>This photograph of a father holding his son in the shower has been shared tens of thousands of times on Facebook in the last fortnight. But over the same period it's also also been taken down by the social media platform more than once before ultimately being reinstated each time. Why?
>For many viewers the image is a touching portrait of parental care and affection. The reason that father and son were naked was because Fox had Salmonella poisoning for which he would soon after be hospitalised
>But for some people the image is inappropriate at best and at worst has undertones of paedophilia. Whitten has been surprised by this reaction and was shocked when people posted negative comments about what was for her a beautiful moment
Reminder that being a loving father is now the ultimate evil. If this doesn't tell you just how fucked society is, then I don't know how to convince you.
JUST.
http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-36322279
>>74538141
The people who that concerns need to be kept away from children at all costs
>>74538141
>implying that doesn't look like the beginning of a pedo porn flick.
How am I supposed to know if its his daughter?
Being naked cuddled up with a kid is weird.
>>74538141
>>74538283
>Being naked in the shower with your child is normal on /pol/ now
It's not an image for social media or the internet, but for family albums. Who would upload such a personal photo ffs.
If you're going for an artistic effect, then fuck you, fucking pedophile.
>>74538466
>>74538306
>>74538410
are you guys mentally challenged being in the shower with ur young child is completely normal
>>74538466
You fucking puritan retard
>>74538540
Pretty much this. It's normal to do it but not to put it up for public display.
a kid does not need to be wet and naked with its butt pressed to your dick to feel love and affection. but it makes the adult feel.. something else..
>>74538547
>are you guys mentally challenged being in the shower with ur young child is completely normal
is cleaning out your daughter's pussy with your tongue also completely normal?
What about giving prostate exams?
>>74538547
Taking picture while holding them nude is not.
>>74538593
I agree with you btw.
My dad gave me Prostate exams every week since i was about 10 years old. I'm glad he made sure I didn't have cancer!
>>74538141
You do know that pedo parents prey on kids during shower time?
The kids dont mostly dont remember anything of it because the trauma memory will be replaced by another bath time.
This is often why investigators will ask for your family album, "just to check".
Whilst OP's pic intentions were good, it's still a touchy subject because not everyone is good.
Meanwhile if the "dad" was black with abs and no body hair no one would have considered it innapropriate.
>>74538547
Photographing yourself in the shower with a child is not.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0_EWr2GJ5A
You retards are missing the point. If the picture was a mom with her child in the shower no one would have said shit.
>>74538645
can leafs be anymore autistic?
>>74538831
>implying men and women are equal both in physique and social standings
r u srs m8
>>74538306
>>74538410
>>74538466
>>74538540
You anglos got some serious issues. How in the fuck can you see anything sexual in that picture, you sick bastards?
>>74538466
It makes it worse that he took a photo but I know a few people that shower nude with their young kids.
My friend's mom back in elementary used to shower with him and his teen brother.
>>74538885
They're very experienced with this kind of thing.
I bet every single one of you has a picture of you in the bath when you were a kid.
That being said our parents don't upload them for the whole world to see.
>>74538141
>is this picture disgusting or beautiful
uhh, it's neither?
>>74538885
Posting an image like that is just baiting for hate.
>>74538942
This.
>>74538540
Yea this.
Being in the shower with your young child is fine, just don't post it online for the world to see.
>>74538141
He can shower with his kids as much as he want but he should also protect the privacy of his kids, not posting semi-CP on his facebook page. Autistic retard.
There has been a war of fathers and men for a long time now.
Feminism is cancer
>>74538868
You're right, men are more important socially and as parents.
>>74538916
>he
Didn't his wife snap the shot?
>>74538141
Why did they take a picture of a kid with food poisoning?
>>74538645
Sounds like you have issues, bud.
>>74538141
It's disgusting because who takes pictures of themselves naked with their naked child and then uploads it to the internet?
>>74538979
>semi-CP
Seriously, Ahmed?
>>74538141
Surely the dad's cock would be touching the son's arse though, right?
>>74538968
>hating spurdo
You got assburgers?
>>74538466
It's normal to shower with your kid outside of America though.
I took a few baths with my mum once.
>>74538942
Yeah but I never saw my parents naked or had my naked body pressed up on their genitals and posted on Facebook.
>tfw you will never be a yuropoor that got to clean the smegma from his fathers uncut dick and then cuddle nude in the shower everyday
why does it matter
what does it all mean
make it stop
this isn't real
>>74538979
Well I hope most people here are sane enough to agree to that. Fathers (and mothers) should be allowed to bathe with their kids, and that's completely normal. I do it all the time with my daughters, so does my wife. Heck, we have a big enough bath to fit all four of us in there.
But taking a picture, no. That shit should be private. Even if it looks "kinda artsy"
>>74539147
>>74538743
yes, and the Kardashians. because we're used to degenerecy coming from them. but it doesn't mean we should embrace it.
