encouraging the people to 'live within their means' during these times of austerity, while addressing a room full of multimillionaires.
She also voiced support for a government imposing longer working hours with less pay on junior doctors.
All while wearing a hat encrusted with rubies, emeralds, sapphires, pearls and diamonds.
She then left Parliament and returned to her one billion pound house.
Her crown left shortly afterwards in its very own horse-drawn carriage.
Why do we not have a democratically elected royal family?
If we have to have one at all, we should get to vote on it.
>>74738945
Piss off Corbyn, go learn the national anthem
what a surprise coming from a reptillian mass rapist satanist queen
>>74738945
Haven't you got prayers to go to Muhammad?
>>74741988
Is there any difference between submitting to a cult and submitting to a german family?
You're a retard, the Queen has no say on her speech, she's a puppet for the PM.
>>74738945
>encouraging the people to 'live within their means'
How dare She. Despite actually practicing this by making many budget cuts at Buckingham.
>>74742097
Yea, quite a bit. What kind of half-wit couldn't see that?
>>74738945
Democratically elected royalty DOES exist, they are called Celebrities.
The Kardashians are just one example.
>>74738945
B A S E D
>>74739141
>worshipping a selfish lazy inbred who has done nothing but sit back and watch as her supposed Christian country is turned into little Somalia
>paying for this
Fucking serf.
>>74738945
>encouraging the people to 'live within their means' during these times of austerity, while addressing a room full of multimillionaires.
>while addressing a room full of multimillionaires.
Not true lad, Peers only get £300 a day
>>74744439
>Elizabeth II
>Lazy
Her Majesty has worked pretty much every single day of Her life.
>has done nothing but sit back
Not allowed to do anything. Your precious politician-elus have seen to that.
>paying for this
No, Her Majesty gives the nation ~£200m/yr of Her own income.
>>74738945
The throne of England is literally a 1000 years old wooden seat with a rock inside it.
Filth detected
Likelihood estimates
Sturgeon: 15%
Corbyn: 25%
ReligionOfPeace: 67%
Engaging cartoons
>>74741296
You're right. She *is* German.
>>74742097
Submitting to a royal family usually grants you a prosperous nation, you know, that thing Ireland will never be
THE QUEEN WILL DIE TONIGHT BUT ONLY IF YOU POST "GOD KILL THE QUEEN"
>>74745154
>97 KB
It was. Back when they had a monarch.
Brian Boru ftw.
>>74742183
>oh better not have a 5th extravagant lawn party this year the plebs might notice I'm a huge fucking hypocrite and shit on a gold toilet whilst their quality of life continues to worsen.
>>74739141
fuck Corbyn the socialist commie the nutter wants to gut the military and get rid of nukes plus is now towing the labour "lets stay in the EU and take all the cocks" position. He's just further perpetuating that all republicans are far left hippies and have no patriotism
>>74745154
what is the US, France, Germany and a shit load of other western democratic republics. They are about as prosperous as the UK and sit roughly the same socially for good or ill
I hope prince Harry starts a military coup then hangs you traitors Like you deserve.
I thought ur queen was a muslim innit?
>>74745455
>oh better not have a 5th extravagant lawn party
The government actually puts those on for various purposes. You're also ignoring that She pulls Her weight and contributing to Britain a helluva better than you, Mustafa.
>>74745675
Make it William. Harry needs to do that here.
>>74738945
She does a shitload of work considering she's 90
People severely underestimate how much they contribute to international relations and charity work
>>74745865
millions of people do charity work and they do it all without going home to live in billions worth of luxury and being treated like a god.
>>74746025
>without going home to live in billions worth of luxury and being treated like a god.
WHAAAAAA some people are more privileged than me.
>>74745713
Mate I'm English and my family have been here for eons unlike yourself. I'm sure if most people had the same access they could do 3 days work with aids for the sole purpose of public relations to but you keep up with your meme rebuttals I'm sure they make you feel like you win arguments
>>74746116
Don't care about money I care about people inhering political or sovereign power instead of being elected.
I fucking hate this country.
Ol' Phil had better give her a stern talking-to.
>>74746254
>instead of being elected.
Tony Blair was elected.
The Royals are more loyal to this country than ANY career politician ever could be.
Daily reminder that the Queen cucked Rhodesia and abandoned them
>>74738945
>democratically elected royal family
I guess you dropped out of high school Pip?
![on-the-internet-nobody-knows-youre-a-dog-meme-1[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/bsppPbC.jpg "on-the-internet-nobody-knows-youre-a-dog-meme-1[1].jpg")
>>74746025
Do those people also pay 500% tax?
And who is treating Her like a God?
>>74746152
>Mate I'm English
Pic related.
>I'm sure if most people had the same access they could do 3 days work with aids for the sole purpose of public relations
I'm sure they could. But Her Majesty wasn't content with that, and has instead spent Her whole life working for the country.
>but you keep up with your meme rebuttals I'm sure they make you feel like you win arguments
No, i win arguments using facts and truth, rather than just loudly expressing my petty tall poppy syndrome.
>>74746254
You prefer popular thieves and charletans in charge instead of having someone who actually cares about their nation?
>>74746516
Pretty sure that was Parliament.
>>74746254
How is the monarchy any different to a multibillionare that gives his fortune to his son who then goes on to have swathes of power and influence as a result of the fortune.
The monarchy exists because it was founded atop the blood sweat and tears of many men and women in the royal line before the current monarch.
Should they not pass down to their children the wealth and power they fought for?
Buckingham Palace could house hundreds of refugees. Move them in and move the Royals into a council flat in Newham.
>>74738945
>democratically elected royal family?
>>74746469
really is that why one royal had to abdicate his position due to Nazi sympathies? Is that why Charles has been suspected of breaking the royalties political neutrality to harrass MP's in letters? Is that why they support the EU and further succession of national sovereignty. Is that why they would have fled to Canada had Germany successfully invaded the UK in the second world war? Yeah keep telling yourself they care an ounce about us. Im sure Vicky's tirade about being above us really has left their family beliefs.
>>74746600
>tall poppy syndrome
Fuck off cunt, tall poppy syndrome is a good thing.
Anyone arrogant enough to think that they're hated solely because they're rich deserves what they get.
I have no problem with the majority of rich people, but Gina the Hutt belongs on a scaffold and anyone who tells me that's tall poppy syndrome belongs there with her.
>>74746881
>really is that why one royal had to abdicate his position due to Nazi sympathies?
Oh? And who do you think that was?
