>yfw this happens
>>72601533
Nah, this is more accurate
>>72601533
>>72601533
who would win?
>>72601603
I think congress would decide.
>>72601603
Jews
>>72601533
This would either spark a constitutional crisis or civil war, or both.
>>72601603
The House of Representatives chooses.
It's majority Republican.
>>72601603
>Only the top three vote getters in the electoral college are to be considered.
>Regardless of its population and number of representatives, each state delegation in the House has only one vote, for a total of 50 votes. The District of Columbia, which sends a nonvoting delegate to the House, has no vote.
>The state's choice is determine by a vote within its delegation. If that vote is a tie, the state loses its vote.
>A winning candidate must receive the votes of a majority-26-of states.
>There is no limit to the number of ballots in the House. If the House fails to choose a President by Inauguration Day, January 20, the Twentieth Amendment requires that the Vice-President-elect, provided that the Senate has chosen one, serves as President until the House makes it choice. The Senate follows these rules in its selection of the Vice-President:
>The choice is between the top two vice-presidential vote-getters in the Electoral College.
>Each senator has one vote, for a total of 100 votes (no vote for the District of Columbia).
>A Vice-President must be elected by a majority-51-of the whole Senate.
http://lwv.org/content/who-will-elect-president-electoral-college-system
everytime you guys post this instead of the most realistic one
>>72601533
>>72601603
>>72601742
This.
>12th Amendment (ratified in 1804): “the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President” and “the Senate shall choose the Vice-President.”
>>72601533
Colorado and Utah voting trump.
>>72601878
>realistic
>wisconsin red
every time i tell you guys that this is not going to happen. illinois commits mass voter fraud up here
>>72601693
That answer is cheating.
>>72601957
this board has gone from satire to cartoonish
>>72601957
okay how bout this then?
>>72601533
>Florida blue
>AZ, Nevada, CO, UT red
"No"
>>72601878
>Florida >blue
>in a hillary v trump contest
Are you retarded?
>>72602159
I made it blue because of the blacks and latinos. if you don't like that one refer to this one >>72602130
>>72601975
Might be, but you damn know that's the right answer.
>>72602159
>>72602158
Tampabro here. Non-Cuban Spics are going to vote en masse for Hillary, and from what I've been seeing I don't think Cubans are going to go for Trump.
>>72602201
>I made it blue because of the blacks and latinos
Trump won every county but dade and republicans BTFOd the dems in the primary 2.5m to 1.7m
now add disaffected bernie voters staying home and trump pulling dems and independents
Hopefully 6 months of ragging on hillary nonstop opens that gap further.
>>72602326
Hopefully white people can outvote them, brownies are going to continue destroying the country for their welfare.
>>72602438
>trumpfags are this deluded
Can't wait to see you on election day
>>72601533
Except that Virginia will go to the GOP.
>>72602326
I also live in Tampa faggot, you're crazy if you think the majority of this state would ever vote for a communist or a criminal as opposed to the loudmouth
>>72602326
>>72602438
Trump won every county except for Miami which was ruboto.
Wont he be fine?
>>72602536
>>72602536
>trumpfag
He is the only viable option now and I'm an anybody but Clinton voter.
>deluded
yes, looking at primary trends is delusional.
>>72602657
Outside of miami and a couple very brown areas the state is pure red.
If recent voting/primary trends are to be any indication the republican candidate should do fine.
>>72601533
I still don't get why DC gets three electoral votes because of the conflict of interest.
>>72602926
Because its still a hundred thousand people. They still deserve a voice in the process. They live in the capital for christ sake.
>>72603067
Puerto Rico is 3.5 million. Where's their voice in the process?
>>72603280
They're not sandwiched between 2 states. I'm still unsure of letting in PR as a state.
>>72603407
>They're not sandwiched between 2 states
Move a lot of goalposts?
>>72603596
My reasons are geopolitical. Puerto Rico is in the middle of bumfuck nowhere. I don't agree with Alaska and Hawaii being states either. If they were both just territories right now I'd be hesitant to let them in too.
>>72603744
>My reasons are geopolitical.
Your reason changes to fit your conclusion.
>>72601533
We Veep now
>>72603864
Is it really too hard to believe that I only like the mainland and not some stupid states that aren't even connected to us at all?
>>72603744
>>72603596
>>72603407
>>72603280
Territories have no place dictating the politics of the mainland., let them have the same political freedoms as the mainland.
let them elect their own representatives to govern their island with all of our constitutional rights.
But do not give them the power to affect the politics of the country they derive said rights from.
>>72602158
Name me one other reasonable configuration that would lead to a tie?
>>72603995
>Territories have no place dictating the politics of the mainland
What is DC but a federal territory? It certainly isn't a state.
>>72604089
He just said the mainland. DC is on the mainland dumbass.
>>72604089
And they have no business voting in national matters. The KY reason they have electoral delegates is because the dems wanted a fee extra black votes.
>>72604139
>He just said the mainland.
Yes. It is a TERRITORY on the mainland. And he said:
>TERRITORIES have no place dictating the politics of the mainland.
That means DC also has no place dictating the politics of the mainland.
>>72604206
>And they have no business voting in national matters
We agree that DC has no business having electoral votes?
>>72604235
>Being this semantic
kys burger.
>>72604089
>What is DC but a federal territory?
A portion of two states stupidly deemed it's own territory instead of the capital of one state.
