What does/pol/ think of Picasso? Was he a progenitor of degeneracy or was he a legitimate artist?
>>73229001
Shitty art. Even that retard Hitler was a better painter.
>>73229001
Picasso was legit, his imitators are largely not. He was at least trained in realism before he moved into the then avant garde type paintings. Even then his "weird" stuff isn't that out there. Pic related, Picasso's mum pre 1900.
Daniel Henry Khanweiler
/pol is always right
>>73229001
Picasso was an excellent painter, he moved to ugly painting since that is what the jews will pay for and promote.
>>73229001
Literally a communist
>>73230037
Communistically a literal.
Absolute degenerate, HATE expressionism or whatever the fuck he painted
>>73229543
this. his abstract art was still within the realm of a man classically trained. he knew what he was doing
>>73229543
/thread
>>73229001
I like his art, I don't really care for what anyone else has to say about it being degenerate, I think much of it is beautiful.
>>73229001
An Alien!
He lied about Guernica. He was a POS enabling useless modern artists to gain traction.
>>73229001
My step grandmother owns his originals. Not good, not bad, very overpriced. Like Michael Kors, or Ralph Lauren.
>>73229543
>>73231347
>>73231526
this
imo you aren't an "artist" unless you are trained in the classics. no matter what lane of artistry it is: painting, drawing, music, culinary, etc. if you can't show your classical training then your "abstract" """"art"""" is really just bullshit
picasso was a classical master first and foremost
Picasso was awesome. He slept all day got up in time for the bull fights, got drunk and when he got home he painted all night.
>>73232153
That's called being Andalusian
>>73232222
wasn't he catalonian?
>>73232222
Checked
>>73229001
bump
>>73231785
What did he lie about specifically?
