how do we solve this problem?
- Home
- Board: /pol/ - Politically Incorrect
- Reading: how do we solve this problem?
how do we solve this problem?
>>73613101
but isnt the picture on the left actually better? betas, sick and ugly people wont reproduce, whats so bad about that?
>>73613298
This
>>73613101
the left one is a lot better because only those with good genes reproduce
>>73613101
Survival of the fittest. Nothing wrong with that.
>>73613298
>betas, sick and ugly people wont reproduce
yes they will, they'll just be from the female side
>>73613101
Stop jerking off so often
>>73613101
You take computers away and force people to develop social skills like normal human beings.
>>73613298
>>73613351
the picture on the left doesn't promote romantic pair bonding, and regardless of your genes, being raised by a single mother is infinitely worse than being raised by two loving parents.
two parents is what's encouraged on teh right.
In an ideal world it would only be the top 4 on the right reproducing, but the rest can emotionally pair if they so choose.
>>73613101
>how do we solve this problem?
What problem? Why should undesirable beta "men" be allowed to reproduce?
Is everybody in this thread retarded?
We'll have all the time we want to filter when there's only whites left.
Meanwhile, non-whites are reproducing multiple times faster. Guess how that's going to end.
>>73613101
>problem
Pareto's Principle (80-20 distribution) occurs naturally.
You dont
Its always been that way
>>73613298
BECAUSE WE ARE THE BETAS ANON
>>73613101
The unsexed men become violent. Eventually the regulation comes back to solve this problem.
>>73613298
It's not better, cause the left pic doesn't make sense procreation wise in a monogamous society. It's just more degeneracy with betas being sidelined from degeneracy but not from eventual procreation (former sluts will marry the betas once they get old and unattractive).
The best (actually: the only good) procreational society is a polygamous and patriarchal society. No degeneracy and the best genes are passed more than the worse genes. 3-6 Betas also get married, since women are forced/arranged to be married younger than the males so more females on the market at any given time.
>>73613890
>What problem? Why should undesirable beta "men" be allowed to reproduce?
>>73613436
>the left one is a lot better because only those with good genes reproduce
>>73613451
>Survival of the fittest. Nothing wrong with that.
>>73613298
>but isnt the picture on the left actually better? betas, sick and ugly people wont reproduce, whats so bad about that?
SINGLE MOTHERHOOD YOU FUCKS
it would leave out at least 4-5 women being single mothers raising a shit generation
look up the stats of how detrimental to society single mothers are
>>73614597
fuck off stef
>>73613298
Its better to eliminate the dumb than the uglies
>>73613101
>bottom tier people don't reproduce
top fucking kek
I can tell whoever made this thinks of himself as a 6 and blames society for his lack of game.
>SOCIETY I'M NOT GETTING LAID CUZ I SPEND THE WHOLE DAY FAPPING TO ANIME AND KEK PORN, PLS HALP!
>FUCKING FEMINISM
>>73614962
literal cuck country
>>73613451
>survival of the fittest men
ftfy
>>73613298
>>73613351
>>73613436
>>73613451
>>73613523
i tink a better way to say it would be that they don't get laid. lack of reproduction is the greatest reason of sexual freedom
>>73613101
>not being MGTOW
>>73615143
>>73613101
Fixed version
Also 2001 called they want their image resolution back
>>73613101
>Implying problem.
What are you, a commie?
Freedom of association too hard on you?
It's natural selection at work, retards. Get attractive or get rich.
>>73615858
kek
>>73613298
Better if you want to become Africa. You're basically selecting for aggression.
>>73613101
wrong. the 10 rated woman in sexual freedom scenario also wouldn't reproduce as there's no 11 or better male
>>73613298
You do know that the guys who don't get any pretty much drop out of society? They system on the right has much better odds that most of the citizenry are productive. The system on the left is largely a welfare state.
>>73616058
Not in a knowledge-based economy (e.g. the West post-WWII) where income and wealth depends on your intelligence and social skills.
The market changes, rules of attraction don't.
>>73613101
>when even women who are an 8 wants a 10
JUST
>>73613298
Men who don't get to reproduce have no interest in being productive besides hedonism. Why would they try to acquire wealth, power or anything worthwhile if it will all vanish when they die? Through monogamy and a regulated sexual market, most men will have an incentive to be productive to leave their offspring something.
Take that incentive away and those men will merely produce to sustain their lives and you have an overall lesser productivity and hapiness in the population
>>73617282
>Men who don't get to reproduce have no interest in being productive besides hedonism.
Claiming the egg comes after the chicken won't get you a partner, loser. Get successful and women will follow.
Besides being productive has many more benefits besides sex. Not that you would know.
>>73615858
>(you)
>>73613298
>he thinks that anyone is reproducing at all in this scenario
The problem isnt hypergamy, the problem is hypergamy + the pill + the destruction of the nuclear family.
