>>75796229

Our society, no?

Their society, yes.

Guess which one they're concerned with.

>>75796229
Depends on their focus. If they focus on the Islamic world. I dont care about facial veils in their countries, but never being allowed to bare witness, getting stoned for being raped and stuff like acid being thrown into women's face is all pretty fucked.

Feminism could also be used to stop the rampant incest there. Beyond that and maybe some isolated cases here and there in the world, feminism is generally bad.

>>75796229
Is this a real question? On /pol/ you ask this?

Of course they are good for our societies anon.

>>75796229
I'm fine with gurl power XD. It's mostly harmless. Let them think they're worldview is worth considering.

Intersectional feminism is the core of modern social justice activism. It was created by black female college students in the 70s and is entirely structured around muh oppression and victimhood. Look at the "leaders" of BLM; fat, middle aged sheboons with an axe to grind.

>>75796912
*Their

>>75796229
Unfortunately the movement has devolved into misandry and feminization.

Basically there is a very large demand for misogyny in the west, but very little supply. So feminists have to manufacture outrage in order to keep their movement relevant.

I am not in favor of current feminists.

>>75796426
>Their society, yes.
They don't have a society, they have no organization short of "This is where I'm at right now, so I'm going to screech."

The way they are portraying feminism is not correct.