It's obvious that it must have happened in the last 20 years or so. The Bernie phenomenon has no other explanation.
There's a whole youth out there claiming the problem of the world is "inequality", they think the Silicon Valley being extraordinarily rich is somehow at the expense of some forgotten African tribe being poor; millions of young Americans who were raised being taught that America is evil and just as bad as Soviet Union, who don't see the United States as a symbol of liberty, which is what it is; who today sympathize with Palestinian terrorists over Israelites.
This isn't an accident. It didn't just "happen". Seems like a carefully crafted plan by socialists/hippies in the 70s, which is now giving fruition.
>>74516683
it has been cucked since at least the 60s, I think by literal communists fleeing their communist shitholes to come to america during the cold war
>Leftist cuck grows up in safe space where arbitrary metrics prove your worth
>Go to school again to a teaching degree - extending their liberal brainwashing
>Go on to teach kids where the teachers are the boss so they're infallible; being around people less intelligent then you makes you more brazen
>Survive off of tax payers so it goes without saying they want a bigger government
>>74516772
This. McCarthy wasn't exactly wrong when he said commie scum had infiltrated the US.
>>74516936
The Department of Education was a mistake.
The Prussians did it.
>>74516936
the infiltration in my country is beyond saving and I know exactly how it works. But I thought America didn't suffer with this same shit, until this Bernie campaign.
I used to link American education with appraisal of the nuclear family, the love for the nation, and faith. But this mass of young people hate America and everything it tries to represent, exactly how the Soviets wanted.
>>74517646
>tfw the Soviets have the last laugh
Leftists are actively attempting to destroy society and I fear they may succeed.
>>74517863
Dammit! I came to this thread just to post that pic
>>74516683
>socialists/hippies in the 70s
They were the ones who fought the most for free speech on campuses.
I had literally one leftie teacher all the way through grade/high school. Or at least only one who was vocal about the ideas. Graduated 2006, grew up in the Midwest.
>Sympathize with Israelites
Who could be behind this post?
>>74518037
They fought for free speech for themselves. The very same socialists/hippies in the 70s that fought for free speech taught later generations about "hate speech" and all that nonsense.
>>74516683
WW2
>>74516683
>>74516772
No it started in the 1930's
by the 1960's it was almost completely taken over
today they run it but the good ones just lay low and subvert from within
Communism is an entire ideology where the idea is that both the poor and your typical middle classer has his life ruined by his dickass boss, and that the "intelligentsia" (which humanities professors and other riffraff think of themselves as) should rule society.
So they think "hey yeah, I'm a smart guy, I should run things, I should be a card-carrying party member". But then they think "hey that's kinda selfish" but then they remember" but I'm not doing it for me! I'm doing to help poor oppressed Jamal! I'm such a humanitarian!"
Colleges never stood a chance desu.
>>74516683
>The Bernie phenomenon has no other explanation.
Are you retarded?
Real wages have been stagnant since the late 70s, most good blue collar jobs have been shipped overseas, even if you're middle class you can't afford a house in a decent part of most large cities, healthcare is still a joke you can't afford, unless you're rich or poor w medicaid, I risk jail just for growing a harmless plant in my own backyard, while oil companies, arms dealers, banks take tax money our of my pocket and give their executives million dollar bonuses. The oligarchs are more blatant everyday.
Bernie comes along and says let's change this, and you think people follow him because they're "indoctrinated?"
I ask again, are you a retard?
>>74516683
I actually know the answer to this, at least in america but i doubt pol is interested in it. It doesn't involve the usual suspects and if pol understood what is up, folks on pol, with our grand ability to shitpost, can actually do something to stop it.
>>74516683
How new are you? This thread is pathetic
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYu6qhd88_M
you guys know it was inevitable
public education and the distribution of "knowledge" disseminating to the poor
if, knowledge is power and it trickled downed to the poorest individual
=??????
Anti communist propaganda died when the USSR died. X was the last generation taught the evils of communism. We thought we won the war when it had barely begun. Linking communism mainly to the USSR was a huge mistake.
>>74518358
Spot on.
Socialism is the quintessential ideology of bureaucrats and "intellectuals".
>>74518728
hello berniebot, what else should be free? transportation, electricity, food, clothes, toothpaste, toilet papers? these are all more important than your sociology degree.
>>74517646
The problem with your country isn't socialism. Socialism is an excuse and a promise, to trick people. I study political science, in my school we were forced to study third world political systems. Mexico, Zimbabwe and Brazil were grouped into political systems where politicians engaged in rent seeking behaviour. Mexico, Zimbabwe and Brazil are marginal democracies (russia belongs in this picture, a shit ton of countries have these features). The democratic party is trying to literally engage in the politics the third world does to win elections. It's so fucked.
>>74518358
Dunno what school you attend canadabro, maybe a community college? But no one in the political science programs think that we. We are all taught about the dangers of good-intentions. Communism isn't blinded supported also. In my political development course, three reigning concepts were: resource curse, curse of charity, and the curse of rent-seeking. China, and 3 other asian countries are the ONLY countries in our human history, besides already industrialized nations, to achieve industrialization and development. Not even russia, with its communist history, was able to lift that many poor people up. Commuism, socialism surprisingly doesn't have much weight in all academic fields except black/aboriginal studies.
>>74516683
Yes and no. Kids thought dumb thoughts in the 30s and 60s. They grow out if it.
It helps if there's a war or if they have to get a job.
As soon as our institutions start to exist we become unworthy of them: the strength, resilience and hardship that breathed life into them become unecessary. The decaying was in motion since day one and to think it was planned all along is false.
When a house is rotting from inside out, all kind of rodents will find their way in.
>>74516683
>live in the bubble of academia
>act like it
when the student loan crisis hits they will lose their bubble
>>74519450
show me where i said anything should be free. do u even reading comprehension?
>>74516683
Subversion of Western/American values began in the 60's and has been developing and growing in dominance ever since. Socialist/Leftist views now dominate the vast majority of educational institutions in the West which leads on to other institutions such as the media and politics.
>>74516683
Limp wristed SJWs are the offspring of hippies
>>74519450
Socialism isn't the ideology of bureaucrats or 'intellectuals'. It is seriously the pathetic ideologies used by power hungry politicians to whip up a disgruntled demographic. Distribution of wealth is class warfare, it destroys the very social contract of society. No one in the past 60 years who studied political science in the west takes socialism seriously. Everyone who studies it seriously looks at how the social contract is maintained, and what are the risks to its existence and collapse.
Brazil is fucked because Brazilians are corrupt. Socialism is an opiate for the poor to feed into their hopes while giving excuses to those who take up its flag that an evil 'outsider' (american,capitalism, the 'elites') as someone who is sabottaging his effort to help them while he syphons off funds or direct state resources to particular favela and not others.
>>74516683
Hippies from the 70s got into important positions in academics. I just graduated college and can't tell you how many department heads were faggot (literally) SJW's.
It's all good though because you're going to start seeing a lot of those private colleges shut down in the next few years due to bankruptcy.
two words
Frankfurt School
pol is full of memes and no real understanding of political science :(
I think it's more that the socialist system is just very appealing at a basic and personal level, while the capitalist way is not. Many socialist ideas are very simple to understand as an appealing and immediate impact on yourself, while also shifting any shortcomings to others.
If you're a college aged kid, free schooling, loan forgiveness, free medical, and basic income etc etc are immediate and easy to understand benefits that apply to you. The trade offs are vague and nebulous, mostly applying to other people, or don't translate into an immediate day to day impact for you.
Left leaning politics are often romanticized as well, giving it's adherents an appealing identity to adopt, which is something young people especially are usually searching for.
>>74519829
>never read any of the works
Frankfurt school advocated to a return of traditional genuine culture. They were worried about the normativeness of capitalism in cultural consumption. They aren't the ones who empowered the gimmiedats you americans face. I wish you guys took the real red pill. If you can see what I am seeing, seeing how the dems to win votes are basically have been doing what mexican, brazilian and Zimbabwean political parties have done to maintain power, it would wake you up.
>>74519769
politicians wouldn't be able to so easily fool the people with such tactics if there wasn't cultural (symbolical) domination in the educational system.
>>74520038
basically the democrats reward the people who support them with handouts at the expense of the actual producers?
>>74520118
The poor people in your country aren't even educated. The promise of gimmiedats is all they need, plus someone to blame. The supporters of bernie, believe it or not, they are a vocal bullying minority. These folks have always existed in the fringes of a university campus.
Brazilio, I don't think you understand how things work. Cultural domination is a tricky hypothesis. Even marxists, who constantly cry that capitalism is dominating, are willing to acknowledge this.
I'm starting to appreciate the courses I took now. I can see the world better then a lot of because of it. I guess the effort to pass and learn the materially critically was worth it.
>>74518728
Health care is expensive because of the government.
Corporations are a product of government regualtion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4Y8vGuBkrk
>>74518871
>I actually know the answer to this, at least in america but i doubt pol is interested in it.
Tell us
>>74519829
I think the following quote is pretty telling.
“The problem is that these students are the next generation of the faculty members and they will bring with them this thinking and herein lays the problem,”
http://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Bring-as-many-foreign-students-as-possible-to-Israel-to-counter-BDS-454330
>>74518200
Hippies were closer to anarchists than communists. They disliked big government
>>74520470
Worse, they have to play this weird dance between the productive classes of society and the segments they mobilize for the vote. They can't do anything really to enact change because doing so would give you Zimbabwe's white farmer flight. Also the cost to enact the sort of change they promise tends to be unrealistically high, which continually gives them a mandate. These political systems, the marginal democracies with rent-seeking (1 party dominating) qualities, always needs a bad guy to keep the con going.
