Liberals won't defend this.

>A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
What did they mean by this?

File: image.jpg (33KB, 494x280px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

33KB, 494x280px

Racist, bigot xenophobe """""right"""" wingers won't defend this.

>>75912644
I think they meant the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

>>75912644
>>A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
>What did they mean by this?
What did he mean by this?

File: nodrugsnoalcoholnocigarettes.jpg (246KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

246KB, 1000x1000px

Nice.

>>75913920
>>>75912644
>>>A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
>>What did they mean by this?
>What did he mean by this?
What did he mean by this?

>>75912342
I cannot and will not defend the indefensible.

>>75913147
They said men.

Do you really think the people who were living in the age of enlightenment and crossed a vast ocean thought niggers living in mud huts were their equals?

In the constitution it even says this country is for their posterity. As in, white Europeans.

>>75913147

He meant white men, clearly

>>75913147
We don't defend your warped and perverted idea of what you think it says.

>>75914372
>>75914289
>>75914087
Thanks for proving my point shitlords.

>>75914762
Everyone is equal, but couldn't some of them go and be equal somewhere else? Especially if they aren't there legally...