I say just make the people in DC register to vote in a state they live near instead of giving three electoral votes to a city
>>72604235
>That means DC also has no place dictating the politics of the mainland.
I moreso meant that islands we incorporate should not be allowed to sway our politics, but I agree that the city should not have so much power.
>incorporate shithole island full of brown lefties
>let them affect presidential elections/constitutional matters
>island full of brownies tilts the country towards a shithole
Trust me, Trump will win Florida.
I have never seen so many Trump signs, and Trump supporters in my life.
Truly a wonderful place.
>>72604586
>A portion of two states stupidly deemed it's own territory instead of the capital of one state.
Two states? I'm rather certain it was the federal government that made that decision. IIRC, it also tasked George Washington with handling the design and layout.
>>72601533
Please explain how this should work.
>>72601742
so hilary would win
>>72601533
What is with this Florida being blue meme? Are you guys that fucking retarded?
>>72604916
When was that taken? Or can I have a link to the website where you got that?
>>72604884
>Washington, DC, the U.S. capital, is a compact city on the Potomac River, bordering the states of Maryland and Virginia.
I literally meant it's a land portion of two states.
They could have just kept it in virginia, made it the national capital located in virginia and let the people vote in virginias elections
But no, they had to be special snowflakes and make a silly not state city state.
I am about to quit 4chan over this retard tier capcha
>>72601533
Reminder it's either trump or hillery
No matter how many slimy rat tactics are used it will not change the facts
>>72601533
that is literally my prediction desu lads
>>72605573
oh shit, I didn't look good: no way florida goes blue this year, virginia is a swing state too
anyways, this is the literal outcome
>>72601878
>>72602130
Why are those numbers sort of similar (265 v 273 and 253 v 285) when the Republicans have a lot more states than the Democrats?
How does this work?
>>72605672
>colorado going red
>ND going red
>NH going red
>etc
Sorry mate, I love Trump too, but this is way too optimistic.
Yeah but Trump will win Florida, Maine, Vermont, Wisconsin, and Michigan.
>>72605826
It's possible but unlikely. We can't make any assumptions until after the first debate.
>>72605698
A lot of the republican states have smaller populations and therefore less electoral votes, democrat states have lots of highly populated citites and receive more electoral votes
look at NY and MT
MT is huge but almost nobody lives there Ny is much smaller but NYC has millions of people in it.
>>72605698
It's population based as >>72605928 said. California has over 55 million people. More than 1/6 of the population. So naturally it has a lot of electoral votes. It's an odd system but it gets the job done most of the time.
>>72606039
>55 Million
m8 try 35million
you're only off by 20million
>>72601533
>doubting trump
You of little faith
-Matthew 8:26
>>72606105
Yeah sorry about that. For some reason I always thought it was way higher. Turns out its just a bit over 38 million. Still the most populous state in the union so it gets the most votes.
>>72601533
It seems like Commiefornia has way too much power desu
Is it the jews?
>>72606105
Damn.
More than Australia's entire population.
>>72605928
>>72606039
Ty anons.
>>72605135
>When was that taken? Or can I have a link to the website where you got that?
http://electiongraphs.com/2016ec/
>>72606308
long answer yes, it has to do with jews influencing entertainment/media and them influencing mexicans and blacks to go there, and other things
>>72606308
Nah it's the spics and niggers in the cities
>>72606105
Latino majority too, though many are illegals who shouldn't be able to vote.
Do illegals recorded in the census count for electoral college entitlements? So the fact that California has many illegals gives it more electoral college votes, even though those illegals can't vote.
>>72606559
>Do illegals recorded in the census count for electoral college entitlements?
Unfortunately yes. The census doesn't take into account immigration status.
>>72606559
Yes, but the electoral college is so fucked toward benefiting the empty Republican states that it doesn't matter. Even if you only go by number of registered voters who are legal citizens, a vote in Wyoming is worth 420% of a vote in California.
>>72606308
No It's because It has a population of 39 million
The Electoral College has a bias towards small states so California and Texas are actually disadvantaged in terms of power. If EC was actually proportional California would have 65 votes instead of 55.
Why are Wisconsin and Minnesota so consistently blue? Isn't Wisconsin a state full of small, white towns and dairy farmers? And isn't Minnesota sort of similar excluding Minneapolis? They're basically in the same tier as Indiana and Ohio who vote red a good portion of the time. I don't understand.
>>72601533
>Virginia going blue.
The time to stop this meme was 8 fucking years ago.
>>72609003
Virginia has been Blue the past 2 elections. I can see it going Red but it seems unlikely to me. Like I think that 60 percent of the time it'll be Blue.
>>72609326
a lot less blacks will vote though, their turnout will be much lower this time around
I wonder for who those 'Pentagon areas' in the north will vote
>>72602130
I'm seriously worried about NC but I do think Trump has a shot at PA.
I also think NH has a good chance of swinging to Trump. Perhaps even Delaware. Every state will count in this general. Illinois's voter fraud is pretty notorious. I wouldn't count on that state.
>>72609732
I can only hope they'll vote less but with the advent of the internet and media blitz in regards to elections they might show up the way they did before for Obama because blacks remember the Clintons fondly. For some reason.
>>72609735
Why would you be worried about NC? It's been consistently red for ages except for 2008. All the states Romney won in 2012 will go for Trump too.
