I'm a Neo-Liberal.
I believe that everyone is born fundamentally equal as a human being
I believe that those who work the hardest will generally have the best rewards for their efforts
I believe that the free market provides the best conditions under which an egalitarian, multicultural world can exist with a minimum of tension, violence, and racial hostility
I believe that the coming techological innovations of things like genetic engineering will eliminate racial differences, and combined with a global economy, will eradicate religious fundamentalism, and erroneous nationalism
There are no great crises in the world, we are in most peaceful period in human history (it's a fact, look it up). There is nothing wrong with our present society and economic conditions. There is no reason to be a socialist, there is no reason to be a reactionary conservative, there is no reason to believe in any conspiracy theories, the world is doing fine.
>>75670748
You postulate that we are all equal.
Explain pic related.
>>75670748
>I believe that everyone is born fundamentally equal as a human being
already fucked up on the first post.
>>75670748
Niggers
>>75670949
>>75670957
>>75670997
I never claimed that there aren't racial differences in the world. That fact is entirely compatible with the entirely different fact that all human beings are fundamentally equal.
I don't believe all people are equal because it isn't true. However I feel everybody deserves dignity until they personally fuck up
who is picture?
>>75670748
>I believe that everyone is born fundamentally equal as a human being
Well, you're wrong. You can see how wrong you arr by looking at any random selection of people.
>>75670748
“If you are in favour of global liberal hegemony, you are the enemy.”
“What we are against will unite us, while what we are for divides us. Therefore, we should emphasise what we oppose. The common enemy unites us, while the positive values each of us are defending actually divides us. Therefore, we must create strategic alliances to overthrow the present order of things, of which the core could be described as human rights, anti-hierarchy, and political correctness – everything that is the face of the Beast, the anti-Christ or, in other terms, Kali-Yuga.”
>>75671109
> fundamentally equal.
Well that cannot be true as you just admitted an inequality in criminal behavior.
Fundamentally equal would mean every aspect is equal, as the foundation of something is the basic building block.
>>75670748
>everyone is born fundamentally equal as a human being
No. Some are born smart, some are born stupid. Some are born healthy, some are born blind, deaf, without arms, legs, etc.
Some are going to be tall , some are going to be short.
Some will have allergies, heart diseases, higher cancer chance.
Some will have na artistic predisposition, some will have athletic.
We are not born equal, everyone is different, everyone hhas a different value for society.
>>75670748
Thanks form making me feel shame for being Irish
At least I'm an O'Brien and not from clearly peasant stock
>>75670748
/lefty/Pol please go.
>>75671109
Can you explain pic related?
>>75671109
if IQ, a genetic trait, isn't fundamental -- then what is?
>>75671209
Looking at any random selection of people would not disprove that all human beings have a fundamental equality. I think you're mistaking that for economic, physical or racial differences, which are entirely different things altogether.
>>75671231
OP just read the word "fundamentally" and wanted to use it. It's the same with "inherently", "systematic", etc. These people are idiots.
>>75671109
You're a retard. How can they be fundamentally equal if they're fundamentally different?
>>75670748
wait a minute...
what is that on her hand?
HOLY SHIT MAN SHES A FUCKING GOA'ULD
DONT FUCKING TRUST HER
>>75671109
>I never claimed that there aren't racial differences in the world. That fact is entirely compatible with the entirely different fact that all human beings are fundamentally equal.
thats not how it works you mongrel... when you are born without legs you are not equal to someone with legs.
Tell me how this is "fundamentally equal"
If you actually mean by the "should have fundamentally the same rights and duties" I could agree, but that again depends on where you are born.
>>75671109
Niggers
>>75671265
Thanks for being a few orders of magnitude less retarded than that faggots OP.
>>75671231
>Fundamentally equal would mean every aspect is equal
That doesn't follow at all.
>>75671265
I think you're mistaking economic, physical or racial differences, which are entirely different things altogether, with something else.
>>75671347
Dignity, status as a subject, and human rights.
