Facebook is censoring conservative posts.
The post in this screenshot does not violate its "community standards" in any way, but apparently it violated an unwritten standard that you may only post that which is liberal.
I posted this screenshot to the Disdain for Plebs Facebook page. The admin then reposted it. Within an hour, it had 1000 likes and over 400 comments.
After about an hour, it was removed by Facebook. The admin was banned.
A friend of his named Lauren Southern posted screenshots of him saying he got banned, plus the original post that got taken down (pic related). Her post was then taken down and she was banned. Now all she has is her alt account.
It's not just about removing posts. There is also the controversy with the "Trending" news ticker, which everyone knows about by now. Facebook is deliberately using it to influence the millions of people that use its site and manipulate them into thinking things (liberally biased things) are trending that are not, thus causing those people to go, "AHA! So THAT'S what's happening in the world! Those evil conservatives! I'm so progressive!" After a while with those topics inorganically declared as "trending", they actual start to become "trending" through this manipulation of the Facebook userbase.
Now you can argue that this is Facebook's right to censor and manipulate and have a political bias, because they are a private company. This is correct, however it presents a problem.
Virtually everyone has a Facebook. Facebook essentially dominates social media and shapes popular opinion and trends in ways that would make George Orwell turn in his grave. Surely there is now a need in the market that is not being met for a truly open and unbiased universal social networking platform on the same level of popularity as Facebook.
What does /pol/ think of this? Is there any way to reverse this obviously deliberate social engineering?
Lauren Southern reuploading Disdain for Plebs' original post that was removed
Lauren Southern banned for saying that Disdain for Plebs' admin was banned
>>74625959
how in hell does this violate community standards?
>>74625755
I know facebook is under investigation some probably has a link you can send these to. I am not sure.
>>74625755
Why the fuck do people still use this kike's website? After the rainbow profiles I thought for sure they would go
>>74625755
Wow they're not even being subtle with this shit anymore
>>74626072
Facebook investigated themselves and surprise they found themselves not guilty
>>74626170
No I thought I heard congress or the senate was looking into it I remember reading about it. Oh yeah, Facebook investigating themselves of course nothing came of an internal investigation.
As much as I hate that evil Jew Zuckerberg - can someone please explain to me why this is even an issue? Is there any legal basis against what he is doing? Any legal basis that prevents him from fudging what is trending to push liberal agendas?
It's a private entity and it doesn't have to be about free speech. Only a shabbos goy would register into that site under it's own name anyways.
>>74626330
No legal basis, but please read the end of the OP again, the problem is that Facebook undoubtedly shapes popular opinion and what the youth and ignorant adults believe. So yes it's their site, but they have a dangerous monopoly on social media and have almost complete control over what the populace will believe. It's why the millenials are obsessed with Sanders and hate Trump. Every other thing in the news ticker talks about how the underdog Sanders is Jesus and Trump is Satan. My main question I guess was if /pol/ thinks there's any way to reverse/undo/fight this obvious manipulation of the populace.>>74626575
>>74626575
Yes but it is a publicly traded company. So what I'm wondering is if it has to adhere to some sort of politically neutral standard?
>>74625755
Hi Lauren, that sucks that you got banned. I enjoy triggering my leftist fucktard friends on kikebook by liking your posts
>>74626330
They claimed that it was an algorithm that determined what stories would get exposure on their site when really it was just employees choosing what they liked. Since most of their employees are, as one article put it, "Ivy League 20 somethings who lean left", right leaning stories were ignored.
>>74626669
>the problem is that Facebook undoubtedly shapes popular opinion
what do you mean by this?
>>74625755
Ha, this flies right in the face of everything Facebook has been saying the past few days about being "open and balanced".
Yes it's their right to be biased, but to then claim that you're not unbiased? Stuff like this could really hurt their reputation at such a critical time when the media is scrutinizing them for allegations of censorship.
Reminder
>>74626965
I get that. I'm asking if there is any legal basis from disallowing them to do this.
Obviously Facebook has a dangerous monopoly on the minds of the internet-browsing public. But there isn't really much that can be done about a private company doing that unless we decide to make laws against it.
It seems there is a double standard though as the government can force a lady to make cake for gay marriage, but can't force publicly traded companies to practice political neutrality.
>>74626330
False advertising.
They claim their trending stories and moderation are done by an impartial algorithm, which is clearly not the case.
