So how many years until pedophiles get rights?
200 years from now? (2216)
>>73759900
Hopefully never.
Being attracted to someone who is not even of healthy reproductive age is a mental illness, just like homosexuality.
>>73759900
>9gag watermark
Yep. This is the average retard that believes in the slippery slope fallacy.
Curiosly the law that allows gay marriage doesnt specify the minimum age
>Stahp opressing me, I want to marry my own 2 years old son
>fucking bigots wont let me have anal sex with my baby on the womens bathroom
>>73760134
Look "meh Geek". If you dont like it, go to /b/ or /g/, depending on your level of autism
>>73760134
>fags can legally marry
>now people are fighting for the right for men to go into the women's restrooms
>"hurr durr this retard believes in the slippery slope fallacy"
>>73759979
Didn't stop homosexuality, as you can see.
>>73759900
More like 20 years. The world is going to hell in a handbasket.
>>73760376
It should have. You can thank pretty much the entire spread of AIDS to those faggots, they're a public health hazard.
>>73759900
Judges are literally handing out rulings that 11 year olds can switch genders because they're able to decide their own reproductive destiny.
It's coming within the decade.
>>73760304
Wow you really got me with your green text and smug anime lady. Pretty soon people might actually be fighting for something that effects my life at all.
>>73759900
The exact opposite will happen.
The age of consent is rising everywhere due to feminist pressure. In 200 years you'll only be allowed to fuck old hags and if you even look at a 20 year old you'r econsidered a misogynist pedophile
>>73759979
But it's okay for a 5 year old to identify as the opposite gender they were born as or whatever the fuck they call it. I hope the answer to the question is never but seeing as how the global population is on the fast track to degeneracy I wouldn't doubt it if the kidde fiddlers will get equal rights for their degeneracy however animal fuckers and plant fuckers might get it before them.
>>73759900
the real question is when hebephiles will no longer be grouped in with pedophiles and when they will begin to be viewed as they are- biologically normal.
>>73759900
Shut the fuck up motherfucker go diiiie!
I've been looking forward to pedo pride parades for years. There comes a point where shit stops being annoying and becomes silly enough to be hilarious. That will be that point.
>>73759979
I mean a lot of people would consider someone attracted to a 15 year old a pedophile. They're well within breeding age. If they have big ol' titties and bleed I don't think it's wrong to be attracted.
>>73761055
It doesn't affect your life because you are a permavirgin, and never have to worry about your children being exposed to this shit.
>>73761055
>closet faggot detected
>>73759900
10 at max
>>73761139
You'll also be called a misogynist for NOT doing that. Don't underestimate the power of liberal doublethink. This is why the Jews need to be gassed, and soon.
>>73760134
You serious? There are already libs demanding more rights for zoophiles and pedoforks.
http://www.greeleygazette.com/press/?p=11517
I didn't believe in the 'slippery slope' either, thought it was just another neo-con trick. Then I witnessed it first hand.
I've said it once, I've said it before
If they legalize pedophilia I'll become a serial killer.
I'll hunt every known pedo I can find and kill them.
Pedos aren't hard to bait either, they're stupid.
>>73761651
holy shit that jew sargon just puts his emblem on a picture that actually has the artists name on it ?
>>73763261
it's commissioned, sargon paid ben to make it
>>73759900
Depends on what you consider a pedophile. And it has already began, it will be legalized within a decade.
>>73759900
They do have rights, just not the right to fuck children.
>>73759900
they already do have rights. Just not to rape kids.
>>73759900
At the rate we're going, I give it about 2 years.
>>73759900
Seeing how shit society is going i would say maybe five....
ten at best...
Never, we will stop them
Depends on how quickly the caliphate takes over.
I give it 30 years maximum. 8 years is my prediction.
They have the right to eat a bullet.
>>73759900
At current rates, next June.
>>73759900
If Trump wins, next year.
>>73759900
Muslims are already allowed to be pedos in the UK - child brides are recognised by the welfare state.
>>73760134
Isn't that what progressives want though, progress :^)?
>>73765978
Why be a cancer on /ol/ buddy?
Go back to whatever cucksites you wank off to - i suggest Raw Story for a gay cunt like you.
>>73763209
Well they are attracted to children, they must, at some level, be thinking like a child... of course they are easy to bait
>tfw 4chan has pedophobic mods
I thought of all places I'd be accepted here. I didn't choose to be this way.
>>73759900
Come to sweden and fuck 15 years old annon.
>>73759900
The AoC is a feminist concept. So as soon as feminism loses.
>>73766333
>Well they are attracted to women, they must, at some level, be thinking like a woman.
>>73761256
>But it's okay for a 5 year old to identify as the opposite gender they were born as or whatever the fuck they call it. I hope the answer to the question is never but seeing as how the global population is on the fast track to degeneracy I wouldn't doubt it if the kidde fiddlers will get equal rights for their degeneracy however animal fuckers and plant fuckers might get it before them.
For me, the question is different.
We all know for sure that:
>sexuality, and especially preferences and behaviour, are uncertain until WELL after puberty.
>consequently, even though for those who turn out to be trannies, the earlier the hormone treatment, the better...
>...it is still degenerate to start hormone treatment with a 5 y.o. just because they have "tendencies"... because (s)he might be turned upside down by puberty as EVERYONE is, so I do not see how fixing a 5 y.o. tendency FOREVER can be considered good practice
Even given these commonsensical shit, I still think the question is:
>How widespread are these 5 y.o. tranny enablers?
Seriously. How many are there, aside from the usual MSM picks?
Answer to this question leads to other questions:
>Is it something sufficiently widespread or serious to warrant legislation on the matter (and not just occasional court settlements)?