>>75670748
What I think this potato bigger meant by fundamentally equal is in the eyes of the law all should be treated equally. Which would make him closer to libertarian than liberal. So he's still a retarded potato nigger that doesn't understand the difference between equality and level playing field
>>75671231
no, as a philosophical proposition, it actually means there is an intrinsic or essential equality that underlies the available observable genetic differences which would otherwise prove inequality were fundamental.
if he did not mean that, then he has not made a rational statement. so, he has either made a rational statement which asserts the existence of a belief system surrounding equality which heretofore did not exist (or which we haven't identified yet because he's doing a shit job at exposition), or, it means he's made a totally irrational and meaningless statement.
let's find out.
>>75671374
>How can they be fundamentally equal if they're fundamentally different?
Nice fallacy of equivocation. You're using two different senses of those terms. One is a fundamental equality in terms of status, the other is a fundamental difference in terms of physical, economic, or racial conditions.
>>75671398
see above
>>75670748
>I believe that everyone is born fundamentally equal as a human being
Then you must be black...
>>75671557
3x not an argument
- dignity is subjective
- status is extant yet much more malleable than the genetic precursors to IQ; there is nothing fundamental about me being middle class, it is an "accident" of my choices in life
- "equal rights" are assigned AFTER the fact of establishing what is fundamental about it; you cannot self-justify.
>>75671557
Right.
Explain yourself now.
>>75671612
>it actually means there is an intrinsic or essential equality
hm...
Sounds like a big stinky pile of bullshit.
>>75670748
>I believe that the free market provides the best conditions under which an egalitarian, multicultural world can exist with a minimum of tension, violence, and racial hostility
Well those beliefs have already been proven false.
>>75671597
>Which would make him closer to libertarian than liberal.
Neo-Liberals are libertarians, though.
>the difference between equality and level playing field
The difference is that a level playing field is completely unnecessary in a healthy economy and in fact impinges on the fundamental liberties and rights of other human beings.
>>75671682
>status
>ˈsteJtəs
>noun
>1.
>relative social or professional position; standing.
nigga you have no clue what you are talking about.
"Status" is defined by economic, physical, racial etc. conditions.
>>75671714
rare
>>75671929
>Neo-Liberals are libertarians, though.
Stop posting.
Neoliberals are pseudo-communists.
>>75670748
"Equality" is an attempt to destroy "legal equality" just like making everything a "right" ruins the Constitution.
>>75671796
>dignity is subjective
Not radically so, the existence of human rights demonstrates that an adequate consensus exists in order to provide a functional and binding universal conception of dignity.
>status is extant yet much more malleable than the genetic precursors to IQ; there is nothing fundamental about me being middle class, it is an "accident" of my choices in life
I'm not referring to your financial status, though
>- "equal rights" are assigned AFTER the fact of establishing what is fundamental about it; you cannot self-justify.
How is that self-justification?
>>75671840
read the other posts I've made in this thread if you still haven't understood the difference and get back to me citing those things which you couldn't follow.
>>75671861
How so?
Cool post, faggot. Suicide when?
>>75670748
>I believe that everyone is born fundamentally equal as a human being
>I believe genetic engineering will eliminate racial differences
Nigger are you sane???
>>75672093
>Neoliberals are pseudo-communists.
They are the antithesis of communists.
>>75670748
>sigh
>it never ends
Everyone is born equally in what way?
Economically, Politically? specify or your opinion is invalid for vagueness.
>I believe that those who work the hardest will generally have the best rewards for their efforts
Life isn't fair. Some of the best, most devoted human beings die young of cancer.
>I believe that the free market provides the best conditions under which an egalitarian, multicultural world can exist with a minimum of tension, violence, and racial hostility
Define Free Market. There's a million interpretations.
>I believe that the coming techological innovations of things like genetic engineering will eliminate racial differences, and combined with a global economy, will eradicate religious fundamentalism, and erroneous nationalism
Doesn't matter. Factions are a way of nature and we'll find ways to compete and kill for other reasons.