>>74625755
>butthurt conservitards
your tears are delicious
their product, their terms
feel free to make your own faceberg
>>74627212
But how did any of these posts violate their terms?
facebook is a corporation and and does not have to answer to any government mandated 'fairness doctrine.'
if rush limbaugh doesn't have to give liberal views equal time on his platform, neither does zuck, just because he reaches more people. free market at work, bitches
>>74627212
>>74627209
By your logic, whites and Christian business owners should be able to discriminate against fags and niggers. Glad you agree.
>>74627283
why would you be asking me
>>74626688
>Yes but it is a publicly traded company. So what I'm wondering is if it has to adhere to some sort of politically neutral standard?
boy are you stupid
>>74626170
Glenn Beck said they're not guilty too
>>74627334
who said i don't
>>74627209
>It's okay when our side does it!
The attitude of every liberal fascist
>>74625755
>getting surprised that leftists are fucking crazy
>2016
>>74627334
This is the fair outcome.
Meanwhile muslims pages that promotr sharia law abd therefore women treated like property, arent banned at all.
>>74627522
>It's okay when our side does it!
thats literally the reason a conservative made this thread
>>74627212
>their product, their terms
>feel free to make your own faceberg
It's going to have to be regulated like telephones. You can't have telephone companies listening to your phone calls and censoring anything they don't like.
If nothing is done to stop them Americans will end up with less free speech than the average soviet citizen as the majority of communication moves to the internet.
a publicly traded company could openly support hitler if it wanted to, and the government couldn't do shit about it.
shareholders and public opinion may step in and censor thru financial sanctions
>>74627293
But government isn't the only solution. The truth is that a majority of people in the world only believe what they're told to believe. If enough people are exposed to this truth, and how everything is just manipulated, then that would create the market demand for a truly open and unbiased social network site
>>74627587
>less free speech than the average soviet citizen
You might as well have said European citizen, at this rate
>>74627587
free speech has nothing to do with someones private property
>>74627587
America thinks it is free but we are actually pretty regulated. The government just does it in a very roundabout way into fooling people they have more freedom than they do. People will spout off about "muh red white n blue" in general but then when you bring up specific topics they will agree our government is fucked - they just can't put the pieces together.
>>74627587
>worries about loss of free speech
>advocates for government regulation of free speech on a public platform
are all conservatives this stupid, or just aussie ones?
>>74625755
Just deleted my kikebook account.
I feel so liberated now. Though I'm sure I'm gonna hear all kinds of garbage from friends and family, at which point I'll tell them the truth.
"I have very good reason to suspect Facebook may be misusing their application for nefarious purposes. I will not be party to such abuse of power."
>>74625755
Should let trump know man he'll fix it by next week
>>74626330
>>74626575
Congress can investigate what ever they want, and you have to answer there questions truthfully or go to jail. They do have the power to make laws prohibiting what Facebook is doing.
>>74627594
>>74627724
Why does everyone think that government would be the only solution to this? Hell if enough people with tech skills got pissed off at this, they could get together and develop their own unbiased Facebook, call it Openbook or some shit. Make a whole gay SJW campaign about free speech, start a gofundme or kickstarter. Who knows, could catch on, especially with Trump and the alt-right helping the pendulum in America to swing just a little bit more towards conservatism.
>>74626669
Ignorant adults and youth have always been a problem, I guess you could say the same about /pol/ and how it shapes opinions because there are people in here who only rely on infographs and meme alt-right news sites for their news and information. Just make people realize that using Facebook is retarded and maybe people stop visiting the site, should happen eventually with this kind of shit happening.
>>74627843
>They do have the power to make laws prohibiting what Facebook is doing.
are you sure about that
>>74626330
This is how freedom of speech will be destroyed here.
>>74627596
well, you are right about that, so get to work on creating one
>>74627843
But they don't have to stop doing what they're currently doing, if it's in their interests to sculpt people into good goyim then that's up to them. I don't see how any laws can prevent that from happening, it's a private company after all.
just mangle the english language. they filter post with a search engine. they dont have the man power to watch everything in real time and remove it
so key words are important. use new euphemisms and garble words. while i am sure they are up to date on acronyms commonly used i doubt they think lolcat is relevant. just take that to the next level
you = yew (like the wood) but could also be yuhew or replace it entirely with dat boi so instead of talking about some black guy you are referring to the person you are talking with it changes the meaning when read
>>74627209
I'll wear your skin faggot.