>>74539135
I can imagine pedos are jacking off seeing a nude prebuscent girl lying on the crotch of an adult man. It's softcore but still naughty.
>>74538831
Well, yeah, because literally out of a hundred convicted pedos you will have maybe one woman, and they usually either 1. did shit in concert with a pedo boyfriend or 2. dated someone a little underage when they were in their 20s/30s.
True women child-molesters are super rare. Women do lots of dubious shit but usually, that just isn't one of their issues.
For me, the pic is too private to post publicly but I don't find it offensive or questionable, because the child is so obviously totally comfortable, relaxed and trusting. Pedos do not inspire that kind of energy, body language, etc. Not ever. Think of all the Joe Biden pics. Or Woody Allen with his daughters. Photos like that show clearly that this isn't a pedo situation.
>Whitten has been surprised by this reaction
They were surprised posting a picture of a naked man and a naked child showering would cause an outcry?
>>74538647
Ask your parents I am sure that they have pictures of you naked as a kid.
>>74539354
Pedos jerk off to kids in swimsuits, does that make beach photos pornography as well?
How come this was ok when it's a 5 yr old tacking pics of mum on phone and a man is a pedo. If this is art or not its still a double standard
It's gross because he's fat and hairy.
Honestly though I don't think people would mind so much if he wasn't a disgusting ball of fat.
>>74538885
pedos, spurdo. pedos
>>74539512
>a while male
feel the priviledge
>>74539512
That lady's vagina is out of the way of the kid, unless the kid's got some octopus legs.
The dad in the photo's dick is against the kid's arse.
>>74539552
>>74539458
No, but if it's a nude beach and the kid is sitting on daddy's lap, it's in pornography territory and doesn't belong anywhere outside a family album.
>>74539354
>this is softcore
I think you need to stop projecting.
Guys did you hate prostate exams as a kid?
My dad always gave me a fucking prostate exam when I'd come home from school, fucking sucked. Sometimes he'd put multiple fingers in there just to "thoroughly check", hurt so much but I'm glad now that he made sure i was cancer-free.
That's why I think that image is completely fine, it's normal to shower with your kids and post pictures of it on facebook. Doesn't everyone do that?
>>74538141
I think its strange.I don't think its pedo but I do think its strange. reminds me of those artsy people who home school their kids and let them run around nude till they are 9 because nature or something.
>>74539371
considering how often there seems to be news of female teacher fucking half of his underage class i don't really buy this
>>74539767
I hated penis inspection day at school more.
Was such a huge hassle and they'd cancel recess just so they could do it.
>>74539767
Right? My dad was often away, so when I was 12 my friend's dad made sure that I knew how to masturbate. He showed me himself doing it, and then did it for me too. People these days just don't understand parenting.
>>74538645
Let's move the goalposts the the MOOOOOONNN
>>74538645
>What about giving prostate exams?
I know some meds are administered that way +enemas. he is baiting you and you seem very easy to fire up
>>74538716
>This is often why investigators will ask for your family album, "just to check".
has anyone ever been caught because they kept the evidence in the family album?
>showing nude with your children is perfectly acceptable!!
No it's fucking not, jesus christ. You can bathe your nude child but having your hairy dick flop around right in front of them? You retarded fucks need to be snuffed out of the fucking gene pool.
>>74538831
>men and women are completely equal in every shape and form and in no way should be treated differently or have different expectations
How you doing MGTOW?
>>74539742
This is considered softcore in Wikipedia. It's not projection, it's a fact. Maybe it wasn't intentional, but the picture is suggestive and has a clear erotic component. If you didn't know it was her father, it wouldn't be "ok".
>>74538831
so?outrage on that point hinges on you buying into narrative of totally equality.
>>74540063
It's completely normal, stop being a prude.
For centuries white people have bathed with their children, masturbated their children and practiced incest. You're trying to destroy ancient white tradition.
>>74538141
>unironically implying that I need anyone to tell me that society is irreparably fucked
Just ride and enjoy the downward spiral, mang. That's what I've been doing for... I don't know... 8 years now?
>>74538942
>I bet every single one of you has a picture of you in the bath when you were a kid.
I poured bleach on all my old photos but even before that there was no photo like that.
This picture just has a couple of unfortunate choices, that's all. If the man's face was showing and had an appropriately solemn expression nobody would think it's inappropriate.
>>74539354
Theres germans who like to wank over people shitty. Does this mean I should be force by law to not record myself shitting?
>>74538141
>>74538466
Why did his cunt wife take a photo of this?
So why couldn't the dad put some swimming trunks on before putting his naked child on his cock?
>>74540232
No, but you shouldn't film others shitting and posting it on Facebook.