In brazil, politicians and political parties would pander to one favela and not the other. They would reward the favela by giving them electricity or build sewage system or whatever. infrastructural upgrades, stuff government should provide if government wasn't badly run. they did this for votes.
There are quite a few notable politicians in America who have communist ties. Bernie for example visited the USSR for his honeymoon. Obama on his trip to Cuba asked to have his picture taken with Che Guevara in the background. We have a lot of undercover communists here in the US. Much of it is a result of some of our most prestigious universities having literal USSR infiltrates as their professors. These people have grown up now and are in legitimate positions of power.
>>74520915
>Corporations are a product of government regualtion.
>>74516683
>It's another Yuri circle jerk thread
We get it. There's a vast socialist conspiracy to convince American youth to support globalist capitalism. Stop making the same threads over and over again.
>>74520038
>Frankfurt school advocated to a return of traditional genuine culture.
lolwut?
>>74520915
>Health care is expensive because of the government.
What are you talking about old chum?
European countries all have governments and yet healthcare costs a fraction of the USA.
>>74516683
American education is a socialist system so since the very start
>>74521296
Academic history would say this utterly false.
The methods taught in academia to criticized capitalism or any system can be used to criticized socialism or bernie's patheticism. what you aren't accounting for is how the democrats make a concerted effort to target minority working class when they realized that the white working class was turning against them due to union failures.
>>74521502
Read some of it. You will see. Don't read the wiki on it. Read the actual books. They are a little dense, but read it.
>>74521609
another falsefood. american education system is protestant from the very start.
>>74516683
The biggest problem with education is the assumption that men and women are equal
>>74516683
I remember a teacher I had in high school Mr. Judd. He taught history, philosophy, and Vietnam war history class. He would always troll kids who would wear Ché shirts or Russian sickles all that kind of shit. He was one of the main red pill inspirations that molded me into the man I am now. Saw him at this bar not too long ago and talked to him had a few with him he's still based and trying to reeeeeaacccchhhh these keeeds but it's fucking insane now.
>>74521615
>let me tell you about American universities
k
People don't realize how popular Communism was in the USA and all over the world in the early 20th century. It seems distant and absurd to think of serious communists in America, but communism was really the "cutting-edge ideology for intellectuals" at the time. The narrative of the Red Scare as overblown is false.
Traditional Marxist-Leninist communism was especially popular in the West before the crimes of Stalin became known. After that point, the "old left" took a blow to its credibility and some became the "New Left" or more like Maoists and some went more new-age and hippy-like, but they all remained leftist in some way or other.
>>74517635
No it wasn't, it was needed under dormant commerce clause powers to make certain that all children we educated reasonably. The problem is a state like Nevada would do a great job but Louisana would do a terrible one and it would hinder economic development. Enumerated powers are there for a reason.
>>74520779
nah you don't get it.
the version of history we're taught influences very much on politics. And the version of history they teach to kids favor the Worker's Party narrative much before they took power, it was a long process where they converted teachers, journalists, professors, artists, all up to this point. Only gimmiedats is impossible for someone to take power. They had the support of the intellectuals, almost all of them. Two years ago, before the crisis broke out, the party released a resolution where it stated that they need to take the next step in order to achieve, and I quote, "hegemony", through "political reform and democratization of the media" (read: nationalization, censorship) and a "cultural revolution". I can send you the document if you want.
>>74521510
If anything American healthcare will be more expensive because of health insurance.
It's the same problem as with giving out student loans like candy.
>>74522229
Go back to /leftypol/ you fucking commie faggot
>>74516683
Early 20th century. All of the commie philosophy from the 19th century finally got in as American universities wanted to be more 'intellectual' like the European universities.
All down hill from there. This shit doesn't happen over night. The cancer has been growing for a century here.
>>74521615
Academic history IS false.
The reason the white working class turned against them is because their stupid communist fantasyland policies don't fucking work. Take a look at Shillary right now. She thinks she can eliminate ALL coal jobs if she becomes president. How can you eliminate an entire industry that has been around worldwide for hundreds of years within four or eight fucking years? These people are fucking insane.
>>74517544
He was EXACTLY right. Had a teacher once that told us he was right. I think it was the one who was angry that his family's position as the premier irish catholic political family got taken by the Kennedys. That was an interesting rant.
Come to think of it, I had a lot of teachers in high school that seemed to be trying to subtly redpill us. I didn't fully appreciate it at the time, but still felt like I as being told some sort of secret, somehow.
>>74522219
I am just saying it is clear you are ignorant of your own country's intellectual history. I mean, should I congratulate you on that?
>>74522245
All governments that are in the marginally democratic class uses the media as an apparatus for support. The delusion here is that even though the media channels are owned and on message, that doesn't change the tricky arrangement they built on rent-seeking. People can feel alienated by the media. The defacto mechanism of continuation and sliding to one particular arrangement is the relationship (which is what the gov does) people have to their government.
Egyptian media is controlled by the government, so is their internet. Yet the Egyptian uprising occurred. I think you need to read some stuart hall and play with some thought experiments. The moment brazil experience prolong economic decline, the nation will hit the shitter. you guys epitomize a gimmiedats political system.
>>74522490
Academic history is the history of the academy. It's a history about its changes and what happened. It's intellectual history. The fact you don't know this shouldn't be surprising to me.
>shillary
she is throwing one demographic under the bus to win another. In any political system, there are winners and losers. Democrats do not support white poor people.
>>74516772
Paddy is right. Literal Commies infiltrated between the 30s and 60s as part of the USSR's programs and ambitions.
>>74522936
I posted on impulse. I thought you meant the commies taking over. But still. Academia has it's negatives even before all this commie shit existed. Don't tell me intellectual history is pure because even that history has its fair share of subversion and deception.
>>74516683
>It's obvious that it must have happened in the last 20 years or so.
Negative, it was there from the inception.
>>74523300
Pure, subversion, deception....
you still don't get it. history isn't some just oral retelling of a source you are supposed to accept as fact. that's highschool child tier shit.
>>74523336
Mann, Sears Harper. The boogie man of the home schooling movement. Americans as a society no longer have a common criteria of what good or succesful means.
>>74523336
On that note, it's my understanding that homeschooling is illegal in many western European countries. Any eurofags awake to confirm or deny this?
>>74516683
>last 20 years
>>74516683
I imagine it happened because non-intensive sciences (Any "science" that wasn't a STEM) were basically highly up to subjective interpretation. These social sciences, particularly sociology and low-level psychology allowed to and for extraneous ideas such as most SJW shit you see today. Since major academia ignored this crap and disregarded it as false, unproveable and non-science as a whole these dumb shitters (the SJW) basically circle jerked over it. They formed their own schools and communities of thought then pressed black and white arguments with "If you don't agree with me you're racist" and since no one wants to be labelled a racist, they go with it.
So you get a hivemind community that effectively says "I'm right because I found stuff that says I'm right!" instead of traditional science with "How does this happen? lets investigate... Form conclusions based on findings". This allows for a ridiculous amount of user input, subjectivity and control and anything that isn't in line is just twisted into a massive fucking confirmation bias. Imagine the Frankfurt school and all its bullshit that just revolves around one gigantic confirmation bias and anything that goes opposite is actually a result of their theory as well so it magically agrees.
>>74526228
Also then mix in the general evaluation of "fairness" and how "being fair" is not the same as "being equal"
But people buy into this shit readily because they know stupid and simple thoughts of "I like equality and if I don't therefore I'm anti-this, that anything" So they buy into it super easy. Back to the black-and-white arguments they promote shit like "if you disagree with me you're something negative" and this follows suit. Since students are feeding off an institution, a school is just a big factory of like minded individuals. Sociology especially is at the core "the study of people" however when you start "studying" people to such levels of human intellectualism some how a leap of faith is made to where "humans operate in X, Y, Z ways because I said so" This is why every psychology paper and sociology paper can't fucking pass any peer review because peers can't reproduce your results. Sure they can reproduce the data, but they can't reproduce your subjective ass results. This is why you get so much bullshit in today's society about public opinion in general. That going against the grain is "good" except "when I don't like it"
>>74521510
Patents. Full stop.
Intellectual property law is choking the life out of the economy with bullshit government-granted monopolies which are then leveraged into ridiculous rents.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evergreening
>>74516683
>When did the American educational system get infiltrated by socialists?
When did the free education for all get invaded by socialism?
Gee OP, when did your brain get invaded by dumb?
no idea
>>74525883
I heard this too. Homeschooling in certain parts of europe is illegal because somehow people don't have the liberty to choose a school or curriculum its all decided by the state
>>74516683
It's been a long process. Read this book. Even just the prologue is informative. It's free on archive.com.
>>74526228
>>74526539
LOL another armchair historian.
sociology, psychology, social sciences, the usual suspects who don't use interpretistic methods.
bro, it was the humanities where SJWs fester.
>>74526719
go on...
>>74526719
Mon frère, est-il interdit d'enseigner les enfants chez-vous ou il n"est pas nécessaire de les emmener à l'ecole?
>>74526935
>bro, it was the humanities where SJWs fester.
sociology usually falls under humanities in colleges. So yes an SJW will take basic sociology.
>>74526826
this book has been totally debunked.
>>74526719
This faggot... Had a professor in uni constantly sucking Foucault's dick
>>74523111
Checkd'
Also sauce on that information?
>>74527000
Source?
>>74526998
No, sociology never falls within the humanities. They always fell within the social sciences. Social sciences aren't humanities. Maybe in community college where they teach it as social studies and remove the distinction between commentary on society, and the study of culture/society, but in universities with research programs in these fields. they aren't under the humanities. Humanities is its own tradition.
>>74527073
Literally or figuratively? I don't find his work useful because he is too fixated on how political forms emerge through discursive means, and he does a horrible job in actually going deep.
