I've heard a lot of his policies are batshit insane. Can you guys give some examples with sources?
Pic related.
He has shared platforms with terrorists and extremists
Don't worry though, his boss supports hezbollah and Hamas and refers to them as his friends.
just put his name and terrorist into google, the entire Labour party is full of jew haters.
Dude ther major is red pilled
>>73337727
But the Labour Party wants the same shit as the Jews, so it doesn't matter
Friendly reminder that Putin is the last hope for Europe.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXcva7eJCUk
>>73337727
>i dont know who's jewing who anymore
with arabs and jews u lose
>>73337318
What were Sadiq Khan’s main pledges?
>Housing
Build at least 80,000 new homes a year
Establish a London Living Rent, as well as new-build affordable housing with rent based on a third of the average local income
Set up landlord licensing schemes, with plans for London-wide landlord licensing
Establish a London-wide not-for-profit lettings agency to promote longer-term, stable tenancies
>Transport
Freeze London transport fares for four years
Introduce a one-hour bus ‘Hopper’ ticket, so you don’t have to pay extra when you change buses on one journey
Build more segregated cycle routes
>Work and equality
Work with employers to make the capital a Living Wage City
Aim to close the gender pay gap and provide extra support to women
Set up ‘Skills for Londoners’ to help Londoners train in certain skills that would be useful to the capital’s economy
>Crime and safety
Restore neighbourhood policing
Tackle gangs and knife crime in London
Tackle the spread of extremism
>None of these sound 'batshit insane'...?
>>73337727
STFU with the Tory talking points 'sharing platforms' is immaterial language.
Those extremists also happen to be Conservative voters btw.
Still better than the Rothschild shill anyway.
>>73338533
>Build at least 80,000 new homes a year
? why is the government planning to build homes?
> new-build affordable housing with rent based on a third of the average local income
hasn't it been objectively proven that rent control doesn't work?
>>73338533
but muh Taqiyah!
>>73340144
Cause there isn't enough homes. Why else?
>>73340144
>>73340226
confused american doesn't understand this socialist bullshit
>>73339984
No it isn't.
>>73338533
>Aim to close the gender pay gap and provide extra support to women
With everything considered, the fact this is still a thing is the definition of batshit insane.
>Tackle the spread of extremism
RIGHTIST extremism you mean.
All the muslims are just legal and calm protestors culturally enriching their neighborhoods with sharia law.
>>73339984
Wait, so the two Rothschild sisters married the two Goldsmith brothers? They're really trying to keep the money in the jew dynasties.
>>73340144
>>73340226
>>73340439
More free shit for the mudwave
>>73340745
Does the government not even build homes in your backwards shitehole of a country?
>>73340929
>>73340745
Let the private sector profit on it!why use a big fat bureaucracy on a job that doesn't need it, disregarding your housing bubble, which was mostly about shit loan restrictions and fucked up etf's and rating agency bs
>>73341352
Why use an inefficient private sector for an essential service that the government can provide?
>>73341500
>inefficient private sector
got it all wrong there mate,
the private sector will always try to get the most for their buck,
the government requires a big bureaucracy, and will always put worker conditions and payment too high for it to be as cheap as the private sector.
>>73341500
ffs, you guys created capitalism. adam smith? wealth of nations? no? free market?
>>73338533
>X needs a living wage!
If someone is alive and collecting a wage, they have a living wage.
>>73341843
The constant lust for profit is exactly what makes the private sector inefficient.
The government just does stuff cause it needs to be done. No messing around.
>>73341907
Yeah and Karl Marx is also buried here. He liked living in the UK.
>>73341500
Why use an inefficient public program for an essential service that private industry can provide?
No government anywhere has ever done anything efficiently, ever.
>>73342076
The living wage means a wage which a person can live on. Don't pretend to be ignorant.
>>73342135
>The government just does stuff cause it needs to be done.
This is (a part of) why the government is inefficient. It doesn't need to manage costs because it can always just take more of your money.
>>73342221
Nah m8. You're thinking of the private sector.
All the greatest technological advancements have been from the public sector. The private sector has always lacked any drive to try anything new for fear of risking profits.
Why do you think everything from broadcast radio to the internet were developed by the military?
