Is this what will replace the two-party system in America from now on, /pol/?
>>74939737
Do you even understand our system?
If no one gets 270 electoral votes (about half) the Senate gets to choose the president
Only a two party or less system works
>>74939737
why are right wing parties always labeled as populist? Isn't promising free college, social welfare and higher wages populist by definition?
>>74939737
Nah they had three parties over in Britain once and it destroyed the nation
Multiple parties don't work in USA because of the electoral college
Stuff of nightmares
>>74939880
bernie is a populist too, nobody denies that
>>74939880
populist is what the people want to hear. you think rich people and people that consider themselves conservatives want to hear about all the higher taxes that new social programs bring?
>>74939737
Wait, Trump is a protectionist? Wow.
Looks like I'm #Artillery4Hilary now.
>>74939852
There was a famous election where the Whig Party ran a Southern Whig in just the Southern States, New England Whig candidate in NE, etc, and they never intended for one to win a majority, but instead would together hold enough votes to keep the other party out, and then decide amongst themselves. It is today known as the great fuck up of 1854, and singlehandedly caused the Civil War
>>74939737
>Constitutional-Liberal Party
>Shilldawg
oh shit nigger what are you doing?
>>74939737
Sanders is more populist than Trump faggot.
Populism itself was created thanks to "peasant-revolutions" which rooted for wealth distribution.
The only difference is that in 19 century populists wanted to tax millionaires, and now they want to tax billionaires.
Stronger borders, stricter border policies and stopping wasteful spendings =/= populism.
After all i don't expect anything from you ahmed
>>74939737
>Hillary
>Constitutional
>>74940181
What's wrong with Populism, gypo?
>>74940288
He's used to the commies telling him what to do
>>74940273
Guns and Abortion confuse everything.
Ignore those two subjects and Hill and Mitt have basically indistinguishable platforms.
>>74939852
>Only a two party or less system works
We have 8 democratically elected political parties and we are doing just fine.
>>74940544
No you're not
>>74940288
I didn't said populism is bad
I just told you that in this context it's mostly wrong used, he's a conservative ( in his policies at least, i don't care about his personal visions)
Populism is more related to socialism than to conservatism,which after that leads to communism.
With populistic propaganda the commies got power in Romania, if you still brought it up.
You wanna end up in a gulag eating shit ( literally) , go for it.
