Can we reach a consensus once and for all that this low energy patreon slug only goes after low hanging fruit?
He gets rekt in any "discussion" where someone disagrees with him that isn't a full blown SJW retard.
The same thing applies to the majority of these youtubers that got popular off the Anti-SJW kick that refuse to step their intellectual game up. The longer people listen to these entry level types, the more they handicap theirselves from making honest stances and arguments.
>>73599903
WE HAVE THIS THREAD EVERY DAY
>>73599932
Hopefully like all shit british personalities we'll export him to the US
>>73599932
>>73600001
Because it's Sargon himself making the threads.
>>73599903
someone post him saying he isn't a cuck bc he raised someone else's child.
>>73600146
Fuck Sargon. Only a man, and a man bleeds the same as everyone else.
>>73599903
Him, Milo and all these other autists can fucking die
>>73599903
Leftism and feminism are low hanging fruit
Hes a hypocrite who loves science when its about gender differences but goes full retard when it comes to racial differences.
Hes part nigger somewhere down the line and has a anti european mindset that often slips through the cracks when hes pushed too much
In short a total faggot
>>73600310
He's a labour socialist too
>>73599903
-A leftist Bernie supporter who happens to be against SJW
-Makes 40 minutes long rants about irrelevant shit someone said on their twitter
Just watch Paul Joseph Watson - top notch arguments, short videos, always on point.
>>73600310
He's part "African," which he just immediately assumes means black. His ancestor is from North Africa though.
sargon frequently addresses the log hanging fruit point
the REAL low hanging fruit are random tumblr posters, random twitter posters, random SRSphere reddit posters
he more goes after journalists, commie professors/teachers, media personalities that do have impact (to the point of being able to shill their shit to the UN)
the only reason you don't like him is that he isn't racist (or at least isn't overtly racist), and if he was he'd lose every non-/pol/ subscriber anyway
>>73600392
he knows his grandfather was full black
>>73600252
Practically touches the ground. If it was any lower it would be a fucking pig snare.
>>73600392
Hes has the "i am a minority" mindset despite being a stereotypical white fat neckbeard loser.
Hes the equal to your "hurr durr i am 1/64 native american!" faggots
>>73600455
I have already answered this. He has no idea, he says himself that he just "believes" he was black.
>>73600408
Nice fucking strawman at the end there. I'm not racist, and I don't dislike him because he isn't one. I dislike him because he is an intellectual cripple that slugs look up to because they are too lazy to form their own point of view or argument.
>>73600376
>-A leftist Bernie supporter who happens to be against SJW
He hates Bernie for pandering to Black Lives Matter, It's been that way a while, calling Bernie supporters cucks.
>>73600408
No, I don't like him because every fucking video of his is one of three things:
>LOOK AT WHAT THIS CRAZY COLLEGE KID SAID?!?!! CAN YOU BELIEVE IT?
or
>LOOK AT WHAT THIS OBSCURE FEMINIST SAID?!?! CAN YOU BELIEVE IT?!?!
or
>LISTEN TO ME READ AND RAMBLE ABOUT CURRENT EVENTS EVERYBODY KNOWS ABOUT AND SPEND 30 MINUTES STATING THE OBVIOUS AND WHETHER OR NOT I LIKE IT
>>73600408
This exactly. /pol/ hates anyone that doesn't agree with them 100% in most cases. They'll tell you no, but actions speak louder than words.
>>73600572
answered this how? you're putting forth an assertion with no evidence, when I remember him specifically talking about his grandfather being black
your post made it sound like you didn't actually know it was his grandfather specifically, "ancestor" sounds more removed than grandparent
you're basically saying he didn't know his grandfather, doesn't have any picturs of him, etc. do you have any proof?
>>73600715
I am never going to understand this logic. Why support someone that you have this kind of difference with? Why support someone who stands for the same shit you have been campaigning against for your entire YouTube career?
>>73600408
This post just false though, it's literally the same as people who apologize for Islamic extremism.
>hurr durr not ALL muslims are like that tho!!!!!