>Is that why Charles has been suspected of breaking the royalties political neutrality to harrass MP's in letters?
Hah, you know what that "harrassment" was? Trying to help the agricultural productivity of an area. What a bastard indeed. Caring about His people like that.
>Is that why they support the EU
They don't, though. People have gotten in shit for revealing how Elizabeth II wants England out of that toilet.
>Is that why they would have fled to Canada had Germany successfully invaded the UK in the second world war?
How is that unreasonable?
>>74747019
>tall poppy syndrome is a good thing.
It specifically isn't.
>Anyone arrogant enough to think that they're hated solely because they're rich deserves what they get.
Except when it's fags like OP who do seem to hate people just because they're rich.
>but Gina the Hutt belongs on a scaffold
Agreed. That's not tall poppy, though. The woman is a blight.
>>74746600
Well you for a start.
>>74746600
no but most people are descendants from those who subjugated common people for hundreds of years and most people don't physically own continents worth of land.
>facts and arguments
yeah calling people muhammed is a quality argument
>>74746600
I hate most politicians as self serving liars but we can get rid of them.
>>74746727
Millionaires have no official power and if troubles come to light they would be fucked. Keep their damn money I don't care about that but don't claim those fuckers were the ones dying in trenches and fields for hundreds of years and not the common man who was ripped from his home forcefully and forced to fight for the glory and gain of others. Im sure the millions of dead from wars profited just as much as the royals.
>>74747189
Ed VIII
>>74747189
doesn't matter he broke the constituitonal agreement that they don't involve themselves. Motive matters not as it opens avenues to other abusement. We have had fucking a civil war over this shit.
>>74747189
really because reports this year claims we need to be a key part of shaping the continent along side Berlin. Sounds pretty pro EU to me
its unreasonable as if they cared truly they would fight and die with those who couldnt just run away
>>74747189
>It specifically isn't.
Ayy lmao.
Tall poppy syndrome doesn't exist. Nobody hates people solely for being rich except the most extreme commies, and there's far more colourful language to use when describing them. Tall poppy syndrome is an invention of rich elites who are genuinely so arrogant that they cannot conceive of a reality where even a single person dislikes them for any reason other than pure jealously. Tall poppy syndrome is a fantasy created by self-absorbed cunts, and the mere fact that someone thinks that it applies to them is proof that they are so arrogant they deserve the hatred they receive.
It's not about the money, it's about being a shitcunt.
Even OP isn't guilty of TPS. He doesn't hate the Queen for being rich, he hates the Queen for (supposed) hypocrisy.
If you're going to bear that flag at least shitpost well.
Why are republicans so pathetically jealous of others? Why do they honestly care about the wealth of a long standing figure who embodies their national identity, despite the fact she gives more to the economy through tourism than she takes?
>>74747589
>Nobody hates people solely for being rich except the most extreme commies
That's usually what it refers to.
>Tall poppy syndrome is an invention of rich elites
Not really. You mostly see it among poor people regarding slightly less poor people.
>He doesn't hate the Queen for being rich
Certainly seems that way. Just veiled behind what he wrongly thinks of as hypocrisy.
Basically, it's not that black and white, and i was really just using the term as a catchall. Didn't expect a whole to-do on it.
>>74738945
>Democratically Electrd Royal Family
>Implying that we wouldn't end up getting a Muslim one
>>74748108
*elected
>>74738945
You've quoted that almost verbatim from huffpost, fuck off and gas yourself
>>74738945
Finally a tea boy calling out the pathetic nobility concept, all these years here and I've never seen one of those
>>74748213
Isn't there like a 25% push to put Dom Bertrand on the rightful Brazilian throne since you've had zero luck from democracy?
>>74738945
She would be right whether or not she were rich.
>>74748213
Oh tell me more about how Brazil's government is better
Subhuman half ape can't think what a surprised. Should just nuke all of south America bunch of dumb cunts who think their the greatest no matter what
>>74748076
>That's usually what it refers to.
That is what it refers to, but the appellation is usually wrong.
>You mostly see it among poor people regarding slightly less poor people
I come from an extremely working-class background and I've never seen TPS groupthink. Sure, a few people get asshurt, but they're bitter fuckwits. That's hardly the widespread scourge that TPS is characterised at, and it's not even aimed at the supposed victims of it.
>Certainly seems that way. Just veiled behind what he wrongly thinks of as hypocrisy.
As a salesperson let me tell you: assumptions are unreliable. Don't make them. If you don't know something - ask. Never guess. The guy dressed like a hobo may just be a gentle push away from an 8,000 television.
>i was really just using the term as a catchall
Don't. Tall poppy syndrome is the worst meme. When rich people get hate 99 times out of 100 it's well-deserved. There's a lot to hate about British monarchy, even if you refuse to believe it, and even if I don't agree with it. Compelling arguments for republicanism exist and you don't need to be green with envy to believe them.
Take your "poor misunderstood billionaires" tears somewhere else.
>>74748211
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
>>74738945
Resentful Labour, probably a Muslim, thinks that rich people shouldn't have an opinion, and that the traditions of the country should be undermined because he is jealous of gold hats. Fuck off back to the commune you hippie.
>>74738945
You surly hav'nt seen prince williams interview this morning,
He called for a referendum next year..... to abolish the monarchy !
He's a good lad
>>74748592
You are insane, source your claim
>>74748778
>Subhuman half ape can't think what a surprised.
>what a surprised
> bunch of dumb cunts who think their the greatest no matter what
>who think their
Not the guy you were talking to, at least we can speak better English than you do, even though it's not our native language.
It seems like you are the dumb cunt here.
>>74748778
Just because the shit I have is not better at least I'm not accepting a fucking queen "chosen" by god
>>74749117
Stfu zeekoid
Your argument is halfbrained
>>74748977
Im one of the republicans in this thread. I can respect that as long of course as its genuine and not just to make him look good with no expectation of it happening
>>74744931
Lol
Fuck off france
>>74749117
It's 1am here and I'm not handing in a resume or taking an English test
And just cause I made a spelling mistake my argument still stands. You gonna argue the point or be some left learning fucking chimp and point out things other then my points like a jew
>>74749273
No one thinks the Queen was chosen by god that's Medieval tier thinking. (Funny coming from a third world shithole)
The Queen is from a system of government that has proven itself time and time again, she has pretty much no power and actually makes the country money. If you truly believe people think she was chosen by god you can go drown in a mudslide cause that's one retarded opinion
>>74748901
>Sure, a few people get asshurt, but they're bitter fuckwits.