>>73342311
Hence making it supremely efficient at getting stuff done.
>>73342250
>The living wage means a wage which a person can live on.
Yes. And if someone is alive and collecting a wage, that means that the wage they're collecting is enough for them to live on. Being that dead people have no labour to offer and thus can't receive wages, ever wage is a living wage.
Social Democrats/Democratic Socialists need to come up with new terminology. Try "comfortable wage" or something.
>>73342135
>No messing around.
are you not feeling well? have you taken any blue pill lately?
>The constant lust for profit is exactly what makes the private sector inefficient.
in the us, private sector will take the mission even if they can make a little bit on it because the competition is big,
>>73342452
The only reason the can stay alive is because of welfare.
If you wanna get people off welfare then they need a living wage. It's that simple.
>>73342192
>He liked living in the UK.
yes, because what capitalism had brought the society, he didn't like how the workers was treated and used that to make his manifesto
>>73339984
A Rothchild is also married to the younger sister of Paris Hilton, apparently. Interesting.
>>73342417
No, thus making it extremely wasteful. If you have less of a resource, such as capital, you need to use that resource more efficiently. Governments, at least at the federal level, have a theoretically unlimited quantity of capital. Even at the municipal level, though,
>>73342373
>All the greatest technological advancements have been from the public sector.
Factually wrong. Every single one of the great civilian technological advancements have come from the private sector. The steam engine and telephone are two random examples. The only particular area where the public sector dominates research and development is in military equipment, for obvious reasons, but even then new developments are mostly contracted out to private companies.
>>73342373
because war brings up desperation in us, just like the need for profit
>>73342622
My point is that the UK has always had long tradition of socialist thinkers as well as capitalist ones.
>>73342772
*Even at the municipal level, though, they can always just raise taxes
>>73342549
The best way to get people off welfare is to stop giving them welfare. 100% success rate.
>>73342772
Yeah, because it is unlimited it is by definition, not wasteful.
>>73340226
Housing shortages and price increases are caused by government interference in the housing market, not cured by them. London will be burned to the ground by this idiot.
>>73338533
>Bangladesh
>>73342192
>Karl Marx is also buried here
i wouldn't take to much pride in this
>>73342896
Yeah but then you effectively commit genocide.
>>73341500
Solid b8.
>>73342957
>be this stupid
no wonder the new face of london is Islam
>>73342995
Why not? He was the greatest political philosopher of all time.
>>73342957
>Yeah, because it is unlimited it is by definition, not wasteful.
That isn't what efficiency means. Efficiency is about allocating resources and effort to produce the greatest outcome at the lowest cost. Governments aren't just inefficient themselves, they live off of inefficiency. The more ineffectually a government is at solving a problem, the more capital they accumulate to solve that problem. There is no impetus for the state to ever actually accomplish anything. The more they fail the more resources they are rewarded with.
>>73343124
confirmed bate
>>73343298
*bait
>>73338533
How does he compare to previous london mayor's?
>>73343004
The only way to increase wages without decreasing the amount of employment opportunities is for economic growth to occur and productivity to increase. That is how you get people off welfare and meaningfully improve quality of life.
>>73343236
First of all, what evidence do you have to support any of that?
Second of all, how is that even bad?
>inb4 herpderp waste of money
Money doesn't actually exist so you can't waste it.
>>73341500
Kek, pretty good b8, 8/10
>>73343327
There have only been three Mayors of London, including Sadiq Khan, as the London metropolitan area was only recently conglomerated. First one was an unpopular Labour bloke, second one was a popular Conservative bloke, third's this new fellow. We can't really compare him to previous mayors because he hasn't even been in office for a day, but his policies are definitely more in line with London's first mayor than its second.
>>73343382
then give away all your money retard
>>73343327
First we had Ken Livingstone, he was hard left Labour and was often saying and doing dodgy things. He's been kicked out of his own party at least 3 times. He was voted out after 8 years.
After that we had Boris Johnson. It was quite remarkable for a Conservative to be elected in London but he had a certain charisma and came across as a man of the people. Overall not too bad for a Conservative. He resigned after 8 years.
Sadiq Khan is the third one. He's another Labour mayor but is much more to the soft left of the party than Livingstone was.
