ABORT ALL UGLIES. New AI can determine what a person will look like based on a simple genetics test. Will allow parents to choose the face and looks of their child. Already working and ready to go.
Eugenics. Is. good.
"From just the fingerprint on your pen, we can sequence your genome and identify how you look," Venter explains.
"We could take foetal cells from a mother's bloodstream, sequence the genome and give her a picture of what her future child will look like at 18," he says.
http://www.wired.co.uk/magazine/archive/2016/05/features/craig-venter-human-longevity-genome-diseases-ageing
>>73271533
INTERRACIALBRREEEDINGGGGGROUNDS
>Beauty Eugenics now possible
>posts pic of ugly cow
>>73271663
We could eliminate the bottom 90% of people rated by looks in a single generation using this technology with CURRENT technologies.
Just imagine a world with everyone existing who has the top 10% looks. That is possible, right this instance, and it is cost beneficial.
Why. Why is society not practicing eugenics?
>>73271533
>genetically alter a fetus's appearance
>don't make them foreskin-less, so they still get to experience the shekel-inducing trauma of circumcision
It just wouldn't be the same unless you make an infant go through that hellish pain.
>>73271792
You don't have to altar anything
Make 50 embryos
Pick the ones that have the best facial structure and no genetic disease
Instantly improve society leaps and bounds.
>>73271890
Good. The future will still plenty of foreskins to surgically remove.
if everyone is good looking no one is
>>73271533
Why fuck around with the looks of a person when you could change their genetics to ensure no genetic diseases like krohns and shit like that. Couldn't you also make it so the body doesn't store fat in arteries? Would mean America could have a national health care since they wouldn't have to spend so much money on saving people from burgers.
>>73272088
It's actually not that relative. More like symmetric and fit = fuckable.
who here handsome /pol/?
>>73272128
You can combine all of those with looks selection. You would screen out the small % with genetic disease and then rank the remaining according to looks.
You'd literally have a screen display of non-diseased embryos and what they would look like at ages 5-10-15-20 etc
>>73271533
>>73271777
>Be ugly
>Be kissless handholdless virgin for 35 years
>Against all odds somehow manage to finally find a partner
>Doctor tells her that she shouldn't have kids with me because our kids would be too ugly
>>73271777
what if ill become immortal thanks to genetic engineering and then would have to live with 99% of people prettier than me?
it would be so depressing
>>73271533
Yeah because beauty is the only thing that matters.Your jewish overlords are not best looking people but yet still control you without any problem.
>>73272290
Idiot.
They don't want you to have white children, fucking dumb Sven.
>>73272290
Considering all possible combinations with partner, one probably looks fuckable enough.
>>73271717
I agree med-kit, OP should have posted an aryan qt.
>>73271890
Her eyes could be larger. She looks a bit too mongoloid this way. Also her nose is too wide.
>>73272331
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201012/beautiful-people-really-are-more-intelligent
Picking attractive offspring could be the best way to select for intelligence right now. With the added benefit of them being attractive.
>>73272534
we already know which genes are responsible for intelligence so we can create both genius and beautiful people
>>73272766
Yep, looks are important because parents love to brag about them. The social pressure of other kids being more attractive than yours will push adoption of the technology.
Smarter kids would alienate parents. So looks might be more important for pushing general adoption. In asia brains might be enough, but USA/europe it needs to be mixed with cute babies/kids.
>>73272198
not handsome but qt
>>73271533
>abort ugly people
>all you are left is idiots
nice plane, are we killing everyone with glasses and left handed people too?
>>73272534
Having better chances in life because of your beauty doesn't equal smarter.Just look at most scientists/mathematicians and even artists.I doubt thats what you will call beautiful considering most of them either look deformed or extremely asymmetrical.Just look at pic related.
>>73272088
Mimetic/social theories of desire are so god damn pathetic. Literally worse than psychoanalysis and I really say that as an insult.
If nobody is starving it's just the same as when everybody is?
>>73272977
>>73272988
The solution is simple. Do the beauty selection on females only.
>>73273104
you call that beauty?
Lol delusional americans at it again.
>>73273104
but if ever girl becomes a hotty and most guys are still ugly or average, the girls would probably turn lesbian.
>>73273104
So they can think even higher of themselves?You sure want to destroy the world dont you?
What's that movie that was about this exact same thing?
>>73272977
>he fell for the "smart people are ugly meme"
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201012/beautiful-people-really-are-more-intelligent
whats it like to have shit tier genetics?
>>73273210
>>73273195
It will work out. Male genetics would still be improved just not entirely on looks. The higher intelligence, large cock, and tall height makes males appealing.
>>73273246
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lP1cCjBkWZU
>>73272988
>Just look at most scientists/mathematicians and even artists.I doubt thats what you will call beautiful considering most of them either look deformed or extremely asymmetrical.
Posting an overrated poo isn't going to make your case. Many mathematicians were complete qts.
Cauchy, Lagrange, ... were handsome. Gauss was classical statue esthetic tier. For fuck sake, the ultimate chad dick giver meme is Rene Descartes.
The trope of the ugly genius with no muscle definition is largely feel good bullshit for children stories. Just look at pictures of Pasteur, Poincaré, Maxwell or Paracelsus. They all make Chris Hemsworth look like a nu male ape. Even permavirgin Tesla was kind of cute.
Explain to me how eugenics are bad again? Any actual reason that isn't "muh feels"?
