Human Taxonomy
- Home
- Board: /pol/ - Politically Incorrect
- Reading: Human Taxonomy
Should different races of human be classified as separate sub-species?
>>74171956
all women used to be redheads?
>>74171956
Yes, if biologically and scientific classification were applied they would be categorized as such. But it would hurt peoples feelings so they ignore science.
>>74172127
The first redheads were neanderthals
>>74172127
#yesallwomen
>>74172127
That's not an evolutionary chart, it's different branches of humans, all extinct except for Neanderthals and homo sapiens
>>74172145
This. It's true, but no scientist wants to get their life and work ruined by faggots shouting "racist!"
Wouldn't matter either way, It's just semantics.
>>74171956
There may be at least three distinct species of human today. White, Black and Asian. Those are the major categories within you could organize all the other sub-races, generally based on appearances.
>>74171956
What is this, a picture for ants?
>>74172447
From a genetics point of view there are something like 8 sub-species and 7 of them are in Africa.
Really all that shows is that niggers are so far from being human that they get their own category.
>>74171956
Wasn't Erectus the first to walk on two legs?
>>74172638
No suprise there.
>>74172893
No, they were the first to have erections. Hence the name, retard.
Jew York times article. On the difference between races.
http://time.com/91081/what-science-says-about-race-and-genetics/
