Anarchy is liberation. Government is slavery.
/pol/ cannot refute this.
p.s. "Anarcho"-Capitalism is not a form of Anarchism.
>>72652021
Ancap a best, BEST
>>72652021
>p.s. "Anarcho"-Capitalism is not a form of Anarchism.
Shitpost detected.
I'll bite anyway since I'm bored:
Explain to me how you would keep your "anarchist nation" intact, i.e. prevent foreign powers from taking over?
>>72652021
Anarcho syndaclism yay or nay ?
The CNT occupied areas of Spain seemed to of done alright
>>72652319
Heavily armed worker's cooperatives. The USA could not beat Vietnam, and neither could an outside nation successfully invade an Anarchist territory.
>>72652619
>neither could an outside nation successfully invade an Anarchist territory.
If I throw enough bombs at you you will hunger sooner or later.
Vietnam failed because the US ran out of public support.
>Heavily armed worker's cooperatives.
How big would these be?
How would they be led?
>>72653041
>Vietnam failed because the US ran out of public support.
No you revisionist shitbag, the US lost because they got their asses beat.
>>72653196
>name calling
not an argument
> the US lost because they got their asses beat.
By a better armed enemy using guerrilla tactics.
Now answer my previous question.
>>72653818
Anarchists would just use the same tactics as the Vietcong, which is my whole point.
AM I BEING DETAINED?
>>72654348
I'm certain with enough bombs and a ruthless campaign that you could defeat that.
Anarchism isn't exactly well known for having large numbers, so its pretty realistic to just keep tossing missiles at you that you will succumb.
