Some real talk from total bro Roosh V again:
>Starting at the end of 2015, I began seeing a sharp rise of women declaring themselves to be “anti-feminist.” (...)
>If you have an anti-feminist movement with a high percentage of women in it, you don’t have an anti-feminist movement. The reason is that single women raised in the West will find it impossible to go against the female urge of sleeping with whomever they want and having complete control over their lives to pursue useless college degrees and degenerate behaviors.
>I’ve had numerous “anti-feminists” in infiltrated movements (alt right, gamergate, men’s rights) attack me to the point where I can’t tell the difference between them and standard issue SJWs,
>One of the reasons for the rise of anti-feminists is not necessarily the strength of our ideas, but the fact that the feminist camp is too crowded. Being a feminist and holding an “I need feminism” sign used to be a great way to get attention online without having to show tits, but with thousands of girls doing it, any one girl no longer stands out.
>You can ask them these questions to reveal where their true sympathies lie:
“Are you against homosexual marriage?”
“Do you believe its ideal for a woman to remain a virgin until she gets married?”
“Do you believe that its best for children to be raised by a stay-at-home mother?”
“Do you believe a woman’s choices should be constrained by her husband, tribe, or church with the intention of doing what’s best for her?”
“Do you believe it’s wrong for a young girl to find herself by traveling around the world and trying new experiences?”
Good luck finding an anti-feminist who says yes to even two of the above questions. I suspect the only girl who would is already married and a stay-at-home mother who happily submits to her masculine husband.
http://www.rooshv.com/why-the-female-anti-feminist-is-a-feminist-in-disguise
mostly spot on article.
Shoe-on-head is a vile disgusting bitch (and most women claiming to be anti-feminist).
>>72563494
What do any of those things have to do with feminism? The intersectionality bullshit is just a tool for them to latch onto everything.
>>72564638
fuck off boxxy-knock off.
Coal burning slut.
>>72564690
this.
sage
>>72564690
This
Keep coal burning whores off /pol/ sage
>>72563494
she burned the coal
she will pay the toll
give it some time
Get a life. You mgtows are just as bad as feminists
>>72563494
I think Roosh is too extreme when it comes to womens rights
He is truly a sexist person
>>72563494
>Not wanting to cuck one of these anti-feminists into becoming the breadwinner for you
Studies say that wives who 100% financially support their husbands are the least likely of any women to cheat, a 1.5% year on year chance.
You know what the chance for women who are 100% dependent, as stay at home mothers and housewives?
30% year on year.
Even househusbands are only likely to cheat 15% year on year.
Why are men even better than women at being parents and housekeepers?
>>72565832
your statistics sounds dumb, i heard that if the man stays at home he is 5 times more likely to cheat
This is a tough red pill to swallow
This all reminds me of a schism that's happening in the so-called 'manosphere". Its true that self proclaimed "anti-feminist" aren't actually against feminism at all and most of these youtubers like Armored Skeptic, Sh0eonhead, undoomed, beering, are in the business of making hit pieces against stupid feminist who'es subscriber count is in the hundreds.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acHe5SihRJY
>>72564690
>>72564816
>>72564885
shoe is a coal burner? since when?
>>72567910
Her ex-boyfriend is the man in OP's picture.
>>72567910
See for yourself
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKCW59ZXJj8
>>72568001
ruined forever
>>72567910
Since years ago you retard. There is a reason she gets shit on every single thread when one of you autists posts her.
I'd also want to ask Roosh V is he truly redpilled and against race mixing
Oh right
>>72570120
He is against race mixing, he actually said if he was looking for a wife it would be one with a skin tone next to his.
>>72565043
>trying to reason with /pol/
why do people still do this?
>>72565832
>Why are men even better than women at being parents and housekeepers?
Because men are better than women at everything.*
*Except having vaginas and irrational emotions
>>72563494
>needing to read MRA articles to realise shoe0nhead is an attention whore
KEK
>>72571880
Isn't Roosh just a PUA?
I was under the impression that a lot of MRAs actually disliked him for that reason.
Shoe0nHead is a pretty basic assed bitch.
I watched the video of armored Skeptic sighing and facepalming at one of Roosh's videos. (as per Sargon's recommendation) That motherfucker is so high up on his high horse now that he's getting decent pussy.
>suddenly pol hates based roosh
how dare you, he's the fucking red pill made a man.