>If it is not something sufficiently widespread anyway, why do we worry if laws are created? All things considered, the phenomenon will remain a minority.
Well, we are only a couple years away from letting children chop their genitals up and change their gender. Once that's over with, I can't really see any argument against it sticking.
>>73769161
back to the mama basement fat lord
>>73759900
I don't know, OP. Are Mexicans people?
>>73759900
no way
in 2030 we have legal pedos fo sho
>>73767551
Fuck off back to cripple/b/
>>73767551
You don't usually get that ban unless you are posting little girl photos. I think it's one or two cunts doing it though.
>>73769161
Are you really cute? Be honest now.
>>73769323
Are you kidding? It happens all the time.
Soon
5-10 years top
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/paedophilia-sexual-orientation-straight-gay-criminal-psychologist-child-sex-abuse-a6965956.html
>>73759900
If the world doesn't end this year, then in less than 10 years. This is the plan: pedophilia, zoophilia, necrophilia, then open human sacrifice and baby burning to moloch.
>>73760841
Not in your country, Trump won't put up with that shit. Here I could see it happening. It's already basically happening in Sweden, if anyone is still paying attention to what's going on there.
>>73769547
don't scare me
Actual pedophilia, ie : fucking prebuscent children?
I'd say it's going to be a right in a few years, but only for a few select individual: niggers, sandniggers, muslims, jews, fags, trannies, women.
A 18 years old white man fucking a 16 years old woman will still be sent to jail because he is a fucking white male.
>>73759900
Pedophiles do not get rights. They get wrongs. Many of them. In jail. Sunflower.
>>73769460
But do the little ones think you are cute? There's a difference.
>>73760134
I would agree. Liberal agenda/fag culture is both a slippery slope and a fallacy.
>>73760134
But liberals have allready started to advocate legalization of incest, zoophilia and necrophilia
>>73759900
Not that i'm condoning pedophilia, but for the entirety of human history, up until 200 years ago, age of consent has not existed.
So it's quite likely that things revert to their original state, as empires crumble.
The whole idea of age of consent and the media pushing it is a feminist one dating back to a lady called Josephine butler, a victorian era feminist.
Again, i'm not condoning anything, this is just a historical perspective. You faggots think it's the leftists pushing pedophilia, but they actually hate it. Feminists fear it going back to it's original state more than anything, because if age of consent got removed, their entire pussy power vanishes.
So yea, if you have a brain and want to learn about the beginnings of social justice (knowing your enemy is the smart thing to do) go learn about some history.
Or you can just rage in this thread about "dem evil leftists" without realizing they have your back on this one.
>>73769766
I'm not feeling any love from the leftists, normiefriend. They are some of the most vitriolic and hateful people. Sure, there are a few token people who advocate for it and get defended by leftists, but that's because they are women to be white knighted for every time, not because they care about pedos.
>>73760134
>back in 1950
>gays are never going to happen
>here we are now in 2016
things doesn't look good
the key word is consent desu
>>73759900
One of those characters is really fuckable, and I'm not exactly into kids
>>73769855
I just know what sorts of celebrities lolis like. I'm not cute to them even though women say I am. A bit too manly, I think.
>>73769888
For the vast majority of English-speaking societies women have gotten married at 19 and you're a retard
>but da feminists
Are irrelevant, there was never a time where it was common for 13 year olds to get married in English-speaking countries.
>>73769932
Why couldn't they consent? There's nothing metaphysical about sex.
Why is Carl Diggler so based?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/posteverything/wp/2016/05/09/our-fictional-pundit-predicted-more-correct-primary-results-than-nate-silver-did/
>>73769888
oh nice, i got trips
but yea, you cunts should really look into the history i'm talking about if you want to educate yourself further on your enemies
>>73769609
He's right you know? the more negative karma or mojo humanity accepts,absorbs and displays the less and less the universe will want it around
armageddon soon fellow non-reptillian
>>73770061
I am speaking from a legal sense. It's never been criminal until then and many kings and lords did partake in it.
Presumably because the younger girls would flock to the successful and rich men (it's the nature of women).
Rape was always looked down on, of course, but marriages did exist. There was a spanish king with a harem of like 30 lolis, not even joking.
Naturally now we know better, but the idea that leftists would promote something that directly correlated with them losing their influence is a laughable one. That's the point i'm trying to make.
>>73770093
Oh I see. I thought you meant as a more general kind of cute. Nevermind then, they'd probably like you. I've always been addressed as an adult and called sir since I was about seventeen. I wish I looked more boyish.
>>73770184
http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2014/02/wives-king-henry-viii-part-one/
read this. little girls engaged at 3.
>>73770184
I see. There are two ways to get away with banging kids:
>Be rich and powerful over 250 years ago
>Be a Muslim immigrant in Sweden, Germany, UK, etc. now
>>73770081
People under 18 aren't capable of consent. Even if they give consent they are children and if you were to listen to them they can ruin their lives since they can't know what is good for them. It is like teaching your children to behave. They don't know what is right or wrong.
>>73770323
Why can retards over 18 give consent then?
>>73770081
I belive you can fuck anything that gives consent and/or not suffer the consequences of not giving consent.
I wish soon
>>73770322
pretty much. but my point was, rape's always been frowned upon, but child marriage was not seen as rape until 200 years ago.
prior to that, rich and powerful people (lets be real they still do today) had their pick, since they were rich and powerful.
also, the age of consent gave feminists incredible power and directly led into them having the right to vote.
they won't give that up EVER without a fight.
They'll push 18+ incest first to further destroy white genes.
>>73770323
Why would it ruin their lives? The only reason is because they are told it was traumatizing. Matress Girl only started her bullshit when she went to the campus feminist club six months later and some harpy cunt told her that it was rape.