Which is what i was referring to. That and an absolutely hilarious show i witnessed on a train in the Valley once, where an aboriginal family were harassing a small girl (daughter/sister/lover? Who knows with them) about going to school. "You think ya fuckin better than ush because ya can fuckin count now?"
>assumptions are unreliable.
In general, yes. But on 4chan? I let my standards slip, sorry.
>When rich people get hate 99 times out of 100 it's well-deserved.
From my experience, i just can't agree. It's usually people blaming people richer than them, people with whom they've never interacted or have reason to, for their own faults. And again, it's rarely the millionaires who get it.
>There's a lot to hate about British monarchy,
Can't agree there either. There are many misconceptions, though.
>Compelling arguments for republicanism exist
Heard many arguments. None were compelling.
>>74749033
Disregard. I can't find it. It was some interview with Dom Bertrand.
>you will get to see the People's Commonwealth of Britain established in your lifetime
Feels good, comrades.
>>74749767
>Heard many arguments. None were compelling.
"Republics are desirable and Britain ought to lead the world towards republicanism" is a compelling argument to progressive ethnocentrists.
You aren't one, which means it isn't compelling to you, but it's a compelling argument to a lot of intelligent people who think differently. Yes, people can still be intelligent while having different perspectives.
>In general, yes. But on 4chan? I let my standards slip, sorry.
It shows.
>an aboriginal family were harassing a small girl about going to school.
Aboriginals aren't human.
>It's usually people blaming people richer than them, people with whom they've never interacted or have reason to, for their own faults.
It's usually people blaming the class that wields power for wielding that power poorly, or, at worst, maliciously.
The class of rich and elites is responsible for a lot ills, and it is appropriate to assign blame to wealthy people for those ills based on their wealth, because their wealth is what defines their responsibility.
The hatred doesn't stem from wealth, it stems from misuse of power. The apportionment of blame is determined by wealth, and that's appropriate.
>>74750158
>but it's a compelling argument to a lot of intelligent people who think differently.
See, i would say compelling as regards a strong fact based, unbiased argument.
>Aboriginals aren't human.
Agreed, but that was just the most amusing example i could think of.
>It's usually people blaming the class that wields power for wielding that power poorly, or, at worst, maliciously.
Then that's not what i was referring to, as it's justified.
Like with OP, his concerns are based on misinformation.
>>74738945
Solid gold chairs are within her means
>>74738945
Nice, straight from the Guardian comments section.
You have to go back.
>>74748976
British, can trace my heritage to 6th century Jockland.
Traditions are not being undermined, I'm doing what the 'royals' have always done, seeking to wipe out a weaker group and seize power.
I suggest Barbara Windsor as our new Queen, she can be Queen for the next five years, wear the silly gold hat and do her cheerful laugh.
then after that I suggest Bendydick Cucumberpatch for King for 5 years after that.
It should be down to public vote and popularity, what makes some person think they are 'royal' anyway? the whole idea is just ludicrous.
>>74750734
>i would say compelling as regards a strong fact based, unbiased argument.
Cool. A lot of people are principled, not pragmatic. Like I said, people can think differently to you and still be intelligent. A cosmopolitan might even argue that the world resembles the way we believe it works anyway.
>Like with OP, his concerns are based on misinformation.
Then it's not TPS.
>>74751144
>can trace my heritage to 6th century Jockland.
Remarkable. I don't think the College of Arms would even be able to do that, but hey, good for you.
>It should be down to public vote and popularity,
Horrible idea. Populism ruins everything. Qualifications are far better to have.
>what makes some person think they are 'royal' anyway?
Having a royal position, usually.
>>74751167
>Like I said, people can think differently to you and still be intelligent.
Of course. But they need to be able to state their case intelligently.
>Then it's not TPS.
It seems to boil down to, "How dare these people be better than me and have more money."
>>74745455
>the nutter wants to gut the military
You mean gut it more?
>>74751671
>It seems to boil down to, "How dare these people be better than me and have more money."
Then how is it based on misinformation?
Either OP is misinformed, in which case inform him and he will agree with you, or OP is a bitter commie, in which case laugh at him.
Either way, TPS is the wrong S.
>>74751791
No I mean he wants to get rid of it totally and every nuke we own. Basically he wants to cuck us for his socialist fantasies
>>74738945
I'm sanctioning your bennies RIGHT NOW
>>74751671
>Horrible idea. Populism ruins everything. Qualifications are far better to have.
Qualified for queen,lol.
Any cunt could do it,its not exactly difficult.
shake hands with people, say a few words and pull the lever that opens the curtains.
fuck sake a dog could be trained to do it
>>74744439
she works harder in a year than you have in your entire life working your cushy 9-5 job
>>74751671
No it boils down to "why should these people inherit power and position over me whilst expecting everyone to grovel before them like serfs when we live in a supposed democracy"
>>74744931
>Likelihood estimates
>Sturgeon: 15%
>Corbyn: 25%
>ReligionOfPeace: 67%
Whats the other 3%?
>>74748977
Let's hope for Civil War. Fathers need to fight Sons again.
>>74744884
T. AS government and politics
peers get a flat salary, the £300 a day is awarded for them sitting in the house.
>>74738945
Where clit cancer when you need it ??
>>74751945
Fine, i submit to you pedantry.
>>74752060
>Any cunt could do it,its not exactly difficult.
Which is why there have been no bad leaders ever?
>>74752134
>"why should these people inherit power and position over me
Because it's inheritance? It's also because that's the best method of long term planning for a government.
>expecting everyone to grovel before them like serfs
They don't, though. It's no different from any other head of state.
>when we live in a supposed democracy"
But you don't. It's a constitutional monarchy.
>>74752492
>Fine, i submit to you pedantry.
This was a valuable use of my time.
;_;
>>74751144
>Jockland
Why am I not surprised?
>>74744926
What is she producing to make that income?
>>74751945
fuck off I'm no commie.
I just see the royal thing as undemocratic, it cracks me up when Cameron says about "Our great democracy".
We live under a very undemocratic monarchy, arguments pro and contra do not change that fact, all must swear allegiance to the royals above all else.
>>74738945
>Implies everyone is worth the same
People like you that preached that niggers should vote, that mixbreeding should be allowed and that immigration is a good thing. You are nothing but a culturalmarxist. Go be a jew somewere els Goldensteinmoneygrubberberg.
>>74738945
>encouraging the people to 'live within their means'
She's right, though?