>>72572091
I don't know, anon. I don't keep up to date with this shit.
The last I heard of Roosh, he was being exploited by the media as clickbait, with misinformation and false accusation such as him being pro-rape.
All utterly contemptible of course. I assumed he was an MRA. if not, I rescind my earlier comment. Replace MRA with PUA if that is more accurate.
>>72572091
PUAs are sort of like MRAs in that they're an offshoot of the beta male feminists. Both groups were once in the feminist camp, but PUAs realized the bullshit of women and the entire movement after seeing the unicorns they orbited flock to chads and adapted to play the game, while MRAs who happened to be the omegas of feminism realized they would never get sex and gave up but can't stop whining as they jerk off alone every night.
Both groups are interesting in a way, but i don't think either has a clear view of reality. PUAs have walleye vision and MRAs are completely blind.
i can't watch her videos because she has a shit potato camera
she seemed to just latch onto quadroon of mossad by always commenting on his videos to get more views. Not only does he take care of his wife's son, he was also view cucked by this coal burner
>>72572465
This isn't gamerghazi.
>>72572727
What's that?
I didn't mean it as a criticism towards PUAs. But MRAs are just as idiotic as feminists. The world doesn't need "equality," just like a family it needs good leaders, in family and society. I'm not sure that PUAs are capable of being those leaders. Care to argue that point?
>corrupt
>owned by wall st
>uses child pornography as a weapon
https://archive.is/mqo42
>pro-war
>friend of Trump
She's everything Anonymous hates and yet all they've done is make a video full of things people already know about her. Why aren't they doing more? Why aren't they hunting down the people who posted CP? Have they been bought out too?
Mods, I am not inciting or condoning raiding or doxing of Hillary Clinton or anyone else. I am just wondering why a group know for doing those things to terrible people have decided to just sit back and do nothing.
>>72573214
Woops. Meant to start my own thread
>2015
Try late 2013.
>Roosh
IN THE TRASH
They arent so much as feminists as they are children in that they hope by being on good terms, the reactionary will turn a blind eye to certain attributes while accepting them. Which is just a natural behavior of children, women, and cowards.
>>72565832
sure thing schlomo
>>72572388
this
I've never paid attention to these e-celebs, but I have a quick question. Is Roosh the Chateau Emissary guy? If not, who/what is CE again.
I want to unsubscribe from this coal burner but she's too damn cute. Hopefully she comes her way someday and realizes this grave error. You can't be a redpilled race mixer.
>>72577127
>but she's too damn cute.
her cuteness is not her own, and is not real. It's the same artificial trickery that boxxy used: overlit (blown out) lighting, camera angle, and a ton of eye liner
>>72577127
>Hopefully she comes her way someday and realizes this grave error.
doesn't matter, you can't unburn coal.
>>72577426
nah i'd tap the shit out of it. she's cuter than boxy anyways. i actually just unsubscribed anyways. i can't deal with coalburning. mulattos are mutants.
>>72566875
Breadwinner husbands are 4% versus wives at 1.5%.
Stay at home husbands 15% versus over 30% for wives
I think I'd
>>72571094
Damn right. As stay at home dads and single fathers, we're better parents too. Feels DAMNED good
>>72575095
Oh no, Sven figured out my Jewish ruse of NOT being cucked into wage slaving for a wife who will never truly love you, and will use the massive amounts of time she has free to get real friendly with the neighbour boy Tyrone before divorcing you!
Truly it is redpilled to let a future coalburning, useless mother be dependent on your daily slavery
>>72563494
>“Do you believe that its best for children to be raised by a stay-at-home mother?”
This is a bullshit question, up until VERY recently the child would have been raised by both parents because they would both be working from their home.
>>72577936
I think I'd be fine with not cheating on the wife who works to pay for me to keep the home, spend a couple hours cooking, and give our kids a decent education better than they'd get from her or from school.
Or hey, she doesn't emotionally open up to me or satisfy me enough so maybe I will, then wring her for alimony!
>>72563494
Roosh is a disgusting and pathetic sack of shit. No person who respects or admires or has any attitude towards him other than revulsion deserves to be taken seriously.
So, kill your self.
>>72563494
And here it is, I told you fags anti-feminists were cancer
They're no different than beta nu-males.
>>72563494
>different beliefs held by a lot of woman =feminism
OP, never go full retard