>There are no great crises in the world, we are in most peaceful period in human history (it's a fact, look it up). There is nothing wrong with our present society and economic conditions. There is no reason to be a socialist, there is no reason to be a reactionary conservative, there is no reason to believe in any conspiracy theories, the world is doing fine.
If you believe in equality how do you not see whats wrong with the left wing pseudo-fascist?
How do you not see what's wrong with Islamic extremism or minority aggression?
I don't think you thought this through, desu.
>>75671986
Thanks Austria, you get what I'm saying.
>>75670748
>I believe that everyone is born fundamentally equal as a human being
you are equal to a nigger , that's your problem
Such a society could only work with Europeans and East-Asians.
Subhuman spics, niggers, and sandniggers with an IQ of 80 will ruin everything.
They are the reason for tension, violence, and racial hostility.
>>75670748
>I believe that everyone is born fundamentally equal as a human being
>>75671557
>I think you're mistaking economic, physical or racial differences, which are entirely different things altogether, with something else.
Mistaking with what ? I think you are mistaking reality with your kumbaya equality dream.
I'm al for equality in a face of law. The problem is that leftists want to flip it upside down and claim everyone is the same but some people should have different rights and be treated differently because of color of their skin, gender etc.
>>75672093
>Neoliberals are pseudo-communists.
No-one refers to people like Friedrich Hayek or Milton Friedman, the most paradigmatic neoliberals, as pseudo-communists.
>>75672187
>everyone is equal
>everything is equal
>all cultures are equal
>lets distribute wealth to become more equal
Right absolutely no trace of communism here.
>>75672164
I presented you two things which point out scientifically proven differences between groups of humans.
You only bothered responding to one, which what I assume was a confession that humans are inequal in some measure.
But you postulate that we are all "fundamentally equal".
I request you explain to me your cognitive dissonance.
>>75672187
lel
They promote cultural marxism , "everyone equals everyone" "we are all humans" , neo liberals are capitalist hippies
>>75670949
>papa new guinea is black
>Neo-liberal
So you're pro-Free Market???
>>75672187
>>75672376
Nevermind we aren't speaking politically.
Economically that is correct that neo-liberals are not communists.
Thought we were using flashy terms for 1990s onwards "liberals" in contemporary politics.
Everyone should be treated with respect and dignity unless shown otherwise. This collectivist view of tarnishing all niggers or people you don't like with a huge ass brush is retarded and has no place in a society reared on ideals of Western Civilization and Greco-Roman culture.
You cucks obsess over race and your own culture while contributing nothing.
>>75670748
Good for you, faggot. KYS
>>75672164
Your neoliberal ideology has resulted in a massive rise in poverty, crime, and racial tensions and people are now starting to reject neo liberalism, as a result, especially in America, demonstrated by the popularity of Trump.
>>75672376
But it is pseudo-communism.
>globalist
>totally oblivious to things like culture while praising ''multiculturalism''
>materialist
>believe free trade is something that's non-negotiable
>creates an idol out of concepts, like free market, despite the fact free market as envisioned by them arguably failed
Not to mention other things that aren't strictly neoliberal but inevitably follow neoliberalism.
>>75672193
>Economically, Politically? specify or your opinion is invalid for vagueness.
Read my other posts in this thread where I specify that.
>Life isn't fair. Some of the best, most devoted human beings die young of cancer.
What's your point? Note that I used the term "generally", not "always".
>Define Free Market. There's a million interpretations.
The family resemblance of conceptions used in Economics. Please refer to the relevant literature if you're not familiar with them, because I'm not here to do that.
> Factions are a way of nature and we'll find ways to compete and kill for other reasons.
I never said that the world will be a utopia, just that racial differences and religious fundamentalism will effectively be eradicated.
>If you believe in equality how do you not see whats wrong with the left wing pseudo-fascist?
What's wrong with them?
