>Thank you for electing me! Now, starting today, we're going to impose strong restrictions on civilian encryption use, in order to fight terrorism and child pornography.
>>72622210
He would never do that.
We have to name our enemy by it's name, RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM.
What, is that hate speech in your cucked country?
>>72622394
>What, is that hate speech in your cucked country?
Not really, that is just Sweden. We have dedicated thousands against Mosque facebook page and nobody got arrested for hate speech.
>/pol/ will defend this
Good goys, you don't need encryption anyways.
>>72622210
Oh shit! Wouldn't want the government to know I post memes on /pol/
Really though. Backdoors and weakening encryption have proven to backfire over and over again. Nobody with expertise in the field would recommend he do that.
https://www.wired.com/2016/01/new-discovery-around-juniper-backdoor-raises-more-questions-about-the-company/
>>72622668
>>72622210
Tbqh internet anonymity is nice but im willing to sacrifice it to catch terrorists and pedophiles.
>>72622693
There was no backdoor involved. There was never a call to weaken or restrict encryption. Steve cook painted it that way to score activist points.
>>72622210
requesting that comic where a bunch of cops ask a stickman to decrypt his hard drive and beat him with a scredriver until he complies
>>72622946
>>72622210
He is totally clueless on technology but let's elect him as our leader. Who cares about encryption as long as the wetbacks are gone, right /pol/?
