>people of color are not racist because they do not systematically benefit from racism
What the fuck does this mean?
Can someone give me an example of where this is true for White people? Are white people also NOT racist because of this definition?
I genuinely don't understand this. Please help.
>>74434551
>Where this is true for white people
Zimbabwe.
>>74434612
So why are people complaining about racism in the US then?
>>74434551
>I can change definitions past their most intuitive meaning and jerk off to how clever I am
>>74434844
checked
That's what I thought as well. But the remade definitions are batshit insane.
I find most people don't use the word properly.
>watching CA Civil War in the theater
>scene with a bald black chick walking with black panther
>lean over to mind friend and say "fuck dude that looks like Rihanna but bald"
>man behind kicks my chair "yo that's racist"
>I look at him and ask him if he even know what the term means
He couldn't even give me an answer.
>>74434551
>when you redefine a term, that term means what you want it to mean
Well for me, bacon means broccoli. So when I'm told to eat healthier, I make sure to eat plenty of broccoli.
I can change the meaning of words too, liberals.
>>74434551
As I understand it, "People of Color" do not have the same level of institutional powers that Whites do to discriminate against others.
>>74434785
I don't want to speak for others, but apparently it is very soul crushing and demeaning.
>>74435098
I believe that definition has been in use for some time now, more people are catching on to it.
>>74435669
Kill me
>>74434551
That would be the sociological definition, which is why SJWs born of Sociology classes spew it non-stop.
>>74435781
>>74435942
how do I stop it?
>>74434551
Bunch of nigger logic because no one took their shit seriously and called them reverse racists which is why we get this faggotry.
>>74435669
>People of Color" do not have the same level of institutional powers that Whites do to discriminate against others.
Even though we literally institutionally discriminate against ourselves to give you guys a better chance than us at a life, through affirmative action and scholarships
fuck niggers
>>74435942
No, language has a certain structure that you can't just break for your own agenda. If "racism" were to be defined as discrimination based on race, or as the oppression of racial classes, it has to be universalized. Therefore, racism can be against any racial class, and the perpetrator can be of any racial class, even its own class. You can't just say "oh well teehee it actually means racism against 'minorities'" because that would be minority racism, there would be a need to qualify the generic word 'racism'.
>>74434551
It's yet another example of hardcore leftists' manipulation of language. They are wrong and hypocritical and get called out on it, so they begin to claim a word doesn't mean what it actually means and try to get the definition changed. Happens a lot. Just tell them to fuck off and don't acknowledge it, no one sane takes them seriously, even their kike professors who use them as useful idiots.
>>74436243
>affirmative action and scholarships
Not gonna lie, that's pretty pathetic.
Ultimately it's not going to matter what is given to these people, what matters is what they take for themselves.
>>74434551
>if one changes how they define a word, that word can mean literally anything
Shocking revelations!
I never really understood how calling someone a "nigger" is racist. You dont have to automatically hate an entire race if you use it, just the person youre saying it to
so they're saying when white people become a minority in the us, and they already are in some places like california, then it'd all of a sudden it would be ok for whites to be publicly racist?
>>74437862
Blacks aren't at a disadvantage by being a minority population though, are they?
>>74435669
>As I understand it, "People of Color" do not have the same level of institutional powers that Whites do to discriminate against others.
So is it racist if a Guatemalan Women refuses to hire a Filipino Man based on the fact that he's Filipino?
>>74434551
Pernicious falsehood.
I like this new definition.
First, racism was just prejudice.
Then, racism was prejudice by the powerful.
Now to be racist, you have to materially benefit from using your prejudice and power to discriminate against a minority.
All these hoops just to make sure that no coloreds are ever found guilty of racism. And I'm sure that they would still call me racist even if I never benefited from prejudice or discrimination. Can't truly be a modern day leftist without being completely irrational and hypocritical, amirte?