>>73343382
What evidence do I have to support what? The definition of the word 'efficiency'? Which dictionaries do you prefer?
>>73338533
>increasing city wages
MY RENT IS TOO FUCKING HIGH ALREADY
I'M EARNING MORE THAN MOST PEOPLE BUT IT'S NOT ACTUALLY THAT MUCH
THIS WOULD ANALLY FUCKING RAPE ME AND EVERYONE ELSE NOT CURRENTLY ON MINIMUM WAGE
FUCK OFF
REEEEE
>>73343598
Unlike the government, I don't have a limitless supply.
>>73343631
I mean the stuff about governments thriving off inefficiency.
>>73343683
Why does anyone besides bankers who work there willingly live in London? It has the highest crime rates and highest cost of living in the United Kingdom. Is there a fence around the city limits keeping intelligent people from going somewhere else?
>>73343696
Westminster's unlimited supply of pounds comes with the caveat that the more it creates the less each one is worth. I encourage you to read up on inflation—very old concept.
>>73340615
Read Springmeier, it's a rule for them. It's miniature eugenics.
>>73338533
Its taqqiya you fucking retards
>>73343913
The government is already printing money to give as handouts to the banks. They wouldn't need to print more. They could just give it to the people instead.
>>73343236
I already explained this to you.
The more ineffectual a government is at solving a problem, the more capital they accumulate to solve that problem. Therefore, there is no impetus for the state to ever actually accomplish anything; the more they fail the more resources they are rewarded with to try again.
>>73343913
The city is literally the only worthwhile place in the UK to live if you're into city life.
Every other city in the UK is fucking shit.
Other towns and the country are nice but dead as fuck.
London is where the jobs and opportunities are.
>>73344045
He doesn't deliver , he gets booted out the next election....simple as that...you are the one being dense...
>>73344084
Bailouts are contrary to free-market principles. If a company is operating inefficiently it should change how it operates, and if it refuses, it should die. The state should never step in to save a failing business, regardless of the short-term consequences. And instead of taking the tax revenue they were going to use to prop up a bank and giving it to poor people, they should instead never collect that tax revenue in the first place and let it stay with the people who earned it. Bailouts are impetuous and short-sighted.
>>73344509
Glasgow is a lovely city. Hoping to go to uni there next year. It's the friendliest city in the country, it's a reasonable size to enjoy city life and it's not too enormously massive like Lond which has more people than some medium sized countries.
>>73344681
"Glasgow is a lovely city"
No. No it isn't. There's a reason there's a medical phenomenom for Glasgow residents to die early.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glasgow_effect
>>73344660
>implying that they 'earned' it
kek
>>73343683
>MY RENT IS TOO FUCKING HIGH ALREADY
that's what he's trying to say , rent cant be more then 1/3 rd of income....!
>>73344895
Either they earned it through voluntary transactions or they stole it through involuntary transactions. If the latter, they should be imprisoned for theft.
>>73344844
Have you ever even been to the place?
>>73345007
Or they extorted it through wage slavery. That too. The least they can do is pay a bit of tax in return.
>>73345154
Voluntary transactions are voluntary. "Wage slavery" doesn't exist: even in incredibly poor countries like China where workers earn just barely enough to survive, they are still not working involuntarily and are thus not being coerced.
>>73345385
If work has to be done for the purposes of survival then it is not voluntary.
>>73344905
He's fucking retarded and it will never fucking happen. He can't just fucking limit how much you can rent your own fucking property for. He can't control land value. He's going to completely fucking fail.
>>73344681
>>73345065
Been to Glasgow. The centre isn't complete shit, I guess, but it's still dead compared to London and the outskirts are just as rough and shit as the worst areas of London.
>>73345563
The crux of the wage slavery idea is that, because a worker needs to earn income to live, he is effectively being coerced to work. This is ridiculous because the coercing power in that scenario is nature itself, or perhaps physics. Human beings need food to survive, and that, nature and physics, is what is "forcing" them to work, not any individual and least of all their employer.