>>74539138
even if that were true, he's not getting a boner because it's his son.
>>74540063
So what, you're going to bathe with a swimming suit or something?
It's your son. Both of you have a dick. It's not something he's unfamiliar with. Nudity by itself isn't sexual unless you go out of your way to make it so, even less when you're doing something where you're supposed to be naked.
Do you think it's wrong for mothers to bather with their daughters too? It's just bonding, chill the fuck out.
>>74539767
>prostate exam
I think you mean Cave Explorer, lad.
>>74540356
So you can put your dick on toddlers as long as it's soft?
>>74540333
>So why couldn't the dad put some swimming trunks on before putting his naked child on his cock?
How is he suppose to penetrate her with swimming trunks on?
Dumbass australian, quit shitposting
>>74539903
That wasn't the school nurse checking your dock out, buddy!
>>74538466
uh I bathed with my parents.
t. Russian.
tfw not a qt anime girl bathing with other qt anime girls :(
KILL THE BBC FOR THE GOOD OF MANKIND!
It's pretty gross tho
Holy shit, don't any of you whingers have children? Very best way to bathe your baby is to have a damn shower while holding it and have your wife help.
Jesus christ you people are insane.
>>74540382
>So what, you're going to bathe with a swimming suit or something?
You don't bathe together, or the mother bathes them.
>Do you think it's wrong for mothers to bather with their daughters too? It's just bonding, chill the fuck out.
Mothers bathing their children is fine regardless of gender. Men bathing their children is alright as long as they aren't stripping fucking nude as they do it.
If you seriously lack the basic understanding of why men and women are treated differently in these kinds of situations you need serious help. You aren't some ascended intellectual who's too self-aware to be bothered by it, you just lack fundamental social development to tell right from wrong, creepy from normal.
>>74540333
>My kids is sick and covered in vomit.
>I need to clean them up before we head to the hospital
>I better make sure I'm photo op ready while my kid is shivering and covered in vomit.
>>74540405
only if it's your son and there's a good reason for doing that, e.g. showering, because he probably doesn't know how to shower himself does he?
>>74538141
But the left supports pedophilia
>>74538141
Nothing wrong with showering together.
But holding them while naked and sitting them on your lap seems a bit much.
>>74539456
Mine don't.
>>74540653
I don't know about you but if I was in that situation I'd be more concerned about getting my kid to hospital than taking a picture for kikebook
>>74538466
Trudeau supporter. Meaningless life. Loveless parents. Generally just a stupid person.
>>74540729
> Implying it wasn't his dumb bitch of a wife who wanted to get the pictures.
>>74538141
>toddler sucking on tits
>so empowering!
>father bathing his son
>pedophile!
The jews are relentless
>>74539169
How the fuck did you get bathed when you were still small?
>>74538141
Let's put it this way - It's not something that necessarily needs to be shared on social media.
I had surgery when i was around 10. The medication fucked with my ability to piss. My mother held a hot washcloth to the area above my dick to help the urine come out. I suppose that's an example of a parent helping her child in a time of need, but she didn't have people snap pictures of the incident.
Yeah, good for the father. Glad he's willing to help his kid. But putting shit like that on facebook or wherever is just narcissism and nothing else.
>>74538956
the only sensible and correct answer and none of you fucks noticed
>>74540606
Who cares about why women get treated differently? This isn't about how others see it, this is about how your kid sees it. And the truth is he doesn't give a flying fuck because he's a kid and bathing with his father is as natural as doing any other kind of activity with him.
I hope you never have kids. You are sexualizing something as innocent as bathing together for absolutely no fucking reason. If anybody here is fucked up, it's you.
>>74540729
>>74540798
Yeah I was wondering about that too. What the fuck is wrong with the wife? Why do women need to photograph and share everything?
>>74540812
This.
>Mom breastfeeding her children
>WOW YOU GO GIRL
>Dad forcing his daughter to suck his dick in the shower
>GROSS GET THIS PEDO OUT OF HERE
>>74540798
I'd slap my whore wife and tell her to start the fucking car. She's clearly delusional from panic.
>>74538466
>childless leaf
Bathing with your parents is one of the easiest ways to get your filthy little shit to clean themselves
>>74539588
so you never read the article I guess
>>74540861
>Why do women need to photograph and share everything?
>>74540093
>If you didn't know it was her father, it wouldn't be "ok".
Fucking obviously, because the father has a special relationship of closeness with his children, one which isn't sexual despite involving nudity, you fucking pedophile mong. There is nothing sexual about this image, period. Are you going to tell me cleaning my babies shitty ass is somehow sexual because it involves them being naked?
Again, strop projecting.
Who the fuck gets naked with their dad?
The kid is gonna grow up to be a fag or a trap, calling it now.