>>73770413
Nice rare Lera.
>>73766163
Why post picture of trump's master?
>>73770413
My point is them giving consent is pointless since they aren't dvaloped enough to know what is good for them. People at 16-17 can be devaloped enough or even 14-15 but they are usually powerless and their naivety can be abused easier. So to me age of 18 feels right.
>>73770493
while i dont support removal of AOC, your argument actually holds psychological merit.
The term you are looking for is called social stigma.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_stigma
Society can essentially brainwash someone into thinking they are a victim by repeating it enough times, even if they're just a sooky fucking cunt.
This phenomenon is why you get so many "triggered" crybaby leftists. It's actually not their fault, it's a normal human response to the extreme brainwashing via social stigma they get.
It many not seem like brainwashing, but it is. Have a read.
>>73759900
reminder there's nothing wrong with being a pedo if you don't actually molest kids
>>73759900
Where? In some parts of the world it's already an overlooked by authorities way of life.
https://youtu.be/dSrH09lLsBI
>>73770605
this
im attracted to children but I would never have sex with them
>>73770605
like the image of the dude with the lazy town shirt
>>73770563
16 is the perfect age of consent.
Anyway let us all listen to Turkroach here. He is correct.
Of course the fact he reasons like this doesn't mean he restrains from fondling minors. We all know Turks love this shit. But they love this shit PRECISELY because they know it is not correct.
If you wanna know about crime, ask a criminal.
If you wanna know about pedos, ask a Turkroach.
>>73759900
Real kids are annoying shits.
I'd rather fap to lolis.
>>73770493
Na dude you don't know shit about children psychology. Having sex with a child can have catastrophic consequences for the child. Look it up. It is really not something like a university whore sucking 10 dicks and crying rape.
>>73759900
lolitas bay for it
>>73770793
nice
>>73760134
Inductive arguments aren't always fallicious. Slippery slope is a leap of logic. This is following the trend we've been witnessing over decades. Kids can now decide on their sexuality and their gender before sprouting their first pube.
>>73760304
relates to pedos how?
classic anime poster trash
>>73770644
YOU FUCKING PIECE OF SHIY DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND IT FUCKS UP PEOPLE SO AN AVERAGE 18 IS A GOOD AGE. ARE YOU THAT RETARDED YOU AMERIBURGER OBESE PEDOPHILIA PIECE OF SHIT?
>>73770805
what exactly do you mean by having sex? giving a girl oral counts as sex you know, and can you explain how eating out a girl is going to cause catastrophic consequences?
>>73770774
Isn't an Australian on trial for fucking an infant to death in the Philippines right now? And wasn't an Austrailian arrested just last week for making crossdressing boy CP? Australia is vastly overrepresented here. The turk at least has the excuse of being an animal, unknowledgeable of right and wrong.
>>73770805
It can, because of society, not because it is intrinsically harmful. Nothing is intrinsically harmful. Aztec children didn't freak out watching beating human hearts being eaten every day. Change society, and remove the harm.
>>73760748
>this
I can't wait for western independence. We're gonna load our fags on trucks and put a hose into the back from the exhaust pipe and shoot the remaining who try to run. You should come for a week for some good food good beer and some free live target shooting
>>73770913
I'm a mechanical engineer. I am very interested in psychology. My mother is a psychologist and have a doctor gf. So what is wrong with me talking about psychology?
>>73770859
can you explain how there is a slippery slope towards pedophilia when right now at this very moment children are more protected from sexual abuse than they have ever been in history?
because it was way, way easier to molest a child back when faggots were still getting lynched.
>>73770805
But isn't this exactly why >>73770782 works with a broader spectrum of customers?
I mean, lolis are designed and engineered not only to have a certain set of body features, but also a certain type of personality in special consequence-free worlds.
They are basically unicorns.
This is why it is perfectly understandable someone might fap to pic above (I don't do it, but I understand) and yet see a kid and be disgusted or unable to sexualize the real life kid.
Roris are just the evidence our normal brains can be tricked, but it is no evidence of pedo tendencies. It's like traps. If a trap deceives you on webcam, you might even fap at him, but this doesn't mean you would fall in love with him in person or even consider having sex once you hear him talk or see him walk.
Precisely because MSM are NOT reality.
So, the evidence is clear:
>most pedos love loli
>but not all those who love lolis are pedos
This is like a genetic test:
>all people with illness X have gene Y
>but not all people with gene Y have illness X.
Is it so hard to understand what a cognitive bias is?
>>73770782
Real kids are great unless you are an unloving cunt. They are fun and sweet and curious.
>>73769364
You sound like a fag and your shits all retarded
I thought this thread was on
1. legislation
2. how degenerates are able to change it
3. how different degenerates are from the commonly understood /a/ NEETs
Not to share kids' pics for fucks sake let's stick to the topic.
>>73771004
>Aztec children didn't freak out watching beating human hearts being eaten every day.
it can be very easily argued that they were terribly traumatized by such occurrences. you just believe they werent because the trauma wasnt recognized.
its the same thing with ptsd in soldiers, people asking why soldiers today are getting ptsd and soldiers back in the day werent, butthe truth is probably that they were also getting ptsd back then, it just wasnt a recognized occurrence.
just because you convince a child they are fine does not mean they are fine. plenty of drug addicts have themselves convinced they are fine.
>>73771004
>It can, because of society, not because it is intrinsically harmful. Nothing is intrinsically harmful. Aztec children didn't freak out watching beating human hearts being eaten every day. Change society, and remove the harm.
Yeah if you change the norm you change the nomal i guess. If everyone is fucked up then no one is. Also should have been a time that pedophilia was considered normal. I don't know man, i cant tell what is happening on this world anymore. But in this reality it is wrong and will fuck the victim up.