>How do you not see what's wrong with Islamic extremism or minority aggression?
They're irrational positions that will be eliminated by the things I've cited above?
>>75672335
>The problem is that leftists want to flip it upside down and claim everyone is the same but some people should have different rights and be treated differently because of color of their skin, gender etc.
I don't see the problem insofar as those rights don't violate the liberties of others.
>>75672596
>This collectivist view of tarnishing all niggers or people you don't like with a huge ass brush is retarded and has no place in a society reared on ideals of Western Civilization and Greco-Roman culture.
Sorry mate but the Western-Greco-Roman-etc. cultural value of Truth is a lot more valuable than your communist ideals
The truth that most niggers are pieces of shit
>>75670748
You're just this pic.
>>75672416
Cultural Marxism is a meme promoted to trick idiots into equating socialism with multiculturalism when it's the capitalists who are behind it.
>>75672919
>They're irrational positions that will be eliminated
How? What things have you cited?
If anything, second generation of Muslims in West is MORE radical than their parents.
How can you be so detached from reality?
And this focus on evil religion, God, where have we seen that...
As always, people adhering to -isms aim at the foundations of society: culture, religion, tradition, family, law, morals.
>>75670748
Fuck off kike
>>75670748
There are innate differences in different humans predisposing them to different activities. Olympic sprint is won by kenyans, pingpong by east asians and strongman contests by russia/eastern europeans. "Everybody being equal" is either a truism in most general of senses (everyone is a human) or it leads to pathologies.
As long as you pursue interests you're strong at
Free market is not a stable state when corporations attempt monopolies and weed out competition by enforcing prices/supply out of their ass. You'd have to enforce it in some way (government having monopoly on markets???)
Will it be publically available and affordable to average citizen, keeping in mind it requires a specialised personnel to do it case-by-case unlike other industries like microwave production or GPS?
Various modern/progressive phenomena like rising divorce rates, gender identities and hikikomoris mirror observations Calhoun made on rat populations as they peak in population density in closed area with unlimited resources. Interestingly enough all of them quickly went extinct by themselves. We are nearing a social/cultural crisis as modern societies dwindle. Ancient Rome had a ruling empress(male) with a husband and entire country almost crumbled not a generation after.
>>75670748
>I believe that everyone is born fundamentally equal as a human being
You would be wrong.
IQ, Race, and adoption studies blow blank slate to smithereens.
>>75672770
>globalist
What's wrong with this?
>totally oblivious to things like culture while praising ''multiculturalism''
Neo-liberal society provides for both insofar as it has a framework for respecting the rights and dignities of various cultures without imposing one on the other. You can propagate your culture as much as you want insofar as you don't violate anyone's freedom.
>materialist
I.E. in correspondence with the physical sciences? This is supposed to be a criticism?
>believe free trade is something that's non-negotiable
It's fundamental, but certainly negotiable in terms of the role the state has in providing an environment in which free trade can occur.
>creates an idol out of concepts, like free market, despite the fact free market as envisioned by them arguably failed
What does "arguably" specify here?
>>75673409
How about you explain to me why I should accept having my formerly White European country polluted by muslim immigrants?
What is your objection to my desire to have a 99.5% homogeneous White nation?
>>75672164
not sure what you mean by "status" or "status as a subject" then.
you said
>I believe that everyone is born fundamentally equal as a human being
well, "human rights" are just different words for the same thing -- yet rights are a legal construction.
the founding fathers who signed the declaration of independence wrote
>that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,
so they did not write that all men are "fundamentally equal," they wrote that men are to be treated equal before the law. you are thus associating, even equating, the meaning of "fundamental" with/to the relationship that exists between man and government.
IQ proves, without a doubt, that intelligence is demonstrably not at all equal trait of humanity, yet it is something that is genetic. this is what is actually fundamental about us. we don't exactly argue that you are wrong about men being equal before the law, only that you're looking to supplant our actual humanity as individuals with a contract version of ourselves and the state by conflating these ideas, probably by misusing "fundamental" in your statement.
