http://archive.is/KTFCL
>Gynecologists Kavita Shah Arora and Allan Jacobs said procedures that slightly changed the look of a girl's genitalia without damaging them were comparable to male circumcision or cosmetic procedures in Western countries like labiaplasty.
>Laws against mild modifications were "culturally insensitive and supremacist and discriminatory towards women", they wrote in the specialist publication that is published by the British Medical Journal.
>The gynecologists suggested that global attempts to stamp out FGM with legislation had failed and may be driving the practice underground.
>"We are not arguing that any procedure on the female genitalia is desirable," they said. "Rather, we only argue that certain procedures ought to be tolerated by liberal societies."
>They said the term "female genital mutilation" should be replaced with the less emotive "female genital alteration" to avoid "demonising important cultural practices".
bumpy
Kek, looks like Muslim rights trumps womens rights. Checkmate feminists.
[[Shah]]
>>74158772
Yay more pandering
>>74158772
damn dude. when someone argues reducto ad absurdam, you're supposed to reject the premise, not accept the absurdam.
The one silver lining in Islamification will be watching the entire writing staff at Jezebel get public clitorectomies done with dull, rusty scimitars.
>>74158772
Holy fuck. Never mind that circumcision is child abuse in its purest form, let's use it as a benchmark for females! Are these two retarded?
>>74158772
If male genital mutilation is going to stay legal in the US, female genital mutilation should be legal too.
>>74159109
Got muh popcorn
>>74160069
and by some strange irony they will be willing participants
So can we mildly murder Muslims and Niggers and Jews please.
According to mainstream media thats part of my white culture.
Don't opress me shitlords!
>>74158772
>changing the look of a girl's genitalia without damaging them were comparable to male circumcision
They're not wrong, it's just that male and female circumcision of underage children should both be forbidden for non-medical reasons
>>74162203
So male circumcision isnt damaging ?
Also why are the backward white traditionalists shunned but the true backward minority culture encouraged ?