>>73770701
>im attracted to children
enjoy your NSA surveillance
>>73763111
kek'd and checked
>>73760134
Degeneracy should be an exception to this particular fallacy
I don't get why from Antiquity to the Industrial Era it was acceptable to be in relationships and even being married to younger women, but around 1930 it shifted dramatically to people adhering to the AoC. What happened?
>>73771199
They pretty much ignored me explaining it from a historical perspective.
>>73771309
Scroll up, i have actually explained this. See my post here >>73769888
>>73770184
>>73770879
>grown men sharing the same bathrooms as young girls
There's already been plenty of cases.
>>73761496
>>73759979
Ye I wouldn't call it a mental illness. I'd say it's morally repugnant and illegal, but there doesn't seem to be a threshold as to what sexual attractions are truly a mental illness and what aren't. A lot of sexual problems are results of mental illnesses too.
Why don't we study pedophiles? Use them for experiments? Nothing too invasive or in threat to their life, but like psychological and experiments in therapy to produce some sort of successful treatment for it.
Does /pol/ think loli quells the pedo in us? Or are we doomed?
>>73760134
>points out a watermark in an image and uses it to judge a user
>unaware that most people here use Google Images to find images, and most overlook or don't care about watermarks
>autism
>>73759900
How can we stop pedophiles? By not making sexy kids.
>>73759900
I'm hoping the next 10 years.
>>73771226
>it can be very easily argued that they were terribly traumatized by such occurrences. you just believe they werent because the trauma wasnt recognized.
Doubt it. Humans have been killing and fucking since forever. What is right and wrong has changed. People today could get traumatized by having to kill a chicken or listening to their parents fuck in a one room house. That was absolutely nothing even seventy years ago.
Besides that, if the trauma wasn't recognized, even by the "victim", does it exist? If it does, is it still trauma if it's just a change in them, not a change seen as bad?
>its the same thing with ptsd in soldiers, people asking why soldiers today are getting ptsd and soldiers back in the day werent, butthe truth is probably that they were also getting ptsd back then, it just wasnt a recognized occurrence.
They probably did, but until WWI, the wars were pretty safe to be in except on the rare occasion of a battle. In that war and since, there has always been a constant danger and constant stress.
>>73771399
>Why don't we study pedophiles?
Non meme answer? Because every study that tries to approach it from a scientific perspective gets conveniently shut down as being some sort of pro pedo lobby due to public outrage, when ironically, they are actually just scientists trying to be reasonable and learn what causes it.
Read this.
https://www.springer.com/about+springer/media/springer+select?SGWID=0-11001-6-1042321-0
Read this study, then shit bricks when you realize someone with an agenda to push shut down all scientific process and actually put IRL lolis in danger because of it.
It's infuriating.
They showed with 20 years of clear research and crime statistics how to reduce the rate of offense, but got shut down cause MUH FEELS
>>73771530
not your personal army faggot
>>73771067
The best part about children is also their most tragic: their curiosity. It's the trait in humans that I'd say makes us such a dominant force in the world, and is part of a good human. It sucks to see this sense of curiosity stamped out so quickly; I'd say it took about 4 or 5 years of school for most of my peers to become the drones they are now (recent high school grad).
>>73771276
>Giving out unknown phone numbers
I don't feel like harassing dudes you don't like under a probably-false pretense.
>>73771199
Welcome to just about any anonymous forum you'll ever see. I do agree though.
My two cents: probably never. The only universally-reviled crime in America is child sex; no-one can come up with an alibi. "I raped that 7-year-old in self-defense!" "This little shit punched my son; better spelunk 'er booty bunker in retaliation!"
>>73771249
>Not everyone here agrees with you on what "degeneracy" is, not everyone wants the same laws you do, not everyone wants current legislation.
People always want things they cannot have or they desire things that cannot be reconciled.
For example, my gf wants to eat shit but doesn't want to feel fat.
Advertising fat as "the new" cool might absolve her from responsibility and make her feel comfortable, but it will NEVER change the fact excessive amounts of fat threaten your health. This is a fact. What she wants is a legislative excuse to ignore a fact.
Similarly with pedophilia. It is a fact you ruin people's lives forever. It is a fact it is an illness. People can ask for respect and be treated fairly by justice.
Or we can have some kind of Greek-ish Pedo world in which everyone does the fuck they want with kids.
But this will not change the fact lives will be ruined and other people's freedom infringed.
Degeneracy is wanting to change the laws as an excuse to ignore a problem.
>>73771471
>tfw some aus shitposter steals your jokes
>>73771530
You live in tampa or brandon?
or seffner or plant city...
>>73771471
>By not making sexy kids.
>>73759900
I think ephebophilia will become legal.
It's a whole less degenerate than the LGBT crap.
>>73760134
We have kids at age 6 getting sex changes.
The slippery slope is proven, and we have slipped.
>>73759900
Realistically, probably around 15. It took 27 years for homos to go from publishing "After the Ball" to getting gay marriage on the books.
After that, it only took a year to get tranny laws and executive orders. But since pedo will be a big leap even for these degenerates, my guess is that it will take about 15 more years before some new "science" comes out to explain why it's "alright."
>>73771618
>legislative excuse
Should have said normative in the broadest sense because it can be social norms we are talking about, not necessarily laws or Acts.
>>73771005
Oh shit, Alberta, BC or Sask?
I'm in BC. Western Canada really needs to separate from gay Canada.
>>73771415
Lolis fulfill the fatherly part of me. Anime that involves slice-of-life scenarios with small girls and the likes gives me escapism and a bit of subtle therapy from all the terrible shit I've seen, and also taps into my paternal instincts. I guess, on a really deep fucked up level, there's SOMETHING sexual about it but as it stands I like it because I hope to raise some kids some day.