The internet was a mistake. Not only has it has made people afraid of their own children so they don't get called pedophiles, but also just fucktards in general who think their opinions matter so much they can judge others like this.
When I was younger, children running around naked on the beach or in the grass during summer was perfectly normal. Don't children shower with their parents anymore? I mean for fuck's sake, in my childhood home there's even pictures of me and my siblings as children running around naked. These assholes need to get over themselves.
>>74538466
The kids still at the age where showing with your kid is normal, what the fuck is wrong with you?
>>74540697
>But holding them while naked and sitting them on your lap seems a bit much.
I understand what you mean, but it's the sharing of the image you are referring to, right?
But this might just be a family thing, the mummy was the one who took the photo.
You and I and our parents' generation would never upload such things on the internet, because they never had the internet, it's a new phenomenon.
And some people just disregards privacy and embrace this new type of image sharing culture more than others.
Helping your child shower when they are ill and before a hospital visit - Fine
Taking a photo of it and putting it on facebook - Not fucking fine
>>74538141
The kid looks three years old at the most, there's nothing wrong with that. What's a little weird is that either him or his misses thought it was appropriate to take a photo of it. Perhaps they're one of those artsy types?
>>74540975
What the actual fuck is wrong with Scandinavian countries.
>>74540847
This entire fucking thread is about how other people are perceiving this you incompetent little shit. Not once have I even remotely argued that the experience would be somehow scarring on the child.
People think it's creepy and gross, a lot of people. When a lot of people are turned off by something there is usually a biological reason behind. Like being repulsed by homosexuality, or a man trying to "become" a woman. That is what I am getting at.
>>74541020
they think they have freedom
>>74538141
He shaves around his nipples. Does anyone else do this?
>>74541020
Not our fault you guys are afraid of your own bodies.
>>74538466
I agree with the leaf for once. Never took a bath with my parents
>>74541020
Why do you think there is anything wrong with him?
>>74541020
They're essentially hippie communes masquerading as nations. Any criticism of their "liberated" lifestyles is denounced as puritanism.
>>74538141
It looks mildly pornographic for a few reasons, this is coming from a no backstory standpoint.
1. They aren't even in a natural position for being in the shower. You either stand or sit in the tub, not on the fucking side. It doesn't look like they are in there for the intention of cleanliness
2. The dad's face isn't showing, the picture focuses on the adult body, rather than the adult as a whole. If you are going to post the picture of your kid, why not include dad's face? It doesn't look like a family photo.
3. The most prominent point I can make is how the child looks. He is sick and he looks sick. He doesn't look happy or energized or any other emotion that embodies childhood. He isn't smiling and his body looks limp, it looks like he is depressed.
Basically, it looks sketchy without a story because it doesn't look like a natural scenario, the adult is unidentifiable, and the kid looks emotionally limp.
I take baths with my kids so I have no beef with that, but why the hell would you upload pics of it? It's a private family picture and it's not even a happy memory.
>>74540873
is it musty where you live? on account of all the strawmen?
>>74538141
1. there is nothing wrong bathing with your child, especially if she is sick
2. you don't show that shit around tho, why do people always have to attention whore on facebook?
why take a picture though
>>74540998
>>Taking a photo of it and putting it on facebook - Not fucking fine
Nobody is forcing you to go into that page.
>>74541152
Dunno. I'm responding to a strawman with a strawman
It's a nice picture and fine with me since it's a boy. Even when I thought it was a girl I found it touching but still a bit disturbing that his penis would be exposed to his daughter.
>>74541193
>Nobody is forcing you to go into that page.
This.
CP shouldn't be illegal, no one is forcing you to watch it, they dindu nuffin wrong
fucking stupid parents
>>74540697
At least read the article before posting. His kid had serious food poisoning and later had to be hospitalized.
>>74541152
I believe anon is just being sardonic
>>74541177
Because women have to take a picture of EVERYTHING
>>74539635
>Child pornography belongs only in my family album.
Ahmeds morals in a nutshell, really.
>>74541177
Well, the picture is now all over the news...
I'm pretty sure that was the end goal of the woman who took it.
>>74541264
Well why would they share it? Scarcity is important!
>>74538141
There's nothing wrong with the sentiment that this is photo portrays, but sharing it on social media is distasteful. Keep it in the family photo album, bro.
>>74538141
The problem is not the picture but the society. When a society is so decadent and corrupt that it's first impulse is to see such a picture as something sexual then it's corrupted beyond salvation.
>>74541177
Because women.
>>74538466
Taking care of your sick child is what parents are supposed to do Tyrone now I'm sure you are confused considering your dad left the second you left his dick but that doesn't make you right
>>74541221
God isn't it like 9am in Newfoundland
Go to bed you sodimizing hick
>>74541221
>CP shouldn't be illegal, no one is forcing you to watch it, they dindu nuffin wrong
This.