>>75673409
>What's wrong with this?
>>75673409
>What's wrong with this?
You dreaming about it, nothing.
Neoliberals enforcing globalism via various means, everything.
I'm not American. I don't want to be American. If I valued same things they do, I would move to America. Why is this hard to understand?
>as it has a framework for respecting the rights and dignities of various cultures
There is no such thing. Radically different cultures can't coexist in same area. One will have to give way.
Multiculturalism never existed without one culture dominating another. Multiculturalism like in modern age always led to disaster.
>This is supposed to be a criticism?
You don't know what materialism means do you?
>It's fundamental
Exactly. Why?
Why would X country be forced to open it's market to Y country?
Why would I let foreign corporations dominate my country?
>What does "arguably" specify here?
Wealth increased, but look at the manner it increased. It also led to many social ills and problems that are continuously pushed under carpet.
>>75673618
in short i mean you are effectively saying "everyone is fundamentally equal because everyone has human rights" but both halves of this logical proposition are actually consequences of something else.
because of X, we can argue that everyone is equal (in some way). because of X, everyone has human rights.
this thing X is MORE fundamental than where you toss it in. and if you were to ask an american who has not betrayed his founders, that thing X is the Creator, and the fact that man is Created.
>>75670748
>I believe that everyone is born fundamentally equal as a human being
Is that why you included an image of a woman with your post who does not even respect her own body.
>>75673324
>"Everybody being equal" is either a truism in most general of senses (everyone is a human)
Can you explain how the provision of dignity and basic human rights is a truism?
>Free market is not a stable state when corporations attempt monopolies and weed out competition by enforcing prices/supply out of their ass. You'd have to enforce it in some way (government having monopoly on markets???)
Of course, but only enforcement as little as possible.
>Various modern/progressive phenomena like rising divorce rates, gender identities and hikikomoris mirror observations Calhoun made on rat populations as they peak in population density in closed area with unlimited resources.
Yes, I've seen the ms paint image. Given the fact that we are, as has been proven, in the most overall peaceful and affluent period in human history, your varius examples are anything but damning.
Also, considering how much of a collective cesspool the various Slavic cultures under communism were, you should be happy that there is now an open market under which you can all freely peddle your horrible, inferior doggerel on a global stage. Then again, however, I suppose most of you would rather return to some pseudo-feudal type state, in spite of the fact that you would be more generally affluent in a free market, probably because most of you were bred to be serfs.
>>75673409
>>75670748
One final question to you OP, as you seem to be ignoring me for whatever reason.
How does your ideology explain the follow differences in GDP in the nations in pic related:
>>75670748
>There is nothing wrong with our present society and economic conditions. There is no reason to be a socialist
remind me what's the ireland's debt and how you are not state with broad socialist programs?
>>75674183
What are basic human rights? You mean those defined by UN Conventions?
>but only enforcement as little as possible
You'll find few people who argue government should intervene as much as possible.
>in the most overall peaceful and affluent period in human history
Again, materialism. You can't comprehend that money isn't everything, nor is peace.
>how much of a collective cesspool the various Slavic cultures under communism were
Exactly. So Slavs are wary of another pseudo-communist ideology.
>there is now an open market
Which led to everything being bought by Westerners. In fact, opposite happened. Local industries collapsed and we're flooded by Western goods. Which are of inferior quality compared to those sold in West.
>most of you were bred to be serfs
Exactly. Most of us were bred to be serfs, most of you were bred so you could starve from potato famine. To each his own.
>>75673758
>I'm not American. I don't want to be American. If I valued same things they do, I would move to America. Why is this hard to understand?
If most people do, and it is evident that they do given the prevalence and endorsement of American culture on a global stage, then they have a right to be so. Likewise, if Montenegran culture were to have a global demand (which you absolutely irrelevant losers will never have), then so be it. You are free to remain culturally Montenegran insofar you don't impinge upon the liberties of others, and others are free to become American insofar as they don't impinge on your liberty.