I'm only 23 so it's a way's away, but I think about being a father sometimes. Lolis just scratch that itch.
>>73761496
You don't want adults dating teenagers, but they can't help being attracted to a girl entering her sexual maturity.
>>73771671
Apologies mate, but the burden of proof this time is yours.
Answer to this question in a clear and informative way:
>adults having sex with children 1 to 14 y.o. forever fucks with their minds in unpredictable and dangerous ways regardless of the cultural acceptance of practice.
I allow you to tweak the parameters if you like. Doesn't need to be 1-14; can be 2-10. I don't care: the task of answering the question is the same.
>>73771676
Science has already said is isn't necessarily wrong. Beyond that, as an empirical discipline, it cannot investigate moral claims. It's all a priori from here.
>>73767551
4chan banned me from my phone for a post that supposedly happened before I even switched to the carrier I was using when they banned me. WTF?
>>73771814
nigger thats not even a question thats a statement
learn english before posting on an english-speaking imageboard
>>73763209
Edginess aside, I'm with this fucker. If pedophilia gets legalized then clearly laws have failed us.
>>73771814
>adults having sex with children 1 to 14 y.o. forever fucks with their minds in unpredictable and dangerous ways regardless of the cultural acceptance of practice.
The majority of human history says this is not the case.
the aoc should be 13.
it was 12 in spain until a few years ago.
>>73771859
My phone once got banned for a post I didn't make. It happens a lot on data networks; if someone in your area got banned on the same provider, you're probably banned in that area too. Just appeal it dood
>>73771552
>Doubt it.
I don't care if you doubt it, and humans have been traumatized by war for millennia
>Besides that, if the trauma wasn't recognized, even by the "victim", does it exist?
Yes and literally every psychologist/sociologist on the planet would agree.
>is it still trauma if it's just a change in them, not a change seen as bad?
what is bad and what is seen as bad can be the same thing but they can also be two different things.
yes morality and trauma are subjective but lets be real here, if you and i are both living in the same sort of western culture, we almost certainly share 99% of our beliefs on what we think trauma and morality is.
im asking if you understand the concept of someone not being truly aware of their own suffering, like a battered housewife in an abusive relationship pretending that it isnt one.
>>73771875
>damage control everywhere
I can tell you're in damage control because instead of proving your point you are just highlighting the fact I forgot to add a question mark or forgot to end the sentence with
>do you agree? Yes/No? Why?
>>73771904
>The majority of human history says this is not the case.
>The majority of human history says mental illness, psychoss, etc. deriving from abuses of all kind (slavery, violence and shit) kept perpetuating a culture of violence.
Pic one man. Human history proves that unless you stop violence at the source, it is gonna perpetuate through generations.
>>73759979
I wouldn't say that
lots of fetishes out there aren't considered mental illness. The only difference is this one is dangerous.
>>73771913
how the fuck do you begin a conversation with a strange child with intentions to fuck?
>uuh, do you like spongebob?
it's weird as fuck
>>73771981
>damage control everywhere
why would i damage control for someone else
i'm just calling you out on being a retard
>>73769087
>...it is still degenerate to start hormone treatment with a 5 y.o. just because they have "tendencies"
Yes. People go through phases. Hormones and surgery permanently fucks up someone's body over something that they'll grow out of.
>>73769152
>Well, we are only a couple years away from letting children chop their genitals up and change their gender.
Try now. Look at the UK.
>>73771929
>My phone once got banned for a post I didn't make. It happens a lot on data networks; if someone in your area got banned on the same provider, you're probably banned in that area too. Just appeal it dood
Just another excuse of 4chan shills to make you purchase 4chan passes.
Once I gave personal info in a post (by mistake) and got banned for spam/raid.
WTF? Maybe the Janitor shill read the word "Tumblr" in my post and went apeshit crazy.
Usual shilling.
>>73771981
I'm not arguing for violence. That should only be condemned. I'm arguing for cuddles and kisses and love and gentleness.
>>73771883
What is your reasoning behind this? What makes you want to kill someone who wan't to fuck something that isn't socially acceptable? You don't see zoophiles getting death threats from people because they want to fuck dolphins.
>>73771981
its a loaded question that cant be answered with a yes or no.
of course a child CAN be harmed by sex, anyone can be harmed by sex regardless of age.
>>73772042
>I asked for proofs and evidence to demonstrate having sex with minors ("real minors" = 8-10 y.o.) does not fuck them up
Everyone on this board is calling me a retard, but nobody undertakes the burden of proof.
>Asks for evidence
>Called a retard
Well, I guess this is how /pol/ works.
I'm out boys.
>>73771924
These kind of people will never look at science mate, you ask any person what exactly causes the trauma in a child and they can't give a scientific answer.
The answer of course is the social stigma, exactly the same as mattress girl.
I don't support pedophilia, but from a historical perspective little girls were not traumatized back in the day, since society did not traumatize them for having such a relationship.
Teenagers are not children and hebephilia was extremely normal back in the day. Such a relationship now would end in trauma, simply because social workers would tell the teenager they're broken goods over, and over and over.
It's best to just fucking ignore anyone who thinks a teenager is a child, as they're some uneducated buffoon who does not even know the MEDICAL diagnosis of pedophilia, nor the history of how it came about.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia
>Pedophilia or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.[1][2] Although girls typically begin the process of puberty at age 10 or 11, and boys at age 11 or 12,[3] criteria for pedophilia extend the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13.[1]
TL:DR you can still be against kiddy fuckers but for rational discussion on teenagers
>>73769888
Age of consent has not existed in a defined sense, but it's pretty obvious when a girl starts to grow into a woman.
