>Daily reminder that if you spank your children you are a degenerate and a child molester.
We all have sick fetishes but it's not fair to abuse children because of them. Find an adult who's into the same shit as you.
>>74365990
>Sexualizing your children
Disgusting. Go salt a potato with your tears.
>>74365990
child is not spanked for the adult's fun, you sicko.
>>74365990
>>74366072
>>74366108
>>74366144
Someone say
>spanking?
>>74366108
POO
O
O
I N
N
THE
H
E
LOO
O
O
How is spanking your child molesting your child?
>>74366108
Why are indians obsessed with superheros and shit like that? Is it because of bolywood or just autism?
spank your children if they do something dangerous even after youve told them not to
no timmy, i already told you why not to play in the knife drawer
>spank kid
>kid associates danger with pain
As a parent, it your duty to teach your kid all the logical consequences their actions will have
>>74365990
The Tavistock institute thanks you for this post. 2 shekels have been deposited into your account.
>>74366072
Children are sexy. Every man wants to sex his own daughter.
>>74366108
Of course it's done for punishment but it is fun.
WHY IS THERE ALWAYS AN ACTIVE SPANKING THREAD
FUCK OFF YOU FAGGOTS AND GO FAP TO YOUR SPANKING PORN ALREADY
>>74366668
Because jews. And shills.
>>74366618
>hitting kids is fun
what?
>>74366487
>>74366668
You know, while we're on topic, why is most spanking porn shit?
The majority of movies produced that cater to it are dogshit because the girls absolutely refuse to act and the hits aren't damaging at all, with only a minority of more extreme videos even being satisfying to watch. If you're a cuck you have access to BLACKED and all that dumb shit, so why don't the Jews cater to MY degeneracy?
>>74366418
>literally just hitting someone's ass until they cry
>>74366795
>swatting your daughter's cute little butt
>not fun
Are you gay?
>>74365990
Humans have been moving forward from being animals for a while now. Recent degeneracy aside, humans have been pretty fucked up for a long time.
>Consider a typical infanticidal, incestuous culture, the Bimin-Kuskusmin of New Guinea. As is so often true in pre-literate cultures, the mothers have long post-partum taboos against sex with their husbands, sleep naked against their children until they are about four years old, have orgasms while nursing them and regularly masturbate them. One three-year-old boy describes how whenever his mother was sad or angry she masturbated him so roughly that it hurt him, and he struggled to get away, complaining of a pain in his penis. “It hurts inside,2 he told the ethnologist. I think it bleeds in there I don’t like to touch it anymore. It hurts when I pee…2 Sometimes, after his mother hurt him while masturbating him, he wounds himself in the thigh and abdomen with a sharp stick and draws blood, looking at his penis and saying, “Now it hurts here, outside, not in penis. Look, blood. Feels good…2 Although he is only three years old, he understands quite well that he is being used as a poison container by his mother to relieve her depression. He says, “Mother twist penis, tight…Hurt inside…Mother angry, hurt penis. Mother sad, hurt penis…Mother not like penis, want to cut off…”
>Maternal incest and pederasty by men are quite common in pre-literate groups and were common in earlier historical times. It is incest itself that has been universal for most children in most cultures in most times. A childhood more or less free from adult sexual use is in fact a very late historical achievement, limited to a few fortunate children in a few modern nations. To give you some idea of the extensive evidence I have gathered for such an unlikely conclusion, I would like to begin by summarizing the evidence which exists for the sexual abuse of children around the world today.
>>74365990
>your child just broke your CD and won't apologise
He's fine
>your child just hit another child at school because he wouldn't get his own way
He'll grow out of it
>still misbehaving
Its just his age
That's how you become a delinquent
If you are not brought up in a firm family you become half the man you could be. I was a little shit but man I deserves a slapped arse sometime. I have turned out fine,(inb4youron4chan) if you leave a child to do what they want without any consequences you grow up to be a fucking druggie or a theif
>>74367495
>Outside the West, the sexual molestation of children is a routine practice in most families. Childhood in India begins, according to observers, with the child being regularly masturbated by the mother, the girl “to make her sleep well,” the boy “to make him manly.” The child sleeps in the family bed, witnesses and most likely takes part in sexual intercourse between the parents. The child is often “borrowed” to sleep with other members of the extended household, leading to the Indian proverb that “For a girl to be a virgin at ten years old, she must have neither brothers nor cousin nor father.”
Childhood in China has historically had the same institutionalized rape rituals as in India, including the pederasty of boys, child concubinage, the castration of boys to be used sexually as eunuchs, marriage of young girls to a number of brothers, widespread boy and girl prostitution and the regular sexual use of child servants and slaves. So prevalent was the rape of little girls that Western doctors found that, as in India, few girls entering puberty had intact hymens. Even the universal practice of foot binding was for sexual purposes, with a girl undergoing extremely painful crushing of the bones of her feet for years in order that men could make love to her big toe as a fetish, a penis-substitute.