>>74627919
Elaborate
>>74627854
>Why does everyone think that government would be the only solution to this? Hell if enough people with tech skills got pissed off at this, they could get together and develop their own unbiased Facebook, call it Openbook or some shit. Make a whole gay SJW campaign about free speech, start a gofundme or kickstarter. Who knows, could catch on, especially with Trump and the alt-right helping the pendulum in America to swing just a little bit more towards conservatism.
yeah, so why isn't this happening? the free market has no demand for it, or else it would exist, according to conservative philosophy
As one who subscribes to Kikebook just to see what normies think about the world. This angers me greatly, but as a person who supports corporations to do whatever the fuck they want.. I'm conflicted.
I do want to know HOW it violates their standards though. If Zuckerberg were to come out and say, "I don't like that. So you're banned for saying it." I'd be much more fine with this because it is HIS corporation ultimately.
To inform you all though, last month the snapchat "dog" filter was being reported in mass by some trolls. You'd think it wouldn't do anything right, but it was found as tits and nudity and the reported victim was banned for a time.
What's interesting though is there is no picture that can be misconstrued in this content. There are simply words. Recently, the algorithm must've been reformatted in order to include conservative posts, or posts in support of Trump to be censored because dog filters no longer get a person banned.
Regardless of the situation, I'll be quitting this site, but only after seeing the consequences of this as the Pleb page is fairly known throughout facebook.
Let us keep our ears to the ground friends.
>>74625755
Important monopolies get absorbed by the government. It happened to power and water, it happened to Telcos, and it happened to the British East India company. It's time for Facebook to be nationalised, in my opinion. Not total control, but an independent board of directors with a clear mission and no shareholders to be accountable to.
You're right, OP. Social media controls in private hands is worrying. Power should only be wielded by democratically elected, and accountable, institutions. Facebook has power, ergo it ought to lose it's freedom.
>>74627771
You did good, Anon. You did the right thing.
>>74627900
yeah civil rights act just make conservative a protected class
they should at least threaten it
Who gives a shit. You conservatards are just getting a taste of your own bullshit lol go bible thump or go on yahoo answers
>>74627854
This would be kinda cool. If their campaign got big enough, and if they pandered to just the right groups and kissed their asses, they could receive some major donations like money or equipment. Imagine a truly open social network site all about free speech, endorsed by Ron Paul or even Trump. Just market it as "liberty" or "the free speech alternative".
>>74626710
Op isn't Lauren
>>74627015
Look up former Facebook employee interviews. Facebook made blm famous. They arbitrarily take down posts, and can inject whatever they are paid to into the trending section.
>>74628129
I literally feel better already, one less niggling internet entity vying for my attention and in-box space.
I never got into Facebook at all really, so what I did was more or less a formality.
>>74628043
The government won't technically censor free speech but every company will so it's basically the same fucking thing.
>>74627854
>Why does everyone think that government would be the only solution to this? Hell if enough people with tech skills got pissed off at this, they could get together and develop their own unbiased Facebook, call it Openbook or some shit. Make a whole gay SJW campaign about free speech, start a gofundme or kickstarter. Who knows, could catch on, especially with Trump and the alt-right helping the pendulum in America to swing just a little bit more towards conservatism.
It won't work, what happens when the majority of communication takes place on electronic private property? The free market won't fix it because censorship will always be more profitable.
Also the government likely helped FB get it's near monopoly in exchange to intelligence data, they shouldn't really be considered a completely private entity.
>>74628130
i would love to see this attempt
>>74628223
i guess /pol/ shouldn't have supported companies controlling every aspect of your life
reap what you sow
>>74627854
Imagine the mocking
>HAHAHA it's conservabook so silly lol!
thats funny I constantly post trump shit trolling normies on kikebook and I haven't had anything removed at all.
>>74628137
go back to neogaf idiot
If conservatives are so incensed and/or so numerous wouldn't organization of a boycott, the flooding of complaint boxes, general Alinskyisms be more useful than grumbling about how there ought to be a law. You don't want Zuckerberg accountable to the law! He's a jew! You have to keep him honest your own damn self. He should provide the algorithm he says he has instead of collegefags being his algorithm.
>>74628357
yeah, they would just have to be careful how they marketed it. Maybe distance themselves from Trump I guess, or make a big deal about being unbiased and unpolitical and post stuff like in the OP to show people the problem and why there's a need for their new open social network where everyone gets a say no matter who they are or what they believe. Just market it like that, paint everyone as the victim whether they're conservative or not, tell them there are things they're not allowed to say, "But on our site we don't care what your political affiliation is!" Just adhere to similar community standards to keep the site family friendly so the site doesn't become stigmatized as neo-nazi or a child porn haven.
