Trump knows what is best.
I actually got shivers hearing this, regardless of it's limited vocabulary. Conveys more emotion than the other candidates could procur
>>73665585
And it's a fucking leaf!
>>73665585
>>73665585
Trump is alot smarter than libtards make him out to be that's why he's winning and they're losing.
>>73665585
He didn't even remotely answer the question.
>>73665585
Still the only candidate talking about the American Dream
>>73666418
He answered it better than the other cuckoids we have running for president.
>>73666757
LOL try harder plz
>>73666166
I might have to side with the faggot here. Trump's well on his way to becoming a real politician with OP.
>>73666757
Question: HOW will you bring the American Dream back?
Answer: We're bringing it back, American Dream is in trouble, we're going to 'do' some real jobs... Hey man nice hat!
Literally what? That didn't answer the HOW in the original question, there was no substance at all. This is coming from a big Trump supporter as well.
>>73667034
Every other candidate would've dodged the question entirely but if you want a more detailed explaination of his economic policies then go read about them on his website
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/positions
>>73665585
This is pretty funny.
It's amazing how people get defensive about this.
Face it: Trump is a rich eloquent idiot surrounded by good people. That can make him good, actually, but he still is an idiot.
>>73667190
>Every other candidate would've dodged the question entirely
Trump did exactly that. His answer to the question is not defendable.
>>73667190
But he dodged the question as well, he literally didn't answer it at all. The point is that he was given a chance to communicate part of his plan to the public, and he gave a shitty answer. Doesn't make me want to support him any less, but it really was a bad reply.
>>73667278
b-but muh MAGA
If you support Trump you have to defend everything he says and does!
>>73666418
he does not need to answer it because no one is saying he didn't answer then question.
>>73667661
>because no one is saying he didn't answer then question.
Why not?
>>73667240
Jesus fuck, you judge a man by a cherry picked quote from the 10000 hours he's put into campaigning? He says the same shit 24/7, he is bound to answer some questions with fluff. Why don't you look for him talking in an intellectual arena if you want to judge his intelligence:
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rksd80-FCAw
>>73668370
Excellent video