>>74527246
Did you reply to the wrong anon?
>>74527246
>No, sociology never falls within the humanities.
Then why can I go to a public college and take sociology as a humanity credit?
It all went downhill after teachers were forbidden from slapping their students. I know my children can be monsters so i want their teachers to smack them in class. Teach them some respect
>>74519829
Yes. Jews and traitors, like usual.
From Culture of Critique:
>Chapters 2–4 reviewed several strands of theory and research by Jewish social scientists that appear to have been influenced by specifically Jewish political interests. This theme is continued in the present chapter with a review of The Authoritarian Personality. This classic work in social psychology was sponsored by the Department of Scientific Research of the American Jewish Committee (hereafter, AJCommittee) in a series entitled Studies in Prejudice. Studies in Prejudice was closely connected with the so-called Frankfurt School of predominantly Jewish intellectuals associated with the Institute for Social Research originating during the Weimar period in Germany. The first generation of the Frankfurt School were all Jews by ethnic background and the Institute of Social Research itself was funded by a Jewish millionaire, Felix Weil (Wiggershaus 1994, 13). Weil’s efforts as a “patron of the left” were extraordinarily successful: By the early 1930s the University of Frankfurt had became a bastion of the academic left and “the place where all the thinking of interest in the area of social theory was concentrated” (Wiggershaus 1994, 112). During this period sociology was referred to as a “Jewish science,” and the Nazis came to view Frankfurt itself as a “New Jerusalem on the Franconian Jordan” (Wiggershaus 1994, 112–113).
>The Nazis perceived the Institute of Social Research as a communist organization
and closed it within six weeks of Hitler’s ascent to power because it
had “encouraged activities hostile to the state” (in Wiggershaus 1994, 128).
Even after the emigration of the Institute to the United States, it was widely
perceived as a communist front organization with a dogmatic and biased
Marxist perspective. . .
You can read the chapter here http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/chap5.pdf
>>74527000
I would suggest these too. They largely corroborate MacDonald's history of academia, but with different focuses. I'd definitely start with MacDonald because he covers more and goes back farther.
These came out in the 1990s, when things seem to be reaching a turning point and were becoming more noticeable.
>>74527570
Second part of the infograph.
Studying history currently and getting my masters in education. I plan on becoming a high school teacher and beginning the long, difficult process of reversing demoralization. It'll take decades, but we'll get past this.
>>74526995
L'école est obligatoire jusqu'à 16 ans. Et on y apprend à être de gauche ; les universités publiques sont parasités par des professeurs encartés, certains programmes du collège ressemblent à s'y méprendre des tracts du SFIO ou de la CGT, le récit national est complètement délaissé... Récemment le gouvernement a même introduit de la propagande LGBT dans les programmes scolaires du primaire.
>>74516683
Vygotsjy
He's was a Russian who came up with a more socialist take on education in the early 20th century but it didn't make its way into America until the cold war.
My guess is it was the soviets that brought it to the west in order to subvert the children.
>>74527383
That's a BS. I really hope you are lying because social science is distinct. Humanities do not teach you methodology, social sciences do. The distinction is necessary to acknowledge to even make those courses at all rewarding.
>>74527337
oops, I wanted also to reply to this fuck >>74527073
>>74527583
Academia had its science wars in the 80s. It was between humanity departments and the science departments. Those pop books are recounts of some aspects of those conflicts. The root of the science wars was funding and relevance. I know of those books, I am very familiar with the politics at the time. Academia is academia, to state that it is all controlling or the defacto source of influence ignores where the left power actually resides. These books saw spat and called it a cultural changing tide. Total bs.
>>74527766
Today's theories on education find their roots in cognitive science and psychology. Common core, the shit what they did to maths, that's wasn't a conspiracy. Math at the university level isn't the plug-and-chug shit they teach you in highschool.
Don't forget that subversion was the societs main activities in infiltrated foreign countries, not espionage.
>>74527766
>didn't make its way to cold war.
so right after WWII?
>>74527883
>That's a BS. I really hope you are lying because social science is distinct.
I'm not lying, I had 3 humanity credits to fill for a 4 year state university and filled all of them with varying levels of sociology courses. My first being Sociology, then Sociology II and then a more specific course called "Sociological Psychology" which was effectively intro to psychology/applied psychology
At least in america this is what I took. Don't know how its different for europe or canada
>>74527883
Vygotsky was an educational psychologist.
>>74518728
The infographic you are refrences does not properly account for inflation AND does not include non-cash benefits like healthcare, sickdays, flextime, etc.
>>74528064
Yeah. It slowly started to enter the school systems in the 60s and 70s.
>>74527570
this is a huge huge red flag
>During this period sociology was referred to as a “Jewish science,” and the Nazis came to view Frankfurt itself as a “New Jerusalem on the Franconian Jordan” (Wiggershaus 1994, 112–113).
>1) the frankfurt school wasn't sociology
>2) sociology at the time was known as the german science, along with geology. Weber, ever heard of him?
fucking degenerative fools who rather believe in delusions to feed their anger then see the world the way it is so they can actually do something about what is bothering them. just like pajeet: you choose the boogieman to chase over real problems.
You dislike the SJW agenda? You want the tide to turn? Wasting your time reading that shit will clearly help, yep.
>>74527883
It's total BS, but yet we see the theories discussed in these books breaking the seams out of academia now and bursting into mainstream discourse on social media, to the point that it has led to substantial support for a major contender for the Democratic nomination.
The books I have posted provide the history of these ideas up to now, so one can see how we got here.
>>74528174
I forgot about this too
shit like this spread like wildfire with the advent of in home internet and the www
>>74516683
>they think the Silicon Valley being extraordinarily rich is somehow at the expense of some forgotten African tribe being poor
god why is it always fucking niggers
>>74528517
Somehow the heroes of our society stopped being those who achieved the highest heights, but have now become those who have sunk to the lowest depths. Our whole value system has been turned upside down.
>>74528064
>university of chicago
>mit
>stanford
>columbia
>nyu
they all have social science departments. At my school, to graduate within a program of social science (sociology, political science, geography, urban studies, etc) you need to take 2 sats courses. the fact you don't know what is the difference between a humanity course or a humanities discipline, and a social science discipline is evidence that your school stinks. how can you take those courses and not understand the methodologies involved, unless... your school is just gearing you to be a consumer of those ideas and aren't interested in preparing you for research. we have a school like that in canada, it's pure cancer.
>>74528104
The soviets didn't have psychology. Their psychology is some sort of voodoo bullshit. American/western psychology (whom rejected freud shit) went the way of skinner and led to cognitive science.
>>74528174
one of the skills those community activists learn is how to use that those ideas as analytical tools. I don't know what your epistemological commitments are like in respect to ideas and how they work, but if you really look in how those ideas are used and how/if it translate to political power, you won't see what those books caim to be there.
>>74527666
>666
>la propagande LGBT dans les programmes scolaires du primaire.
Les putain gauchistes veulent les endoctriner avant qu'ils peuvent actuellement avoir des leurs sexualité . On doit commencer l'affilage des guillotines.
>>74528149
You must be a jew to gibber-jabber this much without really saying anything. Frankfurt School absolutely was a social science and was the source of political correctness. If one wants to change the present, you must understand history to see how it came to be.
>>74528726
I really thought it kind of debunked you when you skipped over this >>74527132
Care to go back to it and deal with it and buy back some credibility?
It was a backlash against McCarthyism
>>74527570
>>74528149
>>74528996
Jews did nothing wrong
>>74529049
>backlash
you mean a continuation, McCarthy was right, but he didn't get very far before he was ruined, forever tainting the "look a literal Marxist is teaching your children" line.
They basically became immune, McCarthy getting fucked made them able to practice their traitorous ways more brazenly, in the open even.
>>74529049
this, honestly
You know what really sucks? There is a huge segment of society that is totally disconnected to the tools and understanding of political power that they revert to folk theories. In turn, there is another group who understands enough about society's functioning and what those boogieman theories say to make use of it for their agenda. It is a culture war.
>>74528996
Frankfurt school never called themselves sociologists. Sociology at the time, in the 40s, was known a a german science, especially in the angloworld. This little fact of history is inconvenient in a narrative of jewish conspiracy. Seriously, the joos are everywhere crowd suffers from the same paranoia the SJWs do with patriachy. If what you are saying is true, and a legit historical account, then you able to extend that narrative to explain why was sociology at the time considered a german science.
>>74529043
Give a specific claim. All his about boas and the Frankfurt school is severely wrong. I want to paint you into a corner, but let me just say this: historically, the Frankfurt school didn't have much influence in American humanities, especially compared to what was actually influential. It is so easy to debunk.
>>74529181
Never said that. I said that it is sad how invested you folks are into a narrative that just leads to more emotions and no solutions. Clearly something is off with the defeat of traditional culture. Clearly a political system that panders to gimmiedats entitlements is bad.
seriously, if you could only be woke.
Very interesting question, OP. Aside from a few posters, of these responses have been pretty shit.
I attribute it to two things, although the first thing directly contributes to the effectiveness of the first.
1) The 1960s draft. Those drafted were from more poor and more rural backgrounds(these are correlated). Those who weren't drafted were in college already, were too old, or went to college to avoid being drafted. Keep in mind college was not as readily accessible as it is today. Back then, it might have been cheaper, but you couldn't just pull a loan out and go like today(and many public schools have generous financial aid today). This meant that a population that was more likely to skew conservative( poor/rural) while those against fighting didn't have to go die or come back with debilitating mental disorders. This created a vacuum. Those now in college were those wealthy or ideologically disposed to anti-war sentiment, a leftist-position. These people then went on to gain P.H.Ds. Basically, a biased sample was allowed to progress in academia because a lot of others who wouldn't be liberal got fucked by the war, this has obviously affected the power structure of academia today.