>>74628352
lol you think I support this bullshit? I'm double uncucked faggot, so shut the duck you faggot,.
>>74628432
>general Alinskyisms
conservative facebook has been tried and failed miserably like most other conservative ideas.
anyone remember reaganbook?
the free market does not want your stupid ideology
>>74627405
yes he is stupid for wondering that
but it is wise to move toward such a discrimination protection codified by the government
"may not discriminate nor censor in any way at any time in any place or digital medium based on political views, beliefs, statements, or affiliations"
>>74628089
>tfw no (You)s for my effort post
Take off your name, moron. Namefags get you (You)s.
>>74628715
noooo you are missing the point, not a conservative facebook but just a social network where this kind of shit doesn't happen. Where people are allowed to have whatever political beliefs they want and not have them censored, but still be a part of a huge worldwide social network versus some obscure site that hardly anyone uses.
>>74625755
>look! The hammer is gonna hurt if I smash it against my face
>proceeds to smash face
>ouch why does it hurt??
Stop using kikebook and become an winrar
>>74628089
here's your (You), friend. Keep the faith
>>74628432
>If conservatives are so incensed and/or so numerous wouldn't organization of a boycott, the flooding of complaint boxes, general Alinskyisms be more useful than grumbling about how there ought to be a law. You don't want Zuckerberg accountable to the law! He's a jew! You have to keep him honest your own damn self. He should provide the algorithm he says he has instead of collegefags being his algorithm.
There's no way anyone can compete with FB, they control the majority of communication in the developed world, their ability to influence populations is unprecedented. There's not even any corporate accountability, Zuck has a dual class share setup where he controls the majority of votes despite owning only a small percentage of the company.
Their monopoly must either be dismantled or they will have to be regulated somehow.
Does the USA have any laws regarding trying to subvert democracy?
kek i got banned for saying that trannies are mentally ill. it was a fake name account so i dont give a shit. goybook is shit
>>74628715
Very true. Conservatives just don't understand- no one is interested in their backwards thinking bullshit. Including the free market.
>>74628959
>Things that I don't agree with shouldn't exist
>He believes differently than me, he shouldn't be able to do that
>>74628813
noooo you are missing the point. The only reason this is coming up is because it's going against conservatives. If it were the other way around, this thread wouldn't even exist and conservatives wouldn't care because their "truth" is being fed to millions. Quit the bullshit. It's like that "both political parties suck" bullshit.
>>74628936
No, that would be illegal, as much as I despise Zuckercuck, it's well within the law, as Facebook is a private entity, what we can do is bring this to light, or create a service better than Facebook, to compete with it.
>>74628813
well, you tell me then, why doesn't it exist already? there is literally nothing stopping it from being created
>>74629200
maybe something like this, or further deliberate censorships brought to light, revealed to the public on a massive scale, could be the start of that.
>>74629051
I'm not the one saying the government should pass laws or regulate facebook, you conservatards are (see above). I'm just saying the general public doesn't give a fuck about your redneck ideology.
>>74629051
do you not see the irony in that
>>74628776
tfw when now you finally understand how the free market works. if there was more demand for your posting, you would have gotten more than this one pity reply
>>74628556
>>74628432
He's right, Alinsky style tactics would work, the communists have been fighting dirty since their inception, and 4chan took off the gloves a long time ago, we just have to aim at the right target.
>>74629199
There already is one, "freedombook" a conservative social media that no one gives a fuck about lol
>>74629180
>liberals are oppressed
is this guy for real?
>>74628216
That's just scratching the surface.
It's old news, but...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/10937214/How-Facebook-was-able-to-manipulate-your-emotions.html
>People reacted with anger after it was discovered that for one week in 2012, the tech company tampered with the algorithm used to place posts into 700,000 users' news feeds to study how this affected their mood, all without their explicit consent or knowledge.
>>74627209
Only a dishonest person would fear to hear the truth.
>>74627334
The Oreo and the Chick Fil A.
>>74629266
there is no irony in that
there is no reason for everyone to not be allowed a say. If they're wrong, evil, retarded, or all three, they will just be ignored and stigmatized by society.
If you're none of those three, you have nothing to fear and can voice your opinion. What's so hard about that for libcucks to grasp? If your ideology is so great then why do you have to hide behind censorship and smear tactics, calling anyone who disagrees with you a racist/sexist/whatever-ist to silence them?