>>73600766
/pol/ hates faggots who deny the obvious and hes one of them which became clear with his stance on muslims and immigration in the UK coupled with the rape gang incidents
>>73600819
You're obviously remembering wrong. Sargon said plainly that he was a North African, and is only assuming he is black.
He didn't know him.
>>73600766
The guy regularly namedrops /pol/ and complains about us being "right-wing bigots."
>>73600606
it's not a strawman of /pol/'s position of him, because for 90% of them that's the reason they have. it seems you have a different opinion but it's probably influenced by the general /pol/ opinion with some other reasons post-rationalized on top of it
I'm not sure how much of an intellectual cripple he is, but he doesn't have enough experience to properly argue against high-tier SJW sophists and generally gets destroyed by them (such as in his recent stream)
>that slugs look up to because they are too lazy to form their own point of view or argument.
what opinions of his do you disagree with other than racial ones?
>>73600766
That is category one bullshit, my friend. Don't make generalizations. If you have spent more than a week on /pol/, the first thing you learn is to protect yourself from the echo chamber trap.
>>73600967
>my memory vs your memory
I'm going to go with my memory then, until you can come up with proof
>>73601001
cripple chan blew his ass out of the water several times including some of the gamergate boards at the time so now he throws a hissyfit regarding anon boards
>>73600959
'The obvious' to you people is always what you happen to think. His response to al of these incidents have been level headed. He didn't sperg out and declare all non-whites to be subhuman vermin like you want him to, so he's 'denying the obvious' now to you.
Dr. Danglers is better.
>>73599903
why dont you start youtube channel then and show us all how its done
>>73601001
He isn't wrong. You are bigots in the actual meaning of the word. You aren't open to ideas contrary to your own.
>>73601084
>He didn't sperg out and declare all non-whites to be subhuman vermin like you want him to, so he's 'denying the obvious' now to you.
Yeah but then someone made this and he sperged out in the comment section calling everyone who disagreed with him/posted facts that hurt his feelings a stormfronter
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vyj4xRDXMGw
Hes not level headed hes a pretentious asshole
>>73601037
>Don't make generalizations.
Tell that to the rest of /pol/.
>>73601161
>You are
>You aren't
>You
>>73601196
>''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''Libertardian Realist''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
>Uses phrenology as an argument
toplul
>>73601371
Sargon using his proxy again
>>73601009
I haven't touched on the racial shit this entire time, so you need to drop that. I have had a problem with him for a long time for reasons to numerous to count.
His success has given him a big fucking head for one thing. Which is unbecoming of a lowly dreg like him. Needs to be humbled on the quick quick.
For another, he has created a community that worships him like a cult leader. They hang on every word he says and they go to him for guidance. One: this scares the shit out of me, thinking that he could have that kind of influence on people freshly woken from SJW nonsense to the point they blindly believe all his opinions. Two: this community had a sort of lazy culture to it. You make videos where you lay down commentary over some retard teen-early twenties kid's video going on an autistic rant and profit from it. It gives incentive to be sit on your ass and parrot the same arguments ad nauseum for patreon bucks.
>>73601196
Libertarian Realist is a classic case of collectivist generalizations masquerading under the pseudo-intellectual label of libertarianism. He can go kill himself. His opinions hold no water to me.
>>73601560
You just described every youtuber's fan base. You've also described most of /pol/. Every community has lazy elements in it.
>>73601592
>His opinions hold no water to me
Good thing that he posted stats about the epidemic of paki inbreeding be it in pakistan or the UK then
>>73599903
>>73599932
>>73600146
Fanboys are the downfall of all these jewtoob celebs. I'm so fucking sick about hearing little kids obsess over these dumb fucks. I hope we have threads like this all day every day, until everyone hates him. I fucking hate them all.
>>73601767
Alright? So what? Get rid of the trouble makers. Don't paint all Pakis with the same brush.
>>73601723
I have a problem with group mentality taking over individual thought. I don't know what specifically it is about Sargon that I can point out that couldn't be applied to others, but all that does is lump him in with the slime.
he defends jews, what more is there to say?