>>74541122
I think you've pretty much nailed it. Desaturate it, add a couple of VHS filters to it and it'd look like the start to some hurtcore shit.
>>74538410
Don't say that. I look forward to having naked, skin-to-skin contact with my baby. It's actually encouraged by hospitals.
>>74538141
>This photograph of a father holding his son in the shower has been shared tens of thousands of times on Facebook in the last fortnight. But over the same period it's also also been taken down by the social media platform more than once before ultimately being reinstated each time. Why?
Because Christian Anglo is sick in head and thinks fapping & nudity is a sin, when at same time fucks boypussy and thinks that's perfectly normal. They took the picture down because obviously they are pedophiles, they seen it as an sexual act instead of bathing. What are priests again? Pedophiles. That's where this mentality came from.
>>74541100
>not noticing all the trolling and shitposting
Mate... you just made the leafposters think they have finally overcomed the australians. they'll never stop now.
>>74541161
I do think the notion and purpose of the family photobook has been lost on newer generations, where as nowadays you must post all the details of you life for constant public approval, the family photobook was a private thing you kept as sort of an inside joke for the family, the story leading to the pictures, the good (and embarrassing) moments captured for remembrance when the family got together. Hell, that's part of why so many shows used to joke about showing the family photobook to girlfriends/boyfriends, because they were recognize as a sort of door into the true inner workings of the family
The actual picture and the taking of thereof? Nothing wrong and unhealthy about it. Sharing in facebook like if everyone in the world was part of your inner circle? Now that's just retarded.
>>74538466
Fuck Europe. In no way should a mans penis ever touch a son or child. If your sons butt is in your crotch it is probably happening. The photo is obscene and you guys need Jesus.
>>74538141
Incredible bait you threw there you cunt. Just look how you outed all the autists rabidly arguing if the pic is normal or not.
>protip: if you see anything sexual in that pic you should go be checked for advanced autism
>>74541310
t. Degenerate from Toronto who never had parents who would clean his penis for him and teahc him how to masturbate to make sure he learned the most effective way
>>74539371
>Well, yeah, because literally out of a hundred convicted pedos you will have maybe one woman
You got memed hard, kiddo.
According to a study done by Cortoni and Hanson in 2005, 4-5% of all recorded sexual abuse victims were abused by female offenders.[7] However, the Cortoni study numbers don't match the official statistics by The United States Department of Justice which found a rate of 8.3% for “Other sexual offenses” for females
https://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2F9780470666715.ch2
>>74541221
well they didnu nuffin wrong or whatever but you can't deny the fact that they're fucking stupid to post this like on internet
>>74538466
M8 your mother would have touched your dick hundreds of times when washing you as an infant, is she a pedophile too now?
>>74538141
soon it will be unacceptable for parents to hold the hand of their own child because of "undertones of paedophilia"
>>74538645
Bet my ass you got abused by your father when you were a child. Thats the result.
>>74538645
So only the mother can wash the child or god forbid see the child naked?
>>74541379
Holy goy.
>>74540971
Normal people who don't have cut-dick syndrome.
>>74538645
That's what your daddy did to you ?
>>74541430
Why not?
It's normal now, did you not have parents or something?
>>74538410
What the fuck is wrong with you? Did you never shower with your parents as a kid? How else are fathers supposed to wash their children? Or should they just leave it to the mother, regardless of the gender of the child, and just be fucking perpetually absent providers who bring in money and do nothing else?
>>74541122
Interesting analysis. I don't like the picture anymore.
>>74541105
>>74541020
See>>74541293
The other Anon who had a free childhood of running around naked in the beach will more than likely grow up to be a sane human with sane views of sexuality.
It's how to best avoid being sexually repressed like you guys are. Your murrica culture create more amount of insane people with fucked up views of sexuality, and if the first thing your people think of is pedophilia, it's is a good indication.
>>74541368
Slovenia, go back to drinking, the hangover is making you say stupid shit.
>>74541423
Keep in mind sexual abuse of female victims includes consensual activities which are more of often than not ignored when it involves a woman, but persecuted as hell if involves a man.
>>74541509
... That sounds scarily like the feminist description of how fathers should be, if present at all.
>>74538141
>And in an online poll run by the Telegraph newspaper 94% of the more than 7,000 people who responded indicated they didn't think the photo was inappropriate.
I mean I think all of us agree that this picture shouldn't be censored and is just an image of a parent washing up with his kid. There's nothing sexual about it. The media tries to condemn all men to be pedophiles and we shouldn't fucking stand for that nonsense. I want to go out in public with my kid and not be asked if it mine. If some cunt with a pink hairdo ever asks me that, she's getting struck the fuck down.
On the other hand, the picture is just a massive attentionseeker. Why would you want to share such an intimate moment with Facebook? Women have to get rid of this annoying habit to share everything they do with the world.