>>74628936
you sound like a fucking communist, mate. stop trying to smash the printing presses because a newspaper isn't pandering to your warped ideology
aussies are usually cool as shit. are u a chink or russian expat or something
>>74625755
>facebook censors the right-wing and astro-turfs left-wing issues
>google puts up memorials for terror-endorsing communists
>these two companies know FUCKING EVERYTHING about us
>google also owns 4chan's captcha system
How fucked are we?
>>74629339
I just checked out the start page and it looks like shit. People actually have to put in some effort if they want to compete with the biggest social media network on the internet.
>>74629180
"I support censorship."
~Anonymous, 2016
The long and short of it is the above quotation, that's all the take away any reasonable person can get from your posting. Save maybe that you insist censorship is good only if it's done by the "right" people.
You, sir, are an Orwellian monster. The irony is that you genuinely don't think yourself to be so. You believe you're a just, rational, and well-meaning human being.
But you're not.
You are but one more sheep on the Farm. Bleating just what you were told to.
>>74629518
>there is no reason for everyone to not be allowed a say.
facebook isn't stopping you from posting on the internet. you have your say.
Facebook can censor whatever they want. It's a private company
"if you don't like Facebook then you can GIIITT OUT"
>>74629518
>your ideology
this is what cracks me up more than anything
>>74627173
Advertisers pay money under the assumption that Facebook news feed operates under an algorithm with minimal manipulation.
This isn't the case. They can sue for damages.
This is unethical, even if not criminally illegal.
>>74629571
Why do you think there are so many "select all shed pictures" captchas?
They've put everyone in a cuckshed
The real reason there isn't a market in the mainstream for conservatism frankly, is because of "you guys". You make everything about your damn ideology. Trying to figure is something is either "conservative or commie/evil/gay". You play victim all the time because hollywood, the music industry, etc don't like what your selling. Academia and the science community aren't on your side, and you shit talk them. You turn everything political, about your ideology. A dog could be taking a shit and you would somehow make it political. That's why conservatism doesn't sell. It's not because you're Christian- most people are (I am), it's because you're just whiney bitches.
The thing is, "conservative news" could be literally anything that makes the left look bad. In 7 years I've never seen any of the Obongo administrations scandals in the newsfeed. When Holder was held in contempt of congress, Fast and Furious, etc... Obamas approval rating would be in Bush territory if Facebook didn't bury literally anything that doesn't make him look like gay nigger Jesus since most normies get their news from Facebook/twitter/google
>>74627594
>a publicly traded company could openly support hitler if it wanted to, and the government couldn't do shit about it.
no they couldn't? Americans haven't had free speech since the 1960s and arguably never.
supporting hitler would be hate speech and king nigger would send the DOJ after you, this is alinskys endgame, no free speech for the right, only marxism gets total protected free speech
The single most important rule for radicals, is to fight unfair, if you believe in free speech then your enemy shouldn't get it, if you like tolerance, only tolerate people who agree with you
egalitarians are long gone, replaced by alinsky marxist agitators. we need to stop pretending these people want a fair political fight, they want total victory and control. The only cure for marxism is a helicopter ride
>>74629702
all advertisers care about is how many eyeballs they can trap, they don't give a shit about neautrality
>>74629646
you're right it's not really "your" ideology, it's just a worldview that you adopted because it's what you're told to believe in and because of social and peer pressure to fit in you follow along like the drone you are.
>>74625755
Facebook is as childish as Mark Suckerberg's ideas of "world peace".
>>74625755
the first way that these liberal communists act is morally superior./ then when the delusion of their own righteousness is rejected by enough people they go into censorship mode. then when outwright rebellion occurs they go into mass murder and torture mode ala red "V" cheka reptilian mass murder castration and skinning of anyone who disagrees with them.
>>74629571
Not fucked at all.
The thing about ruling a group of people is that they can be mercurial. Sure, there are steadfast individuals that'll hold a particular set of beliefs until they hit the dirt, but PEOPLE, that's trickier.
If it ever came out, unequivocally, that the info was being harvested and misused for broad, sweeping attempts to cow the People, there'd be heads on spikes by the weekend.
>>74629801
>since the 1960's
>king nigger
>alinsky
well, its all there
>>74629822
>you
?
>>74625755
I deleted my Kikebook years ago. Why havent you?
