>WE ARE ALL ONE, RACE IS A SOCIAL CONSTRUCT, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS "WHITENESS"., ONLY THE HUMAN RACE
>FUCKING WHITE MALE, CHECK YOUR WHITE PRIVILEGE SCUM, WE NEED RACIAL QUOTAS AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
Explain this, /pol/
>>74956732
How do you explain something that has no logic?
>>74956732
>arguing with Insanity
>insanity has no goal
>>74956732
The best insult for creeps like that thing in the picture is any version of:
You only get white children if you breed white with white.
Vary it as needed (e.g. you get more white children if you breed white with white,) but stick to the original often to verbally kick them in the rainbow baby maker.
>>74956732
The nature of humans has a lot of cruelty and oppression in it. This is just another form of it, albeit forced to lie under the guise of words they don't understand/invented and twisted to suit their needs.
>>74956732
>there is no such thing as "whiteness"
They have never said this
>>74958538
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q90kmUbEv7c
Yes, if you believe race is a social construct then you don't believe in such thing as a white race.
>>74956732
God Big Red is such a trigger.
And a leftist feminist uggo.
Leftists suck ass.
http://northwestfront.org/2016/05/radio-free-northwest-may-19th-2016/
Go to 8:00 and listen to Adam Corolla discuss why honest, law-abiding white people are going for Trump.
Definitely worth a listen.
>>74958830
They don't really believe in whites as a race. They believe in "whiteness" as a qualifier that confers privilege.
They believe race is a social construct, they just believe that social construct had a lot of value because "muh selective history + muh feelings"
>>74956732
To be fair, there is no biological basis in 'races'. But whiteness privileged comes from American whites always getting a better hand than minorities in employment, university etc.
>>74959275
>They don't really believe in whites as a race. They believe in "whiteness" as a qualifier that confers privilege.
>you have white skin that makes you privileged
>yet there is no white race that would enable said privilege
Hmm lots of Jews have white skin- do they have white privilege? What about the Irish who were discriminated by the British despite white skin?
>>74960081
White privilege definitely seems like an American idea. Considering white working class were/are discriminated against by white upper class.
>there is no biological basis in 'races'
I look at Africa and disagree. IQ tests also point to big disparity between races. (with Asians usually at the top, is there Asian privilege?)
>>74956732
>Ran through a stop sign yesterday going 10 mph over the speed limit while not wearing a seat belt.
>written warning
>pic related
>>74960331
Mostly due to environmental effects. If you look at the IQ of a 3rd or 4th generation Ethiopian living in the UK, they are usually on par with British citizens.
Plus you get outliers in every race which throws that off. You'll never get a dog with a IQ higher than any human.
>>74956732
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Bfegy-AX_w
>>74956732
It's not logical because they only pretend their logic is based on a traditional system of morality, like what brings the most net benefit into a system. Instead their morality is based on what makes them feel good/their own vanity. That's why you can argue with them and prove it is illogical by traditional morality but they will still keep their same position.
>>74960535
Why is Africa as a continent so inefficient and corrupt and generally awful? And Europe the reverse? Even Asia and the middle east can degrees of prosperity.
Before you say environment then how come whites managed to successfully build civilization in Africa and blacks can't?
>>74960081
>there is no biological basis in 'races'.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_genetic_clustering
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1196372/
>Genetic cluster analysis of the microsatellite markers produced four major clusters, which showed near-perfect correspondence with the four self-reported race/ethnicity categories. Of 3,636 subjects of varying race/ethnicity, only 5 (0.14%) showed genetic cluster membership different from their self-identified race/ethnicity.
Better be trolling me, nigger.
>>74960845
Colonization happened, no set up of governments when we leave. Countries fall into anarchy. The strong and corrupt make it to the top.
Thats literally it. Europe and Asia haven't had a collapse that hard. Its why Libya went from somewhat prosperous to a country rife in civil war right now.
We're all humans
>>74960971
If the probability is below 93% for any of those test we reject the null hypothesis. Did you fail high school? Only one of those is greater that 93% and thats the German/English one which we know is due to the Saxon migrations.
>>74956732
>THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS "WHITENESS"
OMG MY WHOLE LIFE IS A LIE !!! MY DRIVERS LICENSE IS A LIE...ALL THOSE TEST I TOOK IN SCHOOL I FILLED IN A OPTION FOR SOMETHING THAT DOESNT EXIST...oh wait its just some sjw bitch with dyed hair and glasses. shes full of shit
>>74956962
>no logic
Women.
>>74961058
Whites also brutally colonised Hong Kong and Singapore and parts of East Asia and these places are now doing even better than Europe by various HDI metrics.
And yet the places in Africa that were colonised aren't.
If you are correct, then Hong Kong should be a shit hole full of anarchy, but weirdly it's not. I wonder if that has to do with the average high biological IQ of East Asians or something?
>>74961197
Where are you getting 93% from? It's 99.86%.
>>74961144
DESIGNATED
>>74956732
>>74961058
You can't say it was all the fault of colonization they've had plenty of time since. Decades. Look how Germany recovered after WWII. Ireland after the famine/British occupation.
Zimbabwe is worse than it was under Brits.
>>74961484
It's almost as if blacks have low average IQ and can't sustain a European level civilization on their own or something.
But, no. The real answer is they fail consistently, every time, because whites are evil and their racism causes blacks to be inferior through various forms of airborne magic.