>>74529404
You claimed it was debunked. The work doesn't fall on me. It falls on you. Get on it. Or consider yourself debunked.
One of the things those books get into is how claims are made for which there is no evidence, and the need for evidence has been eliminated in certain parts of academia, and those areas were expanding, so that theorists such as Boas, Freud, Marx, and any other number of sheisty Jews can propose whatever theories they want without having to provide evidence for it, and everyone has to prove them wrong, but with impossible bars set for doing so. So really what those books get into is how the epistemological rules were being changed from needing evidence to not needing evidence.
I'm reminded of when you said this
>>74527000
And then you didn't think you had to provide evidence for it. Except you do. :D
>>74516683
Socialism in academia is an open secret and socialist theory has been taught there since at least the 70s with the original rise of Neo Marxism.
black intellectual leadership that wants your stuff:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_hooks
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._E._B._Du_Bois
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harlem_Renaissance#Leading_intellectuals
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_nationalism
>>74529555
You are almost there.
The anti-war movement had a huge huge thing to do with this. But so does the civil rights movement.
>>74529770
Marx abandoned evidence, Popper wrote extensively how fruedian psychology and marxism isn't scientific but the painting of Boas as an infiltrator of your jewish conspiracy, thinking somehow he abandoned evidence, that's utter bs. The field he founded on still relies on evidence, material empirical evidence because of it him. Before him, the evolution of humans was speculative, armchair work. Boas was the first to realize that to study human culture one needs to study the changes. Again, as I said, this shit is easily debunked.
Again, I don't expect someone who finds comfort in simple autistic-like narratives to appreciate the truth, but do try again.
>>74529974
Neo-Marxism has like 12 active scholars. It is such a tremendous active field of scholarship and ideology pushing.
>>74530041
You said it had been debunked. Where was this done? Still waiting for the source on your claim that it "has been totally debunked." Do you think waving your hands around is going to change the fact that you need to provide a source for your claim? Provide a link to the source that debunks it. Just stop dancing around and do it.
>>74529555
Pt.2
2) As many have noted, discourse and method in the humanities and social sciences changed tremendouly in the mid 20th century. I'm not sure exactly why but you can see it all over. From anthropology's assertion that race is merely social, sociology's critique of gender relations leading to feminism and ethnic studies departments etc.
Many of these entrenched "intellectuals" who avoided the vietnam war mentored countless students and indoctrinated them with their views. Look to the African American studies, Chicano studies, and Womens studies departments for a nice microcosm of this effect. These departments are based in inherently subversive ideologies and non-falsifiable claims. Their purpose to is be a stronghold for accelerating the education of their chosen tribes. I sincerely doubt NO student has been flunked in an AA studies department as long as he did the assignment and held to the view that everything is white oppression. They give Bs and mostly As to every student, especially the black student unafraid to agree with his professor. They inoculate and incubate this bullshit oppression crap in these places and suck funding from the right places, all the while pushing shit students through the ranks with artificially inflated GPAs that are not reflective of their work ethic or intelligence. Berkeley Law is a prime example of a school that prefers these students. They don't care about the LSAT as long as it is good. They care more about your GPA and if your minority and not an idiot, it won't be a problem to gain admission.
I started to rant anons. But TLDR the draft caused a biased sample to enter into academia power positions and the self selecting effect of their ideologies imposed upon the process of scholarship publication and acceptance has drastically reduced the freedom of inquiry in the humanities and social sciences. My field, philosophy, has resisted this in the better departments, but they are trying to infiltrate...
no conservatives give back to the community so liberalism is dominant in the school system
just work on getting mine no one else matters senpai
>>74530170
All you are doing is moving the goal post. Again, you are terribly invested in this narrative, and that wont ever change. You can't even acknowledge the claims I just made, not even dispute it.
>>74530178
>Anthropology never said race is merely social. It said biological significance of race is social, a huge but nuanced difference.
let's pretend you are right, tho. Why would ethnic/area studies become a threat if being african american, or latin, or even woman doesn't exist?
>Feminism existed before sociology and sociology doesn't critique, it studies.
Critiques and interpretations is the realm of humanities. African American studies, Chicano studies, Women studies are a disciplining of these fields within the humanities.
> I sincerely doubt NO student has been flunked in an AA studies department as long as he did the assignment and held to the view that everything is white oppression. They give Bs and mostly As to every student, especially the black student unafraid to agree with his professor.
This seems utter bullshit. What type of work do you think they are doing in these courses? It isn't highschool.
>Berkeley Law is a prime example of a school that prefers these students. They don't care about the LSAT as long as it is good.
bullshit, they care about LSAT.
Also, also,
your whole theory is dependent on good ol conservative men dying in the war. Your theory fails because post-vietnam america provided a shit ton of poor americans who served that war to enter into university, which you claim indoctrinated those who never fought.
>>74530656
You will not go a step further until you provide evidence for your claim.
>>74516936
Its wasn't homegrown you know. Communists literally infiltrated by simply moving to America and becoming professors.
>>74518342
THIS
I am a public school teacher in NYC and the restrictions and fear mongering they blast us with is ridiculous. The administration is totally cucked and broken and between them and the teacher's union you have a clusterfuck that isn't about properly educating children, but not offending or hurting anyones feelings.
Its insane. My specialty is history, which gives me a lot of room to cleverly redpill them without alarming the leftist cucks too much. You have to be smart because the union will turn on your if you're not vomiting out the narrative and touting common core as the next coming of math Jesus.
>>74530714
Move the goal post even further. I already assert 3 claims, you ignore them. Those three claims attack the main impetus of the work. You can't rebut. It's futile to see the truth when you can't even entertain conditions to falsify it. Granted, to expect you to know the tenants of science (which you claim they joos be eroding), is me being really generous with you.
>>74530899
Black nationalism
Mexican identity
Union labor
Democratic party pandering to the civil rights movement to win votes. Republicans pandering to business elites.
home grown.
>>74530973
>bash teaching kids set theory
fucking degenerative
>>74531037
I was going to give you a real response, but its A FUCKING LEAF. Isn't you internet cut off after 15 minutes of shit posting without properly prepping your wife's bull? Get back in your cuck shed.
Canada is truly a lost cause.
>>74531037
You don't get to make any more claims. You have to provide evidence for your first claim first.
Here's your first claim
>>74527000
>this book has been totally debunked.
Now, where was that done? Provide a link. You will not be allowed to move on to any more claims until you can provide evidence for your first one. This isn't academia. This is my house. I make the rules here. I told you what they are. You will provide evidence for your first claim or you will not be allowed to proceed to any other claims.
We're just waiting on that link now. Until then, you won't be allowed to move.
>>74531238
LOL
I made 3 claims. You are being dishonest right now. I hope you find comfort in a narrative that lies to you while pretending to explain how the world is going to shit.
>>74521423
But they are. Do you know what a buy in price is? Very much like poker there is a initial amount of money someone will have to spend to start a business. The more regulation there is the higher that buy in price is going to be. Know who can afford the buy in price? Certainly not poor people with revolutionary new products. Instead the corporation will limit competition allowing him free reign on the market. Whats more is he can now buy these revolutionary products from other people and sell them himself because those people have given up trying to reach the ever increasing buy in price.
>>74531369
Still waiting on that link. You will not be allowed to move until you provide it.
>>74530656
First point: No. They said Race is entirely a social construction; on top of this, race is a quite modern invention in their view. Of course they think the biological significance of race is social because that follows from the overarching idea of it being an inherently social phenomena.
Second: I don't want to get dragged into an argument about the definition of feminism. But, the modern conception, most on /pol and this thread are reacting against is a form of feminism born within the halls of social science and humanities courses(whose academics and theories have greatly influenced one another). I'm not sure why you decide to separate women's studies from the other "studies" subjects; it's merely the same type of thing.
Third: I will admit it was hyperbole. But, what do you mean the work they are doing? They are reading a closely manicured selection of authors all supporting a single viewpoint, writing essays and reguirtiating this information back while taking their points the authors use and applying them to their own "modern interpretation". This might sound like most humanities, but the difference is the ideologies expressed are transparent and already digested. My friend was a AA studies major at UCLA, got a 3.94 and couldn't proofread by paper on Plato because he couldn't read it. I got an A on the paper; this wasn't a problem on my end.
Fourth: No. Compared to rival schools in the T-14, they favor GPAs by a wide margin. They favor GPAs more than ANY other law school in relation to LSAT scores. A 3.9 is better than a 176 for Berkeley. How do i know? Because I got a 176 and had trouble gaining admission while I got accepted into Harvard, Columbia, and NYU.
Fifth: No it isn't. Because the people who died don't have to be conservative. They could have been liberal minorities too. it was just the case that a whole generation self-selected themselves into academia that were more likely biased towards leftist positions. Back off smarty pants.
>>74516683
As someone who recently was in the school system, let me tell you
It's rabidly left wing. All of the teachers (except the very old ones), all of the principles, and most of the students.
The worst is the English classes. These have become refuges for left wing garbage of the most cancerous sort imaginable. All of my English teachers have been fat middle aged women, and all of them have given the girls in the class preferential treatment. When I was younger age, I honestly couldn't understand what their problem was, it just seemed like they always seemed to be antagonistic towards me, even when I had done nothing. It wasn't until later that I learned I was the horror of their dreams: a straight white male.
I have a massively high IQ, I was reading at a college level in elementary school, I'm currently a graduate student in Physics at a major university. And yet I barely passed any of my English classes. The grading is essentially subjective, empty headed teenie-boppers were given A's like clockwork, and overachievers like me barely scraped by.