>>74538647
>>74538815
All parents I know have pictures with their children naked in a bathtub or the shower. There is absolutely nothing wrong with it except you are an autist that thinks nudity equals sexuality.
For me taking those pictures is fine but I have to admit that posting them online is utterly wrong and stupid, especially in this very case because it's just for attention.
>>74538141
>has undertones of paedophilia
Only closeted pedos think this
>>74541588
>>74541560
That's because it IS the feminist description of how a father should be. This entire culture the West is in demonizes fathers so mothers will have a monopoly on childrearing. Despite the fact that studies show being a single mother is literally the worst thing a loving parent can do to a child. Its correlation with low school performance, dropout rates, involvement in crime and teen pregnancy is literally higher than being a nigger.
>>74541499
well i'm not saying it's wrong to take bath with your children but why would you post this on internet just why?knowing how internet is didn't these two adult thought what will happen in future
>>74541588
>J0qNH8AW
(You)
There, now fuck off. Go shitpost in some other thread, you're an annoyance and not funny.
>>74541634
>except you are an autist that thinks nudity equals sexuality.
So basically if you're American?
>>74541588
Man I actually dry retched at that.
>>74541560
Christian mentality: everything that is naked needs to be fucked.
Who banned nudism on beaches and declared fapping to be sin and at same times abused millions of children in church?
We all know who can't tell the difference from reality and fiction, like they can't tell the difference between American pie and vagina.
>>74541672
Well why not?
It's normal, don't you share CP on social media? it's 2016
>>74541588
>>74541588
also that's fucking revolting
>>74539512
There shouldn't be double standards, nude photos made public with kids are exploitative, narcisstic and irresponsible.
>>74540969
Nobody knows the context seeing the photo the first time, the face of the man isn't visible, does he want to stay anonymous for obvious reasons? The kid is in a vulnerable position, seems not conscious and their genitals are in close proximity. Also, the style is pretty voyeurish, blurry, bad lighting, and the kid is in focus of the photograph.
Also, cleaning your baby's ass is not sexual but posting the process on video with close up of the cleaning process would be.
>>74541634
>For me taking those pictures is fine but I have to admit that posting them online is utterly wrong and stupid, especially in this very case because it's just for attention.
>>74541634
exactly
>>74541724
Exactly
>>74541541
Thanks mate. I'm glad those college child psychology classes finally proved use to me.
>>74541655
This. They had to be looking at it sexually in the first place to make the accusation.
>>74538141
>tfw after a long night of rough sex
This pic is screaming sex
Daily reminder that rich Jew mentality that was treated by Freud has now spread all over the western world. Everything is sexualized, everything is a penis and vagina.
>>74538942
U.S. has always been way more prudish in terms of nudity than Europe. Back in the day movies were literally banned from showing any kind of child nudity at all. We don't separate so much between sexual and nonsexual nudity. My mother bathed me as a kid but my parents never bathed or showered with me. I bathed exclusively for awhile and after I got past the age of parents watching their kids bathe was when I started taking showers instead.
>>74541732
>abused millions
>banned nudism in beaches
Again, go back to drinking, slovenia.
>>74541770
No it wouldn't you pedophile, you are applying sexual significance to something that doesn't have it. This is akin to claiming me being naked in a towel is a sexual thing, or that somehow that scene in Inside Out of riley running around naked is softcore.
I am not saying you are projecting randomly, you need to specifically be looking for sexual meaning to find it in all those three cases I described.
>>74541871
How would a Jap know?
>>74538141
My Dad never bathed me anyway. He basically was not involved with parenting.
>>74540828
They just roll around in the snow.
>>74538885
This. Why is it anglo culture always that gives birth to degeneracy like "all men are le ebil rapists" shit?
>>74538141
>living in such a sexualised world that being naked with your baby son is wrong
>>74541951
Why are you calling me a pedophile. Is it some kind of reverse projection, do you feel unmasked? Posting nude photos of you and yourself and posting it in public is not ok, even if you would like it.
>>74542052
Puritanism.
>>74540828
>>74541978
Used a bath? I have never seen either of my parents nude.
>>74542134
Because you keep projecting sexual meaning to a nonsexual image. The fact your first thought is "yeah, this looks like child pornography" tells me a lot about what sort of content you see if that's the first think that comes to mind.
>>74541379
Jesus christ, burgers are fucked up.
>>74541955
Some male bears kill off their young, so you got lucky with your father's lack of interest.
>>74542134
>you and yourself
I mean you and your kid
>>74542254
This is an enjoyable post.
>>74538141
>father and son
>long hair on the son
I can see why people think it's pedophilia. They think it's a girl. Maybe cut your sons hair and people won't think you're a fucking pedo.
>>74540211
This. Also the lighting and both of their postures make it look scary.
