well at least we aren't niggers

>>76148487
A fuckin leaf

F
U
C
K
I
N

L
E
A
F

>>76148487
No, but their degeneracy proliferates because of your school of thought.

I think /pol/ has evolved. It used to be like you said. But I think in being contrary and realizing that alt-right is the logical course of survival (if humanity does indeed survive) we found a sense of purpose and justice.

Indeed we are doing great work now. Even if it's just to be edgy, western civilization is important and if it's destroyed, bye bye humanity.

>>76148405
nice bot, you have the code?

>>76148558
Thoughtful argument... Very surprised at a lack of any rebuttal

>>76148405
Literally 0 arguments presented

>>76148405
Reactionary ideologies are the only ones historically proven to be able to "roll back" leftism. Prove me wrong.

>>76148726
thanks steph

>>76148631
>(if humanity does indeed survive)
You spend too much time in happening threads and not enough time with a history book

>>76148405
Assuming we're reactionaries, and we are not:
It has now become reactionary to have moral values, and stand up for family and for country. That alone is sad.

>>76148405
>If the political atmosphere was dominated by conservatism, /pol/ would be leftist.
Nope. You really are a stupid fuckhead.

>>76148752
The reactionary ideology is closer to leftism than American Conservatism has ever been, it's a mirror image of European's more anti-immigration leaning wings, which are still socialist

What specific problem do you have with /pol/'s ideology? What specific issues do you disagree with /pol/ on?

>>76148405
So if the political atmosphere was dominated by faggots, you wouldn't be here?

>>76148944
But I'm not.
This is just a rabbit hole for those with socially unpalatable opinions politically, not people who have any grasp of conservatism or any of its values I listed in OP.
Proof is in the pudding.

>>76149239
The political atmosphere IS dominated by faggots... And I am here...

>>76148405
/pol/ is full of keyboard warriors waiting for someone to come deliver the 1950s to them, none of them believe in fighting degeneracy, theft, and control strongly enough to lay down their lives

the powers that be know this full well, so they'll continue letting autists vent their frustration, that way they'll never grow enough discontentment to actually change their situation

tl;dr If you're not willing to fight for want you want, you don't deserve it in the first place

>Any person that truly cares about the constitution, the Declaration of Independence, the right to bear arms, would not ignore truth as you all do.

What "truth" are you referring to?

>>76149162
The defense provided for Trump when he speaks ambiguously about gay marriage, or how he bends over for transgenderism on the bathroom laws, or his hinting at bigger government and socialized healthcare, or his blatant lack of respect for Christian values, or his ignorance on tariffs and trade deficits (and economics in general)

>>76149379
But then either you're wrong about /pol/ being reactionary, or you need to GTFO.

>>76149525
Conservatism, if that wasn't obvious enough. Taking false prophets and skewing one's own beliefs as part of a reactionary movement, which carries us further and further away from small government, personal freedoms, and superlative morality

>>76149753

Oh he's attacking Trump. I get it now.

>>76149745
I'm not following.
If the culture is being overwhelmed with celebration of homosexuality, the reactionary stance would be draconian homophobia, which is here.
Or were you just calling me a faggot again?

>>76149934
And this is the taking of false prophets.
I'm attacking the positions he's taking, which should be scrutinized.
Or do you consider that too inflammatory to respond with logic?

>>76149999
I was calling you a massive flaming cocksucking faggot OP. Nice quads btw.