It was well known in "nerd circles" (i.e. future engineering kids) that English classes were a total and complete waste of time. You don't learn anything useful, and it's required all through jr. High and High School and even for your first 2 years of college. The books you read are all left wing crap. Go read about slavery, go read the only woman author from the 1800's, go read a meaningless abstract poem about the vietnam war.
Anyway certain departments are worse than others. The students in mathematics and science are less intensely left wing (although the same cannot be said for the professors). Most of the people have an interest in business and economics but a lot of them are cucked on social issues.
>>74519621
Bernouts are indoctrinated into believing socialism can work and that being rich in inherently evil.
>>74527073
Not sauce specifically, but give a listen to this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zakR2F-A74
>>74516683
the irony is those socialists are degenerate hippies born from rich white families
dude you sound like my old man
>>74531605
It depends what english classes anon. you don't need to brag because you weren't reading college shit in elementary school(you have crazy high verbal iq) but then fail to do well in english classes.
Very very few can say they read that level in 1st-5th grade and be honest. I could have read Kant aloud too but that dosent make me smart. it means i can pronounce words. I'm the best reader I've ever met and studied philosophy at a top school and I didn't do that.
Either way, some lit classes can be great; it depends on the professor and subject. Take a russian lit course and add some balance to your STEM first ignorance.
>>74531605
High school is conventionally left wing, but college is where it really ramps up into pathological progressivism. At my college, the speech at our welcome ceremony was essentially the communist manifesto. The professors are all raging lunatics. One of my advisors told me in confidence that he wanted 99% of humans wiped off the globe.
The thing that makes me really mad is how alternative majors are held up as if they are somehow equivalent to STEM or Business. In one major, you spend classtime talking about your feelings. In another, you're busting out 45 hours of work every week cranking through the most mentally strenuous problems known to man. I don't think we had a single person in our class who got more than 6 hours of sleep a night.
Some of these liberal arts majors are basically just government funded agitprop. The US government is currently paying to indoctrinate an army of revolutionaries to overthrow itself. These kids are learning absolutely nothing of value except how to burn the system down. Soviet-era communism is fetishized to a disgusting degree.
These soft majors have no place on a college campus. We absolutely need to cut their funding immediately
>>74531238
>>74531417
I totally get you guys. Folk theories from sources that seem 'pure' because they can create a narrative that links to your favourite name. You are a symptom of something more interesting.
>>74531501
>1 race
No, you don't get anthropology then. Anthropology as a 4 point discipline views race as biological but the significance of biology, the significance of any biological feature is acknowledged within the social. It's the social significance of biological features. This makes sense in an evolutionary perspective: a flap of skin doesn't have biological significance, it has significance in how it affects the existence of that being.
>2 feminism and other studies.
feminism didn't emerge from sociology. women studies were, among those other disciplines emergent from the humanities department. At the time the literature and english departments were in an identity crisis (50s, 60s). Old forms of literary theory faltered and those fucks are too interested making textual significance more than what it is. Those inclinations led to the women studies and ethnic studies departments.
>3 hyperbole
My friend who is in AA, had to do fieldwork in indonesia for his final project. The work of anthropology students isn't humanistic. The work of a sociology student isn't doing what english majors do, which is basically what you are spelling out in very clear ways. I think you seriously are confusing what is an english or a humanities course with sociology.
>5
Bro, the folks who entered academia in the 50s were the ones who benefited from the GI bill. The folks who entered academia (undergrad, grad, doc) again benefitted from the GI bill. You aren't account for this in your theory. The self-selection thing is a bit off because a lot people aren't going into this knowing what is up. It isn't like a technical education where you choose to go learn to weld to become a doctor You know it is a discovery phase.
>>74531037
you've done nothing but pretend that American Universities aren't indoctrination centers and deny jewish influence. You also talk about marxist schools of though in a positive light. kill yourself JIDF
>>74531925
Totally agree: Le autist savant, rain man, could read college-level books but never understood a single thing. Understanding Kant is fucking difficult, even if the words are easy to read.
>>74532172
i agree to an extent. the subveriseness has reached boiling point and needs to stop. its starting to hurt the universities. look at datmouth for an example.
At my college graduation for the humanities sections(was shared by philosophy, art history, applied linguistics and some other oddballs) this old bitch made a speech where they bemoaned the late death of her husband but then celebrated that she found a new partner, a woman. They kissed on stage and cheered yelling, support love( this was before gay marriage was legal). It was a slap in the face. I support gay marriage but I don't like my graduation being made into a political statement, especially when my family who is quite conservative might not feel comfortable. It was disrepectfult to the extreme imo.
>>74531037
>Black nationalism
That came after reds started the civil rights movement.
>Mexican identity
Thats always been an identity. Its a country. The problem is them living in America.
>Union labor
Jewish red ideology.
>Democratic party pandering to the civil rights movement to win votes.
Again who do you think is creating and spreading these pandering type thoughts in our society.
>Republicans pandering to business elites.
How?
>>74531925
When I say "college level" I meant what is considered "college level" by the US government. Which basically means "above high school level". And considering how dumbed down high school reading standards are (to accommodate you know who), this meant I was simply very advanced for my class (I won all sorts of academic awards).
I absolutely could not have handled Kant or any other heavy philosophy. I would have no grounding, no context, or no deep understanding.
>>74532254
LOL, more delusions.
Dude, pollack, if I may call you dat, you have to choose rn now son to pick a theory which will help make sense of the world and inform effective action:
>over inflated influence of academia who for many many years themselves always tell their students that the real world is outside of it.
or
> the rise of cultural and political change in america is attributed to economic decline for certain classes, the political plays of the republican and democratic party and the rent-seeking behaviour of both parties.
>>74532389
that's really gross.
>>74532478
>black nationalism
black nationalism existed before the reds existed, see liberia bro (1847).
>union labor as a political play
see taff
>mexican identity
see you guys not kicking them out after you annexed those lands. you mismanaged the mexicans and always let farmers use them for cheap labour. do something about it, you should have built a wall from the get-go.
>republicans pandering to business elites
see free trade agreements, see the chamber of commerce, see the shit trump is fighting against.
bro
>>74532541
philosophy is hard.
>>74532244
Yeah, the creation of a narrative, complete with named constructs and statements of causal relations among those constructs seems to be a very useful way for sneaking bullshit into the human mind, for example Marxism and Freudianism, or Mosesism for that matter, or the theory of white privilege, or rape culture, or whatever framework one wants to propose. That's about all I got out of this book, the most of which I didn't understand at all.
Jews seem to be especially good at it.
>>74532244
I love how kikes can write paragraphs without making any statements and just twist words around in an attempt to make it seem like they know what they're talking about. Sneaky kike.
>>74532793
>the rise of cultural and political change in america is attributed to economic decline for certain classes, the political plays of the republican and democratic party and the rent-seeking behaviour of both parties.
I never said this.
>black nationalism existed before the reds existed, see liberia bro (1847)
>liberia
>black nationalism
Those niggers where trying to copy grown ups is all.
>>74531393
the electric car would like a word with you.
>>74517646
Marxist infiltration is completely out of control in Chile, a country which experienced the blight of Socialism and the prosperity of free markets.
Socialism is like a religion, no evidence can make these people change their minds. They find all sorts of bs arguments that you can debunk one by one only to find a new one until you eventually get tired of arguing. Then you multiply this by the millions of bots out there and your realize that you can't beat them.
I just got back from Seattle, Washington and it was packed with trust fund leftist hipsters, it's a lost cause. The world will have to find another stronghold of capitalism if it ever expects to grow again because IMO the U.S is a goner.
>>74532812
how the fuck do you even hold any coherent thoughts? Narratives are not scientific because (and you should know who made this reference, assuming you are educated), it doesn't have limits to its application. Yes, rape culture, muh joos, fruedianism, marxism, white oppression, they are narratives that extend and absorb and territorialize reality, but narratives aren't truth or valid or science. These things are THINGS that sociology, anthropology, (boas was never about that) or even academia besides the humanistic traditions is all about.
I get you are looking for answers.
>>74533041
I rebutted every single point you made.
The reds never existed when black nationalism existed, the proof of this is liberia.
Unions existed without jewish influence in america, to see the form of politics I am talking about see taff.
Mexicans who stayed behind in america after annexation never gave up their identity. this is america's fault.
republicans pandering to business elites is apparent, just listen to what trump says and how koch is treating this election.
>the rise of cultural and political change in america is attributed to economic decline for certain classes, the political plays of the republican and democratic party and the rent-seeking behaviour of both parties.
I said this. All good theories encourage an alternative. Narrative are just stupid stories children believe in.
>>74533195
>Those niggers where trying to copy grown ups is all.
So, uh, if they were doing that before the reds existed? Doesn't that invalidate your whole claim?
so, i btfo your delusions, why can't you accept it?
>>74531636
>trumpets are indoctrinated into believing capitalism works and that being poor is inherently evil
>>74533268
Yup thats helpful information. You sure showed me wrong without explaining anything.
>>74533269
>Socialism is like a religion, no evidence can make these people change their minds. They find all sorts of bs arguments that you can debunk one by one only to find a new one until you eventually get tired of arguing. Then you multiply this by the millions of bots out there and your realize that you can't beat them.
100%
It's no different from the stormcucks. Nobody seems to be motivated enough to want to solve actual issues.
>>74516683
>they think the Silicon Valley being extraordinarily rich is somehow at the expense of some forgotten African tribe being poor;
well to be honest most of the rare metals necessary for tech ARE extracted through slave labour so they're not that off the base
except that they will still gleefully buy the newest iphone
>>74533371
>So, uh, if they were doing that before the reds existed? Doesn't that invalidate your whole claim?
How exactly were a bunch of niggers being sent to Africa represent black nationalism. Pro tip it wasn't black nationalism.
