or is that something only people should do?
Are corporations people with feelings and life and desires?
>>74071090
>Should Corporations be allowed to tweet messages
yes
>or is that something only people should do?
no
>Are corporations people with feelings and life and desires?
no
yes
yes
>>74071090
Yes if they are the creators of GarfieldKart (TM)
>>74071090
They are just hoping their cars don't disappear in a cloud of smoke caused by the exhaust
A corporation is a collection of people (investors). It's like a union for cunts with money. Should groups be allowed to tweet?
>>74071090
If it's a sport corporation where a CM has a specific time window when he can goof off yeah.
Otherwise it's just cringy and only done by millenials who try to be hip
>>74071090
What could possibly be gained by banning corporations from twitter?
>>74071090
No. Because there is no soul to curse and no corpse to kick.
>>74071276
Corporations aren't people. It is awful that we treat corporations like people.
>>74071090
Also, good job Hamilton
>>74071329
Is it?
I remember when I was dumb I came to pol and learnt stuff
Now I read answers/opinions and realise 99% of you have never read anything
Study 'history of the corporation' and then you'll probably derive a benefit
>>74071329
Corporations are made up of people. Should trade unions and political parties also be denied the right to free speech?
>>74071329
Newsflash bub, corporations are people. Legally.
>>74071090
Whose fault was that anon?
I initially thought Hamilton but watching the replays, Rosberg knew what he was doing and forced him off into the green.
