society.
>>76480287
Poor and pissed off would be accurate, anon.
Every single god damn day of my life, I have to listen to spineless liberal parasites tell me that I have "white privileged," and that white males are scum and evil, and I can't do a damn thing except smile and nod or risk loosing the little I have.
I have to listen to useless soccer moms tell me how I don't need a firearm despite the fact that they live in some gated community and have never seen a minority in their life.
I have to listen to my own government tell me that my opinion as white male is worthless, and I get to sit by and watch as some asshole who supposedly represents me fucks me over time and again in both my local and federal governments.
Hell fucking yes i'm mad. I'm pissed off. I'm angry. At this point I want Trump to win just to see the people I hate get bootyblasted. I want to watch the world burn.
Maybe, just maybe, we'll be able to either save this mess before it's too late, or we might be able to build something sane out of the ashes.
>>76477654
>>76477701
>Krugman
>Goldberg
>>76480987
Sounds like you've let the sjws get under your skin anon
1. The long-term expansion of the economy is the economic interest of society as a whole.
2. More goods and services (which comprise the economy) are produced if the barriers to their production are minimized.
Which of those statements would you say you find disagreeable?
>>76477179
Friendly reminder that people who vote for wealth redistribution are just pussies who have others steal for them.
>>76480422
You can drag a boom out longer, and have steady growth that gradually slows down until they call it "stagflation" but that's better than a recession.
Either way, Reagonomics is flawed on a fundamental level because it makes assumptions on human behaviors that turn out to be incorrect in theory.
When capital gains taxes are low and income taxes are high, rich people invest to be taxed at a lower rate. They take risks, and end up with a bigger return and lower taxes.
When income taxes are low enough, they bank the money instead of directly invest it (less risk), so the amount of investment done doesn't increase as Republicans claim it will
Meanwhile the assumption that poor and middle class people will save or invest the money they get back in refunds is false, the poor and middle class people splurge instead.
It causes a spike in growth for a short duration followed by flattening out as that extra income gets absorbed by inflation and their normal budget. So suddenly a lot of people stop making big purchases, and stocks for companies that make things like cars, expensive electronics, etc dip, you get a stock panic, and a recession.
Using tax cuts to stimulate the economy turns out to be irresponsible in the long run. We run higher deficits and the economy goes into an unstable boom and bust.
Bush should have never done those cuts based on our budget in a tech bubble.. Never make long term economic policy changes based on a bubble you're currently in.
>>76477788
>All booms are caused by technology.
what technology caused the housing boom?
>>76477179
Funny, because it is also the dems giving corporate favors in the name of "economic stimulus"
>>76477179
Actually I vote republican because the democrats are openly hostile to me and my economic interests in their rush to pander to niggers and other assorted minorities.
I'd vote democrat in a second if they weren't so focused on destroying everything in the name of progressivism.
>>76480392
>Lets redefine a tax neutral bill why don't we
The 1982 Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act was pushed forward by Democrats and Reagan only signed off on it when it was reformed into a tax neutral act
Surface Transportation Assistance Act was only passed if House Democrats would allocate more funding to the Starwars Program as a form of compromise It was partnered with Highway Revenue Act of 1982
Interest and Dividend Tax Compliance Act of 1983 was a tax neutral act
Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 redefined how tax deductions operated
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 was a denial to employers on specific Title X tax deductions
1986 Tax bill, see last post
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 same premise as the 1985 bill but instead with more severity since the Senate Flipped during 1986 election year.
>>76480930
"If you piss on your enemies, they win."- Justin "Current Year" Trudeau
>>76477743
What about people who don't give a fuck and just want Trump to win to see what happens?
>>76477179
>owns a house, a truck, a gun
>has kids he provides for
seems he has his own wealth and doesn't need billionaires' to "trickle down" to him
>>76477179
Since when is it "in their interests" to have their coal mines and processing facilities shut down and replaced with food stamps?
>>76477179
Look guys I don't understand economics!!!
>>76481713
They both do it really.
Republican economics since Reagan (in other words, Neocon economics) works around the theory that if you cut taxes for everyone, people will invest and it'll stimulate the economy. It relies on assumptions of human behavior that aren't really true. It results in boom/bust cycles.
Democrat economics works by having the government invest in private companies by paying them to do contract work, it results in slow growth but usually more stable Both Democrats and Republicans used to follow this economic policy based on Keynes, since the New Deal.