Perhaps a way to understand what is happening is analogous to the conflict between the enlightenment and romanticism. The enlightenment put empiricism and evidence as the primary priority. In reaction to this, romanticism put human experience and emotions as the primary priority.
This new movement seems to put feelings, or offending people, as a priority over evidence and facts.
Perhaps the solution to this conflict is to propose that facts may hurt people's feelings, but facts are necessary for solving problems. And it is only by solving problems that that people's well-being can be improved. So in reality the priority of the enlightenment produces the priority of romanticism, whereas the priority of romanticism just allows problems to fester and thus not only doesn't provide the priority of the enlightenment, but also doesn't even provide for it's own priority of human experience and emotions.
>>74516683
I grew up in a small town about an hour and a half north of Seattle. I graduated in 2004. I don't remember any "indoctrination" that we usually talk about, there were a couple of hardcover leftist that thought communism was cool but they were the outcast. It seems those people grew up in the wrong time.
>>74533269
No you did not experience the "free market." You experienced preferential treatment from the US and various international institutions for political reasons. That's why you guys are still so poor. True free markets lead to prosperity.
>>74530178
Philosophy has been infiltrated m8, sorry to tell you. The APA has been giving out grants to feminist bullshit and pushing lecturers to consider non-normal pronouns.
>>74533372
I wasn't indoctrinated though. Everyone I know is a socialist liberal. I live in the liberal capital of the world. I came to that conclusion myself.
Movies always make the poor person the good guy while making the rich evil. School teachers always talk about the evil rich and powerful. It never ends.
>>74530656
I've taken a few of those courses because it was required by everyone even though I studied economics. They're bullshit hugboxes where most of the teachers are indoctrinators with a few based teachers who will actually debate and accept opposing viewpoints, but the majority of paperwork revolves around reiterating what they've taught rather than using it for both cases.
>>74533674
Chile had a widespread wealth destruction so the starting base was quite low. Freeing up the markets lead to great economic expansion.
We are still poor because the markets weren't allowed to work freely long enough.
>>74533641
Of the 40 teacher at my school 10 of them were outspoken communists and even had soviet flags on there walls.
>>74533371
Nah, the social sciences are too subjective, so they just give the feeling of being evidence based, but in reality they are theory based, and evidence is cherry-picked to support it. And any evidence that does not fit with certain unquestionable theories is discarded.
As for social sciences being infiltrated by the Jews, you can just look at the connection between the Frankfurt School and Kurt Lewin, who is the "grandfather of social psychology" and his students made most of the bedrock theories in social psychology, one of the main ones being the fundamental attribution error, which says that people's behavior is shaped more by circumstances than people usually realize, which is a big part of the dindu nuffin philosophy, because it's not the nigger's fault. It's society's fault. There's a direct line from the Jewish Frankfurt school to dinduism.
>>74533576
Liberia was black nationalism. They wanted their own country. Read up on it. They weren't just sent to africa. America gave them their own country.
>>74533636
this is the most sane thing you've stated so far. And it is just more than a academic school of thought. Our political leaders are pandering to these affective inclinations.
To appropriate the term hyperreal, the media is doing a terrible job in showing reality and people are responding to pictures on the screen as real. It's not real, its a simulacra. Narratives are simulacra.
>>74533861
I don't know what anthropology program you are talking about, but this doesn't like a legit one. Social or cultural anthropology NEVER wants to take normative claims about human society is. They hold a epistemological commitment to relativism. I don't think you get it. When you go to do fieldwork, you aren't going there to tell people how they should live their lives. Anthropology was born in the shadow of mission work: missionaries wanted people to live a certain way, whereas anthropologist want to see how those people live in their own way.
>>74533972
how the fuck do you go from sanity to this insanity. you acknowledge what narratives are unprovable claims. You acknowledge how marx and freud (proven by popper, badly appropriated by author of that book) aren't scientific (you are just, desu, regurgitating what you read). Then you claim social science is too subjective by restating the very premise popper makes about what is science and what isn't. You can really benefit from taking a philosophy of science course.
Dude, seriously, if you knew how to better connect your dots, you would escape the stormcuck's prison.
>>74533886
chile is poor because FDI didn't come, china is rich because FDI came in crazy.
>>74516683
>It's obvious that it must have happened in the last 20 years or so
Literally happened in the 1920's you ignorant orangutan
Education system was the first thing the Frankfurt school listed in their plans.
>>74534306
It's not that all narratives are unprovable. It's just that a narrative can hide the fact that claims are not proven. It makes sense! But people forget that there's no evidence to support it. But you can also have narratives where all of the claims are proven. So a narrative itself does not indicate fallacy. You have to look to see if the narrative is backed by evidence. For some reason, providing a narrative or nomological network can hide lack of evidence. It was this that Freud and Marx took advantage of.
As for MacDonald's book, it is not really social science. It's more history. He says these people did this, and these other people did that, and so forth. What MacDonald has Boas stating is that no culture is superior to any other, which was at odds with what was previously thought, which was that Western culture was superior to cultures of the jungles of Africa, for example because of the better facility with procuring food and curing disease. Boas had no evidence to support his claim that no culture is superior to another. It was just stated, accepted, and passed on from teacher to student and became dogma, just like Freudianism did, just like Marxism did, just like Mosesism did. Really what Boas did was he just threw out the measuring stick and said since I won't use any criteria for judging superiority, we have to say they are the same. That's the antithesis of science. And that's what can creep into social science, and that's what MacDonald was saying, that Jews use the imprimatur of science to dress up their theories, which in realty have no evidence to support them, and it was Jews, such as Freud, Boas, and Marx that snuck this anti-Enlightenment way of thinking into academia.
And that is what we are suffering from today, the feeling among the youth that they can make any claims they want, and evidence is not needed, and in fact requiring evidence is part of the "patriarchy" yet another nomological network.
>>74528149
>>1) the frankfurt school wasn't sociology
The Frankfurt School is literally called "Institute for Social Research" at the Goethe University.
It was founded after the workers revolution didn't happen and the communists tried to find a method to destroy the social cohesion of the society, to make a revolution more likely.
>>74528149
This poster is a huge shill trying to rewrite history. The key to understand everything is the Frankfurt School!
>>74534367
Chile is much richer than China on a per capita basis.
>>74530041
>The anti-war movement had a huge huge thing to do with this.
It wasn't an anti war movement leaf shill, at least not for the initiated leadership. It was a pro communist movement, to demoralize the American troops who fought against communists
>>74535008
Read Culture of Critique: he said that the frankfurt school wasn't sociological.
>>74535159
Less people, true. But china has a lot more gross wealth. The interesting thing I would love to know about chile is what china is doing to you folks.
>>74535187
>the draft didn't demoralize americans.
>>74534981
>hat MacDonald has Boas stating is that no culture is superior to any other, which was at odds with what was previously thought, which was that Western culture was superior to cultures of the jungles of Africa, for example because of the better facility with procuring food and curing disease.
He misconstrued Boas hugely. What Boas was saying was that culture was a productive of people living. To evaluate culture, you need to consider this. He also disproved something called unilineal evolution because, and this is a tricky argument, that cultures do not stay within their confines. There is much mixing. What you need to focus on when reading cutlure of critique is a consideration of what is narrative, and what are the conditions that separate narrative from theory.
I implore to break out of your stormcuck mental prison. your culture needs fighters who have the tools to shape it.
>>74535236
Of course they have more gross wealth, they are 1.2 billion whereas Chile has 17 million inhabitants.
Ever since Chile decided to go socialist, our growth became more reliant on Chinese demand for our commodities. Now that Chinese growth is faltering our economy is stagnant.
I don't think we will find a way to export anything besides commodities since the Government here has killed pretty much all incentives to do business.
>>74535008
There's another piece besides just the critical theory of the Frankfurt School. There's something from France too, which is Derrida and Foucault. I'm not sure what the connection is between these two things, the stuff from France and the stuff from Germany (Frankfurt).
>>74531037
>Black nationalism
>Mexican identity
>Union labor
Who founded the NAACP and funds reconquista efforts? Who is Saul Alynski?
Its communists who have been kicked out of Europe in multiple expulsions and started to infiltrate the USA.
>>74535379
I'm an eclectic. I pick tools where I can find them. I don't feel limited to any one toolbox. Critical theory from Frankfurt school is good to use. But the creation of symbols and manipulation of language is good too. Both to defend against these things, but also to turn them to one's own purposes.
>>74516683
1935. Colombia university, new York state.
>>74534981
also Boas work was scientific. One of the conditions necessary for anthropological work to be anthropological is that it must have a commitment to an explanation of humans as a whole, in all our facets (biological, cognitive, social-cultural). Boas was never anti-enlightenment, he is a product of kant too because of his commitment to understand and disabuse humans of our ignorance.
You don't get how science differs from narrative. Narratives are unprovable because narratives are always amended. I know you don't know this but Mcdonald basically ripped off the claim made by someone else on his frued/marx shit but he emphasize le joos instead of the issue at hand. You really need to read up on the philosophy of science. If you came to the critique of culture from a philosophy of science background, you would see through its bs.
>>74535708
Boas also introduced the ideology of cultural relativism which holds that cultures cannot be objectively ranked as higher or lower, or better or more correct, but that all humans see the world through the lens of their own culture, and judge it according to their own culturally acquired norms.
That's what MacDonald says about him, and that's what Wikipedia has. No culture is superior to any other. Western science equal to the negro witch doctors. White people have nothing to be proud of.
How do we know they are equal? Well, we just don't compare them. Then we can't say one is better than another. Just don't measure. Then you can conclude what you like.
This is not science. This is made up bullshit, believing whatever we want. But it's called SCIENCE! So science is just made up bullshit. This gives SJWs permission to make up rapes. No evidence needed.