Childhood in contemporary Japan, although somewhat more Western than that of other Eastern nations, still includes masturbation by mothers “to put them to sleep.” Parents often have intercourse with their children in bed with them, and “co-sleeping,” with parents physically embracing the child, often continues until the child is ten or fifteen. “It’s not good to do it alone. Your IQ becomes lower. I will help you, ” or “You cannot study if you cannot have sex. You may use my body,” or “I don’t want you to get into trouble with a girl. Have sex with me instead.”
>>74365990
>We all have sick fetishes
dont project your degeneracy on others
>>74365990
Aww, did Paddy just get the paddle? Maybe you won't grow up to be a drunk. Maybe.
>>74367671
>The Greek and Roman child lived his or her earliest years in an atmosphere of sexual abuse. Girls were commonly raped, as reflected in the many comedies that have scenes that were considered funny of little girls being raped. Both Greek and Roman doctors report that female children rarely have hymens–just like the Indian and Chinese girls I described above.
Christianity attempted to reduce the outright killing of newborns, thus moving beyond the infanticidal mode, it continued the abandonment of children–whether by child sale or by sending to wet nurse or monastery or nunnery or foster family or to other homes as servants–which is why I labeled this second stage the abandoning mode. The refusal of parents to raise their own legitimate children was so powerful that through the nineteenth century over half of the children born in Florence, for instance, were dumped into foundling homes at birth, to be picked up by their families–if they lived that long (the majority died)–when they were around five years old, thus avoiding having homes where crying babies disturbed the peace.
Despite the advance that just abandoning rather than outright killing your children represents, most of the other childrearing practices of antiquity continued in the middle ages, with the buggering of boys–even in monasteries–continuing to be widespread and even accepted by society.
>>74367182
when you are in charge of a small kid, how can it even come in your mind?
lel, i am going to punish her. oooh, a cute little butt ooooh
STOP RIGHT THERE PEDO
>it's another spanking thread
>>74367862
>
The erotic beating of children continued in Christian times, because of the anxieties of living with a child who is so full of your projections. Children were experienced as always about to turn into “changelings,” those who, as St. Augustine puts it, “suffer from a demon”–which usually meant just that they cry an ten children with their crapping, eating, and screaming.”
That children with devils in them had to be beaten goes without saying. A panoply of beating instruments existed for that purpose, from cat-o’-nine tails and whips to shovels, canes, iron rods, bundles of sticks, the discipline (a whip made of small chains), the goad (shaped like a cobbler’s knife, used to prick the child on the head or hands) and special school instruments like the flapper, which had a pear-shaped end and a round hole to raise blisters. The beatings described in the sources were almost always severe, involved bruising and bloodying of the body, began in infancy, were usually erotically tinged by being inflicted on bare parts of the body near the genitals and were a regular part of the child’s daily life. Century after century of battered children grew up to batter their own children in turn. Public protest was rare. Even humanists and teachers who had a reputation for gentleness approved of the severe beating of children. Those who attempted reform did so only to prevent death. As a thirteenth-century law said, “If one beats a child until it bleeds, then it will remember, but if one beats it to death, the law applies.”
Parents must “keep the golden mean,” which is to say they should not “strike and buffet their children about the face and head, and to lace upon them like malt sacks with cudgels, staves, fork or fire shovel,” for then they might die of the blows. The correct way, he said, was to “Hit him upon the sides…with the rod, he shall not die thereof.”
>>74366868
Even Jews don't like seeing kids getting hurt you nigger.
>>74365990
All spanking teaches is that it's ok to hit someone weaker than you. Authority is mental. That you have to stoop to enforcing it physically only shows that you're either lazy or that your kid is smarter than you.
>>74367944
> Church moralists for the first time began to warn against sexual molestation of children by parents, nurses and neighbors (the mothers had previously been instructed to masturbate their boys “so their yards will grow long”). The length of time of swaddling was eventually reduced from a year or more to only a few months. Pediatrics and educational philosophy were born. Parents of means began suggesting that perhaps rather than sending their infants out to be wetnursed in some peasant village–and thereby condemning over half of them to early death–the mother might herself nurse her infant. The baby, said some mothers who began to try nursing their own babies, even responds to this care by giving love back to the nursing mother, stroking her breast and face and cooing. And if the father, as often happened, complained that his wife’s breast belonged to him not the baby, these bold new mothers suggested that the father should be allowed to hold the baby too.
For the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries in Western Europe represent the great watershed of psychogenic change, wherein vastly improved childrearing allowed at least some of the schizoid and borderline personalities of antiquity and medieval times–who regularly heard voices and hallucinated visions–to move on to the more integrated, less splitting modern neurotic personality more familiar to recent times, thus achieving Melanie Klein’s “depressive position.” The sixteenth-century watershed in childrearing allowed people to reduce splitting and feel real depression for the first time, as can be seen in the popularity of Renaissance melancholy (Hamlet’s admirable depressive guilt), the ability of Protestants to end the good mother/bad mother splitting of Mary/Eve, and the ability to internalize the projective panoply of split Catholic saints/devils into Protestant depressive guilt.
