Yep, I called it.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/2016/jun/06/reverse-maastricht-legal-politically-feasible-eu-referendum-brexit
tl;dr, parliament can reject a brexit anyway.
>>76309554
Well, government knows best, right?
If that actually happens you fuckers better revolt.
>>76309554
They won't openly reject it since it will damage the EU's reputation even further. They'll just pull a Van der Bellen all over again with postal votes or some other shenanigan
>>76309554
They won't though, it would actually cause riots if they did that.
>>76309880
>it would actually cause riots
lol no it wouldnt
>capcha: select all images with tea
>mfw
>>76309686
oh i will, somebody will be n the receiving end of a very perturbed letter
>>76310014
ofc it wouldn't, people have to get up to work the day after!
they got us by the balls!
>>76309554
If it was the people vs the state, then sure, they might pull that.
You're forgetting that there's enough politicians with a vested interest in leaving that this shit won't fly.
They're backstabbing opportunist cunts at the best of times, and you expect them to ignore a golden gift like this?
>>76310078
Don't rural brexit-voting britfags all have a few shotguns?
>>76310014
good work on demorailzations shillings komrad
>>76310078
Give the blighters what for, Clive, and God speed!