Let me frame this in a different context. If my house is burned down in a forest fire, I'm not a victim of arson. When a woman's skirt is blown up by the wind, she isn't a victim of sexual assault. If I go for a walk one down and get struck by a meteor and die, it isn't homicide. If the force that is exerting pressure on you is a force of nature, you're not being coerced. Coercion is between individuals. It would have been arson if a kid with a match-book set my house on fire. It would be sexual assault if a dirty old pervert hiked up a woman's skirt. I'd be a homicide victim if a man with a crowbar beat the back of my head and killed me, not a rock from outer space. When the force that is compelling you to work is a natural one, you're not being coerced.
>>73345742
that's where 80000 new homes per year comes in.....supply and demand...flood the market , price will auto fall...
>>73346107
So if I point a gun to your head and tell you to work or I shoot then that's voluntary?
It's just physics, I pull the trigger and the bullet flies through the air. It's not my fault if it's deadly to your body when it hits. That's just nature.
Work will always be wage slavery unless people have a guaranteed basic income to make it a genuinely voluntary choice.
>>73346143
I doubt Sadiq Khan plans on building 80,000 detached dwellings with backyards and garages. He's talking about public housing, what the United Kingdom calls council estates. Building 80,000 new apartment blocks increases the supply of apartment blocks and therefore decreases the price. It doesn't affect the price of nicer housing, which is seeing the largest increases in cost. Most of the council estates in the United Kingdom are derelict already. Sadiq's no doubt incredibly expensive construction project is only going to give London more abandoned, rat-infested holes that the poorest of the poor refuse to live in. Housing costs for most residents of London will be mostly unaffected, and the program's positive effects will be nowhere near the cost of its undertaking.
>>73340929
>the government not even build homes in your backwards shitehole of a country
The government doesn't even build homes in our super awesome progressive blazing country. Private companies build and the gov zones them as 'public housing' (aka shitholes forever) then pays a portion of the rent for the tenants that is pretty muched some number based on your skin colour * number of kids (as far as I can tell anyway).
>>73346562
and your expert solution would be.....?
>>73346324
Using a tool to cause my death is also homicide. Continuing to use our metaphors, if, say, someone grabbed a snowblower and used that to hike up the poor woman's skirts, she's still being harassed. Unless your employer is responsible for setting out the fundamental laws of the universe (in the case of "I need food in my belly" the first law of thermodynamics), you're not being forced into working for him. If anyone is forcing you to work it's your parents for having conceived you. Go cry about wage slavery to your mother, she's the most culpable.
>>73346107
Nobody believes that bullshit.
>>73344531
>All those white brits
Good job destroying your country, fucking cuckolded liberal faggots.
>>73346852
Violence through inaction is violence no less.
>>73346888
>implying they aren't eastern Europeans
>>73346867
Nobody believes what, in particular? That the reason you have to eat is because of nature, and not because of anything your boss ever did? I'd hazard to guess that most people understand that, even most social democrats. We've had compulsory schooling for a long time after all, and I'd hope the first law of thermodynamics is a part of that.
Unrelated, but that captcha was fucking bullshit. Had to click eighty different rivers, they just kept coming.
>>73346888
>>73347030
He has the way with the Ladies...
>>73347853
>Local women join MP Sadiq Khan for International Women's Day
Ya, sure, what a stud.
I was pleasantly surprised when I saw his wife doesn't wear a hijab. At least that family's a little integrated I suppose.
>>73348559
Fuck this slide thread
Post great examples of Western culture instead:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9UWzJ0UEoA
>>73338533
They sound like meme policies.
He is a mayor not a magician. To me it looks he is just going to go into the pockets of more taxpayers.
>>73340144
America has some of these cheapest modern housing in the world. "We" are looking at some of your cities policies on housing to drop the price of housing over here.
The guy's clearly an apostate who just wants to have a calming impact on Islam, like Maajid Nawaz.
Won't work, though. You can't tame a rabid dog.
>>73342958
Wrong. Building more homes will only be a good thing you fucking moron.
>>73343872
You're a fucking moron.
>>73337318
I don't get what the big deal is. The other guy was a fucking Goldsmith (Jewish banking dynasty related to the Rothschilds).
/pol/ should rejoice, the Goldsmith was defeated!
>>73350599
http://www.politics.co.uk/news/2016/03/30/sadiq-khan-there-are-too-many-white-men-on-transport-for-lon
Hes still alive?
