Is agnosticism pol approved?
- Home
- Board: /pol/ - Politically Incorrect
- Reading: Is agnosticism pol approved?
Is agnosticism pol approved?
It's impossible to say for sure.
>>75308995
listen straya, all ideologies and beliefs can and probably will be expressed here, and while you may find a handful of anon you might agree with you, many will likely out shitpost even the likes of you.
>>75308995
You sure that isn't a Star Trek emblem?
>>75308995
"MAYBE"
>>75308995
>pol is one person
As long as you're not an idiot who thinks it's a middle-man/mutually-exclusive.
>>75308995
No, agnosticism is the way of beta cowards. On /pol/ you can only either be a pious crusader or go full fedora.
>>75309178
Underrated post
Laughed
10/10
>>75308995
Agnosticism when used as an answer to "belief" is nothing more than a meme, a way to dodge the question while retaining amiability with both sides.
>>75310390
>can only go crusader or fedora
Pull a varg
>>75308995
Not only is it /pol/ approved, but it's /pol/ policy and is mandatory.
The god question is so irrelevant and it's extremely stupid to even ponder such garbage.
>>75310511
>Do you believe in X?
>"I can't tell whether or not I believe in something"
Doesn't that in in and of itself implies you do not believe in X? Belief is a positive position, lack of belief is a neutral position.
>>75309178
First post best post, sage for no other response topping this one.