Average personal debt excluding mortgage in the UK is a staggering two year's income. If we had to pay that shit back due to another Labour government fucking the economy, it would wreck most households.
That Liz owns 1/5 of the dry land on the planet via the Crown Estate corporation is neither here nor there, is it? We've borrowed too much unsecured debt. 1/7 households are living off of debt, this is not good.
![Jacques_Bertaux_-_Prise_du_palais_des_Tuileries_-_1793[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/BJY3og9.jpg "Jacques_Bertaux_-_Prise_du_palais_des_Tuileries_-_1793[1].jpg")
>>74752774
All governments are democracies in the end, mate. If people didn't want a Queen there wouldn't be one.
Its amazing that Britains are incapable of making the logical connection between their overbloated bureaucratic welfare systems, and their ever-deteriating economic standards.
Britain needs to abolish its national health service and let the market sort it out, not try to squeeze more out of doctors for less. That just aint gonna cut it.
Basic economics.
>>74752492
>>"why should these people inherit power and position over me
>Because it's inheritance? It's also because that's the best method of long term planning for a government.
What utter rubbish,.North Korea is good in your eyes then? they love inheritance.
>>74748213
He's not likely to be British mate.
>>74752492
>Because it's inheritance? It's also because that's the best method of long term planning for a government.
Just because they inherit power and influence over people doesn't mean the people must accept it. Also I think Switzerland is arguably the best governed place in the world and they are a republic.
>expecting everyone to grovel before them like serfs
what is her majesty and highness, what is royal pagentry, what is kneeling and bowing what is an oath of allegiance to serve the monarch and not the country and good of the people.
>But you don't. It's a constitutional monarchy.
and yet we are told we also have a democracy.
>>74752843
I never said any of that, you are putting words into my mouth.
Under her clothes and without the goldy hat the queen is just another human
>>74752408
£74k/yr. A lot less than we give ours, but i guess yours are expected to have their own income.
>>74752565
You and me both. One day i'll break free.
>>74752716
Rents from owned land.
>>74752774
>it cracks me up when Cameron says about "Our great democracy".
He's a politician, what do you expect? He has to defend the franchise until he's sick of it and someone else gets the gig.
>>74753000
They're not all perfect.
>>74752774
>Democracy
It's essentially a meaningless buzzword and has been for a long time.
Check out the reflection. Kek!
>>74753196
and despite that she is expected to be something far more every waking moment of every day
>>74752991
What is the USSR, what is the peoples republic of China, what is every despot and dictator. People don't demand change for one of 3 reasons
fear
propoganda
apathetic content in their personal lives that isn't worth risking
>>74752997
The NHS is 70% privatised, and has been since about '82. If you're unfortunate enough to have cancer, 85% of your treatment is provided by private for-profit organizations.
The NHS logo is exactly that, these days, a logo. The government sinks ~£125billion into the NHS a year, and we haemmorage ~£10billion on foreign nationals abusing the system.
The real money sink is Public Sector obscene pensions at ~£200billion in taxpayer money. That's before we take into account the State Pension available to all. Now, to their credit, the Tories have come down hard on the Civil Service and the NHS pensions, altering the Final Payment payout to one that represents an average of lifetime public sector earnings. So in about 25 years we may see that figure dramatically reduce.
>>74738945
Do downies still believe she writes the speech?
>>74753194
>doesn't mean the people must accept it
True, but you might need a reason not to.
Switzerland is also a lot smaller as a direct democracy.
>what is her majesty and highness, what is royal pagentry, what is kneeling and bowing
Pretty much the same done with every other head of state? Everyone has pageantry.
>what is an oath of allegiance to serve the monarch and not the country and good of the people.
They're the same thing. The monarch IS the country.
>and yet we are told we also have a democracy.
Well they're lying to you. "They" being politicians who say things like that for their own interests.
>>74753194
Republicans have such an ignorant boner for Switzerland.
>>74753389
welp, she ain't a vampire
>>74753442
I've never seen her round here, she never shows up without a retinue of cringers and fawners.
Right now she could be supping brown ale in her bra and knickers.
I wouldn't know, all this she is queen 24/7 is surely bollocks though.
>>74753578
>What is the USSR
Gone?
>what is the peoples republic of China
More liberal now than ever?
>what is every despot and dictator
Supported by a close cadre of fanatic loyalists and ever-teetering on the precipice of power?
People only revolt when their food or security is threatened, because when it gets down to it, that's all people really want. Everything else is fringe benefits. If you have food on your table and you're safe from marauding bandits you've got it better than 99% of people who ever lived. That's why people don't revolt.
>>74753196
Do you not even read David Icke? She's descended from Enki and the lizard aliens m8.
>>74751970
Sounds good to me, hopefully gulags come included.
>>74753622
No the people are the country if the monarchy vanished tomorrow the country would remain. If the people vanished leaving only the windsors then the country would cease to exist.
>>74753675
its not ignorance Switzerland works and is one of the most prosperous and happy places on the planet due to the direct democracy you tar brushing cunt
>>74752113
She hasn't done a hard day's work in her life, you sycophantic royalist heathen.
>>74753812
you highlighted and missed my point at the same time
these things collapsed due to economics not due to the peoples will. They didn't rebel either due to fear of punishment or fear of the risk reward being too great to risk their current stance in life getting worse through a lack of personal power to defend their self interest not because they primarily agreed with the current mode of government. Apathy or lack of action does not equate agreement and support in the same way that correlation does not equal causation
Socialists hate beautiful things.
>>74753984
>No the people are the country if the monarchy vanished tomorrow the country would remain.
It would be quite different. And that obviously means that the monarch is the embodiment of the nation. Why is everyone so literal tonight?
>>74753996
She hasn't worked down t'pit, if that's what you mean. But Her Majesty has been working for nigh on 70 years with few breaks. She was also in the army during WW2.
>>74754349
They didn't rebel because they wanted what they had more than what they could have had.
Choosing not to act is still a choice.
>>74754552
Nah, we just hate class-cucks and unearned privilege
>>74754654
because you keep making bullshit sweeping statements that's why. If they dissipated the fundamental culture of the British people wouldn't change. The things they believe, the way they acted, what they enjoyed and did in their free time, the way they viewed politics. This would not change. if everyone vanished and the royals were the only people left then there wouldnt be a county anymore just an island with a few dozen people sat on it.
>>74754790
why dont you tell that to people who lived in the soviet era or people living in north korea now. Pretty sure you wouldnt fucking rebel if you knew you would be thrown into hard labour or worse. No choosing not to act because it will get you killed is submitting under duress
Because you are the cuckiest of all cucks and have been for a looooong time
>>74755187
>they dissipated the fundamental culture of the British people wouldn't change.
