Does this matter?
>>73370171
no
>>73371184
fpbp
nobody plays the single player anyway
>>73371231
I do ;(
Not for me, I've never played a battlefield game and I probably never will
>>73370171
No, why does /pol/ get triggered by the faintest hint of dark skin in popular media?
Stop posting this, we already have a thread. Nobody gives a shit about "War Shooter #1284 ft. Tyrone", it's a fucking video game and it'll probably be shit like the vast majority of video games these days.
SJWs and leftists in general will say "no".
But if that were really the case they wouldn't notice it and start discussing it as soon as we do and they wouldn't feel it merited praise.
If the all-white devs didn't think it mattered then they wouldn't have done it. They would have just defaulted to a white male.
no, not at all
>>73370171
What a stupid fucking naming scheme.
>Guys, we never actually MADE a Battlefield.
>Fuck okay, were starting over.
>>73371386
Nobody cared about black soldier in BF3, the issue I believe is that a black American is being used to represent WWI when Americans had comparatively little to do with the war and blacks even less. It feels like misrepresentation for the sake of "diversity" (the promotion of black people) or some shit
>>73370171
No.
Swedes being fascinated by BBC is nothing new.
But Im willing to bet they conveniently ignored pic related.
>>73371386
>No, why does /pol/ get triggered by the faintest hint of dark skin in popular media?
Why does everyone else get trigger by a lack of it?
>>73371589
>Why does everyone else get trigger by a lack of it?
I dunno, but it's obnoxious. Everyone needs to chill the fuck out. Hell, you couldn't even read my post without pulling the "But SJWs do it too!" card.
You shouldn't be emulating SJWs, man.
>>73370171
It's stupid propaganda sure but I doesn't care, the trailer looks awesome and if they didn't fuck it up with to much action this game will be really great.
>>73371543
Afrika Corp.
Not a Nazi.
>>73371386
>>73371905
if this doesnt kinda piss you off you probably dont know WW1.
if this was Vietnam or pretty much any later american war it would be no big deal.
the problem is that out of 60 million european men fighting in this war they chose the >10,000 blacks to represent it all. its a slap in the face for "muh diversity"
this would be like putting a white guy on the cover of the sino japanese war (china - japan)
>>73371543
stop triggering people shitlorde
>>73371231
Single player is just the start. Next battlefield you will be playing black soldiers fighting the white zombie horde
>>73370171
No. It's not historically accurate and is probably pandering but who cares honestly.
>>73371530
its a fucking VIDEOGAME
>>73371905
So what you're saying is its okay to sell your game on the premise that you are aiming for historical accuracy and then turn around and shoehorn blacks in every corner despite it being historically inaccurate to push an agenda, and if anyone says, "You've gotta be joshin' me" then they are exactly like SJWs
>>73372586
a videogame is a direct representation of culture.
It's like GTA. GTA depicts American culture in a somehow brutal and exaggerated way, but it's still accurate.
This is supposed to be a representation of WW1 and they put a fucking nigger on the cover.
get that arabic cock out of your mouth, Hans.
>>73372586
you realize this influences millions of young people who cant be bothered to learn this shit?
i guarantee you this will make kids think blacks played a huge role in ww1.
next they're going to make viking movies where half of the vikings are black.
>>73372747
to be fair, not all vidya fall into that category. fantasy shit,simulators etc are irrelevant.
>>73372586
this isn't 1989 grandpa, video games are more than dumb toys
>>73370171
Quite honestly, it will be so far off reality, it won't be fun.
ARMA 4 should be set in the first world war. ARMA players like realism and would be ok with killing Krauts with an Enfield rifle.
>>73370171
Micro aggressions against white people :^)
I think he looks pretty badass
Plus, it's definitely a step up from countless games with white protags in them
>>73373035
every time.
never playing. don't care.
>>73372839
ARMA has always been a modern game. They can just make a ww1 mod, the ww2 one is pretty good. I just want ARMA 4 to be modern day.
>>73372284
Pretty much this
>>73372284
its an interesting point to address.
nobody knows american blacks particiapted in the ww1 so that adds appeal to the game
they got more sales this way
>gay ass wub wub soundtrack in a WWI game
>"cinematic" bullshit
>quickscoping and run and gunning with a 13kg machinegun
>DICE's trademark eyecancer post process effects
>buying an EA game
>any year
The only thing making me mad is how people still buy that shit, fully knowing they will get jewed.