>>73601902
Jews will always be preferable to Mudslimes, just by the fact that they are literally 11 million people and not 1.6 billion and aren't pouring en masse into Europe to replace the native culture.
>>73601826
Amen, brother.
>>73599903
>Can we reach a consensus once and for all that this low energy patreon slug only goes after low hanging fruit?
Certainly
He is, without a doubt, the king of /pol/ and he should forever re-branded as such
Everybody should back this Idea and here is why.
a) It's a way for his fanboys on this sight to show their love for him
b) It will piss him off to no end which will amuse his detractors
Everybody wins
>>73601560
so you can't point out a single opinion of his that you disagree with.
your argument is "I don't like that people who espouse their opinions become popular and end up with people them"
he doesn't need to be humbled really because he already is every now and then by a SJW who knows how to argue at an extremely high academic level
>>73601899
> don't know what specifically it is about Sargon that I can point out that couldn't be applied to others
and into the trash it goes
>>73601835
>Don't paint all Pakis with the same brush.
Or how about they stop acting like subhuman scum be it in their home country and abroad?
Not my job to take everyone in and give him a chance. This mindset has already caused too much damage to the west
He's the other side of the Anita coin. Him and all the other Youtube "Support me on Patreon" pseudo-intellectuals.
He doesn't support individual thinking, he and others like him just want to create their own echo chambers in which they can be looked upon with admiration by the politically illiterate and children in order to take money from their pockets. He's just pandering to people who think they're 'too smart' for feminism and other things.
Him and the other cucks all banding together to support a charity was one of the most vile things they've done. They didn't do it out of a genuine care for people struggling with real equality issues, they only did it so they could create 40 minutes videos exclaiming how much better they are than Anita or another irrelevant tumblr whore.
>>73600121
plz no. first piers morgan and then current year man, we've had enough
>>73602023
Jews are the reason muzzies are pouring into Europe, baka.
>>73602151
Also funny enough they exploit third world women just like feminists when using them for a appeal to emotion.
Sarcuck, Thundercuck and the gaming cancer cuck who are all brits could have used the chance to help the local rape victims but like feminists they steer away from muslim rape
>>73602151
if he wanted to create echo chambers he wouldn't frequently hold debates with SJWs, not only ones below him or at his level but ones far above his level
this is something that echo chamberists specifically do not do. because that's not an echo chamber. you will never see anita discussing anything with someone who doesn't share her view. you will only see her preaching to the choir at SJW conventions and in comments-disabled youtube videos
>>73602089
Swallow the rest of that sentence.
>>73602362
not until you remake your thread to complain about people who have popular youtube channels in general
>>73602249
>Jews are the reason muzzies are pouring into Europe, baka.
Sure Mohammad.
>>73599903
>Can we reach a consensus once and for all
Probably no
>low energy patreon slug
>low hanging fruit
>He gets rekt in any "discussion"
All of this!
>The longer people listen to these entry level types, the more they handicap theirselves
Possibly
>>73602428
There's no point. You'll just pick out what you want from what I say all the same.
>We'll deal with the far right once we're done with the SJW
What did he mean by this?
>>73601560
who is Milo Yiannopoulos/Stefan Molyneux
He is no better than the people he complains about, censorship only when its in his favour. Removal of pertinent discussion. He is the biggest cuck I've ever seen
he's actually a mossad agent.501
>>73602622
you haven't said anything about sargon in general. you specifically admitted you don't have anything to say about sargon except he has a following that hangs on his word, and maybe that he's not very intelligent (but you can't actually point to which views of his that you disagree with, despite complaining about how his userbase can't form a nuanced philosophy on their own)
where's your nuanced philosophy and its contradictions with sargon's beliefs?
>>73599903
he's just another internet commentator who enjoys the sound of his own voice far too much.
>>73602699
Its gonna end like the day tumblr tried to invade /pol/
>>73602752
he hasn't removed videos where he gets BTFO by sjws
>>73599903
Internet culture is autism.
>>73599903
Can we reach the consensus that youtube faggots need to be banned from this board?