>There is no such thing. Radically different cultures can't coexist in same area. One will have to give way.
That's only speculation on your part. True multiculturalism with a libertarian, free market society enforces moderation across different cultures, which in turn promotes tolerance, progress and affluence.
>>75674183
Legal equality is the basis of civilization. Conflating it with what just happens to be the official goal of revolutionary Marxism is, you must admit, a little suspicious.
>>75670748
>born fundamentally equal as a human being
That's where you're wrong
>>75674707
>True multiculturalism
Doesn't exist.
It has been proven that groups segregate themselves, among animals and among humans.
Do you think islamic ghettos in Europe sprung up because of magic?
You're avoiding all of my arguments (which is funny) and then keep posting these abstract postulations "BUT IN TRUE LIBERTARIANISM!!"
Lol..
>>75670748
ebin meme
>>75674707
>If most people do
Most people don't know what they want, especially when they are confused by propaganda.
>given the prevalence and endorsement of American culture on a global stage
American culture of hedonism and consumerism is not sustainable. What follows it is a rude awakening.
>if Montenegran culture were to have a global demand
Well there's not ''Montenegrin'' culture, we're in reality Serbs, so Serb culture, which is a part of broader Orthodox culture. But I don't want that. I want my culture here. I don't want to force my culture onto others who don't live in Orthodox countries.
>You are free
Nope, you aren't free, because fundamental aspects of culture are replaced and torn down because they don't follow ''modern'' standards.
Meanwhile, various sorts of decadent trends prevail.
When you poison people, and then employ propaganda to keep them poisoned, people don't know what they want. They're confused.
>you don't impinge upon the liberties of others
Liberty can only be enjoyed within a certain framework. Beyond that, liberty is not sustainable.
>others are free to become American
If they go to America, yes. There's always that option.
>That's only speculation on your part.
Nope, many such examples in history. Starting with Rome.
>True multiculturalism
Reeks of True Communism™
>enforces moderation
Why would you enforce moderation? My home, my rules. Get out. This is a pretty libertarian concept, isn't it? Only on a bigger scale. Why are you against it?
>tolerance, progress
Why should I be tolerant of something that's foreign to me and possibly dangerous?
For example, Islam. Why should I be tolerant of Islam? It's a foreign aggressive expansionist ideology.
>progress
Running towards a cliff is also progress. Progress is a meaningless word. In social matters, it can't be quantified.
That's why I spoke about materialism earlier on. You people desperately try to quantify everything.
>>75674707
You're absolutely deluded. Islam doesn't promote affluence, progress or tolerance. Where do you live in Ireland? A place mostly untouched by immigration. Come and live in London for a year and see how the multicultural free market utopia is panning out. FYI, it's a complete mess.
If you're not a shill (which I think you are) then you're hopelessly naive.
>>75674578
Which led to everything being bought by Westerners. In fact, opposite happened. Local industries collapsed and we're flooded by Western goods. Which are of inferior quality compared to those sold in West.
A momentary Intermission, please. I'd like briefly translate this statement into objective terminology:
>Which led to everything being bought by entrepreneurs with the most capital (and therefore the most wealth to inject into a society). In fact, opposite happened. Lower capital industries were overtaken by those capable of meeting greater demand and we're flooded by goods are more demanded. Which will steadily rise in quality given greater accumulation of wealth and steady increase in demand (remember, our eastern-bloc shithole stopped being communist in a relatively short period of time, but I'm such a short-sighted peasant that I think our economy should be instantly equivalent to a long-established free market economy like the US's).
>>75671127
https://secretgarden.findrow.com/
>>75675356
But that's not True Multiculturalism®
>>75675504
>entrepreneurs with the most capital
Exactly. Those people are foreigners, and on top of that powerful foreigners. For example, they don't care if something happens to the land they come to. They can always move their wealth away. Rootless cosmopolitans.