And it also upsets me that people expect historical accuracy in a military shooter.
The game would be pretty shit if it was accurate, but it's not going to be, instead it will be an alternate depiction of WW1. Realistically there would be fuck all attachments to put on guns, and even if there were basically all they really used in the war were bolt-action rifles and magnums, not a Mauser like what the cover shows off, and yes of course an inaccurate depiction is going to make a bunch of uneducated pricks think this shit is realistic, but all in all I'd say it looks like it's going to be a great game.
I don't see the issue. The campaign will probably revolve around the haarlem hellfightes or whatever. It is not like they would be directly implicated with white regiments or else it is clear that dice has no clue what they are on about. I don't think it would affect mp either.
>>73370171
It's historically accurate that they did fight. If heir ubiquitous then it's shit. If it's part of the campaign where it makes sense then not really. Getting butt hurt by it not properly representing the percentage demographic is something you shouldn't be.
Overall, it depends on the context.
>>73373733
>calling revolvers magnums
Shutup noguns
>>73373732
>giving shekels to EA
not even once.
They occasionally crap out something playable once you get the full 400e game with dlc though
I refuse to buy this game
>>73370171
No, the black guy is one of the few protagonists that you'll get to play in the campaign. They didn't even show him or the Helldivers in the trailer, they were all white. Anyone who is legitimately triggered by this needs to be gassed, it's literally tumblr tier.
WE
>>73374230
cuck
>>73370171
Trailer shows not a single black person..
They are aiming at minorities because USA only fought 1 year out of the 4 years in WWI. I dont get why they are trying to push this to them but general education about the war isnt too bad even if they are trying too hard to pander at those who arent even the main audience of their games.
Why are more and more games infested with such niggerism?
>>73374304
Effectively the US troops only fought the last two months of the war and in those two months suffered more casualties than during the entire Vietnam war.
>>73372284
Interesting point. Where did you get the less than 10,000 figure from? Just curious.
>>73370171
No. There were arabian soldiers, turks, blacks. You know, we are calling this WORLD War for a reason.
>>73371386
WWI was an European war. Great Britain, Germany, France or even Italy were the main protagonists of this event, but for some reason America is the fucking star once again, and not only that but a fucking nigger this time, the smallest minority of the war. I fucking hate diversity, they put feelings before facts.
> muh american black man saves Europe.
WW1 Western front is the most pointless and boring war ever fought.
>>73374595
American troops didn't do anything but guard duty until the very last two months of the war
See David Stevenson, 1914-1918 - The History of the First World War
>>73374544
it was off the top of my head.
there were technically alot more shipped overseas but they were SOS (service of supply) men not fighting units.
for america, there were 2 black combat divisions. so total combat troops were probably more like 20,000 troops.
still, even if it were 100,000 (which its not) my point still stands.
>>73373732
These are the same devs that play dress up with a swedish collector and pump whatever uniform and camouflage patterns look cool into their game. They have no military advisers of any kind, so it's strange that everyone suddenly expects accuracy when their past games have always lacked it.
>>73374595
Please tell me you're joking it's an American lead AGAIN.
So sick of it.
>>73373733
>magnums
nice.jpg
>>73370171
shut the fuck up you little cunt
what are you trying to slide?
What annoys me most is that once again the Germans are cast as "the bad guys", in WW1 they were not.
And playing as a German soldier would be much more interesting than an American seeing as the Germans fought for all the war, not just the last year like the Americans.
Also the Germans fought on every front so the possibilities for a varied and interesting single player campaign following a soldier to all those fronts would be much more interesting than seeing Jamal fight in the trenches.
>>73371543
>"unedited"
>edited with a blown up patch in a box with an arrow
Triggered
>>73370171
This is why I respect CDPR
The game is based on middle ages Poland so there are no fucking niggers as it should be, fuck diversity quotas.
>>73371543
>Make new Call of Duty about a negro Afrikakorps soldier killing British colonising straight cis white males during Rommel's campaign
>Watch the left eat itself up
