Find a flaw in this book.
Everything they anticipated came true.
Massive accumulation of capital, technological unemployment, etc.
Why haven't you embraced the most rational philosophy yet, /pol/ ?
Why cling to phantasms remnants of the past such as "Nationalism"? Meaningless constructs that obfuscate the true class warfare that is ongoing ?
Tell you this. Imagine a rich person from your country. Now imagine that same rich person meeting poor people from your country. Would they get along just because >muh nation?
Now imagine a rich person from your country meeting a rich person from China, India, America, Russia... they would have a lot more in common. They could talk about golf, the stock market, which personal jet they have etc.
You're deluded by the idea that someone gives a fuck about you just because he's the same nation. He'll stab you in your back for $100 and export all to tax havens.
The only solidarity that exists is class solidarity, solidarity between the exploited workers.
Like I thought. Nobody can find a single flaw.
>>72624434
>find a flaw
The entire book
>>72624434
It's actually a chapter of Capital
>>72624434
interesting, tell me more examples. I'm afraid to read this book, it's so big
>>72624434
communism in the real world as practiced is also globalist
nationalism is the only way
where does he talk about technological unemployment?
>>72626834
>He's afraid of the truth
>>72627993
Capital, Volume I
>>72624434
Not applicable to majority service sector economies of today
If such a revolution was to happen it would have happened already
In my mandatory philosphy class we read Richard rorty's essay that essentially equates cm to the new testament, both being a nice contemporary fairytales giving people hope and little else
>>72628554
Capital is still wholly applicable to the service sector, not to mention that the industrial sector still exists, and must exist, even though it has been moved overseas.
>>72626882
/thread