>>74539588
the fact that you even think that is very telling
I don't have a problem with a father doing that. But I do have a problem with them uploading it onto the internet for everyone to see. Its a gross picture in a gross situation and the whole thing should stay private. im sick of facebook and all the social media shit where people think they need to upload a picture of their daily shit every morning for the whole world to see.
when this kid gets older hes going to see this picture that his attention whore parents wanted the whole world to see and he'll be traumatized. its pretty damn gross.
>>74542052
Hint: boarding school & constant buggery.
>>74539354
>>74539635
>>74540093
Once again Kraut autism has to be explained away because you put the cart before the horse. Softcore pornography has to be sexualised in intent and focus by general definition. Protip, it doesn't matter whether paedophiles consider it to be erotic because they consider everything about a child to be erotic, that's why they are paedophiles.
This picture is softcore. The stupid whore in your picture is made up to look like a filthy whore and the newspaper is tactically placed to be erotic and open to sexual advance, hence if a picture was made with the exact same elements and containing a child it would not be appropriate. If she was not wearing sexualised makeup and was simply standing naked or doing mundane things while naked it would not be pornography. A naked child by itself is not pornography either. This is a really simple concept.
>>74539838
>tfw none of my teachers were anything like that back in the days
>>74541770
>nobody knows the context
>so we should all immediately assume pedophilia and other bad things
People like you are why I got in trouble for riding my bike across my little white town alone at age 8. The civilized world has seen LESS crime per capita, consistently as the years go on, not more.
It's nice how any immediate logical assumptions are now not even completely thrown out, they don't even surface in the typical person's mind.
>>74541379
I hope you are being ironic.
Same picture with mom/daughter and nobody bats an eye. Maybe don't rape and molest kids for 12 millennia next time, white bois.
>>74541423
RARE FLAG
>>74542574
In japan there are no kids anyway so you don't have a say in this.
>tfw used to take baths with my sister to save water
I turned out okay.
...-ish
>>74541105
Because you are puritan, burgertard. Honestly, I don't see that much difference in muzzies & burgers considering their "Absolutely Haram" views on sexuality. Fucking backwards nutjobs.
6,000,000 years in Photoshop
How'd I do?
/pol/ are you all fucking shitting me today?
Yes there is nothing wrong with a father taking a shower with their kid.
But when in the hell did it become normal to photograph it and spread it on the internet!?
You fuckers are getting rusty this is shitty bait trying to get clicks on how bad it looks.
>>74542349
From the thumbnail, I thought it was a father breastfeeding (I know) his daughter. I didn't even know it was a boy until I read the article because the picture is strange.
>>74542488
Yeah, a voyeuristic pic of an unconscious child on the crotch of a faceless man posted on the internet for everyone to see is not suggestive, right?
>>74540093
Taking wrongopedia serious: Fail.
>>74542669
...is she wearing eyeliner?
>>74542634
Saved
>>74542634
FBI/10
>>74542669
>While checking her ass
Not here. I can't find attractive this pic, even I find it a bit stupid with all that make up.
>>74541588
>dat tash
>>74541554
>The other Anon who had a free childhood of running around naked in the beach will more than likely grow up to be a sane human with sane views of sexuality.
This is just a series of stupid cliches
"healthy sexuality" "projection"
all nonsense
>>74538141
>But for some people the image is inappropriate at best and at worst has undertones of paedophilia
Humans were a mistake
>>74538141
If this is the parent of similar role
Who gives a shit
If it isn't this man should be hunted down
>>74542574
Oh look, another weeb pedophile who moved to Japan.
The wrong part about is the fact a private family moment of this nature is being put on the internet.
Between father and child, the context of this moment is clear, when cast into the internet at large, the context is free to be corrupted.
Modern everything is all about context, identity and meaning - put to a larger forum, all three can be changed.
tl;dr dont share private shit on the internet, ya big dummy.
>>74538466
>not bathing with family
>>74542634
>Poltards say parents are idiots, warn about the dangers of uploading family pics
>Another poltard makes this
Let self fulfilling prophecy may-may.
>>74542883
posting pictures of naked children on the net has always been frowned upon
you don't share family photo's with strangers, why would you post them on the internet?
It is a private picture that desperate people use to whore themselves out. It could be a loving image to show the child when they grow up (not post for people to see, kind of odd), but people spin it into something sexual. The child is very young, not 10 years old or something.
Men and women are different, though. If you consider the caring nature of a woman. This doesn't mean that men can't be caring to the point of a woman, just less common. It does make apparent the doublethink when they parade obviously lewd images of women with younger men. Imagine cougars and young men in contrast to older men and younger girls. One is a fetish and the other is a criminal.
Men and women are different, though.