Thanks, Jew!
>>74535406
There is also issues of literacy, and education on chile. China went to you guys not because of socialism, they wanted markets for the goods they couldn't sell into western markets. I bet huweiew or whatever is a big brand?
>>74535565
You are a dilettante. I am not trying to insult you, but the way you are using these things is very unscientific. Wow, this is interesting. To pick and prod this segment of the 4chan community. You guys are your own culture. Boas would say everything about this culture, the good and bad, can't be judge as either good or bad but must be seen in how they functionally effect that person. Culture is rational.
>>74534306
I think you've mistaken me for another, I'm an econfag whom had to take anthro/cultural studies courses. I will restate that they were shit and typically offered little to no room for rebuttle. This is as someone who knows how express right wing views gently keeping leftists from getting uppity.
>>74536060
So in short, what Jews have done, from Marx, to Freud, to Boas, is to erode the evidence-based epistemology of the Enlightenment down to accepting completely fabricated pseudoscience as equal to science.
Marx called himself scientific. Freud called himself scientific. Boas called himself scientific. And they all had a huge following. They basically dressed up new religions as science and were able to pass them off without anyone ever asking for evidence.
This opened the door to all claims being equally valid, whether they are based on evidence or not. And that is what has led to the problems we are having now. There are no criteria for truth anymore. And it came in through the Jews.
>>74536021
>Boas also introduced the ideology of cultural relativism which holds that cultures cannot be objectively ranked as higher or lower, or better or more correct, but that all humans see the world through the lens of their own culture, and judge it according to their own culturally acquired norms.
Yes and no. This is Kant influence. Kant is hardly a jew. Like I said, Sociology as a discipline was considered german. Kant influenced Boas, along with the founders of what established American sociology. What boas says is that culture provide answers to their own people (kant perspective), but, second, two cultures can't be measured side by side because cultures trade in cultural resources. These two aspects of boas work is conflated and confused by McDonald.
>>74536415
Marx and Frued are two points McDonald stole from another philosopher of science, but he spun it to connect 'jewish dots'. Boas is fundamentally different from those two in terms of how he took upon the role of evidence. If you knew a little bit of the philosophy of science, this point would be very apparent to you.
>>74536021
>This is not science. This is made up bullshit, believing whatever we want. But it's called SCIENCE! So science is just made up bullshit. This gives SJWs permission to make up rapes. No evidence needed.
slippery slope argument. this is bullshit. you still don't know what is the difference between science and narrative. It's a simple simple difference. Again,
>>74536331
I seriously don't know what anthropology courses you folks are taking. Here in canada, anthropology is taught as a 4-field discipline. You are not supposed to take up a normative view of culture, but you don't abandon the scientific approach either.
I know yall are regurigating memes derived from whatever sources can support the cultural marxist narrative. it is most likely a fool's errand on my behalf trying to tell you that he is wrong.
>"When did free-education-for-all become socialized?"
ITT: idiots
>>74535708
>Narratives are unprovable because narratives are always amended...
Pay attention newfags, this is exactly how shilling works!
Trying to derail a conversation by redirecting the topic to ghosts like "the issue at hand", "see through its bs" without giving specifics that might actually enhance the discussion. Its smoke and mirrors trying to sound intellectual.
Nothing he said has actually helped the OP to better understand the situation, it's only creating noise to hide the valuable information.
Newfags inform yourself about all the things that this leaf shill tries to derail/debunk and especially the persons connected to it. You will understand why he is shilling that aggressively!
>>74536415
Honest question, what is your highest level of education and do you know what a null hypothesis is?
I think you are a strong reader, intelligent, but you graduated highschool and haven't really experienced university. I put you either 17, about to enter university, or much older and missed the train.
>public, federally funded, practically mandatory and federally designed education
Well I'd say right at the beginning
>>74536852
>pretends reddit is 4chen
attention stormcucks, before trying to appropriate an anime board culture, please realize that I am responding to what anon stated. I replied to anon. We aren't in an ideological circlejerk here, this isn't reddit where we are mere sub threads to OP's post.
>>74536680
Yes, it is a slippery slope. That's why we must insist upon our standards at all times. If you have a claim to make you will provide evidence for it whether you like it or not, or you will not proceed. Freud, Marx, and Boas would have been stopped in their tracks if they had had to deal with me. I would have made them prove their claims.
All cultures are equal? Well, start measuring. To say they are equal in all ways, you have to measure every variable. Measure how well they meet the desires of their people for food and health. Then you will find that some cultures meet these desires better than others, and therefore they are not equal. The only way they can be claimed to be equal is to not measure, but instead to climb up on the mount and proclaim it as an undoubtable truth that cannot be questioned. But I would have called Boas down from the mount and told him that he needed to provide evidence if he wanted me to care what he said.
Speaking of which, you never did provide any evidence to support your claim that MacDonald "has been totally debunked>>74527000. As it stands, that is still just made up bullshit that you pulled out of your ass without anything to support it.
>>74536415
SJW culture isn't a conspiracy. If you are motivated and I feel you are incredibly motivated by this, you can go deep into it and start doing what anthropologists since boas has done. Go deep into the wilds, and observe and learn and report back. That would be more productive to helping this culture wars then circle jerking around a shit-tier scholar who is either too stupid to notice that his charges against others is easily applicable to himself or just plain dishonest.
>>74522594
Yeah, most of my teachers tried to redpill us on Socialism when I went to school as well. Pretty much gave the old, "sounds great on paper but is disastrous in practice" shtick. I grew up in a predominately white and conservative neighborhood, though.
>>74536861
>Honest question, what is your highest level of education
> please realize that I am responding to what anon stated.
Watch closely newfags, another prime example how this leaf shill tries to derail the conversation. How many of his replies gave valuable infos to further our knowledge?
None - he only creates noise. Critique is good, but this leaf shills critique has no substance except for "you are wrong".
Its only purpose is to stop you from further investigation a subject by denying its relevancy.
>>74537219
Dude, if it isn't totally debunked, then how come I can argue against the fundamental aspects of it including cursory ones?
Boas was right, he provided evidence, but you only care to get to that evidence through McDonald and other trusted conspirators of the narrative. This is exactly is the problem: marxist, fruedians which an important philosopher of science articulated very well long before McDonald.
I mean it is interesting how you are responding to things.
>>74537373
Again, /u/lestormcuck, this isn't reddit. your shitposts have no value.
>>74537219
>instead to climb up on the mount and proclaim it as an undoubtable truth that cannot be questioned.
The moses figure. love it. Mcdonald is doing this too. Mcdonald stole from other scholars and misused their work either in a flawed manner or did it purposefully because he is dishonest. What is clearly happening here is that we are reverting to subscribing to our personal truths.
Tell me this, do you know what a null hypothesis mean?
>>74537567
Your claim was not that you could argue with it, but that it had been debunked. That's a claim you still haven't provided any evidence for.
And Boas did not provide evidence that cultures are equal. He simply said they could not be compared. If they can't be compared, they can't be judged to be equal. He simply dodged the need for evidence. Which is fine. He doesn't need to provide evidence. But we also end up with no reason to accept his claim that all cultures are equal. It's just shit he made up. Who the fuck is he? I don't give a fuck about him. I care about evidence. That's all. If he doesn't have any, he doesn't get believed.
>>74537221
>SJW culture isn't a conspiracy. If you are motivated and I feel you are incredibly motivated by this, you can go deep into it and start doing what anthropologists since boas has done.
Another prime shilling example newfags. Watch how he tries to make the topic appear complicated and how he implicates a lot of effort to understand it. His goal is to make you stop in your tracks and focus on "easier" things. SJW is not hard to understand. "Equality", "Forward", "Progress" are old school slogans of marxists/socialists/communists. It's history repeating itself because the US let the East European/Russian communists into the country as "refugees"
I figure around the 70s, when the hippies got teaching degrees.
>>74537788
Yes, the null hypothesis is a specific hypothesis which if rejected leads one to accept an alternative hypothesis, which is that the null hypothesis is not true.
>>74537799
I have provided evidence. I stated how he was wrong about boas, I referenced how boas disproved unilineal evolution. I stated how McDonald was wrong about the role of a jewish conspiracy in american academia. I stated how sociology is considered a german science, i referenced as proof to the foundations of the discipline in america. I also stated how the commitments of science still exist, for evidence, I showed that narrative is different from science.
I did everything you asked, but I know it won't matter. This is serious ideological commitments you got going on, and you aren't roleplaying or regurgitating memes. You are regurgitating talking points .
>>74537818
>low quality shitpost
at least try to comprehend what I said with some accuracy before pretending to provide an interpretation so markable false that anyone who reads your response will just get the butthurt out of it.
>>74538051
Close, but far off. Null hypothesis is something you create first and start looking evidence for. This is something that is the basis of science.
ok, so you are either 17 or neet, or smart but working class.
>>74537818
I have actually done this to some extent. I have a notebook in which I collect SJW arguments, with the eventual goal of systematizing and taxonomizing them them to determine what they have in common and what the core features are.
>>74538051
>>74538204
You need to do theory building after you collect observations. Boas should be your hero. Don't go about creating taxonomies. It is very wasteful in effort.
Also tell me the truth about your educational background.
also null hypothesis, because you got it wrong:
> you first come up with a hypothesis
> from that hypothesis, you derive conditions to reject it
> you then go about testing your null hypothesis
but science is more messy then that.
>>74522338
kek, I forgot about /leftypol/. Do they even make those threads any more? All I remember of them was a handful of pinkos, Corbynistas and full-blown reds would post then it'd get drowned in right-wing shitposting
>>74538197
Your claim was that MacDonald "has been totally debunked." This was in the past tense, and it was a statement about complete debunking. So this should be something that exists somewhere. And you should be able to link to it. but you won't. So my suspicion is that you know of no debunking of MacDonald.