>Lower capital industries
Domestic industries, owned by locals, employing locals.
>should be instantly equivalent
Of course not. Nothing comes instantly. But taking down your pants and getting dominated by foreigners is an awful option, in exchange for some scraps.
>but I'm such a short-sighted peasant
And you're a cosmopolitan intellectual who believes in utopia.
Let me be a short-sighted peasant, and you can build your utopia outside of my home.
Let's see where each ends up in a few decades.
>>75675892
Dude...
I think it's time to give up desu.
He hasn't bothered responding to my posts and with you he is resorting to barrages of ad homs which (you guessed it! aren't arguments).
>>75676217
I don't care even if he's trolling. People like this actually exist you know.
>>75670748
wow, can't wait for you to take the mark of the beast.
>I believe that everyone is born fundamentally equal as a human being
Genetics say otherwise.
>>75674707
There's a religious and cultural war when and where two religions and cultures meet. What is one mans truth is another mans poison.
And with the clash of western culture and Christianity versus middle eastern culture and Islam it's silly to talk of giving pestilence a place in the sun.
History has proven that multiculturalism and globalization does not work. It will lead to war and death.
You have a infantile notion that scientific progress is equal in some way to human progress. There's no such thing as human progress. We are what we have always been. A Romans thoughts and dreams are the same as a 14th century Prussian or a 21st century French. Having an iPhone doesn't make you more advanced than Attila the Hun.
You need to stop shitposting on pol and read some books before you commit suicide
>>75676217
They do. I'm one of them as well. I too have watched Star Trek and have read my John Locke and Adam Smith. Keep it up Irelandbro, you're starting to frighten them.
> mfw someone is actually responding to the tantrum wailing with academic rigor and defining his fucking terms.
>>75675504
Why are you doing this Irelandbro, you just wake up this morning and say to yourself, "golly I just read something inspiring by Eamon De Valera and think I'll go on /pol/ and get raked over the coals by the unwashed?"
>>75670748
>I believe that everyone is born fundamentally equal as a human being
>I believe that those who work the hardest will generally have the best rewards for their efforts
>I believe that the free market provides the best conditions under which an egalitarian, multicultural world can exist with a minimum of tension, violence, and racial hostility
Sounds like you're a conservative to me. Oh except this part
> and combined with a global economy, will eradicate religious fundamentalism, and erroneous nationalism
There will be no free market in a one world government silly, you will be a slave without a nation.
Welcome to /pol/ enjoy the redpill
>>75676723
Sorry meant to link to your post Montinegro. Not Austria.
>>75670748
Biggest reason why I care about homogeneity of European countries and its lebensraum in the New World is beauty of White art and physical beauty of White Race. I need no criminal statistics or science to say "uglglies, get out".
>>75670748
>I am *something*
>I believe *some shit*
>I believe *some other shit*
> ...
>I believe *n-th other shit*
You've gotta be seriously autistic to think anybody on this board cares about your special snowflake beliefs. I didn't even read what you said or look up whatever the hell a "Neo-Liberal" is.
It helps to have some facts or an actual point, jagoff.
>>75673047
It isn't "the capitalists". Monopolies thrive the less free a market is. A large state allows them to thwart competitors with regulation and high taxes that they themselves can bypass. The globalists basically want socialism on a regional scale and crony capitalism/state sanctioned monopolies for themselves.
Look at how the EU is run for a model of this. Companies like Facebook and Twitter are the ones running the EU, through their proxies in the "EU executive. Cultural marxism is just a tool to break down society to make it more malleable. If there are no standards, no traditions, no morals, people will be okay with anything, even a total removal of their rights.
>>75671265
You're statements favor the left-wing ideology
>The unfortunate, the lame or the poor need to be helped to become equal
We should all be equal at birth. What happens next it's not anyone's business but our own.
>>75675356
To be fair you don't have anything close to a free market in Britain or any country belonging to the EU. This guy is full of shit, he doesn't give a damn about free markets, sovereignty, or people's rights. Sounds like he is in a cult, tbhfam.