Being that the monarchy is part of that, it kinda would.
>the way they viewed politics. This would not change.
Again, kinda would if you're taking parts out. Just because Britain has become de-British-ised doesn't make all the remnants worth abandoning.
>>74754861
I used to work for a company that had a lord on its board of directors, simply because he was a lord.
The guy was about 100 years old & completely useless but hey .. its a Lord.
>>74755187
>why dont you tell that to people who lived in the soviet era or people living in north korea now.
I gladly would, if you gave me the opportunity. I would say "You had the choice of suffering a revolution or suffering your government, and you chose to suffer your government. Ergo, you valued your government more than a revolution."
I'm not saying anything other than the truth. I'm not saying that the USSR or NK are liberal Western democracies where life is fine, I'm saying that everybody makes choices.
>but sometimes choices are shitty
Yeah, and sometimes so are outcomes.
>>74754654
>in the army in WW2
She posed for some propaganda photographs. You're insulting the men who died in combat by suggesting she was "in the army."
Someone with hundreds of servants does not have a hard life.
>>74754861
>>>/tumblr/
Also hope you're against all inheritance.
>>74755665
Usually good for PR and connexions.
It's true identity. Without the Queen, the UK is a pity parody of the USA with Muslims and Polish toilet cleaners.
>>74756007
Like Russia without the Tsars?
>>74755919
>Usually good for PR and connexions.
True, but the sycophancy when he visited was revolting to see.. "anything else, your Lordship?"
>>74755887
>She posed for some propaganda photographs.
And was an active driver.
>You're insulting the men who died in combat by suggesting she was "in the army."
Protip: The armed forces are more than just frontline troops.
>Someone with hundreds of servants does not have a hard life.
Hilariously petty. Are you saying they've had nothing bad or hard happen?
>>74744926
>Her Majesty has worked pretty much every single day of Her life.
If you ever read the court circular, you'd see the royal events schedule is pretty light. Royalty do work, but not much.
I'd like to beat her lizard head in with a bat desu fampai
>>74738945
next thing you know, the royal family is a collection of shitskins
>>74756156
Sounds like anytime someone from the board visits a workplace.
>>74756193
>you'd see the royal events schedule is pretty light.
Every day is usually accounted for. Wouldn't say it's on par with working down t'pit, but it's still work.
>>74745007
BTFO
>>74738945
Maybe your family should have done as much shit the past 1000 years as hers then.
>>74755568
they dissipated the fundamental culture of the British people wouldn't change.
Yes because the British people are so ant like in their drone like personas that they would fall apart in confusion and destroy one another out of an inability to function without a monarch lording above them. Piss off you puerile bootlicker in the day to day life people don't think of the monarch. They go to work, come home partake in what ever entertainment they like and maybe do something on a weekend. Their beliefs are shaped by personal education and their immediate local socialization not by some sort of weird connection to some old woman in a palace.
>>74755728
Yeah sure you would champ lets point a couple dozen rifles at your head and see how long it takes you to spit at those holding them. Don't be a keyboard warrior it makes you look pathetic
>>74756179
yes she drived round for small amounts of time for propoganda she didn't spend 12 or more hours a day in an ammunition factory or toiling in a field like every other woman in the country nor lay bleeding to death in some fucked up field or street in europe. No wait she just sent off everyone else to do so whilst her family were safe and sound and never in any real danger.
>>74738945
>all these people hating on monarchies
>>74756193
>Royalty do work, but not much.
Its how they live so long, most people are ruined by a life of work at 90 years old, she seems pretty well and healthy.
>>74756071
No. We have a lot of features: USSR, Putin, etc. The UK without the Queen is a vapid yet another state of the America with gays, freaks and Muslims. Queen and all those decorations at least remind us that some time ago they were white and straight and strong.
>>74756504
We did, but only one song was ever written about us.
>>74756504
pretty sure without the power to force commoners to fight die and work in fields they wouldn't have achieved shit
>>74756516
>Don't be a keyboard warrior it makes you look pathetic
And don't make assumptions about people on the internet, because you'd be wrong.
I'd never have rifles pointed at my head, because I'd be a good little slave and do my fucking job and not kick up a stink about political philosophy because I realise what's important in life: food, shelter, and enough alcohol to ignore the rest. That's how billions of people got through the day before me, I'm sure it'll work for me too.
You're the one bitching and moaning about the ebil gubment.
I don't even know what your fucking point is anymore. You seem to have no coherent argument. Everything you say is just an on-the-spot response to whatever I choose to post because you are incapable of holding an argument for more than 2 minutes at a time. Jesus Fuck.
People make choices, and if they want something other than what they've got they'll fucking choose it. You're just having a teary because people are happy to suffer evils while evils are sufferable rather than through themselves on the fire of your righteousness so that they can burn for the benefit of your concept of your fellow man.
Suck a dick, dogshit. People are animals, and all animals need to be happy is enough food and a cage big enough to run around in.
>>74756516
>she drived round
>drived
You're a special boy, don't let anyone tell you otherwise!
>>74754861
No you clearly hate beautiful things.
You dislike ornamentation.
You dislike frivolity.
You dislike craftsmanship.
When you see "a hat encrusted with rubies, emeralds, sapphires, pearls and diamonds." All you can imagine is how much food for the poor you could buy if you stripped it of it's precious stones and metals and sold them off.
It never occurs to you that feeding the poor just creates more poor but that beautiful object you destroyed to feed them is now gone forever, or if it does you don't care.
Socialists hate beauty.
That's why your art is shit.
>>74757005
>through
throw*
>>74756373
Everyone can read exactly what they do, and they attend social functions a few times a week, with lots, and lots of holidays.
And they don't have pits anymore.
>>74756516
>Yes because the British people are so ant like in their drone like personas that they would fall apart in confusion and destroy one another out of an inability to function without a monarch lording above them.
Where did i say that? I mean hell, if nothing else, you'd still have your chosen people of Parliament lording over you without missing a beat.
>she didn't spend 12 or more hours a day in an ammunition factory or toiling in a field like every other woman in the country nor lay bleeding to death in some fucked up field or street in europe.
Not every woman did that. Hell, my grandmother was on similar duty. And no woman was a frontline soldier.
>No wait she just sent off everyone else to do so whilst her family were safe and sound and never in any real danger.