>>74368046
If kids were so smart they'd know not to throw tantrums.
>>74368083
>Although erotic whipping of children decreased gradually, the intrusive mode required nevertheless a steady pressure on the child to “break its will” and discipline it properly. This breaking of the will began early. John Wesley’s mother said of her babies, “When turned a year old (and some before), they were taught to fear the rod, and to cry softly.” One would never know, she claimed, that children were present in her house. Rousseau confirmed that in France babies in their earliest days were often beaten to keep them quiet. Another mother wrote of her first battle with her four-month-old infant, “I whipped him til he was actually black and blue, and until I could not whip him any more, and he never gave up one single inch.” One can sense in this description of baby battering the struggle with the mother’s own powerful parent, with the baby seen as so obstinate that it “won the battle” even after being beaten. In fact, this “double image” of the child as both a powerful adult and a wicked child accounts for the merging of beater and beaten in our myriad historical accounts of child abuse. Here, for instance, is an early American father describing the beating of his four-year-old boy for not being able to read something. The child is first tied up naked in the cellar. Then, the father writes,
>>74368122
>This picture of the merging of parent and child, with the father complaining that he is the one “beaten out” and in need of pity, is common for the intrusive mode. Similar confusion between parent and child can be seen in the severe punishments for masturbation championed by the child-training literature since Tissot. Prior to this, children were masturbated by adults and even licked on their bodies as though they were substitute breasts. For instance, Little Louis XIII, in 1603, was described by his pediatrician as having his penis and breasts kissed by everyone in the court, and his parents would regularly make him part of sexual intercourse in the royal bed. But childrearing reformers beginning in the eighteenth century began to try to bring this open sexual abuse under control, only it was the child who was now punished for touching his or her genitals, under threat of circumcision, clitoridectomy, infibulation and various cages and other genital restraint devices. These terrorizing warnings and surgical interventions only began to die out at the end of the nineteenth century, after two hundred years of brutal and totally unnecessary assault on children’s bodies and psyches for touching themselves. Despite the reformers’ efforts, progress was so uneven that one British journalist could write in 1924 that “cases of incest are terribly common in all classes. [Usually] the criminal…goes unpunished…Two men coming out from [an incest] trial were overheard saying to a woman who deplored there had been no conviction, ŒWhat nonsense! Men should not be punished for a thing like that. It doesn’t harm the child.'”
>>74367877
Is the man in pic taking a power poo? Leave the internet pajeet, you stink. You stink like shit.
>>74366527
http://www.redorbit.com/news/health/1113413810/spanking-defiance-health-discipline-042616/
Good point.
Matter of fact, take it one step further and full on beat them like the good old days.
It doesn't do any harm and is why abused children tend to live successful passionate lives.
Just full on abandon them at a young age if you don't have the time.
>>74368203
>By the nineteenth century’s socializing mode, some parents no longer needed to terrorize, beat and sexually seduce their children, and more gentle psychological means began to be used to “socialize” the child. The socializing mode is still the main model of upbringing in Western nations, featuring the mother as trainer and the father as provider and protector, and the child is seen as slowly being made to conform to the parents’ model of goodness. Many of the abusive practices are reduced in the home but remain elsewhere in society. While Elizabeth I was sexually seduced as a girl by her caretakers and Louis XV had Madame du Barry procure little girls for the King to rape in his royal bedroom, by the nineteenth century parents would less often commit incest themselves but still sent their children to schools where they were erotically whipped on the bare buttocks and usually buggered by the older boys and masters. As John Addington Symonds reported his experience as a boy at public school:
true, and it also makes them stupider
>>74368205
a pedo comes to save the face of his fellow pedo brother.
Also, not an argument.
>>74368330
This graph doesn't even make any fucking sense.
You're a fucking idiot if you believe in this shit.
>>74368122
>>74368203
europeans were filthy degenerates KEK
>>74368205
>>74368372
>One Poo Man
>>74368330
You just have to keep spanking them when they are 5-9. If you spank 20+ times the child will become the new Einstein.
I don't hit my kids.
And do you know why that is?
Because I'm not afraid to hit my kids.
Just because you're a victim of emotional abuse and shame doesn't mean I'm the least bit interested in trading one form of abuse for another.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yC7HwPh6Es
>>74366108
>Third worlder lectures on spanking
K... Keep me posted.
>>74367862
>Girls were commonly raped, as reflected in the many comedies that have scenes that were considered funny of little girls being raped.
KEK
>>74368010
>kids
dumb nigposter
>>74367495
Yeshua was ahead of his time in a culture that was not much different from today's Afghanistan.
Mark 9:42: And whosoever shall cause to stumble one of these little ones that believe; it is seemly for him, rather, if there is hung a large millstone about his neck, and he is cast into the sea.
>>74366108
Sure they are