>>74629801
>if you believe in free speech then your enemy shouldn't get it
you mean like you want to deny zuck his free speech?
the mental gymnastics in this thread are amazing: 'i'm for free speech but something has to be done about this private company that is exercising its rights to express its content as they see fit.' LOLOLOLOLOLOL
>>74629615
Lol quit being such a dramatic little bitch. I never said anything about censorship, I was just calling you cons out on your bullshit. Save your red dawn boner speech for some tumblr lesbian, patriot.
>>74625755
you know Donald Trump is a nice man so he is anti ISIS. If he was an ordinary man he would be anti Muslim.
How is any sane person not anti Muslim?
these fucks are single-handedly fucking up world peace
>>74629776
>You turn everything political, about your ideology. A dog could be taking a shit and you would somehow make it political.
You just described modern identity politics, a nearly exclusively liberal thing. Go shill somewhere else.
Don't worry, free market will fix it. Somebody will make competition to Facebook that doesn't censor stuff, it's how the world works!
>>74629871
>If it ever came out, unequivocally, that the info was being harvested and misused for broad, sweeping attempts to cow the People, there'd be heads on spikes by the weekend.
pic related would disagree
>>74629776
>"You make everything about your damn ideology"
>coming from the side that does literally everything in their power to shove politics into video games, comics, movies, television, art, and all forms of media they can
>coming from the side that sends bomb threats to pizza parlors because they said they wouldn't cater a gay wedding
>coming from the side that's trying to make all college students attend mandatory white guilt classes
>coming from the side that thinks not wanting to see Ghostbusters instantly makes you sexist
Just fuck off back to Neogaf or wherever the fuck you came from, you fat pink-haired SJW cuck.
>>74630020
just laugh at the fact they've become the liberals they claim to hate
>>74629525
>you sound like a fucking communist, mate. stop trying to smash the printing presses because a newspaper isn't pandering to your warped ideology
>aussies are usually cool as shit. are u a chink or russian expat or something
It's no longer just a company, it's more of a public utility. It would be like letting one guy build and own all the roads in new york city, no one can just build a better road to compete. Any idea of a facebook competitor is unrealistic.
Then there's the issue of it being used as a weapon, you could easily instigate civil wars, riots and violence in general through manipulation of information. No one would let Cuckerberg build tactical nukes at facebook HQ because muh private property. But somehow inciting violence via BLM and providing ISIS with support is fine.
>>74625755
>Jewbook
>An attention whore
I'll take things "I Don't Care About" for $600 Alex.
>>74630096
kek
no one cares about shit like this, now we just care about "MUH CURRENT YEAR" and fitting in with social trends and memes like Bernie on social media
>>74630121
>land of freedom
>>74625755
>>74625898
>>74626032
Send this shit to Dan Scavino, who will send it to Trump so Cuckerberg and Glenn Beck get a good stumpin'.
>>74625755
No different than the tv news outlets. I dont think you should get yourself too worked up. Intelligent people formulate their opinions and views based on many different sources of information on a topic. Not just going and agreeing with the first thing they read.
>>74630541
But there are very few intelligent people in the world, and only very rarely are they able to fight against and succeed against the mobs of stupid people being controlled by other intelligent people.
>>74625755
>>74625898
>>74625959
>>74626032
hahaaaaa kikebook just doesn't give a fuck anymore how blatant they are with this shit
The problem with Facebook's manipulation of the posts and trends is that unlike openly politically slanted news stations in the USA Facebook is apparently neutral. If they have a political bias in altering the content on Facebook they have to openly declare it.
>>74631059
>If they have a political bias in altering the content on Facebook they have to openly declare it.
no they don't. recent court ruling stated fox news can blatantly lie and still pretend to be news. google it faggot
>>74631253
so will facebook become the new Fox News
Like will people say "Ha I bet you use Facebook, you dumb sheep!" As an insult like they do with Fox News
>>74631332
they already do
>>74631413
not on that level though
>>74631059
Its part of bilderberg so guess who gets to manipulate news feeds.
lol I only use fb to send bizarre hentai I save from /d/ to my ex gf's
Glenn Beck says Facebook loves conservatives and the conservatives who dont like facebook are cowards
facebook is not like a physical business, they don't own the internet. they may have created the platform, but they are encroaching upon open propaganda.
Its a really good thing our liberal congress repealed the propaganda laws before they were all outed. thank you Obama. google and facebook are the two most frequent visitors to the white house.
I wonder why they fought so hard to get rid of those laws?????????
>>74631633
>Glenn Beck says
stopped reading there.
Piss on Cuckerbergenmansteinmaner