Sargon is afraid of becoming too controversial, because that would mean no youtube partnership, no patreon money, and a polarized fanbase, who I'm sure he believes will become "violent".
It's much easier to pick on "low hanging fruit", aka, radfems who your average person doesn't like anyways.
It would be very difficult for him to talk more on subjects that require more thought and research. Plus, as I've said above, are too "sensitive" even for the staunch anti-SJW types.
I also think he's a bit insecure about his african ancestry. One of the reasons why he refuses to be a "racial realist".
>>73602328
None of them give a shit about the actual problems women have faced in recent memory. They will avoid any opinion that would see a decrease in their patreon money.
>>73602341
His level is rock bottom. Its much the same as that retarded interview that Gavin did where he just grabbed some random woman who clearly had no fucking idea (and said as much) what was going to happen and then just threw random statistics around. Sarcuck just points out retarded people to other retarded people but assures them that they're super smart for not being in the former camp of retards.
These people are the parasites that come with any rise in a political movement. He and others are no different to Anita, they are riding the wave of counter culture to fill their pockets and have created the modern day version of a fedora tipping atheist that Dawkins did years go.
He's a 'Middle of the road, I am above having extreme opinions because I am enlightened by my superior intellect' faggot. Nothing more and nothing less.
>>73602870
whether or not he's a racial realist deep down, he will never be one publicly
and if he doesn't actually believe what he says on race, then you're right he hides it because he would lose all his allies and all his money and all his credibility. you just can't be openly racist and get anywhere
radfams are no longer low hanging fruit because they are getting more and more things under their control. the true low hanging fruit in this regard are tumblr posters, twitter posters and SRS posters. which he doesn't really go after in comparison to ones that actually have media influence
>It would be very difficult for him to talk more on subjects that require more thought and research.
his entire reason for creating his channel was to speak out against SJWs. you want his channel to change topics?
>>73602938
>Its much the same as that retarded interview that Gavin did where he just grabbed some random woman who clearly had no fucking idea (and said as much) what was going to happen and then just threw random statistics around
Except that Gavin was right on about the stuff he talked about and she was a walking lefty stereotype which is why it was so funny to watch
>>73600000
wew
>>73602938
>He's a 'Middle of the road, I am above having extreme opinions because I am enlightened by my superior intellect' faggot. Nothing more and nothing less.
so the same old "I don't like sargon because he isn't openly racist" talking point
you didn't actually address my point as to the key difference between, just re-asserted yourself with no actual arguments. he would debate any high-tier SJW who would debate him (which is to say, basically none of them). he would debate anita if she would accept, but she would never accept. he got BTFO by a doctorate SJW in the last month. do you think anita would ever have a debate with ben shapiro or anyone?
SJWs keep twitter blocklists that recursively search followers to make sure to block anyone who follows anyone who has the wrong view. that's the real essence of echo chambers.
>>73602816
In his attempt to be seen as reasonable or that he's open to changing his views, there is little remaining by comparison to what he has removed.
>>73600408
>he more goes after
Nice 8 year old grammar. Typical Sargon fan.
>>73603503
>there is little remaining by comparison to what he has removed.
could only possibly be true regarding videos from years and years ago. it's not true for his modern videos
how many of 2015's videos has he removed? 1? 0?
I doubt you even pay enough attention to his channel to be able to accurately say something like this
>>73602938
>I am above having extreme opinions
Not even extreme opinions, he thinks having an exactly middle "non-position" is automatically correct.
He responds well to authority. If the BBC tells him race is a social construct, he will say "well, it must be at least somewhat true, but since I don't want to pick a side it must be exaggerated."