Well no, they were bombed a few times, and when did the Nazi sympathising monarchy send anyone off? Pretty sure that was your elected politicians. But that wouldn't help your bias, would it?
>>74756957
And the government doesn't do that?
>>74738945
She's not the rightfull heir though.
The Hanovers get the throne because the jews wanted them.
>Why do we not have a democratically elected royal family?
Don't do it, two countries of Europe that kicked their monarchs are now one of the most cucked countries in Europe
>>74757182
>Everyone can read exactly what they do, and they attend social functions a few times a week
Just like most heads of states and dignitaries. That is work. Just easy work.
>>74757224
>She's not the rightfull heir though.
Patently (no pun intended) false.
>>74738945
Don't you have 1400 children to horrifically betray?
>>74757182
>and lots of holidays.
This.
William is always on holiday, the media make it out to be him doing a service for his country.
but its just another taxpayer funded holiday ffs.
>>74757075
Imagine how many pretty stones we can buy from selling your organs.
Why do you hate beauty, you Marxist?
>>74757393
did that yesterday, they now sit weeping and bleeding from their (no longer) virgin holes.
alan ackbar.
>>74756071
For example Australia, New Zealand and the USA are same. The UK differs from them by means of Queen, conservatism, and all those old good features: pastime with tea and so.
After the UK started to import liberalism and democracy from the USA, they become freaks, gays, transgenders, nigers, feminists, Muslims; shit in other words. Removing the Queen from the image makes them just the same as the others.
>>74755919
No, Tumblr's idea of privilege is "white men". They are bourgeois liberals with false consciousness. Wealth and class are the only form of privilege, and it is particularly prevalent in Britain, which still has the remnants of feudalism.
>>74757075
I frankly don't give a shit about a few parasites leeching off the hard work of the people, wasting resources and calling it beauty and art. Material conditions come first, always. When post-scarcity is achieved (a goal of communism), and work is abolished, then we can focus on art and fulfilling human potential.
Well, as English Bob once said, "Doh!"
>>74757206
In her and her families name they do.
>>74738945
She's living well within her means dumbass
>>74757535
>For example Australia, New Zealand and the USA are same.
You've never been to any of those countries, have you?
>>74757005
Everything you say is just an on-the-spot response to whatever I choose to post
It is called having a conversation. Person A speaks, person B responds, Person A responds to Person B. If either one breaks this cycle and ignore the previous respond then the participants are no longer talking to each other.
>because I realise what's important in life: food, shelter, and enough alcohol to ignore the rest. That's how billions of people got through the day before me, I'm sure it'll work for me too.
Except millions didnt have these things in any of those regimes but were too afraid of death or being next to be targeted to do anything about it as they couldn't possibly fight the states resources and man power.
>People make choices, and if they want something other than what they've got they'll fucking choose it. You're just having a teary because people are happy to suffer evils while evils are sufferable rather than through themselves on the fire of your righteousness so that they can burn for the benefit of your concept of your fellow man.
You claim they had a choice. When resistance equals certain death its not a choice is subjugation
>>74757022
>Oh no he made a point I cant refute better highlight that he didn't write drove before someone notices I don't have a rebuttal. Ad Hom to the rescue!
>Where did i say that? I mean hell, if nothing else, you'd still have your chosen people of Parliament lording over you without missing a beat
As flawed as FPTP is (which I do not agree with) we can vote out the goverment and also aspire to join it as an MP. A common person cannot aspire to be head of state in the UK.
>Not every woman did that. Hell, my grandmother was on similar duty. And no woman was a frontline soldier.
The majority did and those that didn't still worked hard and full time they didn't drive around a little and take pictures then go home to a mansion. pt 1
>>74757569
>wants to feed poor people
>complains about how art is wasting resources
You're either a monarchist or a liberal.
Do you want to be governed by someone who's been groomed and educated from birth on how to lead his people and represent them as a physical embodiment of the nation?
OR
Do you support transgender bathrooms, SJW's, and unlimited muslim immigration?
>>74757569
>Wealth and class are the only form of privilege
Privilege comes with duty, though. And all classes have duty. I would hope that with the increase of the Indian population there, that maybe the caste system will return.
>which still has the remnants of feudalism.
Not enough, sadly.
>I frankly don't give a shit about a few parasites leeching off the hard work of the people
Blame the EU with their "arts" programs.
>>74758000
This.
There are no other option. Liberalism, including the original liberalism, led to the SJW bullshit.
Praise Hirohito
pt 2
>>74757188
And no woman was a frontline soldier.
no they werent but woman did become nurses and other volunteers in wars in non combat roles and the other male royals weren't in the frontline trenches.
>Well no, they were bombed a few times, and when did the Nazi sympathising monarchy send anyone off? Pretty sure that was your elected politicians. But that wouldn't help your bias, would it?
Pretty sure the monarch is the only one who can declare war and the military serves in their name and on their behalf with the current monarch as commander in chief
>>74757206
until modern times the crown and its aristocracy was government. In modern times conscription is not accepted by the people
>>74758000
All I want is the chance to vote for my choice of Queen.
Real democracy.
Nothing else will change, the palaces will remain, the gold hat stays &c.
>>74758288
Why do you care about having your choice of Queen?
She doesn't do any work and sits around all day remember?
>>74758288
Democracy is for cucks, women, faggots and weak men.
>>74757982
>rebuttal
I wasn't arguing with you. I just wanted to laugh at you for being a simpleton. I honestly couldn't give a toss what your opinion is on the subject.
>>74758256
>no they werent but woman did become nurses and other volunteers in wars in non combat roles
Indeed they did. But not all of them. Those heartless harpies.
>and the other male royals weren't in the frontline trenches.
Neville Chamberlain and Winston Churchill didn't storm any beaches either. Do you hold the same outrage there?
>Pretty sure the monarch is the only one who can declare war
Legally. But it's Parliament who do it.
>and the military serves in their name and on their behalf with the current monarch as commander in chief
In name, yes.
>>74758468
It's two lambs and a lion deciding on dinner.
Make some rule 34 of the queen, I want to fap to that pussy.
>>74758517
I made a mistake and didn't notice sue me for not being a fucking computer.
>I get kicks out of pointing out grammatical, punctual, spelling etc mistakes on a korean dog cooking board.
Bet you have a great circle of friends anon. Don't forget to wash under your neck beard tonight or you may develop skin tags
>>74738945
The royal families these days are just for show, nothing else.
But in the event there's a major crisis then they may be good to have to provide a continuity.
>>74758517
The ancient Greeks were in no way weak men.
