What if Bernie actually ended with more delegates than Hillary but still lost due to having no super delegates. Fucking think about it. Hillary gets the nomination
I can't even imagine the redpilling
No one wants to vote Dem
Gives the nom to Trump
The DNC is a corporation, and it's a wholly owned subsidiary of the Clinton foundation. If it was like the democrats were choosing between coke or pepsi, but it's really more like choosing between a quarter pounder with cheese or without cheese, and still getting a big mac because they fuck up the order on purpose. They even spit in the special sauce, those bastards.
He was only down about 100 regular delegates like 2 weeks ago.
>>72598328
Can we even call this a democracy
>>72598594
I don't see how. The electoral college has decided the winner for how long? If the popular vote does anything, it satiates the populace's need to make noise.
Is this what Trumpcucks have come up with inorder to immagine a scenario where a short-fingered orange clown with a 67% disapproval rate among voters could win the election? First they laughed at berncuck delusions, now they're buying into exactly those same delusions.
Reminder: America is 30% non-white and 51% female. there is no way a candidate like trump could win an election in america.
Even if Sanders takes the lead in pledged delegates, the vast majority of the superdelegates would still back Clinton. They've known her a long time. They've done favors for her and vice versa. They owe her for ditching her to back Obama in 2008.
The DNC chair Debbie Schultz, who also happens to be Clinton's former campaign manager, says the superdelegates have never decided the outcome of election. If they don't decide elections, why do we need them at all? Because they're a trump card for the DNC, in case someone like Sanders actually took the lead over the establishment candidate.
>>72598328
Not happening bernouts.The system is not rigged. Sanders got all of the delegates he deserved.If he was in the Democrat party for more than one year he might have had more support among the members but it's a moot point anyway
>>72598594
No your country is an oligarchy.
>>72598822
>Reminder: America is 30% non-white and 51% female. there is no way a candidate like trump could win an election in america.
Watch it happen.
>>72598822
His opponent is married to a serial sex predator, travels constantly with a doctor by her side and spontaneously breaks into 3 minute-long coughing fits, and is under active investigation by the FBI.
You watched Bruce Jenner become a civil rights hero and you still don't think the American public can be sold an image remake of the magnitude needed to push Trump's poll numbers 3 or 4 points higher? You lack wisdom, and imagination.
>>72600744
He literally only needs like 300 to pass her and all the leftover states are bernie territory....
how is that difficult to figure out?
>>72601406
Unfortunately, Hill Dog is still leading in the polls in all of the upcoming big states. Bernie may take the snaller ones, but he'd need blowout victories in eg. California to take the pledged delegate lead. As of right now it doesn't look likely.
I'd still encourage people to go out and vote for him though, it may buy him some bargaining power at the convention.
>>72601406
>all the leftover states are bernie territory....
You guys have been saying that for months.
You lost, senpai, time to face reality.
>>72600853
It ran well until socialists put their foot in the door circa 1900.
>>72601858
Shut the fuck up
I'm obviously not for Bernie and if you think Oregon Washington and California aren't where Bernie will finally win for once you're dumb as rocks
>>72601406
Clinton only needs 20% of the remaining delegates to win.
Hang in there buddy 1 (800) 273-8255
>>72602301
In case you're too autistic to realize it's clearly stated in the OP that he can get more delegates and still lose because he has no super delegates
Go >>>/b/ack
>>72601406
>....
>doesn't capitalise the first letter of a sentence
>supports Bernie
Too transparent.
>>72598594
>Can we even call this a democracy
>Clinton: 12,135,109 votes
>Sanders: 8,967,401 votes
Seems so, what with the popular vote winner winning.
>>72602231
Yeah, I'm sure you're getting sooooo triggered because i said the guy you supposedly want to lose is going to lose.
Take your impotent /r/age back to /r/SandersForPresident, please/