In almost every situation he concedes that something "exists," but claims that it means nothing. This means he enables liars and automatically refuses to listen to criticism, since you can make something up and he will never accept the possibility that it is entirely false, just partially false. He will always concede that:
1. Racism is a serious problem.
2. You need the government to pay for healthcare.
3. Communism has never really been tried.
4. Gender is a social construct with no basis in biology.
5. The "refugees" are Syrians fleeing war.
6. All races are the same.
7. Rape culture is real.
8. White privilege is real.
9. Most Muslims are "moderates" and the violence is only a small subset of terrorists
10. Terrorism is caused by white racism.
In an argument he will never concede that these are made up entirely because that is taking a side in the question of true or false. As long as you introduce an idea he will never outright reject it, just try to find a "balance." It makes him look like a god-damned moron in the subject he specializes in. He preferred opponents just pile on theories made up on the spot, so he can never really refute them. One of his primary complaints about "right-wingers" is that they will wholly dismiss something like "rape culture," as though it must exist in some capacity just because someone mentioned it.
If you've seen him try to debate, he concedes to feminists on every point. He just raises his voice and yells at conservatives for wrongthink. Guy's a moron and his whole thought process makes him sympathetic to the weird social justice theorycraft.
>>73603639
Fantastic argument. You sure showed him.
Mister Metokur is pretty much the only good /pol/ e-celeb, but the butt fucker stopped posting videos. I guess you can't fuck big tits asian gf and make videos at the same time... oh wait
>>73603077
Gavin is doing the exact same thing lots of other people are doing, He's playing the counter culture card to get views and money. Lots of what he said was followed up by "I don't know the statistics but..." even most of his youtube videos are him just giving circumstantial evidence at best or at worst just fabricating shit to support his argument.
The woman was a complete walking stereotype but Gavin gave her no forewarning on what the interview was going to be about or how he would be going. That is just bad play. It's no better than the leftists who jump people in the street with a camera and start asking questions, the person is going to be off guard and a little bewildered.
>>73603392
He's willing to debate them because he (and any sane person) knows they're wrong. Anita won't debate him because she's a con artist and she knows it. He'll gladly debate people who hold stances that are obviously wrong and take no effort to prove wrong.
He fucks up every now and again by debating people who actually know how to debate. I highly doubt he'd agree to debate someone who he knew would rape him on his own show. It's all a created hustle to ensure he's seen as a paragon of intellectual purity and keep those patreon £££ coming.
I also don't care if he is racist or not, his views are middle of the road tripe.
>>73599903
He's a product of the culture of critique. Like almost all other youtube intellectuals, he's nothing but a mere contrarian and it actually shows how clueless he is whenever he steps outside his usual topics of feminism and social justice. I don't have a problem with him as long as he stays in these topics, but his views on real politics are just hopeless. His one video about the refugee crisis last year was the pinnacle, it's as if he has read out a huffpost article. But what do you expect from a literal cuck and fat neckbeard?
>>73603639
I guarantee my grammar is better than the average /pol/ poster, considering you see shit like its/it's and your/you're getting mixed up all the time
what you're pointing out is more a colloquial slang thing than a grammar mistake. and I would not write that way if I was writing anything remotely formal
>>73603812
He isn't racist though and he has a gook gf. He is also not voting Trump.
Instead of simply naming the Jew he just sits there and complains like a pacified pussy.
Trying to make a living off his shitty videos that change NOTHING
>>73599903
>Implying some SJW fruit is not low hanging.
>>73603957
>implying 'da joos' isn't one of the stupidest conspiracy theories out there.
>>73604067
it's better than
>big businesses fund SJWs
>>73603864
>I highly doubt he'd agree to debate someone who he knew would rape him on his own show
this is unfalsifiable
"sure, he debates people who proceed to blow him the fuck out, and he doesn't take those videos down, but you see, that's because he didn't KNOW he would lose. if he knew beforehand, he wouldn't do it!"
you could say that for anyone who has ever willingly debated anyone with an opposing view because you can't prove that's not what they're doing without seeing inside their head.
he can't think he doesn't stand a good chance of losing when he debates a phd in a liberal arts field. sophistry is what they're all about.
>>73603946
>He isn't racist though
yeah, yeah he is. just watch his videos about blacks and BLM
>and he has a gook gf.
that's the thing, if you go into it you find out from all the 24 hr OPS they did, that he only likes them because he thinks they are submissive. He even wanted to move to Thailand because of this reason.
>He is also not voting Trump.