>>73772157
Yes, see the above post i made >>73772142
Sex with teenagers was and still is biologically normal. A 15 year old girl makes a better baby than a 25 year old girl, when it comes to chance of less autism.
I'm against pedophiles, but the idea that anyone who finds a teenage girl hot is a pedo is laughable and not based in any scientific merit.
>>73772130
>Everyone on this board is calling me a retard, but nobody undertakes the burden of proof.
because they understand you cant prove negative, you retard.
>>73772142
>using wikipedia as a source
top shitpost
>>73759900
Retarded 2000s kids dont understand it was legal for them to get fucked back in the 60s. Current culture isnt what dominated always. Be happy we ended the degeneracy years ago. Color climax isnt so innocent
>>73772099
>of course a child CAN be harmed by sex, anyone can be harmed by sex regardless of age.
But you have to prove many more things to accept a certain practice:
>kids are not usually harmed by sex with adults
lel
>kids can enjoy it
lel
>it doesn't fuck up with their mind
lel
>kids can consent to what happens to them
lel, because their brains are underdeveloped. Can a dog consent? Please /pol/ you're pathetic. Even if they can consent, their natural ontogeny is that of being trustful. So even if they are able to consent they are also capable of being manipulated by everyone.
Ask yourself:
>can a kid sign a complex contract with unexpected outcomes and a lot of fine prints?
>>73772230
Kek.
It is UNANIMOUSLY accepted in the medical community that the start of puberty is the cut-off.
>>73772230
It was sourced from the DSM-V. Ya know, the one that is used to diagnose psychiatric disorders, like Autism Spectrum Disorder. I strongly suspect you have that.
>>73771932
>I don't care if you doubt it, and humans have been traumatized by war for millennia
I was talking about the Aztecs. But in the context of war, it was war itself that would be traumatizing, not killing. No tears were shed by the Greeks at Marathon.
>Yes and literally every psychologist/sociologist on the planet would agree.
People making shitloads of money insisting that there is trauma, insists that there is trauma. News at 11.
See my example of Matress Girl earlier, who wasn't "rapes" until feminists and probably jewesses told her she was. And on the topic of Jews, they are still claiming trauma at the third generation after de shoah to get germoneybux.
>im asking if you understand the concept of someone not being truly aware of their own suffering, like a battered housewife in an abusive relationship pretending that it isnt one.
People can suffer and not be aware, and they can also be fine and still think they are suffering. I'm sure that kid who killed himself over the loss of his ipod had problems that felt really real to him.
>>73771806
M..me too
>>73759900
I'm a pedophile and if I was born in any I would have every right other citizen has. So pedophiles already have rights, just not the right to have sex with kids. I'm pretty okay with that though.
>>73771004
>It can, because of society, not because it is intrinsically harmful. Nothing is intrinsically harmful. Aztec children didn't freak out watching beating human hearts being eaten every day. Change society, and remove the harm.
Two things.
1) Yes, some things are intrinsically harmful. Humans have various hardwired reactions built into our bodies.
2) We hope to stem the tide of degeneracy because we have achieved something superior. Your marxist bullshit enables them.
>>73772325
I think the law should be what it used to.
Rape is rape, but arbirtray numbers not based on science should go.
And if a pedo rapes a kid, lynch mob can give him justice.
>>73772142
>from a historical perspective little girls were not traumatized back in the day, since society did not traumatize them for having such a relationship
Keep telling yourself this fairy tale.
>Implying feeling of having been used and manipulated is only socially induced and not something universal across cultures
Keep telling yourself the tale Greek young boys were happy being touched by old fags.
Keep telling yourself this... because all the documents we obtained, including artworks were actually produced by the same old fags who felt like legitimizing their own misdeeds.
>>73759900
In Europe? 10-15 years. In Russia? Never.
>>73772072
Well, yes. Because dolphins aren't human children.
The laws have failed if children can be legally molested.
>>73770913
>publicly funded study says diddling kids doesn't screw them up in the head
holly shit if this happened today the SJWs would burn down every single campus
>>73772455
cus you already do it right?
>>73772389
>1) Yes, some things are intrinsically harmful. Humans have various hardwired reactions built into our bodies.
Exactly my point.
I don't see why the pedo enabler here >>73772405 says the burden of proof is mine.
Cutting an arm might be socially accepted and also be considered "cool" and people complimenting you. But it is intrinsically a painful experience, a scarring one and a maiming one. It reduces the subject's agency and cripples him. He can lead a normal life in a certain society (like someone who is low-sighted has little problems nowadays) but the fact he can have a sufficient quality of life and social acceptance will never change the fact that cutting an arm is intrinsically damaging.
He can be proud of that, but let's see 2 years later when he wakes up having nightmares or feeling absolute pain in the ghost arm. Let's see 10 years later what mutilation did to this "hero".
Same goes for mental illness.
>>73772333
>>73772336
fuckin trolled
nice trips
>>73772405
Yeah, I was jacking off since I was probably about 7 or 8 years old. My (same-age) buddy showed me porn from what was probably his older brother's browser history, and I've been fapping since then. If I had sex with a woman when I was 10, I woulda been totally fine with that. Whether or not it was a good decision... well, I'm not sure. I was still attracted to girls "my age" (7 or 8) until about the end of puberty, and though I might have actually been a pedo.
>>73772389
1 - Name one that wasn't invented as a bullshit way of infantalizing people.
2 - Not a marxist, and loving little girls isn't degenerate. What is so superior anyway? Your laws created by a campaign of feminists and suffragettes?
>>73772512
>Yes glorious Russia! We know you have no pedos there!
Only servers.
