1. Open up borders
2. People from around the world flood in to work.
3. They vote for a bigger government.
4. Libertarianism over.
Is this ideology more far fetched than Communism or socialism?
>>75713339
It's controlled opposition. They want us to root for something nonsensical and outlandish rather than trying to fix what we have now. They want to make us disinterested in all the corruption and incompetence. They want us to wish they would go overboard with it so that it will "collapse" and then we would finally have our lolbertarian utopia. But it's not going to happen. They're REALLY good and keeping it working for them.
Why is there not an ideology between conservatism and libertarianism? Like I literally have no issue with some public schools and government roads. Sue me
>>75715875
Because "balance" or "temperance" isn't a very seductive idea. Hence why hypersluts are a thing now. The world only exists as a pendulum continuously swinging between extremes, desperately trying to reach equilibrium but swinging past it every time. Hence, the good times, the peaceful and temperate ones, only last a fleeting moment. And then back to chaos.
>>75715875
That's pretty much classical liberalism.
>>75715875
It's called being a moderate, and the loud fringey bits will always hate you for it
>>75715875
>he doesnt know about the super secret centrists club
>>75715875
Ayo senpai same
People get ancaps and libertarians confused all the time
>>75713339
Yeah it is.
>flood to work
These immigrants disportionately use welfare.
I'm pretty the lowest it gets is 51% welfare usage among non Asian and European immigrants.
UGGHHHUHHUZGG
WHERE IS MY DIAPER ??
>>75715875
>I want to go back 30-40 years ago
>surely that will fix the problem
The slippery slope is not a fallacy. It is a strategy. If you can convience people a little bit of socialism is good cause the roof didn't cave in.... Then you can convience them more is even better.
>>75715875
At least in Canada, they're not dumbass AnCaps who think no government should exist. The main idea is that the federal government has no role in education and roads,
in fact, I'd gladly pay my city for education and roads, but not me, in Edmonton, send money to Ottawa, the idiots in charge bleed away half that money on stupid shit and bureaucrats, who then create shit like in the US like common core
Libertarians don't even want power they are just virtue signalling.
>>75716837
founding fathers FTW
>>75717089
easy, end welfare, it's not governments responsibility to take care of you. We have charities, and I bet if the average American/Canadian kept 25% of their money, going from average effective 45% tax rate down to a good 15-20%, they'd have more money to more effectively save for their retirement, buy health insurance, and donate to charity
The government always spends money less efficiently than the person would
Some people with mental illness or legit disabilities would starve without welfare tho
>>75714575
first post, best post
>>75717542
There should be event-based "boost welfare" that encourages you to find new work and discourages reliance on gibsmedats for sustenance.
I am all for greatly reducing the size of government and the welfare state but not eliminating it for very severe cases like schizophrenics and such