He isn't voting at all, and the only bad thing to him about Trump is the internet privacy thing, this because of his paranoia
>>73604219
Big business is code for 'da joos' to /pol/. There's really little difference.
>>73602938
I wrote all this years ago after reviewing approximately 10 minutes of his work. Why are people just now coming to this obvious conclusion?
>>73604247
Making fun of stereotypical niggers does not a racist make. I do this all the time and I don't hate blacks people generally. He isn't racist like /pol/ is.
>>73604431
>I don't hate blacks people generally.
get out.
>>73603940
The fact you heavily concentrate on the your/you're dichotomy let's me immediately know you're a legitimate simp.
>>73604550
>hurr durr if you're not racist get out
Fuck off.
>>73603760
i enjoy watching sargon and milo, but i'm ready to upgrade
are there any youtube channels that are pol approved?
>>73604572
>bring nitpicky about grammar makes me smart
>>73604750
GET OUT
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>73604572
you were the one to bring up grammar
you can't not be frustrated when you see people who are native speakers making these mistakes. because they should have learned the difference in 2nd grade, and if they forgot it shouldn't take them more than 5 minutes to look up the difference and relearn it
and yet you see it all the time. you just did a similar thing yourself
>let's
complaining about grammar is a very low level of argument because it doesn't serve to refute any points other than ones relating to someone's literacy but that doesn't make it any less depressing to see
>>73604067
Sure Hitler put them in concentration camps and they have been kicked out of many countries for NO REASON
Lurk more faggot.
>>73604225
Except people like Douglas Murray, Peter Hitchens and Mark Steyn will debate on real topics with anyone and are fantastic at it. Sargon will tackle issues he knows 90% of people agree with him on and when he steps outside his safe space he comes off as a complete fucking idiot.
His 'job' is to make videos on youtube, part of this is to push the idea that he is a paragon of reasonableness and intellectualism. This includes deliberately being the opposite of what he accuses Anita of being. This is just an orchestrated personality designed with the intention to generate income from people who want to be the new-age smarty-pants. He's a product. He'll never leave his middle of the road stance because that's what makes him money.
He'll never debate people who he knows will 100% rape him because he's got to be right sometimes, but when it does happen its handy to spin it into a 'look! I don't do what Anita does!" play.
He's a modern version of the God delusion in human form.
>>73603957
>that change NOTHING
i'm not trying to defend him, but it was videos like his (easily digested rebuttals against SJWs) that brought me here. now i'm trying to learn more and move on.
>>73599903
You jelly huh?
>>73599903
who the fuck like(d)s this faggot anyways?
>>73604884
KILL YOURSELF
>>73605031
I have been here for a couple of years now. The 'evidence' you have is circumstantial at best. The hate is irrational.
>>73604820
>having 10 post on a sargon thread at /pol/
>not yet committed suicide
>>73605231
>being on /pol/
>not being deserving of death
>>73599903
He's super-low energy, but for whatever reason he has a high profile and people see his videos. He is also much pithier and much less edgy than anyone else. For example, Molyneux isn't edgy but he will also spend half of an hour-long segment... listening to the other person talk. Praise-worthy, but not the kind of quick shot in the arm you need to deprogram people.
>>73605102
>Except people like Douglas Murray, Peter Hitchens and Mark Steyn
so your problems with him are
1. he's not a famous intellectual, just niche internet famous
2. his channel was made for and focuses on a certain topic
again, your argument is completely unfalsifiable. it can be demonstrated that his channel isn't an echo chamber by the debates he has and invites people to have with him, but you will claim regardless that he only had them because he thought he would win
again an argument that you could make about anyone who has debated anyone ever as long as you assumed their ego was big enough
>>73605226
The Anti - White propaganda and history of flooding Muslims into Europe isn't enough for hate?
T. Jew
>>73605639
I listed my problems with him. Don't know why you feel the need to use a strawman to defend him.
>>73605639
>sargon having debates
kek
>>73605702
t. edgy National Socialist
DUDE KEKOLDRY LMAO
>>73605875
Asians, Blacks, Indians, Jews, Muslims, Mexicans, etc. get their own countries but we have to accept all their immigrants?