>>73759900
They'll never have the rights you're thinking of, but hopefully society will start treating it with help instead of taboo. Lots of people live their whole lives as pedophiles never acting on it, never touching kids, and never able to tell a medical professional or family or get help because of the taboo around it.
>>73772455
90% of CP comes from Russia.
>>73772674
I have absolutely no idea.
Is she a victim of something?
>>73772455
You guys can legally possess CP as long as you don't produce or distribute it. If anything, Russia is almost a safe haven for pedos right now.
Side-note: there's no minimum age of marriage for Libya, and that's the only criterion for sex there. The age of marriage was lost after the fall of Qaddafi, and never reinstated, so basically if you pass yourself off as a Muslim you could pretty easily arrange a marriage to a child and bang her as much as you want, legally. Just another example of how fucked the mideast is.
>>73772721
>Is she a victim of something?
She's a siberian mouse.
>>73772571
I saw it happen just a few years ago when i got my degree
A senior lecturer teaching BCOM wrote a paper using existing data from stats NZ about the effects of Polynesians on the economy. She got sacked because of it, and you can tell what the net gain was
Basing things like immigration policies off facts is usually a good thing
>>73772507
>>73772512
>until pedophiles get rights?
Read OP post. We have pedos here, it doesn't mean we will ever tolerate them. We even had an internet show where bunch of guys hunted them. It was popular.
>>73772416
>Keep telling yourself the tale Greek young boys were happy being touched by old fags.
If Plato didn't like getting felt up by Socrates, why did he write the Symposium where he argues that it's the highest form of love? Are you saying fucking Plato wasn't aware of his motivations or needed to justify something to himself?
More like people back then had better shit to worry about, like the huge empires on both sides of them and whether they were going to eat tomorrow to drag up banalities like arbitrarily deciding sexual mores.
>>73772795
HOLY FUCKING SHIT. This thing must end here.
>>73772795
Goddammit
>>73770322
Rich and powerful can still go to India/SoutheastAsia to get their skittles
>>73772814
>We have pedos here, it doesn't mean we will ever tolerate them. We even had an internet show where bunch of guys hunted them. It was popular.
Link to this shit in which pedos are humiliated? Not sure I would agree death penalty: >>73772593 seems convincing about the fact better cured than killed.
But still
>>73772915
Travel to that region is cheap; you could go there for a month and the most you'd spend is on the plane ticket. That's if you're high-rolling by local standards. I'd imagine their prostitutes would be among the cheapest in the world too.
>>73760134
Someone who believes the rising liberal rights movement is a slippery slope would be AGAINST thinking pedophiles have a chance at getting more rights you retard. I'm tired of you faggots acting like you even know what the slippery slope is while trying to talk shit about it.
>>73772842
>If Plato didn't like getting felt up by Socrates, why did he write the Symposium where he argues that it's the highest form of love? Are you saying fucking Plato wasn't aware of his motivations or needed to justify something to himself?
Cherry picked. One happy abused boy doesn't prove anything.
Where's art admirer?
>>73770323
>>73773002
Not sure why you're happy about pissing off the only reasonable normies here. You do this every fucking thread too. I think you get off on being hated.
As long as everyone is sleeping with their own race i could care less.
>>73761139
This. People need a boogeyman which is literally worse than Hitler or any other amount of murderers, torturers and other scum combined to vent off their moral panic on. Nevermind that pedophilia, especially in its modern media-made definition, is infinitely more natural than men pounding asses of each other or various trans-poly-mega-demi-sexuals.
>>73773084
It's plenty enough to counter your universal claim about "all" though. I literally CANNOT not cherrypick, since only 0.00001% of people who have ever lived ever had their stories recorded such that we can study them. Why are you allowed to speculate if I can't?
How do I ignore the Greek flag shitting the thread?
>>73759900
Look at it like this:
For something like that to come into effect it would have to be voted on, probably nationally. Can you imagine a world so shitty that pedophiles outnumbered the rest? Something wouold need to have gone SEVERELY wrong with society.
Or kids got REALLY sexy.
>>73760134
But we already have pedos latching themselves onto the lgbt movement and feminists writing justifications for mother child incest
>>73773163
He was doing his best and talking to us, which is more than the greek nigger is doing. There was no reason to start posting cropped CP to taunt him.
>>73773342
Yeah, like how the USA had a national vote for gay marriage.
>>73759900
Just move to germany of sweden, they already get their rights
>>73773327
Bump
>>73773327
Use 4chanX filter. If you don't have it, you'll have to deal with it, sadly.
>>73773358
Fucking faggots. Pedos marched with them at the beginning until they tossed us under the bus for Good Boy Points. After the pedo uprising, all the fags, dykes, and trannies are getting lined up against the wall.
>>73773552
>Use 4chanX filter. If you don't have it, you'll have to deal with it, sadly.
That's breach of posting rules no matter what.
And it is the first time in 2 years I see some shitposting to such extent.
I thought Janitors were here to avoid this shit happening.
This is clearly a bot.
Moreover, every time I try to post duplicate shit, I get warned. Why is this bot allowed to roam freely?
>>73759900
They already have rights though?
As long as they're not white, you can sex children as much as you like.
See Europe.
It would be racist not to let the poor refugees fleeing from FUCKING WAR not to fuck your little daughter in front of you while another refugee stands behind you with a machete.
>>73772964
We don't have a death penalty also there are talks among those who in power about returning it. I don't have links on those where humiliation is noticable (even though I remember there was a bunch). Most of the time it's subtle and all beatings happen off camera to avoid issues with law.
>>73773628
It would take forever, and they let shills shitpost in threads they don't like. Also, look at the end of his posts. The punctuation is different, so he doesn't get blocked.