>>75670748
>I believe that everyone is born fundamentally equal as a human being
This is not true. Some people are born with birth defects. Some have better genes than others. I am a strong believer in the good of eugenics for improving health and intellectual aptitude.
>I believe that those who work the hardest will generally have the best rewards for their efforts
This is unfortunately untrue in the real world.
>I believe that the free market provides the best conditions under which an egalitarian, multicultural world can exist with a minimum of tension, violence, and racial hostility.
Sorry, but it's been proven that a segregated society thrives the best. Multiculturalism causes racial hostility in any environment.
>I believe that the coming techological innovations of things like genetic engineering will eliminate racial differences
So you want to kill off the "inferior" races? It's not surprising since you liberals are all closet racists. I want to preserve diversity, not destroy it just so that people who naturally don't get along someday will. What do you do when you can't get along with someone? You avoid them. Let people segregate for the good of society. This suicidal Multiculturalism is nothing more than the veiled attempt by the Jews to destroy all people of the Earth except for their own.
>>75678229
>I too have watched Star Trek
(You)
>>75678229
> get raked over the coals by the unwashed?"
>anyone who disagrees with me is an unwashed pleb
>star trek
This is pretty good b8, well done.
>>75670748
>I believe that everyone is born fundamentally equal as a human being
So you're irrationally, pathetically, anti-scientifically deluded
HAHAHAHAHA but no, I know you're just lying
>>75670748
>I'm a Neo-Liberal.
>>75670748
>I'm a Neo-Liberal
my thoughs before reading more: stupid naive brainwashed idealist
my thoughts after reading the whole op: stupid naive brainwashed idealist
>>75672335
>I'm al for equality in a face of law. The problem is that leftists want to flip it upside down and claim everyone is the same but some people should have different rights and be treated differently because of color of their skin, gender etc.
exactly.
what they want is reverse racism, not what they're really saying.
>>75679076
Now I'm just confused. Are you saying that I am the same person as the Irish guy? Didn't your post itself say that people like us exist? Perhaps even two in the same thread?
>>75678915
It's simple. Leftists and collectivists want equality of outcome, libertarians, right wingers and the like, want equality of opportunity.
>>75680113
In an ideal world both would be possible, but neither are possible in the world as it is now.
>>75670748
>There is no reason to be a socialist,
>there is no reason to be a reactionary conservative,
>there is no reason to believe in any conspiracy theories,
>the world is doing fine.
>the world is doing fine.
>the world is doing fine.
Who you trying to convince here m8? Us? Or you?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=44vzMNG2fZc
>>75670748
>I'm a Neo-Liberal.
Only leftists shills use this term. False flag
>>75680113
>equality of opportunity.
http://inductivist.blogspot.com/2016/05/which-american-groups-are-most-race.html?spref=tw
Alt-righters know that in practice "equality of opportunity" means letting niggers and mudslimes into white institutions who turn around and fuck over and backstab the whites who let them in for the sake of their in-group, because nobody aside from white people ever got recruited to the merchant racial togetherness agenda
>>75681144
Don't get me wrong, equality of opportunity is great - among white people and other white people.
But niggers really don't need equal opportunity to come in and trash everything
In solidarity with Ireland OP and our inevitable globalist future, I shall now start posting high test.
>>75670748
>There is nothing wrong with our present society and economic conditions
>https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/reading-between-the-headlines/201305/white-middle-age-suicide-in-america-skyrockets
ITT: Merchants literally admit that they find nothing wrong with white genocide
I have less if this than I thought.
>>75670748
tl;dr... Fap material derailed it for me.
the irish are good goys
sauce for OP's pic?
Who is it?
>>75681361
>posting the shopped version
>>75670748
I clicked on this, read a little bit and thought "why hasn't this turned into a milf thread?". But then I realized I clicked /pol/ instead of /b/ and you guys actually talk about shit. At least the source for that image was easy to find.