>>74738945
This is no way to talk about your sovereign, peasant.
>>74758690
>Democracy: A hyena and an elephant deciding what's for dinner
>Monarchy: 1 snake with 10 mice soldiers eating the other 99 mice
>>74757752
I can see that Germany or France aren't the same as the USA, New Zealand or Australia, even though I was in none of those countries.
>>74757982
>It is called having a conversation
This isn't a conversation, it's an argument. The distinction is that an argument occurs when two people have conflicting positions and attempts to convince the other of their correctness.
Except it's not even an argument, because you have no consistent position. You're just responding to whatever I say and then leaving it there, because you actually have nothing to say yourself.
>it's not a choice because I don't like the options
It doesn't stop being a choice just because you don't want to choose.
Your argument (this post, anyway) is that because revolutions are hard work it's not fair to expect people to choose them. I agree. I've already fucking said I sure as shit wouldn't choose one so long as my basic needs were met and my life could continue in some pathetic way. That doesn't mean it isn't a fucking choice. You can choose: danger, or discomfort. Millions of people choose discomfort every single day and I don't blame them at all. But all it takes for them to rise up is to wake up one day and decide that they want to be free. If they all did that the most comprehensive police state in the world couldn't suppress them. Death is only certain because you act alone, and you act alone because most people choose to suffer what is sufferable.
>Except millions didnt have these things in any of those regimes
And when it reached critical mass, regimes changed. The police state never got any weaker and the punishments actually got harsher, but people still rose up. If you're saying that people don't revolt because of fear then why, when fear ought to be most severe, do the few revolts that happen, happen then?
Subjugation is when you choose to do what you're told instead of what you want. Nobody can force you to do anything. All they can do is hurt you and kill you.
>>74758000
I want Kaiser Wilhelm the first back.
Would choose monarchy over everything.
Hows the emperor in japan doing?
>>74759181
>A hyena and an elephant deciding what's for dinner
Not sure i get that analogy.
>1 snake with 10 mice soldiers eating the other 99 mice
More like one mouse with ten mice soldiers having 99 other mice grow food for the lot of them, as directed by the first mouse.
>>74738945
If you can't see why having the Royal family now more than ever is so vital, you might as well vote Labour, get Corbyn in charge and end this country in 2020.
>>74759367
>Hows the emperor in japan doing?
He was just put on lighter duties due to age.
>>74758915
Where are they now?
>>74758690
Indeed they did. But not all of them. Those heartless harpies.
The ones that didn't weren't viewed as gods and weren't praised or lived in luxury and position.
>Neville Chamberlain and Winston Churchill didn't storm any beaches either. Do you hold the same outrage there?
Both did not inherit a crown, both left office, churchill saw active war as a participant
>Legally. But it's Parliament who do it
It still cannot pass without royal consent. If they didn't agree to it then it would not have happened especially in a time when the government were even more obsessed with royalty
>In name, yes
If they didn't want to be they could abdicate the position and not take military titles but they do and so that implies agreement to it.
>>74738945
It's called birthright you lowly peasant. Although it surprises me not that you aren't capable of thinking for a couple of seconds are arrive to this conclusion by yourself, I would ask that you keep your unwanted and uneducated opinions to yourself.
>>74759369
in democracy now (at least current state) there is about a 1 to 1 ratio of complete parasites to producers
What happens when the first mouse "directs" (threatens) the other mice to give it and its soldiers more and more of the food and less for themselves?
>>74738945
Who gives a shit beyond edgy teens?
Do you want a nice hat OP?
Or let me guess..,you would sell the pearls and feed the poor right?
Who is going to buy them?
An ebul monarch?
> Things have value because you place a value on them.
Is she the one who has a hoard of properties and invited in tens of millions to inflate house prices? Or pushed for privatization? Or pushed to invade Iraq?
> No
That was be the ELECTED PM, LABOUR PARTY member Tony Blair.
The same party that runs interference for organized crime and terrorist groups. The Labour Party are a racket that cause problems then sweep in with robin hood rhetoric.
What is it you are asking for? A tokenistic change to a republic? Great, problem solved, the human condition will suddenly cease to be a problem.
>>74759778
What happens in a democracy when the career politicians vote to give themselves ever higher salaries, make and vote for laws based on who gives them the most money rather than the best interests of the people, and then after retirement have high paying jobs at companies or as speakers thanks to their connections while the voters recieve less and less for themselves?
>>74738945
>we should get to vote on it
A farmer does not submit to the opinion of his cattle.
>>74759633
>The ones that didn't weren't viewed as gods
Nor was the then Princess Elizabeth.
>and weren't praised or lived in luxury and position.
Plenty did. You act is if everyone in Britain was grunt or the monarch.
>Both did not inherit a crown, both left office,
So?
>churchill saw active war as a participant
But does that live up to your standards?
>It still cannot pass without royal consent
Who do you think controls Royal Consent? Protip: It isn't the monarch.
>If they didn't want to be they could abdicate the position and not take military titles but they do and so that implies agreement to it.
I don't see your point. Or you missed mine about their role being ceremonial, and the army really bending to Parliament.
>>74759778
>in democracy now (at least current state) there is about a 1 to 1 ratio of complete parasites to producers
How are you defining parasites? Because i just can't see that ratio being true.
>What happens when the first mouse "directs" (threatens) the other mice to give it and its soldiers more and more of the food and less for themselves?
Then it's doing a lousy job, and will suffer in the long run.
>>74757188
> No wait she just sent off everyone else to do so whilst her family were safe and sound and never in any real danger.
...This idiot actually thinks the Royal Family were the ones to decide to intervene. So annoyed that one family wasn't (completely) directly involved in the war. The Royal Family were cheerleaders and a symbol of order and power against the enemy, as always.
>>74757535
>After the UK started to import liberalism and democracy from the USA, they become freaks, gays, transgenders, nigers, feminists, Muslims; shit in other words. Removing the Queen from the image makes them just the same as the others.
You have that backwards, you retard. We were one of the last western nations to free the slaves and provide universal suffrage. All waves of feminism started in Europe (UK, too) before it reached us. We were one of the last western nations to grant civil rights to our minorities and faggots.
We import cuckoldry from Europe, not the other way around.
>>74760874
Oh, and liberalism literally started in Britain first. You ever heard of John Locke, Ivan? For fuck's sake.
>>74760350
>Nor was the then Princess Elizabeth
She was praised both then and now as if she did something ridiculously good as if everyone else wasn't doing more.
>and weren't praised or lived in luxury and position.