Instead you just started arguing against it. But that's not evidence that it has been debunked, which was your claim. It's just evidence that you can argue against it, and badly, sloppily. That's why I wanted you to provide evidence for your first claim, because I started to notice that ALL of your claims were crap, and you were just piling them up. So you needed to start back on your first claim and provide evidence for it, and you were never able to do that, which classifies you as a bullshitter. Sorry, but you did it to yourself and ruined your credibility.
As for the null hypothesis, you are badly wrong about that. You don't try to prove it true. You try to prove it untrue. You try to reject it. If you can't reject it, you stay agnostic. If you reject it, you end up, not knowing what is true, but knowing what is not true, which is the null hypothesis, because you rejected it, or falsified it, in Popper's terms.
>>74538349
I'm still in the data collection phase, more a Brahe than a Kepler. Boas the Jew was too eager to rush to theories and then collect evidence to support it. I'm a more data-based guy. I like to get a lot of evidence, and then very slowly build theory from it. Social science generally tends to run ahead of itself with its theories, way ahead. That's why it's always having to scrap itself and start over. I would prefer to see it start from the basics and build slowly.
>>74538197
>I stated how
Exactly, you stated your opinion. Now give us your references how you came to your conclusions.
What makes you deny the influence of the Frankfurt Schools "critical theory" on academia?
Frankfurt School personalities have actually been awarded by Germany for their big role in post war Germany. Was this decision wrong? Why?
>>74518871
>>74519456
>>74519769
>>74519856
>>74520038
>>74520779
>>74521248
>>74521615
>>74521701
>>74522936
>>74523982
>>74524142
>>74526935
>>74527000
>>74527246
>>74527883
>>74528149
>>74528726
>>74529404
>>74530041
>>74530656
>>74531037
>>74531369
>>74532244
>>74532336
>>74532793
>>74533371
>>74533423
>>74534306
>>74534367
>>74535236
>>74535379
>>74535708
>>74536060
>>74536680
>>74536861
>>74536987
>>74537221
>>74537567
>>74537788
>>74538197
Someone has to do something about this leaf cancer.
>>74538805
Does it bother you that I keep arguing with it?
>>74538543
>You try to reject it. If you can't reject it, you stay agnostic. If you reject it, you end up, not knowing what is true, but knowing what is not true, which is the null hypothesis, because you rejected it, or falsified it, in Popper's terms.
Try again.
You are missing some huge huge part.
>model building confused as data collecting
again, you need to rethink what a null hypothesis means. you are doing it wrong. data comes from doing something, what guides that you are doing? null hypothesis bro.
Also mcdonald work has been debunked by others, check up the wiki article. But it isn't fun linking to it. I want to see you.
>>74538805
I'm half bored and half doing my coursework about something on here.
Its because right winged students leave the field early to start a business or pursue things more meaningful to them.
Left winged students tend to stick around for a much longer period and become teachers and professors.
>>74538889
he doesn't like you bumping this thread, and maybe I am the ultimate jew that I want to slide this thread by having folks sage it..
>>74516683
You do understand that Bernie phenomenon is driven by the same dynamics as Trump's success? Average Sanders voter isn't a college SJW, just as average supporter of The Donald isn't cuck-obsessed alt-righter.
In both cases, core supporter demographic is white working class, the group that since 80's saw the biggest fall in standards of living - falling real wages, rising debt, disappearing jobs, union-busting and related loss of job security. These people are the 'silent majority' Trump was talking about - alienated both by Democratic identity politics and by Republican subservience to corporate interests.
Explaining Bernie with college SJW brainwashing makes as much sense as explaining Trump with /pol/ or Stormfront. If you really believe some internet trends influence elections, you should really get off your computer for a change.
>>74539081
Yeah, but pol is fun.
>>74538951
no, normies were converted into far left wing freaks.
>>74516683
Everything started going downhill when the population started losing sight of exactly what is meant by "The American Enlightenment".
Nowadays, we teach our children that government is an authority figure that rules over them and they must obey unquestioningly.
Of course it's obvious why that is.
But the fundamental principle which brought the Constitution into existence explicitly outlines otherwise.
Man is inherently free. Any cuck who argues to the contrary will get a musket in their face until they figure it out.
THEY HAVEN'T TAUGHT THAT PRINCIPLE IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS SINCE GOD KNOWS WHEN, and it's a fundamental principle that laid the groundwork for the American Revolution.
>>74538935
Actually in science one is more guided by the alternative hypothesis than the null hypothesis. The alternative hypothesis is the interesting hypothesis, such as the drug works. The null is that it doesn't work.
So in my case, my alternative hypothesis is that there is something unusual about SJW arguments, something startling about them, something not quite right. So every time I see a new one, I write it down in my notebook.
I'm not really at the hypothesis or theorizing stage yet. I'm collecting. It's like how you first have to collect a lot of beetles in order to start to see how some of them are similar to each other and different from others. It's only after you have collected a lot of them that you can start to see the groupings. So I'm collecting beetles right now.
>>74539264
https://www.nccs.net/will-the-great-american-experiment-succeed.php
>>74517863
but the thing they fail to realize is society falls apart the extreme liberal leftists become easy prey for pretty much everyone else.
>>74539356
>Although the word "rights" remains an important part of the political and social vocabulary, the perception that individual rights are of divine origin has been largely excluded from public discourse. What was once the very cornerstone of the philosophy of freedom expounded by the Declaration of Independence-that a Creator endowed human beings with rights and the liberty to enjoy those rights - has virtually disappeared from the textbooks of the nation and from the public statements of many leaders. Indeed, rights are now thought of as man-made and emanating from government. As such, the concept of rights not only has been secularized but trivialized as well. After all, what is the authority for such rights? Any self-proclaimed entitlement to special treatment, privilege, status, or benefit conferred by government can, by inference, be withdrawn. Moreover, the modem notion of man-made rights does not embody the natural law injunction that the exercise of a right embodies a corresponding obligation to observe the rights of others, nor does it recognize the "laws of nature and of Nature's God" described by the Declaration of Independence.
>>74539908
>In this connection, the rights specified in the Bill of Rights frequently have been interpreted in an arbitrary manner without regard to the tradition or values which they were designed to protect and preserve. For instance, the First Amendment's provision that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" has been 'interpreted' in a manner not in keeping with Jefferson's idea that the "liberty to worship our Creator" had been "proved by our experience to be its [government's] best support." In this and other areas, rights are upheld quite apart from the Framers' concerns for civil or ordered liberty, or for the ends of government, especially those set forth in the Preamble. Alexandr Solzhenitsyn's scathing critique of Western moral values, and those which have gained currency in the United States in particular, drives this point home:
>"Destructive and irresponsible freedom has been granted boundless space. Society appears to have little defense against the abyss of human decadence, such as, for example, misuse of liberty for moral violence against young people, motion pictures full of pornography, crime and horror."
>>74516683
>When did the American educational system get infiltrated by socialists?
I can give you the exact date: November 22, 1963. Lee Harvey Oswald, a dirty communist, sneaked into this building and turned our country upside down.
Pic related: it's the Texas Schoolbook Depository.
>>74539981
>>74539472
That's why they're called useful idiots. The Soviet Union executed them all after they were no longer of use.
50s-60s
It was planned well before then, likely around the 30s, but that's when the shittinning started.
>>74539981
The civil war fucked shit up, not even because of slavery either, but because of the federal government over-stepping their constitutional authority.
And the Civil Rights movement, which set a precedent for the "right" for <insert underprivileged minority here> to enter any public space, infringed upon private property rights *and* the right of free association, leading to the retardation we see today.
>>74519362
This pretty much.
>>74539018
>said "folks" like 30 times throughout the thread
O-Obama?
>>74540310
>right of free association
I should retract this one because it's not technically an explicit right, but I cannot see any reason why the right to freedom of speech, and freedom of assembly, and private property rights, in combination do not imply it by their very nature.
>>74522237
>exploiting loophole
>Enumerated
I can tell a liberal idiot taught your government class. Try again junior.
>>74541412
I don't associate with many black people but are any of them bitching about transgender and gay "rights"?
Because niggers set the precedent for those, and this is the future they chose.
We could already have the niggers pretty much quarantined in public and private lands they own, and there would be no need whatsoever for any wall if we could all just put these fucking signs up on our property again.
>>74516683
Read up on the Frankfurt school. This trend started in the 1930s. It took 3 generations to solidify its hold as all ideologies do. And it will take 3 generations (or genocide) at a minimum to undo it.
American universities have been full blown indoctrination machines since at least the end of WW2. That's where they raised an entire generation of students to end racial segregation and 'racism' in general.
Really, most of the indoctrination american universities do today is STILL part of the cultural backlash against the nazi dictatorship.
>>74516683
Started way back folks. Was already well entrenched by the time I was old enough to see the signs (middle school), I still recall the reintroduction of "Earth Day" shit in the late 80s and it just seemed to ramp up quickly after that. But, this shit started sooner, probably the 70s when the hippies went into education because they could influence a younger generation.
Back then, it was usually just the Creative Writing and Sociology teachers way back in the late 80s/early 90s who didn't hide their overt liberalism, and even then, they kept in pretty tight bounds of not forcing it on everyone. Nowadays, I hear it's a whole crazy new fucking world in Education, I don't even want to know how far gone it is now...
they fight capitalism because in a capitalistic system they need to get their hands dirty. in a
social communistic state they think they can leech off by spuwing inequality and what not. in nature, mammal leecher usually die in battle or bc of lack
of effort for surviving. in our civilazation they stay alive and we support it for a reason of compagnionship and other emotions.
