[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
We Need To Stop Protecting Famous Men
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Thread replies: 38
Thread images: 8
File: ss+(2016-06-01+at+03.43.00).jpg (208 KB, 1013x895) Image search: [Google]
ss+(2016-06-01+at+03.43.00).jpg
208 KB, 1013x895
Why do we scrutinize Amber Heard, but fail to question Johnny Depp?

http://archive.is/AhCNK
>>
>>75798963
Because nobody would know who the fuck she is if not for Johnny Depp.

WE WANT PRENUP
>>
>>75798963
Really makes you think huh?
>>
File: amber heard.webm (207 KB, 720x360) Image search: [Google]
amber heard.webm
207 KB, 720x360
>>75798963
kinda hope they both get terminal hemorrhoids desu she's a gold digging whore and he's an autistic anti trump liberal faggot who dresses like an emo 15 year old
>>
>>75798963
>Why do we scrutinize Amber Heard
because the cops say she wasn't injured when she first filed complaints

>Why do we scrutinize evidence
>>
File: 6C7080581-130424-ned-stark.jpg (248 KB, 1000x793) Image search: [Google]
6C7080581-130424-ned-stark.jpg
248 KB, 1000x793
>>75798963
>Huffington Post
>>
99.9% of women agree his soon to be ex-wife is a bitch and would marry Johnny Depp on a stack of prenups. Many others would agree that she is going to ruin the divorce game which is basically a legitimate life plan for women because it's so profitable.
>>
File: Ci7V02mXIAAs3eN.jpg (108 KB, 1024x768) Image search: [Google]
Ci7V02mXIAAs3eN.jpg
108 KB, 1024x768
>>75798963
>>
>>75798963
That's a good question. I suppose #I'mWithHer now.
>>
>>75798963
> It's 2016, that whole "innocent until proven guilty" and requiring "evidence" before we convict you in the court of public opinion is just so passe.

HuffPo, not even once.
>>
>>75798963
Agreed Huffpo, let's start with Rapin' Bill Clinton.
>>
>>75798963
She fits the profile of a whorish social climber, thats why.

I mean how many times does this shit have to happen before women like her are laughed at.
>>
>>75799093
Apparently prenup does fuck all in divorce.
>>
>>75798963
Depp is the one being accused, that him being questioned. questioning her is just the other side. it would work the same with the genders reversed.
>>
>>75802063
HOW DARE YOU BRING UP THOSE OLD LIES AND SLANDER FROM THE VAST RIGHT-WING CONSPIRACY!
>>
>>75801933
"Diversity" : "achieved"
>>
>>75802084
I know, courts can basically throw them out because it's "unfair". Just fix divorce courts tobh.
>>
File: 1463426211308.gif (3 MB, 640x266) Image search: [Google]
1463426211308.gif
3 MB, 640x266
>Huffington Post
>Huffington Women

About as credible as Salon or Tumblr.
>>
File: amberheard.webm (281 KB, 1920x1080) Image search: [Google]
amberheard.webm
281 KB, 1920x1080
Because she faked her injuries to get the money
>>
>>75802074
Pretty much everyone is laughing at her, except for tumblr "pansexuals" and the most hardcore internet liberals
>>
>>75798963
Who? and Who?
>>
Only two sites defending her are HuffPaint and NeoFAG
>>
>>75802309
Amazing Amy was a woman with vision. A woman who put effort and pride on her craft, Amber is lazy
>>
>>75802249
or just not get married you fucking moron.
>>
>>75798963
>Why do we scrutinize Amber Heard, but fail to question Johnny Depp?

Because Johnny Depp is Captain Jack Sparrow.
Amber Heard is just some tavern wench he's been fucking on the reg.
>>
>>75802309
Even if Depp did hit her, why does that somehow make her entitled to half or more of his networth? I seriously don't get divorce law.
>>
>be super successful millionaire
>get married and risk the wench running off with half your fortune
Russian oligarchs have figured it out: if the woman gets uppity you feed her to the pigs.
>>
>>75802669
It used to make more sense, but not completely.

Like back in the day, your wife would stay home and cook,clean,take care of kids so that the husband could go and work more and make more money. 10 years later they file divorce, the wife has no prospects cuz she's never had a job , so they give her a stipend to live on.

It's compeltely fucked up now, where the wife doesn't even stay home or clean or cook or any of that shit, they pay some illegal to do it for 4 dollars and hour. Then they divorce at like 25.
It makes even less sense to use the same logic on extreme earners like movie stars.
>>
>>75798963
Because harpies like >>75801933 pic think Depp is good looking. Amber is probably doing it for money though, divorce is a good way of making a living nowadays.
>>
>>75803286

These 'harpies' care more about being feminist wanting to ruin Depp than care about how he looks.
>>
File: Screenshot_20160531-072741.png (386 KB, 1080x1920) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_20160531-072741.png
386 KB, 1080x1920
>>75803472
They're torn man. I've been lurking a disgusting Facebook page just so I can know what their arguments are at any time. Within a few hours, they had 2 completely contradictory posts on the issue.
>Pic 1 here
>>
File: Screenshot_20160531-072750.png (705 KB, 1080x1920) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_20160531-072750.png
705 KB, 1080x1920
>>75803472
>>75803874
>Pic 2/2
>>
>>75798963
I think if a no-name male actor married a rich, established older female actress, then one year in, divorced, demanded $200 million for "time put in" and laughed about it on camera with his gay yoga instructor lover, all while claiming she was "abusive", we'd probably suspect him too.
>>
>>75803874
Depp is HuWhite? I always thought he was a spic.
>>
>>75798963
Because we already know Depp is a huge faggot. His slut was a literal who before this.
>>
Because nobody on earth deserves 200 million dollars over a black eye. The whore can throw a cold steak on it and then cook it for me later.
>>
>>75798963
>HuffBlo
>Not a blog written by jewish women to attack white men
>>
>>75798963
Why do we demonize Johnny Depp based on one person's accusation, but fail to question the motives of Amber Heard?
Thread replies: 38
Thread images: 8

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.