Here's an Idea I've had in the back of my head for a while:
We should support de-anonymization of the internet, which leftists are trying to do anyway, and there's pretty much no way to fight it.
Not in the sense of every 4chan shitpost doxing yourself to strangers, but in the sense that employers, and potential or current marriage partners shod be able to request the employee's or mate's full internet history. Same with parents and children .
Feminists already want to do this to shame racists, mysogynists, and conservatives. But hear me out: this will backfire and actually work to shame feminists, fight degeneracy and give men more power.
This can be used both ways. Women will use it to check for porn addicts and other degenerates, but at the same time, men can prevent hypocrisy by requesting the same of their women. Suddenly every slut on Tinder and Tumblrina will be instantly known and rejected.
In terms of employment, yes libtard companies might use it to not hire "intolerant" employees, but this will force men who have no stand for this shit to only work for companies that support their interests, or work for themselves / make their own businesses. Like people will end up with like, and the all libtard ones will eventually go to shit and be unproductive.
And this should be applied to government jobs too. No more hypocrisy. It will be known now if someone who claims to be redpilled is secretely fapping to hentai or cuck porn. But at the same time it will root out "traditional wives" who are fucking Chad and Tyrone.
De-anonymizing the internet in this way is a win-win, it's too bad 4chan will never realize this because most are degenerates who cling to the mask. And for those who oppose an idea like this, it's fucking inevitable that the Left will force it on us anyway so we should think of how to use it to our advantage.
Do not want
>>75093349
The Internet is the ultimate libertarian shithole.
I like it as it is. Give too much power to governments: big brother ensues. Total removal of privacy and the possibility of tracking everything in order to judge someone for reasons that do not have nothing to do with committed crimes is Big Brother tier thought crime.
You are a damn degenerate.
>>75093349
Sorry, Stalin
>>75093349
FUCK OFF REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>75093920
This isn't about government surveillance. This isn't proposing a strict ban on any kind of speech or content.
It's a decentralized solution. the law could even prevent the government from having access to the histories, only the spouse or employer requesting it. Again, I didn't suggest strangers on sites like these should be open for everyone to read the history of. Only those engaging in a long-term real-life contract would be able to do it.
The other thing I'm pointing out is this is an inevitability. Unless we're politicians, or NSA and FBI insiders who can to destroy the system, it will only get worse.
The best people like us can do is use such a system to our own advantage. Maybe the left will get sick of what it exposes and actually go back to wanting freedom again.
>potential or current marriage partners shod be able to request mate's full internet history.
Are you insane? Im going to have to burn this computer when I am done with it.
>>75093349
so like total transparency, huh?
it would just prove how humanity is fucked
also would be used against masses as elites would not use not be scanned
imagine compulsory google glasses from the birth and your whole life recorded, everything you have ever said, you can rewind it and watch again nice moments in the evening
....
no
>>75094389
Well you would have to either find a woman who doesn't care, or just admit to them you've been a degenerate and could change. But the same standard will apply to her. You'll be able to see everything she's browsed for the past x number of years and either accept her flaws, or reject her .
>>75094531
Obviously this would be abused like you say. My idea is hypothetical, but you also have to remember that liberals are already pushing for a version of what I'm saying and we need to prepare for ways to use it against them.
>>75094291
'What the eyes don't see, the heart doesn't grieve over.'
Sometimes it's best to not know things about your S.O. or loved ones if they love you anyway.
>>75094989
You're probably right. This idea goes against my own intuition and I certainly am uncomfortable with it, but somehow I have the fear that it's gonna happen anyway and it could be good if done properly. Thing is, the /pol/ack up there was right that it's probably a slippery slope into abuse. It's just that I'm starting to see the dangers of unrestricted "freedom" in the modern age especially when it comes to things like porn for men and social media for women. And I'm just thinking what might actually play out in the future and this seems like the best we could do with the cards we're given.
>>75095314
Freedom regulates itself. One is free to do shit and they're free to face the social consequences. Lefties will know it in the near future when their ideas will change with age, and their facebook selves will still haunt them in HR departments when they will look for promotions or jobs.
>>75095705
The thing is, it might work out in jobs /markets, but I can't think of anything that will fix the family. Modern communications have utterly destroyed social and intimate relations and child rearing. And you and I both know that nobody will ever come to power in the West who would just ban porn or other subversive media out of genuine concern for the people.