Those who were arsitocrats can have similar arguments made against them of their ancestors subjigation of their subject however most of their modern powers are gone and I don't really believe in forced repatriation of wealth without extreme evidence and then due process.
>But does that live up to your standards
There will always be officers and grunts in an army. I don't agree with the method of officer recruitment of the era both for efficiency and fairness but still he saw active conflict which caused him to risk his life so yes it does enough.
>It still cannot pass without royal consent
Parliament could not force royal assent without over whelming public support. At least not publicly. If they do however then it doesn't make a strong argument to keep them instead of a more transparent and publicly accountable institution.
>If they didn't want to be they could abdicate the position and not take military titles but they do and so that implies agreement to it.
My point was that if they did not agree/enjoy the positions in the military hierarchy they could choose not to take them due to moral reasons. I doubt the public would have an uproar over it.
>Then it's doing a lousy job, and will suffer in the long run
The royals didn't suffer the devastation of the wars the common person suffered from. They didn't suffer the grief of destroyed families and homes or businesses and in the modern world they didn't suffer from the recession or collapse of public services so this metaphor doesn't fit.
>>74760874
You are not fooling anybody . . . . .you don't even believe that yourself.
>>74761262
You can google it, you fucking moron.
>>74761323
>You can google it, you fucking moron.
I could . . .but I won't.
Degeneracy comes from the USA, it's common knowledge, you guys are kings at it, your Universities are full of it.
America 1st!
>>74745242
Nah senpai
>>74761323
Daily reminder that interracial relationships were literally illegal in many states until the 60s. You could serve jail time for it. Niggers and whites were not even allowed to eat next to each other or use the same bathroom.
That would have been unheard of in Europe just like how Europe will never have anything close to Trump. Geert Wilders doesn't even come close.
>>74761573
The only western nation more "regressive" than us would have been Nazi Germany.
Obama is trying his hardest to turn us into you, but we're sick of it. We're so sick of it we are about to elect a fucking reality television star because he makes fun of cucks.
>>74761163
>She was praised both then and now as if she did something ridiculously good as if everyone else wasn't doing more.
At what point were people saying, "Those boys in the Ardennes, they're soft compared to Her Highness driving staff and supplies around at home!", compared to, "Good on Her for trying to help. Encouraging everyone to do some part."?
>Those who were arsitocrats
More than just aristocrats managed to avoid getting roped in. And the point was about your accusation of armies consisting only of frontline.
>so yes it does enough.
Jolly good. Now what about every other politician?
>Parliament could not force royal assent without over whelming public support.
>At least not publicly.
There you go.
>If they do however then it doesn't make a strong argument to keep them
Makes an argument against Parliament being dodgy enough to keep a finger on the Cromwell button.
>My point was that if they did not agree/enjoy the positions in the military hierarchy they could choose not to take them
Sure, but i don't see what that has to do with anything.
>The royals didn't suffer the devastation of the wars the common person suffered from.
In some cases they did. But in regards to that, it will ultimately reflect on their rule. You can't benefit from that which isn't there.
>They didn't suffer the grief of destroyed families
Nobles are immortal?
>and in the modern world they didn't suffer from the recession or collapse of public services so this metaphor doesn't fit.
They did, actually.
>>74760224
I think democracy is shit too I'm just saying it's not as bad as a monarchy where the king is a dick. I'm an anarchist
>>74761950
All of this 'gender-fluid' shit comes from America.
Your Kenyan, Muslim, President has talked about it . . . . .even Trump thinks it's good. You don't hear much from our PM . . .even Nigel Farage says it's so minority it's not worth discussing.
You are way further down the road than Europe.
>>74745615
>about as prosperous
Excuse me?
>>74762627
you racist, sexist, xenophobic, islamophobic, gender-binary enforcing, rape-enabling, patriarchy oppressive cis-scum.
STOP RAPING ME WITH YOUR MIDCRO LEVEL AGGRESSION MANSPLAINING
>:^)
>>74761573
It's not degeneracy comes from the USA. The UK is trying to adapt notions which are good in a big country but bad in a small one. Freaks in the USA are negligible because the country is big, they can accept a lot of migrants for the same reason. So they can afford some freaky laws which allow LGBT and so. London, trying not to be out of date, is pursuing this multicultural, tolerant shit which causes the overpopulation of the capital, the spurt of house prices, etc.
>>74758288
Letting the mob decide on an ultimate ruler is a fantastic idea, right? H-heh.
>>74738945
First off, those are historically significant items and it would be beneath the dignity of them and your country to sell them off. Do you think that we would ever sell our historical shit? The liberty bell? Why not just sell off the original US constitution? These are hard times after all. Secondly, the royal family is self sufficient so suck a cock and get your priorities straight.
>>74738945
I've got no problem with monarchy, but I don't like the Windsor's. I say KING FARAGE.
>>74763454
>Why not just sell off the original US constitution?
I kind of want to see Nicholas Cage buy it.
>>74763108
Sorry vodkabro but even on percentage terms we are far behind the USA when it comes to this.
Yes London is trying hard but it is still no where near the levels in American cities. To say that degeneracy comes from Europe and NOT the USA is well off the mark . . . .you must know that too?
>>74738945
Monarchies are pretty based, but
>Worshipping a kraut
>>74763860
Please tell me where in Germany the Queen was born?
>>74763659
You've literally never even been here, I know it for a fact. If you were you would have realized that there are two problems here even bigger than degeneracy, and that is our failing education system and the freakish influence of mega-corporations. Degenerates are disgusting, but they can be useful enough in tackling bigger problems with a little convincing, especially since america is so big that shit gets spread out to the point where it very marginally effects people on a day to day basis.
>>74763659
I don't deny that degeneracy comes from the US, ginbro, quite the contrary. I mean that these measures about human rights and so should be changed somehow to be seamlessly weaved into the European environment.
>>74763931
>Being born in the UK makes her English
tippity top kek, guess that explains your mussie problem.
Enjoy your saxon whore.
>>74764173
>failing education system
I watch a lot of Stanford and MIT video lectures, they're very useful and interesting. I suppose there're no better IT related materials in the world.
>>74763931
If a dog is born in a stable, it doesn't make it a horse.
Of course, Her Majesty is still majority English. But the namesake comes from Orange.
>>74764249
>quite the contrary.
I am impressed with your understanding of English.
As you probably know, We have never really considered ourselves 'European' and the ECHR is something we Brits would really like to shake off.
>>74738945
Fuck off muhammad.