Get real.
>>73605131
Reddit tier pseudo intellectuals who believe in vague incoherent rehashed anti-west cultural marxist doctrines, fully dumbed down for a new generation of simps who navigate through their world according to the frequencies of niceness they believe they're receiving/emitting. As every subversive adversarial historical element encircles them for the final cuck.
A sub-populace of mediocritorial lightweights in society who're easily duped, conned and shackled by opportunistic low fruit picking contrarian social rejects masking themselves as mentors of timeless wisdom.
>>73605823
I pointed out why he's not an echo chamberist on tier with anita, which was your initial assertion. your refutation was to pull out an unfalsifiable argument that could be used against anyone, and would require a psychic to refute
>>73605829
you can only say he doesn't have debates if you're trying to say he's so bad at arguing that he can't have something that you could seriously call a debate
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZEe4PSLCoY
it's a fact that he holds "debate" videos with people who don't share his view, and doesn't take them down even when he believes he lost
>>73606175
Actually I said lots more than that. You just decided to pick on one aspect that I was happy to say was something I personally know he'll do in order to keep the money coming.
I also compared him to Anita for other reasons. I've never once said he's not famous enough for me to like him, I've never once said he should be more racist and I've never once said his channel is too niche. Those are all things you said that I think.
See? everyone commits some kind of fallacy. I just didn't jump on you for doing it like you did me.
>>73606175
He loses every "debate." They are not debate. At best they are conversations.
If he is talking to a liberal, he just concedes everything to them. He never attempts to argue a point, but he is not willing to yell at them either. If he is talking to a conservative, he just disagrees with them on everything without providing a reason. He never attempts to argue a point, but he is willing to yell at them because he hates them. He just raises his voice for no reason and it turns into a one-sided screaming match.
They are not debates. They are nothing at all. There is no exchange of ideas and nothing is learned. They only serve to reinforce his preferences, he is sympathetic to all liberals and will allow them to be right without examining their points. He is immediately hostile to all conservatives and will literally (in the literal sense of literally) plug his ears and scream NANANANANANANANA I CAN'T HEAR YOU at them until they give up.
The worst was MillenialWoes, since he just stayed calm and never reacted to it. It dragged on for hours because Sargon just plain had nothing to say but he wasn't willing to let it end in a victory for MW.
>>73606548
I'm not going to not point out how your arguments are unfalsifiable just because you want me to
I don't even think I'm strawmanning, just putting your real arguments into unfavorable phrasings that prove how weak they are
why don't you point out what your actual arguments are and exactly how they differ from the things I'm saying they are
>>73605151
You do it
>>73606862
>I'm not going to point out why you're wrong, just know that you're wrong.
>>73606747
>He loses every "debate." They are not debate. At best they are conversations.
Then he can't possibly think he'd lose debates he's hosting unless you also assume that his ego is far too big to ever see it
>If he is talking to a liberal, he just concedes everything to them. He never attempts to argue a point, but he is not willing to yell at them either.
he's not a skilled debater on the level of postgraduate liberal arts academics
> If he is talking to a conservative, he just disagrees with them on everything without providing a reason. He never attempts to argue a point, but he is willing to yell at them because he hates them. He just raises his voice for no reason and it turns into a one-sided screaming match.
more often, a two-sided screaming match. he's had debate opponents who scream far more than he does, and sargon actually lets people state their points, which is more than you can say for many SJWs
>he is sympathetic to all liberals
he doesn't like SJW liberals, although he's a liberal himself, SJW liberals would (and frequently do) claim he's right-wing.
if you're arguing that he's sympathetic to liberals and yet hard on conservatives I find it hard to believe you're basing this on anything other than his debate with millennial woes / the alt right guys associated with him
>The worst was MillenialWoes,
worst or only?
millennial woes was arguing for racial realism, which for one reason or the other sargon would never concede. but this is also something anyone who wants acceptance from anyone other than niche right circles would never concede. if you believe that race realism is the correct perspective, and sargon is having a debate with that as the main talking point, and he doesn't concede it, then you'll probably never see him as winning
and as I've mentioned throughout the thread, this is the main reason /pol/ has for hating him recently
>>73607244
>why should I point out how you strawmanned me and what the nuance of my actual opinions are? educate yourself, blocked
>>73606132
Nice stormfront rhetoric.
"Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, white countries for... Everyone?"
Lel
>>73599903
Common Filth is the best of all these
>>73600310
Yeah, because racial science doesnt match up with your world-views right?
This is why pol is considered the dumbest board after k.
>>73607388
>SJW liberals would (and frequently do) claim he's right-wing
And it totally paralyzes him, preventing him from saying anything at all in his defense.
>>73599903
It's pretty obvious. The Anti-SJW market is growing and it's like shooting fish in a barrel.
I like Gad Saad, Dave Rubin, Stefan Molyneux and maybe sometimes Gavin is entertaining. They are all interesting because they cover a pretty wide swathe of issues and they have very divergent personalities. I'm not down for the amateur btfo SJWs and feminist shit that Sargon does.
>>73607439
I did point out how you used a strawman. You decided to ignore it. In fact the only thing you've done so far is state that one thing I said can't be proven one way or another, which I said is just something I personally believe.
Good Job.
>>73607678
gad saad has talked with sargon multiple times. dave rubin is also interesting
stefan though is an egomaniac if anyone is, and has far more wrong about him than sargon. and he's also an idealist who can't offer practical solutions
>ONE DOLLAR
his published work on his beliefs was also panned by philosophy academics
>>73603812
AiU is GOAT on absolutely everything except the shillary garbage, which I'm convinced he's just trolling everyone on.
>>73607871
no, you pointed out how you believe I strawmanned you. you listed my points and said they were strawman arguments of your actual positions, but you didn't actually state what the differences are between your actual beliefs and each of the strawman points you believe I made up.
point those out otherwise I'll assume you're just using it as a buzzword to excuse the fact that I put your arguments in an unfavorable light to show how they were weak
>>73607879
Gad Saad speaks to all sorts of people.
Stefan is important in getting the message out about IQ differences between populations. And he covers a wide variety of topics.
Sorry, but Sargon is boring as fuck and I learn nothing from his material.
>>73608064
Let me put it this way, Stefan has a few things wrong about him (primarily to do with his useless philosophy) but he makes up for it in his knowledge of economics and clear sight of the future.
Sargon may have less 'wrong' with him but that's because he's pretty much a non-factor. He's bland and doesn't have enough depth to have anything to really criticize.
>>73608064
>Stefan is important in getting the message out about IQ differences between populations. And he covers a wide variety of topics.
I more find he goes on for an hour without really making any coherent points and then brings it back to libertarianism
sargon's this week in stupid videos are boring as fuck. but that goes to show what a liberal clusterfuck the media has become. his streams are less boring
>>73600310
>Why do you say human beings are the same? Did humans suddenly stop evolving? If so, at what date did this event occur?
Easy enough to make brain dead Leftist rage quit.
I find him incredibly boring. And he's become increasingly self-righteous and self important after he gained a following. So i hope he fucks up and goes the way of King of Pol. Where someone smart takes advantage of Sargons raging confirmation bias and ruses his fucking pants off, and like the fucking retard he is he's now too fucking high and mighty to admit he's a mongoloid who yells at the internet for a living and not a fucking smart person, he'll go down in flames.
But whatever, he's in Britistan, so i know for sure he'll get beheaded. I just hope he humiliate himself on the internet first.
>>73608282
I have nothing against Sargon but I have nothing for him either. He is decent at breaking down SJW silliness but he is pretty weak when he isn't criticizing.
Stefan brings a shitton of data to his arguments. I take the good with the bad when it comes to him. Just listening to him talk to Vox Day is very interesting.
Post videos of Carl of Quadroon getting BTFO
>>73607455
Nice rebuttal.
>>73608539
okay, I can respect that
>>73599903
Then, who isn't entry level?
>literally raising another man's child