>>76482495
Confirmed no understanding of how monetary systems work
>>76482495
>Democrat economics works by having the government invest in private companies by paying them to do contract work, it results in slow growth but usually more stable Both Democrats and Republicans used to follow this economic policy based on Keynes, since the New Deal.
That isn't an accurate description of Keynesian economics, and calling Keynes' theory "Democrat economics" is absurd for a number of reasons.
>>76477254
>>76477798
You. I like you.
>>76478758
Civil rights era democrats and dixiecrats did not switch parties. They just died.
Those that vote regularly were and are primarily those of the older set; these people did not live a quarter of a century more until the Republicans began to regularly win the south. They departed the earth still voting Democrat. Most of the south's congressional delegations, state legislatures and governorships didn't flip until circa.1994, occasioned by the check-kiting scandal and Clinton's liberal governance.
>Before Johnson, Georgia for example was always democrat
The Republican crack into the south began during Eisenhower's time, when Mason-Dixon line states began voting Republican in presidential elections. Go play your race card elsewhere.
>>76481680
Construction equipment became cheaper/more efficient. House design became cheaper/more efficient.
>>76478173
You're fucking a white male!
>>76477179
Good point, I'm a #CruzMissile now.
>>76477179
What's funny is that image is from an anti gun ad paid for by Michael Bloomberg.
Guess we know who you are working for.
((()))
>>76482297
you're pointing out an angle a lot of people don't really consider; the argument in the OP presumes people vote primarily for more money for themselves, in the form of social benefits for example. that's because this is what lefties do, while cletus there is more likely voting for a homogeneous community, smaller government, and less social benefits, because what little social benefits he sees, he probably sees going to the single mother with five niglets next door.
so it's not really a strawman so much as a projection.
>>76477179
No, they aren't.
Trump's (proposed) policies are a stark 180 from Reagen's.
Which is why the establishment spent so long reminding people he wasn't a real Republican.
His (proposed - I keep saying proposed because I don't think he'd ever implement them) policies are in the interest of the working classes.
To almost Bernie degrees, actually.
>>76477825
>ISIS has just 30,000 members
Yes. And it's only ISIS that are the problem, right?
>Stein
>Goldberg
>Krugman
>>76479331
>typing /thread at the end of your own post
Do you high-five yourself and laugh at your own jokes too, faggot.
>>76477743
Deregulation usually refers to the finance corporations or deregulating business in the sense of removing things like labor rights, environmental protections, basically laws which cost businesses money, but are better for the people living near/working for the company
>>76479865
Saved
>>76479085
>why do people become more concerned about promoting the status quo as they get older?
Because humans become progressively more anxious over their lifetime about change, this has been observed and noted throughout history so long and in so many cultures, you would have to be literally an imbecile to suggest that is a consequence of being "correct"
>>76477179
Democrats elected Hillary on the grounds of being a woman. I think they need more red pills than the republicans.
>>76479825
Hmmm. That map looks very similar to another map I once saw. I can't remember what was being measured though.
>>76477179
nationalists are the best candidates for the working class
there's a reason that people with trades (plumbers, electricians, miners, farmers) tend to vote for candidates like trump. because his "america first" attitude is the best for their livlihood.
>>76483338
The housing boom was caused by government regulation you fucking retard.
>>76484596
>huge tax cuts that disproportionately favor the wealthy
>full 180 from Reagan
This must be just shitposting
>>76482109
You. Get the fuck out of my country
>>76477179
You must not have been around when those tax cuts were put into place. My dad was an engineer for Raytheon, and it was the first time my family could actually afford to give me my very own Pepsi. Actually talk to people who were alive back then, and they will tell you that it felt like a weight being lifted off them. Its precisely why Bush Sr got voted in, despite being an absolutely horrid candidate.
>>76477179
THE TILT CONTINUES
>>76477179
>wanting Billionaire's money
>not wanting to be a Billionaire and keeping your money cause they cut taxes
>>76477179
>>76480558
>? Big business loves regulation,
Retard detected. BUT IT WASN'T REAL CAPTIALISM !!!!!!!!!!!!!!11!!
>>76477179
Higher taxes go to the middle class, never the rich, faggot.
>>76490036
He's actually right. Regulation limits competition. Its part of the reason why the EU is in such trouble.
>>76489919
how do rich people like Trump (who employ low skilled workers like Jed there by the thousands) ruin his life exactly?
>>76477179
MUH TRICKLE DOWN meme needs to die already. Nothing more than an invention of the liberal media, not to mention a projection of their water sports fetish.