This Muslim is going to fill up all the appointed positions with as many Muslims as possible. At which point every lever of power will be pulled towards consolidating London as a Muslim controlled city
>>73337318
America is the leader of the free world. What happens here, the rest of the world follows. We elect a muslim as our leader, the rest of the world does the same.
>>73350711
Ok that's shitty, but the other guy was a fucking Goldsmith.
>>73350599
that's why Tory lost almost 10% of their voter base from last election....rich mama's boy prat's are seldom electable....
>>73350599
Muslims are just poor jews. They do the exact same thing once they get into power.
>>73350711
and that's why he won by the biggest margin in history (14%)....
>>73338495
Pakistanis aren't Arabs nigger
>>73344531
Dear God, the meme is true:
- Beta males: check.
- Old white union men: check.
- SJW young women: check
- Foreigners: check.
- Women: check.
Not a fit white man to be seen among any of them... guess we all vote conservative.
-
>>73338533
How will he afford all that?
The Muslims have finally conquered London. What city is next to fall?
>>73351583
by out-jewing the camden jews...?
>>73351892
Occupied London.
>>73344045
You faggot, only saudi shills do that. This guy is a supporter of Hamas and Hezbollah both of whom are enemies of Saudi Arabia.
Funny how this scum pushes for looser immigration policies, then once they take over, push for them to be better represented.
In the article about white men transport, he claims that the rights of women and minorities are not accurately reflected because there aren't as many of them on the board. In what way are they suffering, and how are the current board members neglecting their plight? It is so pathetically moronic; they are trying to take over the government sector even more than they already have. Come on chaps, you're better than this.
The anglos hated the polish candidate so much they voted a muslim.
>>73344905
That basically means, "Your rent -WILL- be 1/3 of your income"
>>73346562
Completely misinformed, you have never lived in England have you?
>>73352382
nope means 'No More Then'....
>>73352287
They are not suffering at all. The purpose of the tfl board is to provide transport services and improvements for roads, rail, and buses. I want people who are most competent in this specialised field, not some random women off the street simply because they are muslim.
>>73337318
londonstan Caliph
>>73352874
Exactly. It is simply going from point A to B in the most efficient way possible, providing an upstanding service to the people. The native population can do it best, so leave it to them. Funny, if the Muslim Meme Man wants to appoint women to "address women's issues with transportation and sexual crimes", then he's going after his own people! Idiots.
>>73353066
The news story is mixing two seperate issues. The police wanted to close the transport sex crime unit. It had nothing to do with the guys at Transport for London. So for some reason as a result of the police deciding to cut the transport sex crime unit, he wants to replace the Transport for London board with minority women.
>>73351424
:~)
So much shilling from daltonic japan
Sharia police I guess
why cant we just pick the best qualified for the job? we should just been shown the policies on each candidate. no photos, no names, no ethnic background or religious beliefs and that way people cant get blinded by diversity propaganda. even the party they are backed by should remain hidden until the votes are counted. its the only way i can see people voting without being bias
>>73355591
wouldnt work
>>73351781
Will Sadiq Khan nuke Camden?
>>73337318
Look lads, I'm english okay, I was born there, live in the US now.
You can spot the bad versus the okay, integrated "Muslims" They're about as muslim as the average brit is christian, so not very.
The whole muslim thing is table dressing to get him brown votes.
Look at this man, his manner, the way he dresses, speaks etc.
He's a colonial brit, if anything. He's from somewhere else in lineage but is essentially a part of the greater british dominion.
He dresses well, speaks well, is more culturally british than not etc.
He's probably from one of the less insane Islamic denominations and doesn't seem to take his religion very seriously.
He's the golden retriever of the muslim world, well trained and culturally western.
Not much to be worried about desu
>>73356320
why not?
The demand for housing in London vastly eclipses the possible supply.
It wouldn't make a fucking dent in the rent, there are hundreds of thousands to millions who would want to live there.
The only way you'd lower rent is a vast reduction in population.
>>73357262
>You can spot the bad versus the okay
Yes, you can tell by the color of their skin.
>>73338533
>Tackle the spread of extremism
kek, this won't happen, if anything it'll get worse because Muslims will feel more entitled with one of their own in power.