You aren't redpilled if you're against eugenics
>>73273362
The Myths of the exceptional people always being unhappy and crazy are important for normal people to believe. Delusion is the most important coping mechanism for humans.
>>73273366
Agree. Eugenics based on improving future humans and eliminate diseases are one of the most redpilled things a person can believe in. Imagine the shitstorm when all the feminists and beauty subjectivists get wiped out in generations because people are choosing "stereotypical and oppressive" beauty patterns
>>73271777
trips, mate, all you'll be doing is narrowing the bell curve down to minute differences in looks, there'll still be a top 10%
you're forgetting the danger of such an informedly willful selection process, you could en d up selecting children who are good for nothing but looks down the line
without an complete picture of the genetic health, indidvidual capacity to adapt to a constantly changing human environment with even more rapidly altered niche dynamics, or the social genetic need of the populace (now, let alone over time), this technology is fucking dangerous
in this case, ignorance is the rational option and making children pretty the blissful idiocy
>>73273511
It's funny the only way to stop it is to take away freedom. Because most people will not be interested in having an intersex retarded black baby just to be PC.
>>73271533
Yes this is good but gassing people is too primitive for my taste.
>>73273511
I can't wait for the day people can choose to have white children. 50 year after the technology is in place, non whites will represent 10% of the world population.
>>73273571
Exactly my friend. Human nature will always prevail in the end. No matter how hard the media tries to subvert the people, we'd be filling the world with beautiful Aryans (and people of other races who could be also pretty, which would freak out the SJWs even more because it wouldn't be just whites getting rid of defective faces)
>>73273568
Another person who ate the "everything is relative" social sciences cancer.
Just shut the fuck up and fix how you think, retard. Do you have some studies or evidence for attractiveness being absolutely 100% relative?
Guess if you just moved to an area with only geriatric women you would start seeing grannies as 10s?
Nope motherfucker, just kill yourself for being so stupid.
>>73272198
>tfw handsome
>tfw balding
>>73273472
>The Myths of the exceptional people always being unhappy and crazy are important for normal people to believe.
Normies have sometimes bizarre ideas about geniuses but they don't hate them. It's people with pretense of genius that are the worst. I was baffled by how psychoanalysts trat actual artists. You can read what Freud wrote about da Vinci. It's short and well...enlightening about this Jewish scam.
>>73273362
>ramajun is overrated because he is famous
>Just look at pictures of Pasteur, Poincaré, Maxwell or Paracelsus. They all make Chris Hemsworth look like a nu male ape
You consider that beautiful?They are below average and average at BEST.
>The trope of the ugly genius with no muscle definition is largely feel good bullshit for children stories
Yeah because one example of a beautiful scientist who probably never contributed anything significant is the norm?
You either have too low standards or just autist who have hard time analyzing their faces.
>>73273785
sorry for your hair loss
eugenics is cool and all, but when are we going to deport the jews to africa
>>73273862
Ramaj is a better mathematician that I will ever be by a mile but he is overrated. Nobody would give a shit if he hadn't been discovered by accident in a slum.
>They are below average and average at BEST.
From the few Bulgarians I've met in life, I wonder where you come from considering pic related as below average. He's a caricature of White Supremacism from 19th century textbooks.
>Yeah because one example of a beautiful scientist who probably never contributed anything significant is the norm?
Maxwell is easily 1,000 more relevant than ramajun.
>>73272198
>tfw if I posted how attractive I was, height, dicksize, age etc. /pol/ would think I was lying
Feels good
>>73271777
agreed. Brown Master Race, with a Jewish Religion. Aquiline features. Long noses of course. Hitler couldn't have done better.
We Gattaca Now
Oh, forgot the obligatory Israeli Politician.
And for the last time ISRAELI, not Jewish!
>>73271533
This won't work. You can have genes specifically for an illness and we can't tell you if you will get that illness or not.
This technology is claiming to know the out come of many genes interacting. No way.
>>73272907
taengooo~
>>73274141
>From the few Bulgarians I've met in life, I wonder where you come from considering pic related as below average
You dont need to live around beautiful people to know what is ugly average and beautiful.First he is hiding behind so many beard and his face is way younger for it.Second you posted a fucking painting and its not even a front one.
Here is a PHOTO of him.If you call this beautiful...
>>73274654
It does though. Machine learning.
The guy isn't lying.
>>73271777
When everyome has top 10% looks, no one has top 10% looks.
Im against this shit, i enjoy the benefits off having above average looka
>>73271533
If you have a large enough amount of genetic information sampled and available to a computer and desirable traits are fed back with a powerful enough computer to crunch the numbers anything can be selected for easily.
>tfw eugenics will allow for a master race of 6'5 aryans
>>73271533
Beautygenics is my new indie-cosmetics line. I'm going to sneak redpills into white women's clown paint.
>>73273362
You are fucking stupid beyond belief. Descartes looks like a Greek Jew whose been stuck in the throes of alcoholism for the last 40 years.
>>73275171
>>73273761
All I know is that the shit I find healthy or attractive in a partner or mate tends to be way off-key to what other people think is what's best in life and the people with their shit in proper order tend to be homely
on top of that we consider the hedonistic treadmill and the equally stupid premise of "getting rid of the morons" whereby you just eliminate 90% of our genetic stock because it's the 90% lower bound on testing
I'm actually a nurture-first advocate and don't believe natural inheritance determines all the traits that are desirable in functional modern-day people
appearance be damned, form follows function, but if you select for form you'll quickly find a loss of function- anybody else engineer in here?