>>74542957
i thought that was gonna be very softcore but the ending to that was horrifying in a way I can't fully explain
>>74538141
>The reason that father and son were naked was because Fox had Salmonella poisoning for which he would soon after be hospitalised
that doesn't sound very convincing
why can't they just be dressed exactly?
the pedo talk always comes from the same types that will not leave an opportunity out to brand men as auto-suspicious of pedophilia so they can be ignored, but the nudity here is nonetheless indecent
>>74543050
>>74542574
I don't get how can pedos be attracted to children. It's very unnatural considering that they, in most cases, cannot breed with them and they do not possess natural sexual appeal.
So what went wrong in the wiring of the pedos minds to perceive this boney malnourished child as a 10/10?
>>74542687
It's not voyeuristic because (no matter how ill advised) it's from the fucking family you idiot. The context makes clear (if the photo isn't enough) that the situation is the antithesis of 'suggestive', given that the child is extremely ill. The only suggestiveness really comes from your filthy mind.
How would you suggest holding a sick child in a shower for hours as a father? Dumping it on the floor? Holding it over your back like a rucksack? He's trying to hold the kid (who is obviously too weak to stand) upright because it is vomiting and if you knew anything about childcare that's what you're supposed to do.
>>74543114
>>74542957
This is why Japan wins.
The purest form of love.
>>74538141
Nigga wtf is with the dads head missing from the pic?.
>>74538283
FPBP
anybody who remotely thinks this is disgusting has a very narrow mind and I'd actually worry about them being around kids if that is where their mind goes the moment they see this.
I find it an insult as a father myself, a very sexist view, I have two daughters, I have had a bath with them both from being babies up until being a toddler around the age seen in the child in the pic. They are still practically babies, but it shouldn't matter anyway because it all comes down to intent, if there is no intended sexual intentions then there is zero problem aside from societies own opinion which is based on nothing more than ignorant do gooders who don't even have kids inserting their OWN intention into the situation.
>>74538141
>Just remember, white straight men are part of the patriarchy.
We have allowed this and unless we stand up to it then it will continue unabated, the ultimate goal is to make the perfect disposable candidate who do all the grunt work and then only get used for breeding as required.
>>74539588
fuck off you stup....
>noticed flag
wew, nearly got me
>>74542957
This is a problem
Is this rape or not
is he old enough to consent or s he manipulated
Can adults not be manipulated
>>74538141
Some people have dirty minds, they want it banned because they think paedophilia not because it is.
Even so why should any one need to post so personal a incident. It is not the world's business.
>>74542235
It's not so much what I think about this picture, but the consequences of posting these kind of photos for the public to see. Keeping you children from harm should be the first priority, you put them and yourself in a fragile situation where shit like this gets exploited for the wrong reasons even if the intentions were good. And this photograph is especially suggestive for the uninformed bystander.
>>74543156
Wrong premise, you think people know the context? Make this pic as your wallpaper and see how people will react.
>>74543114
That's not ok.
didn`t know i got raped as a child while bathing with my mom and my dad, thanks pol for the enlightenment
>>74543362
>is he old enough to consent
It's an anime retard, what do you fucking think?
>>74543545
There is literally nothing to be uninformed about when it's posted by the actual family. I do not understand all the pedos thinking there is anything sexually suggestive in this picture.
The only degeneracy in this pic is the fact that they share this moment in kikebook. Why people share their intimacy like that? Fucking disgusting.
Pic related is totally acceptable but switch the genders and get the cops called on you lmao
>>74543362
Would you say that it's problematic then?
>>74542957
Indeed, what kind of parent does not take care of their child?
>>74538141
If you browse her album of facebook there's worse stuff
>>74544503
>Woman are naturally better caregivers
>Gender roles are a societal construct
>sweating_man_has_to_push_a_button.jpg
looks like the kid has dick up his ass
lets be honest. its probably shit like this that fucks little kids brains for life and makes them like fucking their same gender
do you want MORE fucking fags? because this is how you ensure kids will develop such a disorder
but then again. faggotry is completely "normal" now
fuck i swear for a right wing board you /pol/ cucks have some pretty damn lefty ideas at at times
also check >>74538141 s flag...
>>74544503
not really tbqh
Leftists are the real pedophiles for even making the mental connection to sexuality in this picture.
fucking hell.
>>74544326
I argue if intimacy even exists anymore. Every emotion, every thought, every position we share with each other is de facto not worth doing unless it can be put online. The kid would literally not be loved and the moment of comfort would be meaningless if there was no photo posted on the internet. The father would just be treating his son like a common dishrag if it wasn't for the photo going on the internet. Not worth the internet not worth anything at all I say.
>>74538141
>has undertones of paedophilia
oh for fuck sake
>being manly isnt okay
>but also dont be too affectionate with your kids
>NOTHING YOU DO IS EVER GOOD ENOUGH FOR US
