Aside from the Watergate scandal and his increasing paranoia at the end of his second term, was he a good president?
>>73865193
Ironically, yeah he wasn't too bad.
There is literally nothing wrong with breaking into hotel rooms to steal evidence to frame Democrats with.
>>73865193
He was bretty gud. Cracked down on hippies and niggers. Good foreign policy. Decent economic policy
>>73865193
He was an excellent President.
>>73865193
Idk but he's pretty handsome desu.
>>73865352
Did he push for desegregation though and founded the EPA?
He chose to be loyal to his subordinates and protect them. That's the mistake he made. Everyone else had people doing stuff like that.
In the end the jewish lobby got him.
If it wasn't for the watergate scandal he would be remembered better than JFK was.
>>73865805
I feel kind of bad for him, granted, it's in hindsight but he really didn't need to go through Democrat documents to help win the election. In fact, even after those guys got caught, things only got worse when he attempted to cover it up. If it had been left alone, the controversy would have died like any controversy that happens today.
He made the EPA, ended segregation in schools, even pushed for a universal healthcare and welfare for families for children to help end poverty. Despite being Republican, he's probably more liberal than most democrats are nowadays.
>>73865506
Shit had already been desegregated. He invented the drug war and used it to put hippies and niggers in jail
>>73865506
When he was a senator he and the mainstream GOP pushed all the civil rights bills up to but not including the 65 Act.
In fact he and Johnson had competing bills in the Senate, when LBJ realized he suddenly didn't hate niggers anymore and could get the black vote for the Dems.
At about 4:35, the great Pat Buchanan runs through his accomplishments. He answers your question pretty much exactly:
https://youtu.be/RCkIo4tUONk