I certainly recognize that it was all better before the Internet, when these things required going out of the house and doing something shameful in real life, and it regulated itself. But again, un-inventing the internet is also never going to happen. I think at the very least something like My proposal has to be available to parents for their children's connections and especially phones.
>>75094582
Women just watch lesbian porn, that hasn't cut it for me since I was seventeen.
This would disproportionately affect more men negatively than it ever would women, why the fuck would men ever want this?
>>75096344
Porn isn't the only issue. You'll be able to see if she's cheating or was involved in Tinder or other related shit. You will basically know if she's a slut pretending to be innocent. Plus, she makes the choice, not the government, and a lot of women would possibly accept your habits.
The point is that a system like I described would encourage both men and women to be less degenerate if they have any sort of values and want a partner as conservative as them. If they don't care then it shouldn't matter anyway, but there would be no hypocrisy.
>>75094531
There is a black mirror episode about that called "The Entire History of You"
>>75096703
The problem with my idea is of course that as technology advances it could be come an abomination. I'm just imagining it with text data of internet histories, nothing more. What happens in real-life privacy remains private. I'm probably being too idealistic to realize that it would probably turn into some freakish things like
>>75094531
describes.
>>75096114
Is porn subversive? It has always existed since day 0. I think today is better than yesterday regarding porn: in the past, people went great lenghts to acquire porn that had that 'illegal' adrenalinic flavor to have. Like drugs. Look at the Muslim countries, porn is banned and they live in porn. I suggest you to look at porn research statistics in Muslim countries, where porn is banned.
>>75096929
Really, go on Google trends, look for 'porn', then look at the ranking and remember porn is an english word.
>>75097471
There are countless stories of thousands of men's sex lives being ruined by high-speed internet porn. Porn has normalized unnatural sex acts, premarital sex and promiscuity. I won't claim to be uncorrupted by porn, but there's no question that porn is subversive and degenerate. But I agree that a ban simply won't work at this point, especially since women's "liberation" is just as degrading to society as porn and it's part of the reason men get so sucked into porn in the first place. It's a chicken and egg issue.
>>75097716
OR better, look for 'xxx' on google trends. It will blow your mind.
>>75097716
I never agreed that Muslim countries are pure just because they ban porn. Of course not, and it's not like it's enforced well anyways. But I do think that some of the stuff about Muslims being hyper-perverted actually was heightened by exposure to internet porn. They're impulsive brown people used to real sex, unlike whites who just become weak shutins because Western society is feminized, shitskins actually go out and imitate porn in real life.
>>75097840
At least some people in our generation are starting to learn the side effects of porn and promiscuity.
>>75097840
Men got their lives ruined by porn not because of porn itself but because they are degenerates. A sane man will live his life normally even if porn is omnipresent around him because he can control himself.
Look for 'pussy' on google trends. All sexually frustrated countries.
>>75098339
that's a bullshit argument, because most men can't control themselves. This has been true for all of human history and it's why libertarianism is as much of a pointless pipe dream as communism.
If Trump wins, I will feel safe taking off the Anon mask and putting my name next to this stuff.
Men in the past were less degenerate mostly because degeneracy had greater physical consequences, because of lack of technology and state/corporate comforts and security measures. And because they were shamed by smaller, more limited communities. This doesn't work anymore with the Internet which is why I thought of my idea in the first place.
>>75098468
You clearly misread the OP. Nowhere did I say that I want every anonymous poster to use their real face everywhere online. Only that their history is recorded (preferably encrypted to third parties) and can be vetted by employers and/or spouses if they want.
>>75093349
>
Not in the sense of every 4chan shitpost doxing yourself to strangers, but in the sense that employers, and potential or current marriage partners shod be able to request the employee's or mate's full internet history
Get a load of this guy
>>75098449
Degenerates are scum, and if most men are degenerates who see boobs then have to jerk off/rape something, the they are scum and no right to live. Thank God western Law exists. Ask yourself why the most sexually degenerated countries (endemic rape) are not those 'sexually liberated'. Sweden does not count because Somalians rape people, not Swedes.
>>75098925
I can be almost sure that America is the most degenerated sexually country on earth today. It's just that they have porn and entertainment as a surrogate , and women's liberation means that men's degeneracy is kept locked inside and they're too pussy to act out in real life, except for women, rich people and nogs/spics
>>75099139
So you say Americans are more prone to rape and violence against women than Somalians, Iraqis and all the Muslim scum that roams Europe?
>>75099508
No, I say they're more prone to degenerate thoughts and habits, even though they act more civil. They have the most cognitive dissonance.
