If the Republicans were smart, wouldn't they be endorsing the Libertarian canidate? They could get conservatives and evangelicals to vote, and save their own congressional seats, but would no longer have to be TrumpBots.
>>73847813
literally who?
>>73847813
What Libertarian candidate? Rand? Hmm, well the whole point of being a TrumpBot is that he isn't a career politician. My libertarian views align pretty well with Donald's policies anyway.
>>73847941
Try Gary Johnson. Already on the ballot in most states.
>>73847813
they wouldnt save their own congressional seats. if the gop thinks using a 3rd party candidate wont force white nationalist into the government in the next midterm their stupid as fuck
even in states you wouldnt think it would fly they dont have to admit to being one and many are not in groups considered to be white nationalist and havent said anything on face book or twitter
democrats and republicans can look forward to not running uncontested if the GOP continue this stupidity
>>73847813
That's actually happening right now.
>>73847941
So you agree that eminent domain should be used to seize property for profit?
How very libertarian.
>>73847889
Some Inquisitor from Disney's latest Star Wars cartoon/abortion.
>>73848161
I disagree. How did you come to that conclusion, my friend?
>>73848315
Trump supports eminent domain.
Because the only people supporting libertarians are unemployed graduates and people who've devoted 5-15 years studying philosophy, history, politics and theology.
Basically, smart fags. Of course they're a sheer minority.
>>73848455
Well, yeah. Did you not hear the explanation he gave at that debate? I'm sure you watched the debate since you heard him talk about eminent domain.
>>73848315
"But I happen to agree with it 100 percent, not that I would want to use it. But the fact is, if you have a person living in an area that's not even necessarily a good area, and government, whether it's local or whatever, government wants to build a tremendous economic development, where a lot of people are going to be put to work and make an area that's not good into a good area, and move the person that's living there into a better place -- now, I know it might not be their choice -- but move the person to a better place and yet create thousands upon thousands of jobs and beautification and lots of other things, I think it happens to be good." - Trump, re: Kelo vs New London, Conn
He used eminent domain to take a lady's house from her for a casino parking lot or some shit, the decision later was overturned.
He's a scumbag.
I've noticed the MSM starting to talk about Gary Johnson the past week. Could it be because they've suddenly decided to stop ignoring him because the power of his arguments has finally convinced them he is not just wasting his time?
Or could it be that it's just another low energy attempt to lure anti-establishment voters away from Trump?
Meanwhile, Donald trolls Elizabeth Warren and gives no fucks.
>>73848682
They are not smart fags. They are think-they're-smart fags.
>>73849126
Milton Friedman and George Sowell would say otherwise. Also, do you really think someone who reads Adorno or Horkheimer is more intelligent? It's like, sure, I'll believe in this philosophy that ultimately wants to make me a racial underclass, that's completely reasonable.
>>73848932
I'm not sure how in saying that, he meant that he supports it being used to seize private property. As explicitly stated in the quote you pasted, he supports it for government use.
Private companies are able to make a deal and use eminent domain if they want to as well, but their requests can easily be overturn if the person simply declines. Which is what happened.
>>73849666
forgot words: "...seize private property for profit..."
>>73849299
>muh Austrian economics
>muh philosophy
STEM here and none of that shit impresses me.
I'm not a racist, either. But I could write an essay on how bad "Free Trade" has been for working class and middle class white people in the US and West Europe.
Great for Asian elites, though. And for Asian workers who consider having a cathode ray TV and an indoor toilet for only their family to use to be a huge material advance.
>>73850051
Cosmopolitanism is a straw man against libertarianism, there is nothing wrong with wanting a free market with just enough protectionism to prevent incredible youth unemployment.
>>73850160
Nope, not a strawman. Ultra-SJW bullshit is a perfect fit with corporatism.
Also, most of mankind's greatest achievements have been organised by governments. Space missions, for example. And the development of a lot of new technology (for example the Internet) was sped up HUGELY because government took a wise risk without the likelihood of a fast return, something that self-interested VC types almost never do.
Finally, you need someone to maintain the roads, pay the police, defend the nation, ensure food, water and air quality, etc... for that you need taxes and government. To do it properly takes a decent amount of taxation, especially among the wealthier people who have benefited the most from society and therefore should give the most back.
If you don't have an effective government in these areas you have at best China (in which an unaccountable billionaire elite always win and can afford a high quality of life as they drain the country of wealth and ordinary people worry about what they eat/drink/breathe every day) and at worst Somalia.
>>73849299
Austrian economics
Literally feels the economic model
Face it there is no evidence it works, in fact it's based on ignoring evidence