>>73773710
You are going to get banned, muzzie.
>>73773779
>It would take forever, and they let shills shitpost in threads they don't like. Also, look at the end of his posts. The punctuation is different, so he doesn't get blocked.
Fuck me. Janitors can block the IP with a click. When I shitposted wrong I got banned for what seemed to me to be no reason.
Now you are telling me it is too hard for Janitors to stop this faggot from shitting all over the place?
I don't thing it would take "Forever" to identify the ID and clear it in one go.
>>73773832
Arguably, it is the Greek flag who's shitting all over the place. Not the Ameritard. Unless they are the same dude.
>>73773779
They can delete all posts from 1 IP with 1 button click.
>>73773773
Yes, you slavs do enjoy beating people. Your greatest contribution to the world is tree guys one hammer after all.
>>73773922
>>73773937
Not saying they can't, I'm saying they won't.
>>73774023
Lel. I got banned from reporting.
I can still post, but cannot report posts.
>>73773993
>tree guys one hammer
What else do you expect from Ukrainians? Well, jokes aside we have such scum as well.
Paedophilia warrants the death penalty. Fucking Muslim scum would be killed off too
>>73774343
If reporting gets you banned, shit is serious here and we should write a serious letter of complaint to the management.
>>73774502
See? Mods literally banned and deleted freedom fighter posts and left the spam up.
This site is fucking shit.
Nevermind the censorship happy mods did remove the spam now, and all the posts from FF too
>>73774617
>See? Mods literally banned and deleted freedom fighter posts and left the spam up.
This is fucking ridiculous.
Why is the spam still there and contributing poster not any more?
Why can spam sit on this fucking thread? What for?
>>73774335
>yes goy, you should only breed with women in their 30s and 40s, anything younger is nasty pedo shit
>>73774502
Well, see who got their posts deleted. These are moots SJW mods and have been doing this for years. They were starting to delete moe anime threads in /a/ until a drunk Hiroki told them to stop.
>>73774661
OMFG that job has been amazing. I love Janitors.
I thought there was some loop due to the change of Jaintors.
>>73774502
Posting real children, even clothed is against the rules, so you shouldn't try to summon mods if you're breaking the rules too.
>>73771415
I wouldn't rape children even if I didn't have access to sexy Japanese cartoons.
>>73774617
Don't advocate abominable crimes and that won't happen then
>>73774706
>Well, see who got their posts deleted
Maybe the pic of girls? Rori shit is still forbidden almost everywhere on 4chan.
>>73774717
Yeah, exactly: >>73774763
>>73774723
>board is politically incorrect
>you better be PC shitlord!
Kill yourself
>>73774709
Wait, what are you saying? You saying you're glad they deleted FF posts?
>>73774683
Fuck off Ahmed, how hard is it to wait until age 18?
>>73774717
>posting children is against the rules
Lmao
So 4chan is lighter weight than facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, google plus and every other site on the net?
Posting clothed chilluns gets you B&?
>>73759900
At the rate everything is happening?
>10 years
>>73774788
Nothing politically incorrect about advocating degeneracy
>>73760134
>It will never happen!
>BELIEVE ME!
>>73774788
>Wait, what are you saying? You saying you're glad they deleted FF posts?
I'm glad they deleted the spam.
I cannot voucher for the other users because he might have breached rules I don't know of (my ignorance). Maybe he did something else on other boards. Cannot voucher for him.
But basically the main argument was that Janitors allowed spammers to live. And guess what? They don't. We had a proof here of the magical Godlike hand that cleaned the thread from almost 50 messages of spam.
Cannot voucher for the other user, but as far as spammers are involved, justice has been served.
>>73774852
>everything I don't like is degeneracy
>don't agree?
>get banned and censored
Seriously. Kill yourself. It's no surprise you're English you nanny loving cunt.
>>73774833
Usually gets the "Idiot Pedophile" ban, yes. You can find way more interesting stuff on Youtube made by lolis themselves than you would find here though.
>>73774914
there's also nothing wrong with fucking corpses or incest if its consenting
>>73774852
Fuck you you authoritarian mental midget. Attacking the feminist bullshit is the very definition of politically incorrect.
>>73774923
Nah, he's just a serial ban evader. He'll be back.
>>73774925
>Seriously. Kill yourself. It's no surprise you're English you nanny loving cunt.
Man, it was clearly the girls pic that got anon banned. Russbro said it clear >>73774717
Had he advocated without images of underage girls, I would have accepted it... but basically he gave Janitors reasons to act and guess what? They acted.
Then he complained he was going to be banned.
Typical kike strategy.
>>73774962
if they didn't consent to being killed they don't have to consent to me fucking em
>>73774925
Fucking children is degeneracy like it or not Mehmet
>>73775024
It isn't against the rules. It's part of their discretionary powers, and the bans aren't templated like they are for rule breaking posts. I'm a 4chan lawyer, I know these things.
>>73775078
I've never gotten that one, but I usually don't post images, and even more rarely post real ones.
>>73775041
you sick pedo fucks, children should only have sex with other children
while i watch and masturbate
>>73775022
Fighting Islamic paedophilia is politically incorrect, not advocating it
>>73775169
>I'm a 4chan lawyer, I know these things.
Lel. Is this a position such as "janitor" or is it just something you made up for the bantz?
Five years, the reincarnation of /l/ is coming.
>>73775237
Make it happen, greatest ally.
>>73775169
You thought this: >>73775024
normalfag newcuck was different and here is he supporting censorship and unjust bans because someone posted legal images he didn't like and triggered the mods.
Fucking cuckolds.
half the faggots who bitch and whine...go create your own perfect website
Das rite. You won't because you're a slave to 4chan.
